Pengaruh System Quality, Information Quality Dan Service Quality Terhadap User Satisfaction Sap R 3 Dengan Perceived Usefulness Sebagai Variabel Moderating Di PT.Indosat Medan

Lampiran 1 Jadwal Penelitian
Bulan
No

Kegiatan

1

Survey
awal,
penentuan
lokasi
penelitian
dan
pencarian
bahan

2

Penyusunan
proposal


3

Seminar
Proposal

4

Pelaksanaan
penelitian

5

Pengolahan
Data,
analisis dan
penyusunan
laporan

6


Seminar
Hasil dan
Perbaikan

Febuari

Maret

April

Mei

Juni

Juli

Agustus

September


Lampiran 2 Kuesioner Penelitian
PERMOHONAN KUESIONER PENELITIAN
Kepada Yth,
Bapak/Ibu Pegawai PT.Indosat Medan
Jalan Perintis Kemerdekaan No 39
MEDAN
Dengan Hormat,
Yang bertanda tangan di bawah ini:
Nama

: MONETARIST BUTAR BUTAR

NPM

: 117017082
Saya adalah mahasiswa Program Pascasarjana Magister Ilmu Akuntansi Universitas

Sumatera Utara. Saat ini sedang melakukan penelitian dengan judul penelitian adalah : “
PENGARUH SYSTEM QUALITY, INFORMATION QUALITY

QUALITY

DAN SERVICE

TERHADAP USER SATISFACTION SAP R/3 DENGAN PERCEIVED

USEFULNESS SEBAGAI VARIABEL MODERATING”

Saya memohon kesediaan Bapak/Ibu untuk berpartisipasi mengisi kuesioner ini. Saya
menyadari permohonon ini sedikit banyak akan mengganggu ketenangan/kegiatan Bapak/Ibu.
Saya akan menjamin kerahasiaan dari semua jawaban/opini yang telah Bapak/Ibu berikan.
Penelitian ini semata-mata hanya digunakan untuk kepentingan penyelesaian tesis saya, dan
hanya ringkasan dari analisis yang akan dipublikasikan. Atas kesediaan dan partisipasi
Bapak/Ibu untuk mengisi dan mengembalikan kuesioner ini saya mengucapkan terima kasih
sebesar-besarnya.
Hormat Saya,

(MONETARIST BUTAR BUTAR)

KUESIONER


PENGARUH SYSTEM QUALITY, INFORMATION QUALITY, SERVICE QUALITY
TERHADAP USER SATISFACTION SAP R/3 DENGAN PERCEIVED USEFULNESS
SEBAGAI MODERATING.
I.IDENDITAS RESPONDEN.
1. Nama Anda

: ___________________________________

2.Usia

: ___________________________________

3.Jenis Kelamin

: a).Pria
b).Wanita

4.Pendidikan


: a) SMA/Sederajat.
b) D1-D3.
c) S1
d) S2-S3.
e) Yang lain _______________

5. Bagian

: ________________________

6 .Jabatan

: ________________________

7.Lama bekerja

: ________________________

8.Pelatihan SAP R/3 : a) Ya, __________________ tahun.
b) Tidak.


II. Petunjuk Pengisian
1.

Sebelum menjawab

pertanyaan-pertanyaan

kuesioner dimohonkan

kepada

responden untuk terlebih dahulu mengisi identitas sesuai dengan formulir isian yang
disediakan.

2. Bacalah pertanyaan-pertanyaan secara teliti dan berikan tanda (√) pada salah satu
jawaban alternatif yang benar menurut Bapak/Ibu
3. Dimohonkan untuk tidak mencoba menganalisis pertanyaan secara intensif, dan
jawablah sesuai dengan pengalaman/pendapat anda sendiri tanpa ada paksaan dari
pihak manapun (jujur), karena tidak ada jawaban yang salah atau benar.

4. Dimohonkan untuk tidak mendiskusikan pertanyaan/jawaban kepada orang lain
Petunjuk: Berilah tanda silang atau lingkaran pada jawaban yang anda pilih.
Keterangan: SSTS

= Sangat sangat tidak setuju.

STS

= Sangat tidak setuju.

TS

= Tidak setuju.

N

= Netral.

S


= Setuju.

SS

= Sangat setuju.

SSS

= Sangat sangat setuju.

1. System Quality.
Pertanyaan/pernyataan dibawah ini berkaitan dengan persepsi Bapak/Ibu terhadap Kualitas
Sistem Informasi Akuntansi yang dihasilkan SAP R/3 di dalam perusahaan tempat Saudara/i
bekerja. Mohon pilih dan lingkari kolom jawaban yang Bapak/Ibu anggap paling tepat
mencerminkan persepsi Bapak/Ibu.
No
1

Pertanyaan
SAP R/3 yang saya gunakan mampu


SSTS

STS

TS

N

S

SS

SSS

1

2

3


4

5

6

7

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

meningkatkan kapasitas pemrosesan data
secara signifikan
2

SAP R/3 tersebut dapat dijalankan pada
komputer lain, selain komputer yang
digunakan saat ini.

