Research Procedure RESEARCH METHOD

48 proficiency 4. Wants 6 to find out students’ desire related to the materials Hutchinson Waters 1987: 56 5. Input 7, 8 to find out students’ preference for the types of input in learning English and the reading skill Nunan 2004: 47 6. Themes or Topics 9 to find out students’ preference on the themes and topics related to the materials Nunan 2004 7. Materials 10 to find out the appropriateness of the content, language, and presentation in the materials Richards 2001: 273 8. Procedures 11 to find out learning activities that students like most Nunan 2004: 52 9. Setting 12 to find out setting of doing tasks that students like most Nunan 2004: 71 10. Learning media 13 to find out preference learning media to the reading skill Ellis and Brewster 2002: 186 11. Teacher’s role 14 to find out information about the role that the teacher should perform Nunan 2004: 64 12. Learner’s role 15 to find out the role of the students Nunan 2004: 64 continued 49 2. Rating Scale Expert Judgment Questionnaire The second questionnaire was the rating scale questionnaire for expert judgment. This questionnaire was meant to evaluate the first draft of the product in details by an expert. The questionnaire comprised two types of questions: the closed-ended and the open-ended questions. The open-ended questions were intended to allow the expert to freely deliver hisher suggestions towards the developed learning materials. The organization of the Expert Judgment Rating Scale was presented in Table 3. Table 3: The Organization of the Expert Judgment Rating Scale No Aspect of the Question Items Number Purpose of the Question Reference 1. Expert’s personal identity Part A to find out the information about the expert’s profile Tomlinson 1998: 240 2. Materials 1, 2, 7, 10, 11 to evaluate the content of the materials Nunan 2004: 175 3. Language 4, 5, 8, 9 to evaluate the language appropriateness used in the product Hutchinson Waters 1987: 99 4. ThemeTopic 3, 6 to evaluate the appropriateness of the themes used in the product with the content materials Nunan 2004: 30, 131 5. Learning activities 12, 13, 14, 15 to evaluate its appropriateness in terms of learning activities developed in the product Brown 2001: 142 Nunan 2004: 169-170, 175- 176 continued 50 6. Media 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26 to evaluate its media appropriateness Ellis Brewster 2002:190- 191 Tomlinson 1998: 286

F. Data Analysis Techniques

Based on the data collection techniques and instruments, the data obtained by this research were quantitative. Hence, the data analysis techniques employed were descriptive statistics. The data from the needs analysis questionnaires were statistically analyzed using the formula of percentage and frequency. The result of the analyzed data was in the form of percentage in which the highest percentage indicated the students condition in need. Meanwhile, the rating scale result of the expert judgment was quantitatively analyzed based on descriptive statistics which showed the mean and the standard deviation of the findings. The formula used was the one that was proposed by Suharto 2006 whereas the comments and suggestions by the expert were used as a guide and direction to revise the first draft of the learning materials developed and the descriptive statistics finding was converted into descriptive analysis by adhering to data conversion table as presented in Table 4: continued 51 Table 4: Quantitative Data Conversion Table Suharto, 2006 Scales Mean Interval Categories 4 3.25 ≤ � ≤ . Very Good 3 2.26 ≤ � ≤ . Good 2 1.75 ≤ � ≤ . Fair 1 1.00 ≤ � ≤ .7 Poor 52

CHAPTER IV RESEARCH FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION

A. Research Findings

The research findings in this chapter cover the results of the needs analysis, the course grid, the unit design, the first draft materials, and the expert judgment. Further, the detailed descriptions are presented in the following descriptions.

1. The Results of the Needs Analysis

The needs analysis is a procedure used to collect information about learners’ needs Richards, 2001: 51. It is able to be conducted prior to, during, or after a language program. However, according to the type of this research, the needs analysis took place prior to the research product in order to obtain the inf ormation related to the students’ needs in terms of reading comprehension. The result of the needs analysis was used as one of the factors besides the core and basic competencies in the 2013 Curriculum to develop a theme-based storybook. The needs analysis instrument was a questionnaire which consisted of fifteen multiple choice questions. The questionnaire was distributed to the students of VII-E and VII-F of SMP Negeri 15 Yogyakarta on August 26 th to 27 th , 2015. The total respondents were sixty six students who were split into thirty three at each class. 53 Based on the organization of the needs analysis questionnaire, the questions were categorized into twelve different aspects. They covered students’ personal identity, goals, lacks, wants, input, themestopics, materials, procedures, setting, learning media, teachers’ role, and learners’ role. The students were allowed to select more than one answer to every question according to their real condition. The detailed description of each question is presented in the following explanation. a Students’ Personal Identity There were two classes of Grade VII students involved in this research. They were VII-E and VII-F of SMP Negeri 15 Yogyakarta. Each class consisted of thirty three students with almost equal distribution of male and female students. These students’ personal identity was Part A from the questionnaire which was meant to find out the information about the students’ profile as respondents. The data of the respondents are presented in Table 5. Table 5: Data of the Needs Analysis Respondents Group Class Age Range Sex 11 12 13 14 15 Male Female Students of Class VII-E 5 19 7 1 1 14 19 Students of Class VII-F 2 26 5 15 18 b Goals As starting questions in Part B, goals were the second aspect in the questionnaire which were asked to respondents. According to Brown 1995 in Brown 2007: 155 goals are ”general statements concerning desirable and