3

SAP R/3 tersebut, dapat digunakan

dalam lingkungan organisasi lain tanpa
harus banyak dimodifikasi lagi.
4

SAP R/3 tersebut memiliki system

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

security sehingga pemakai yang tidak

berhak, tidak dapat mengakses data yang
terdapat didalamnya.
5

Tersedia fasilitas untuk mengkoreksi
data (fungsi help) pada SAP R/3 tersebut.

6

Kesalahan (error) yang terjadi mudah
dikoreksi dan diidentifikasi dalam SAP
R/3 tersebut.

No

Pertanyaan

SSTS

STS

TS

N

S

SS

SSS

7

Setiap bagian dari sistem informasi yang

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

cukup untuk membantu saya memahami
fungsi dari bagian tersebut.
8

Meskipun pemakai telah lama tidak
menggunakan SAP R/3 tersebut, akan
mudah menggunakannya lagi.

9

SAP R/3 tersebut mudah dipelajari oleh
orang yang baru pertama kali
menggunakannya.

10

SAP R/3 tersebut dapat digunakan untuk
berbagai perusahaan yang
karakteristiknya berbeda.

2. Information Quality
Pertanyaan/pernyataan dibawah ini berkaitan dengan persepsi Bapak/Ibu terhadap Kualitas
Informasi yang dihasilkan oleh SAP R/3 di perusahaan tempat Saudara/i bekerja. Mohon
pilih dan lingkari kolom jawaban yang Bapak/Ibu anggap paling tepat mencerminkan
persepsi Bapak/Ibu.
No

Pertanyaan

SSTS

STS

TS

N

S

SS

SSS

1

Informasi yang dihasilkan SAP R/3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

tersebut akurat.
2

Informasi yang dihasilkan SAP R/3
tersebut dapat dipercaya.

3

Informasi yang dihasilkan SAP R/3
tersebut tepat waktu.

4

Informasi yang dihasilkan SAP R/3
tersebut relevan.

5

Informasi yang dihasilkan SAP R/3
tersebut mudah dipahami.

6

Informasi yang dihasilkan SAP R/3
tersebut bersifat detail dan benar.

3. Service Quality
Pertanyaan/pernyataan dibawah ini berkaitan dengan persepsi Bapak/Ibu terhadap Kualitas
Pelayanan SAP R/3 di perusahaan tempat Bapak/Ibu bekerja. Mohon pilih dan lingkari
kolom jawaban yang Bapak/Ibu anggap paling tepat mencerminkan persepsi Bapak/Ibu
No

Pertanyaan

SS

STS

TS

N

S

SS

SSS

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

TS
1

SAP R/3 merupakan alat yang selalu
up-to date

2

Fitur yang ada ditampilkan oleh SAP
R/3 sangat menarik

3

Tampilan yang ada di dalam SAP R/3
sesuai dengan yang saya butuhkan.

4

Ketika saya mengalami masalah dalam
pekerjaan, SAP R/3 dapat membantu
menyelesaikan masalah tersebut.

5

SAP R/3 dapat mengolah data secara
akurat

6

Saya percaya bahwa SAP R/3 dapat

membantu pekerjaan sehari-hari.

4. Perceived Usefulness
Pertanyaan/pernyataan dibawah ini berkaitan dengan persepsi Bapak/Ibu terhadap Persepsi
Kemanfaatan SAP R/3 di perusahaan tempat Bapak/Ibu bekerja. Mohon pilih dan lingkari
kolom jawaban yang Bapak/Ibu anggap paling tepat mencerminkan persepsi Bapak/Ibu.
No
1

Pertanyaan
SAP R/3 yang digunakan memiliki

SSTS

STS

TS

N

S

SS

SSS

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

kecepatan yang baik.
2

SAP R/3 yang digunakan memiliki
kinerja / performance yang baik

3

SAP R/3 yang digunakan memiliki
produktifitas yang baik

4

SAP R/3 yang digunakan sudah efektif
mendukung pekerjaan

5

SAP R/3 yang digunakan mudah
digunakan

6

SAP R/3 yang digunakan bermanfaat
dalam mendukung pekerjaan anda

5. User Satisfaction
Pertanyaan/pernyataan dibawah ini berkaitan dengan persepsi Bapak/Ibu terhadap kepuasan
Bapak/Ibu terhadap SAP R/3 di perusahaan tempat Bapak/Ibu bekerja. Mohon pilih dan
lingkari kolom jawaban yang Bapak/Ibu anggap paling tepat mencerminkan persepsi
Bapak/Ibu.
No

Pertanyaan/Pernyataan

1

SAP R/3 yang digunakan mampu

SSTS

STS

TS

N

S

SS

SSS

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

memberikan informasi persis seperti
yang saya butuhkan.
2

Isi informasi yang dihasilkan SAP R/3

yang digunakan, memang saya butuhkan
3.

SAP R/3 yang digunakan mampu

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

menghasilkan laporan yang tepat seperti
yang saya butuhkan.
4.

SAP R/3 yang digunakan menghasilkan
informasi yang cukup.

5

SAP R/3 yang digunakan bersifat akurat
(program/sistemnya).

6

Saya merasa puas dengan tingkat
akurasi SAP R/3 yang digunakan

7

SAP R/3 yang digunakan mampu
memberikan informasi yang sesuai
dengan format yang dibutuhkan.

8

SAP R/3 yang digunakan mampu
menghasilkan informasi yang dipahami
secara jelas.

9

SAP R/3 yang saya gunakan bersifat
user friendly.

10

Mudah untuk menggunakan SAP R/3
tersebut

11

Saya dapat memperoleh informasi yang
saya butuhkan tepat waktu.

12

SAP R/3 yang digunakan mampu
menghasilkan informasi yang bersifat
mutakhir/up to date.

Lampiran 3 Artikel DeLone dan McLean (2004)
Artikel Jurnal yang dikumpulkan dalam DeLone dan McLean (2004)
Jurnal

Jumlah artikel yang
dikumpulkan

Information and Management

24

Journal of Management Information Systems

11

MIS Quaterly

15

European Journal of Information System Research

10

Information System Research

7

Decision Sciences

6

Omega-Internatioanal Journal of Management Science

6

Management Science

4

IEEE Journals

4

Communications of the ACM

2

IBM System Journal

1

Other journals

54

TOTAL

144

Sumber: DeLone dan McLean (2004)

Lampiran 4 Pengembangan Model DeLone dan McLean dalam berbagai bidang
Ruang lingkup IS
Data warehouse

Publikasi
Wixom dan Watson (2001), Shin (2003),
Nelson, dkk (2005), Wixom dan Todd
(2005)

Decision support system (DSS)

Bharati dan Chaudhury (2004)

E-commerce system

Molla dan Licker (2001), Delone dan
McLean (2004),Wang (2008)

E-mail system

Mao dan Ambrose (2004).

Enterprise system

Gable,dkk (2003), Sedera dan Gable (2004),
Sedera, dkk (2004), Sedera (2004), Qian dan
Bock (2005), Lian dkk, Sedera (2006)

Finance and accounting sytem

Livari (2005)

Health information system

Yusof,dkk (2006)

Intranet

Masrek,dkk (2007), Hussein,dkk (2008),
Trkman dan Trkman (2009)

Knowledge management system

Jennex dan Olfman (2003), Clay, dkk
(2005), Wu dan Wang (2006), Halawi, dkk
(2007), Kulkarni, dkk (2007), Velasquez,
dkk (2009).

Learning system

Lin (2007)

Online communities

Lin dan Lee (2006)

Picture and achiving and communication system

Pare dkk (2005)

Portal

Yang, dkk (2005), Urbach,dkk (2009),
Urbach dkk (2010)

Telemedicine system

Hu (2003)

Web-based system

Garrity,dkk (2005)

Web-sites

Schaupp,dkk (2006)

Sumber: Dwivedi, dkk (2011)

Lampiran 5 Tempat Penyelengaraan ICIS

Tempat penyelengaraan ICIS ( International Conference on Information Systems) :
2014 - Auckland, New Zealand
2013 - Milan, Italy

2012 - Orlando, FL, USA
2011 - Shanghai, China
2010 - St. Louis, MO, USA
2009 - Phoenix, Arizona
2008 - Paris, France
2007 - Montreal, Quebec, Canada
2006 - Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
2005 - Las Vegas, NV, USA
2004 - Washington, DC, USA
2003 - Seattle, WA, USA
2002 - Barcelona, Spain; Dec 15-18th, 2002
2001 - New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
2000 - Brisbane,Australia
1999 - Charlotte, North Carolina
1998 - Helsinki, Finland
1997 - Atlanta, Georgia
1996 - Cleveland, Ohio
1995 - Amsterdam, The Netherlands
1994 - Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
1993 - Orlando, Florida
1992 - Dallas, Texas
1991 - New York, New York
1990 - Copenhagen, Denmark
1989 - Boston, Massachusetts
1988 - Minneapolis, Minnesota
1987 - Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
1986 - San Diego, California
1985 - Indianapolis, Indiana
1984 - Tucson, Arizona
1983 - Houston, Texas
1982 - Ann Arbor, Michigan
1981 - Cambridge, Massachusetts
1980 - Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Sumber: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Conference_on_Information_Systems

Lampiran 6 Evolusi Sistem Informasi
Eras
(Timeframe)

Community

Data processing
(1940 – 1960)

Research

Success
Measure
Profile
Nascent

Practice

Technocrat

Management
reporting &
decision
support (1960 –
1980)

Research

Operational

Practice

Unobtrusive

Strategic &
personal
computing
(1980 – 1990)

Research

Sociotechnical

Practice

Detached

Success
Measures

Level of
Analysis

Stakeholders

Little to none

Not applicable

Not applicable

Technical
Quality (Speed,
Accuracy)
DecisionMaking
System Use
Cost Reduction
Minimal
Organizational
Impact
Cost Reduction
Productivity
Strategic
Alignment
Value of IT
User Needs
Technology
Acceptance
User
Satisfaction
Information
Quality
Operational
Performance
Development
Performance

System

Technical Staff

Individual
Organization

Managers

System
Organization

Users (of
Reports)

Individual
Organization
Industry

Managers
Users

System
Project
Organization

Managers
Project
Manager

Enterprise
system &
networking
(1990 – 2000)

Customer
focused (2000 –
20??)

Research

Inclusive

Team
Performance
IS Service
Quality
Net Benefits

Individual
Team
Organization
Industry
Society

Managers
Users
Industry
Partners

Practice

ProjectOriented

Strategic Value
Project Quality

Research

Customized

Customer
Impacts
Social Impacts

Project
Manager
Managers
Managers
Users
Customers
Citizens

Pratice

Rigid

Balanced
Scorecard

System
Project
Organization
Individual
Team
Organization
Industry
Society
Project
IS Function
Organiztion

Managers
Users

Sumber: Petter, dkk (2012)

Lampiran 7 Daftar Perusahaan yang memakai SAP R/3
Daftar perusahaan yang memakai SAP
Abacus Distribution Systems Indonesia, PT
AJBS Swalayan
Ajinomoto Indonesia
American Standard
Amoco Mitsui, PT
Aneka Gas Industri, PT
Anugerah Pharmindo Lestari, PT
Apac Inti Corpora, PT
Arun NGL
Astra Daihatsu Motor, PT
Astra Graphia Tbk., PT
Astra Honda Motor, PT
Astra International Tbk., PT
Astra Otoparts, PT
Bagusnusa Setia Gemilang, PT
Bakrie Kasei Corporation, PT
Bakrie Telecom
Bank Mandiri
Bank Niaga
Bank Permata
Bank Permata Cab. Bintaro Jaya
Bank Central Asia Tbk., PT
Bank Danamon
Bank Rakyat Indonesia, PT
Berlian Sistem Informasi, PT
BHP Coated Steel Indonesia
Blue Bird Group
BMW Indonesia, PT
Bukaka SingTel International
Charoen Pokphand Group Indonesia
CMNP

CNOOC SES BV
Cognis Indonesia, PT.
Combiphar, PT
Conoco Indonesia Inc.
DaimlerChrysler Indonesia, PT
Delta Djakarta, PT
Domusindo Perdana, PT
Dynamitra Tarra
Dystar Colours Indonesia, PT
Essar Dhananjaya, PT
Excelcomindo Pratama, PT
Exspan Nusantara
Federal Motor, PT
Fuchs Indonesia, PT
Garuda Indonesia, PT
Goodyear Indonesia, PT
GMF Aero Asia
Indah Kiat Pulp & Paper, PT
Indofood Sukses Makmur Tbk., PT
Indosat, PT
Infomedia
Intikeramik Alamasri, PT
Intraco Penta Tbk., PT
Jaddi Pastrisindo Gemilang, PT (D'Crepes)
Japfa Comfeed Indonesia, PT
Kao Indonesia Chemical, PT
Kao Indonesia, PT
Krakatau Steel, PT.
L'Oreal Indonesia
Mandara Medika Utama, PT
Mayora Indah, PT

Mekar Armada Jaya, PT
Mitra Integrasi Informatika, PT
Panen Lestari Internusa, PT
Pramindo Ikat Nusantara, PT.
PLN, Persero
PT ASAHIMAS CHEMICAL
PT BMI
PT DAHANA (PERSERO)
PT Dos ni roha
PT Elnusa Tbk
PT Freeport Indonesia
PT Friesland Food Indonesia
PT INCO
PT Kereta Api Indonesia
PT MAPI TBK
PT PERTAMINA
PT POS INDONESIA
PT REHAU INDONESIA.
PT REHAU INDONESIA.
PT Sinarmas
PT TRIAS
Rajawali Corporation, PT
Sari Roti
Serasi Auto Raya, PT
Sayap Mas, PT
Siemens Indonesia, PT.
Smart Corporation, PT.
STARBUCKS
South Pacific Viscose
Tempo Data System, PT
Tiara Marga Trakindo, PT
Toyota Astra Motor, PT
Trisula Textile Industries, PT
United Tractors, PT
Ultrajaya Milk Industry, PT
Wicaksana Overseas International Tbk., PT
Zyrex
Sumber: myronaldimussa.blogspot.com. (2011)

Lampiran 9 Statistik Deskriptif Penelitian
Descriptive Statistics
Std.
N

Range Minimum Maximum Mean Deviation Variance

Statistic Statistic Statistic

Statistic Statistic Statistic

Skewness

Kurtosis

Statistic Statistic Std. Error Statistic

Std. Error

SQ

30

30

40

70

54.37

7.481

55.964

.011

.427

-.056

.833

IQ

30

18

24

42

31.03

4.709

22.171

.753

.427

.594

.833

SERVQ

30

18

24

42

32.07

4.961

24.616

.547

.427

-.368

.833

PU

30

18

24

42

31.97

3.996

15.964

1.013

.427

1.160

.833

US

30

36

48

84

62.13

10.037 100.740

.787

.427

.377

.833

Valid N

30

(listwise)
Descriptive Statistics
N

Minimum

Maximum

Mean

Std. Deviation

SQ

30

40

70

54.37

7.481

IQ

30

24

42

31.03

4.709

SERVQ

30

24

42

32.07

4.961

PU

30

24

42

31.97

3.996

US

30

48

84

62.13

10.037

Valid N

30

(listwise)

Lampiran 10 Analisis Deskriptif Frekuensi User Satisfaction (Y)
Y1
Frequency
Valid

4
5
6
7
Total

9
12
6
3
30

Frequency
Valid

4
5
6
7
Total

6
17
4
3
30

Percent
Valid Percent
30.0
30.0
40.0
40.0
20.0
20.0
10.0
10.0
100.0
100.0
Y2
Percent
Valid Percent
20.0
20.0
56.7
56.7
13.3
13.3
10.0
10.0
100.0
100.0

Cumulative
Percent
30.0
70.0
90.0
100.0

Cumulative
Percent
20.0
76.7
90.0
100.0

Y3
Frequency
Valid

4
5
6

8
15
4

Percent
Valid Percent
26.7
26.7
50.0
50.0
13.3
13.3

Cumulative
Percent
26.7
76.7
90.0

Valid

Valid

7
Total

3
30

4
5
6
7
Total

Frequency
10
11
6
3
30

Percent
Valid Percent
33.3
33.3
36.7
36.7
20.0
20.0
10.0
10.0
100.0
100.0
Y5

Frequency

Percent
Valid Percent
16.7
16.7
46.7
46.7
26.7
26.7
10.0
10.0
100.0
100.0
Y6

4
5
6
7
Total

5
14
8
3
30

Frequency
Valid

4
5
6
7
Total

7
16
4
3
30

Frequency
Valid

4
5
6
7
Total

6
16
5
3
30

Frequency
Valid

4
5
6
7
Total

7
16
4
3
30

Frequency
Valid

4
5
6
7
Total

6
12
9
3
30

10.0
100.0
Y4

10.0
100.0

Percent
Valid Percent
23.3
23.3
53.3
53.3
13.3
13.3
10.0
10.0
100.0
100.0
Y7
Percent
Valid Percent
20.0
20.0
53.3
53.3
16.7
16.7
10.0
10.0
100.0
100.0
Y8
Percent
Valid Percent
23.3
23.3
53.3
53.3
13.3
13.3
10.0
10.0
100.0
100.0
Y9
Percent
Valid Percent
20.0
20.0
40.0
40.0
30.0
30.0
10.0
10.0
100.0
100.0

100.0

Cumulative
Percent
33.3
70.0
90.0
100.0

Cumulative
Percent
16.7
63.3
90.0
100.0

Cumulative
Percent
23.3
76.7
90.0
100.0

Cumulative
Percent
20.0
73.3
90.0
100.0

Cumulative
Percent
23.3
76.7
90.0
100.0

Cumulative
Percent
20.0
60.0
90.0
100.0

Y10
Frequency
Valid

3
4
5
6
7
Total

1
5
12
9
3
30

Frequency
Valid

4
5
6
7
Total

7
12
7
4
30

Frequency
Valid

4
5
6
7
Total

5
16
5
4
30

Frequency
Valid

48
50
51
53
56
57
59
60
61
62
64
65
68
70
72
74
84
Total

N Valid

3
1
1
1
2
2
2
4
1
1
2
3
1
1
1
1
3
30

Percent
Valid Percent
3.3
3.3
16.7
16.7
40.0
40.0
30.0
30.0
10.0
10.0
100.0
100.0
Y11
Percent
Valid Percent
23.3
23.3
40.0
40.0
23.3
23.3
13.3
13.3
100.0
100.0
Y12
Percent
Valid Percent
16.7
16.7
53.3
53.3
16.7
16.7
13.3
13.3
100.0
100.0
TOTAL Y
Percent
Valid Percent
10.0
10.0
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
6.7
6.7
6.7
6.7
6.7
6.7
13.3
13.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
6.7
6.7
10.0
10.0
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
10.0
100.0

Cumulative
Percent
3.3
20.0
60.0
90.0
100.0

Cumulative
Percent
23.3
63.3
86.7
100.0

Cumulative
Percent
16.7
70.0
86.7
100.0

Cumulative
Percent
10.0
13.3
16.7
20.0
26.7
33.3
40.0
53.3
56.7
60.0
66.7
76.7
80.0

3.3
3.3
3.3
10.0
100.0
Statistics
Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4 Y5 Y6 Y7 Y8 Y9
30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30

83.3
86.7
90.0
100.0

Y10 Y11 Y12
30
30
30

TOTALY
30

Missing
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Mean
5.10 5.13 5.07 5.07 5.30 5.10 5.17 5.10 5.30
Std. Deviation .960 .860 .907 .980 .877 .885 .874 .885 .915

0
5.27
.980

Analisis Deskriptif Frekuensi System Quality (X1)
X1.1
Frequency
Valid

4
5
6
7

3
11
10
6

Total

30

Frequency
Valid

3
4
5
6
7
Total

1
1
14
4
10
30

Frequency
Valid

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Total

1
1
4
6
4
6
8
30

Frequency
Valid

1
4
5
6
7
Total

1
1
3
18
7
30

Frequency
Valid

4
5
6
7
Total

1
11
12
6
30

Percent
Valid Percent
10.0
10.0
36.7
36.7
33.3
33.3
20.0
20.0

100.0
X1.2

Cumulative
Percent
10.0
46.7
80.0
100.0

100.0

Percent
Valid Percent
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
46.7
46.7
13.3
13.3
33.3
33.3
100.0
100.0
X1.3
Percent
Valid Percent
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
13.3
13.3
20.0
20.0
13.3
13.3
20.0
20.0
26.7
26.7
100.0
100.0
X1.4
Percent
Valid Percent
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
10.0
10.0
60.0
60.0
23.3
23.3
100.0
100.0
X1.5
Percent
Valid Percent
3.3
3.3
36.7
36.7
40.0
40.0
20.0
20.0
100.0
100.0

Cumulative
Percent
3.3
6.7
53.3
66.7
100.0

Cumulative
Percent
3.3
6.7
20.0
40.0
53.3
73.3
100.0

Cumulative
Percent
3.3
6.7
16.7
76.7
100.0

Cumulative
Percent
3.3
40.0
80.0
100.0

0
5.27
.980

0
5.27
.907

0
62.13
10.037

X1.6
Frequency
Valid

3
4
5
6
7
Total

3
1
6
16
4
30

Frequency
Valid

4
5
6
7
Total

3
10
13
4
30

Frequency
Valid

3
4
5
6
7

3
4
9
11
3

Frequency
Valid

2
3
4
5
6

1
2
8
10
7

7
Total

2
30

Frequency
Valid

2
3
4
5
6
7
Total

2
1
6
7
12
2
30

Frequency
Valid

40
41
42
45

1
1
1
1

Percent
Valid Percent
10.0
10.0
3.3
3.3
20.0
20.0
53.3
53.3
13.3
13.3
100.0
100.0
X1.7
Percent
Valid Percent
10.0
10.0
33.3
33.3
43.3
43.3
13.3
13.3
100.0
100.0
X1.8
Percent
Valid Percent
10.0
10.0
13.3
13.3
30.0
30.0
36.7
36.7
10.0
10.0
X1.9
Percent
Valid Percent
3.3
3.3
6.7
6.7
26.7
26.7
33.3
33.3
23.3
23.3
6.7
100.0
X1.10

6.7
100.0

Percent
Valid Percent
6.7
6.7
3.3
3.3
20.0
20.0
23.3
23.3
40.0
40.0
6.7
6.7
100.0
100.0
TOTAL X1
Percent
Valid Percent
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3

Cumulative
Percent
10.0
13.3
33.3
86.7
100.0

Cumulative
Percent
10.0
43.3
86.7
100.0

Cumulative
Percent
10.0
23.3
53.3
90.0
100.0
Cumulative
Percent
3.3
10.0
36.7
70.0
93.3
100.0

Cumulative
Percent
6.7
10.0
30.0
53.3
93.3
100.0

Cumulative
Percent
3.3
6.7
10.0
13.3

47
48
49
50
52
53

54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
70
Total

1
1
1
4
1
1

3.3
3.3
3.3
13.3
3.3
3.3

3.3
3.3
3.3
13.3
3.3
3.3

16.7
20.0
23.3
36.7
40.0
43.3

1
1
1
3
2
1
4
1
1
2
30

3.3
3.3
3.3
10.0
6.7
3.3
13.3
3.3
3.3
6.7
100.0

3.3
3.3
3.3
10.0
6.7
3.3
13.3
3.3
3.3
6.7
100.0

46.7
50.0
53.3
63.3
70.0
73.3
86.7
90.0
93.3
100.0

Statistics
X1.1 X1.2 X1.3 X1.4 X1.5 X1.6 X1.7 X1.8 X1.9 X1.10 TOTALX1
N Valid
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
Missing
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Mean
5.63 5.70 5.03 5.90 5.77 5.57 5.60 5.23 4.87 5.07
54.37
Std. Deviation .928 1.088 1.712 1.155 .817 1.104 .855 1.135 1.167 1.285
7.481

Analisis Deskriptif Frekuensi Information Quality (X2)
X2.1
Frequency
Valid

4
5
6
7
Total

4
19
3
4
30

Frequency
Valid

4
5
6
7
Total

7
16
3
4
30

Frequency
Valid

3
4
5
6

1
4
15
6

Percent
Valid Percent
13.3
13.3
63.3
63.3
10.0
10.0
13.3
13.3
100.0
100.0
X2.2
Percent
Valid Percent
23.3
23.3
53.3
53.3
10.0
10.0
13.3
13.3
100.0
100.0
X2.3
Percent
Valid Percent
3.3
3.3
13.3
13.3
50.0
50.0
20.0
20.0

Cumulative
Percent
13.3
76.7
86.7
100.0

Cumulative
Percent
23.3
76.7
86.7
100.0

Cumulative
Percent
3.3
16.7
66.7
86.7

7
Total

4
30

Frequency
Valid

4
5
6
7
Total

5
18
4
3
30

Frequency
Valid

4
5
6
7
Total

7
16
5
2
30

Frequency
Valid

4
5
6
7
Total

7
13
8
2
30

13.3
100.0
X2.4

13.3
100.0

Percent
Valid Percent
16.7
16.7
60.0
60.0
13.3
13.3
10.0
10.0
100.0
100.0
X2.5
Percent
Valid Percent
23.3
23.3
53.3
53.3
16.7
16.7
6.7
6.7
100.0
100.0
X2.6
Percent
Valid Percent
23.3
23.3
43.3
43.3
26.7
26.7
6.7
6.7
100.0
100.0
TOTAL X2

Frequency
Valid

N

24
27
28
29
30
31
36
39
42
Total

Valid
Missing

Mean
Std. Deviation

Percent
Valid Percent
4
13.3
13.3
1
3.3
3.3
1
3.3
3.3
1
3.3
3.3
12
40.0
40.0
4
13.3
13.3
4
13.3
13.3
1
3.3
3.3
2
6.7
6.7
30
100.0
100.0
Statistics
X2.1
X2.2
X2.3
30
30
30
0
0
0
5.23
5.13
5.27
.858
.937
.980

100.0

Cumulative
Percent
16.7
76.7
90.0
100.0

Cumulative
Percent
23.3
76.7
93.3
100.0

Cumulative
Percent
23.3
66.7
93.3
100.0

Cumulative
Percent
13.3
16.7
20.0
23.3
63.3
76.7
90.0
93.3
100.0

X2.4
30
0
5.17
.834

Analisis Deskriptif Frekuensi Service Quality (X3)
X3.1
Frequency
Valid

4
5

2
18

Percent
Valid Percent
6.7
6.7
60.0
60.0

Cumulative
Percent
6.7
66.7

X2.5
30
0
5.07
.828

X2.6
30
0
5.17
.874

TOTALX2
30
0
31.03
4.709

6
7
Total

7
3
30

Frequency
Valid

3
4
5
6
7
Total

1
6
13
7
3
30

Frequency
Valid

4
5
6
7
Total

2
18
7
3
30

Frequency
Valid

3
4
5
6
7
Total

3
5
10
9
3
30

Frequency
Valid

4
5
6
7
Total

3
13
11
3
30

Frequency
Valid

3
4
5
6
7
Total

1
2
12
9
6
30

Frequency
Valid

24
25
26

1
1
2

23.3
10.0
100.0
X3.2

23.3
10.0
100.0

Percent
Valid Percent
3.3
3.3
20.0
20.0
43.3
43.3
23.3
23.3
10.0
10.0
100.0
100.0
X3.3
Percent
Valid Percent
6.7
6.7
60.0
60.0
23.3
23.3
10.0
10.0
100.0
100.0
X3.4
Percent
Valid Percent
10.0
10.0
16.7
16.7
33.3
33.3
30.0
30.0
10.0
10.0
100.0
100.0
X3.5
Percent
Valid Percent
10.0
10.0
43.3
43.3
36.7
36.7
10.0
10.0
100.0
100.0
X.3.6
Percent
Valid Percent
3.3
3.3
6.7
6.7
40.0
40.0
30.0
30.0
20.0
20.0
100.0
100.0
TOTALX3
Percent
Valid Percent
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
6.7
6.7

90.0
100.0

Cumulative
Percent
3.3
23.3
66.7
90.0
100.0

Cumulative
Percent
6.7
66.7
90.0
100.0

Cumulative
Percent
10.0
26.7
60.0
90.0
100.0

Cumulative
Percent
10.0
53.3
90.0
100.0

Cumulative
Percent
3.3
10.0
50.0
80.0
100.0

Cumulative
Percent
3.3
6.7
13.3

27
28
30
32
33
36
37

1
2
10
1
2
5
2

3.3
6.7
33.3
3.3
6.7
16.7
6.7

3.3
6.7
33.3
3.3
6.7
16.7
6.7

16.7
23.3
56.7
60.0
66.7
83.3
90.0

42
Total

3
10.0
30
100.0
Statistics

10.0
100.0

100.0

X3.1 X3.2 X3.3 X3.4 X3.5 X.3.6
N Valid
30
30
30
30
30
30
Missing
0
0
0
0
0
0
Mean
5.37 5.17 5.37 5.13 5.47 5.57
Std. Deviation .765 .986 .765 1.137 .819 1.006

TOTALX
3
30
0
32.07
4.961

Analisis Deskriptif Frekuensi Perceived Usefulness (Z)
Z1
Frequency
Valid

3
4
5
6
7
Total

1
4
15
8
2
30

Frequency
Valid

4
5
6
7
Total

1
18
9
2
30

Frequency
Valid

4
5
6
7
Total

1
21
6
2
30

Frequency
Valid

4
5
6
7

1
18
9
2

Percent
Valid Percent
3.3
3.3
13.3
13.3
50.0
50.0
26.7
26.7
6.7
6.7
100.0
100.0
Z2
Percent
Valid Percent
3.3
3.3
60.0
60.0
30.0
30.0
6.7
6.7
100.0
100.0
Z3
Percent
Valid Percent
3.3
3.3
70.0
70.0
20.0
20.0
6.7
6.7
100.0
100.0
Z4
Percent
Valid Percent
3.3
3.3
60.0
60.0
30.0
30.0
6.7
6.7

Cumulative
Percent
3.3
16.7
66.7
93.3
100.0

Cumulative
Percent
3.3
63.3
93.3
100.0

Cumulative
Percent
3.3
73.3
93.3
100.0

Cumulative
Percent
3.3
63.3
93.3
100.0

Z1
Frequency
Valid

3
4
5
6
7
Total

1
4
15
8
2
30

Frequency
Valid

4
5
6
7
Total

1
21
6
2
30

Frequency
Valid

4
5
6
7
Total

1
21
4
4
30

Frequency
Valid

24
28
29
30
33
34
36
37
42
Total

Z1
N Valid
30
Missing
0
Mean
5.20
Std. Deviation .887

Percent
Valid Percent
3.3
3.3
13.3
13.3
50.0
50.0
26.7
26.7
6.7
6.7
100.0
100.0
Z5
Percent
Valid Percent
3.3
3.3
70.0
70.0
20.0
20.0
6.7
6.7
100.0
100.0
Z6
Percent
Valid Percent
3.3
3.3
70.0
70.0
13.3
13.3
13.3
13.3
100.0
100.0
TOTAL Z

Percent
Valid Percent
1
3.3
3.3
1
3.3
3.3
2
6.7
6.7
15
50.0
50.0
3
10.0
10.0
1
3.3
3.3
3
10.0
10.0
2
6.7
6.7
2
6.7
6.7
30
100.0
100.0
Statistics
TOTAL
Z2 Z3 Z4 Z5 Z6
Z
30 30 30 30 30
30
0
0
0
0
0
0
5.40 5.30 5.40 5.30 5.37
31.97
.675 .651 .675 .651 .765
3.996

Cumulative
Percent
3.3
16.7
66.7
93.3
100.0

Cumulative
Percent
3.3
73.3
93.3
100.0

Cumulative
Percent
3.3
73.3
86.7
100.0

Cumulative
Percent
3.3
6.7
13.3
63.3
73.3
76.7
86.7
93.3
100.0

Lampiran 11 Kisaran Teoritis Total Skor Alat Ukur Untuk Masing - Masing Variabel
Dan Rekapitulasi Data Variabel
Kisaran Teoritis Total Skor Alat Ukur Untuk Masing - Masing Variabel
Jumlah
Instrum
en

Total Skor Kisaran Teoritis Alat Ukur

Skala 7

Skala Skala Skala Skala Skala Skala
6
5
4
3
2
1

1

User
Satisfaction

12

34

71

169

81

1

0

0

2

System Quality

10

52

109

85

34

14

4

2

3

Information
Quality

6

19

29

97

34

1

0

0

4

Service Quality

6

21

50

84

20

5

0

0

5

Perceived
Usefulness

6

14

42

114

9

1

0

0

N
o

Nama Variabel

Rekapitulasi Data Variabel
SQ

IQ

SERVQ

PU

US

53

31

25

28

59

42

30

33

29

57

57

36

37

37

74

41

30

27

30

50

56

39

37

37

70

49

30

30

30

60

50

31

28

33

65

50

31

28

33

65

47

28

26

30

51

50

31

30

33

65

48

27

36

30

60

58

24

30

30

48

57

30

30

30

48

60

30

30

30

56

40

24

24

24

48

50

30

26

30

60

54

36

30

36

68

58

24

32

30

53

61

30

30

30

60

62

30

36

30

64

59

30

30

30

57

45

30

30

30

59

52

29

36

34

62

55

30

36

29

61

57

24

33

30

64

60

30

30

30

56

70

42

42

42

84

60

42

36

42

72

60

36

42

36

84

70

36

42

36

84

1631

931

962

959

1864

Lampiran 12 Tabulasi Variabel Penelitian

USER SATISFACTION (Y)

X5.1

X5.2

X5.3

X5.4

X5.5

X5.6

X5.7

X5.8

X5.9

X5.10

X5.11

X5.12

TOTAL

4

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

59

5

5

4

4

5

5

5

5

5

5

4

5

57

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

7

7

74

4

5

4

4

5

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

50

5

6

6

6

6

6

6

5

6

6

6

6

70

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

60

6

5

5

5

6

5

5

5

6

6

6

5

65

6

5

5

5

6

5

5

5

6

6

6

5

65

4

5

5

4

5

5

4

4

4

3

4

4

51

6

5

5

5

6

5

5

5

6

6

6

5

65

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

60

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

48

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

48

4

4

4

4

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

56

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

48

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

60

5

5

5

5

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

68

4

4

4

4

4

4

5

5

4

5

5

5

53

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

60

5

5

5

5

4

4

6

6

6

6

6

6

64

5

5

5

4

5

5

5

4

5

5

4

5

57

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

4

5

5

59

5

5

5

6

6

4

4

4

6

6

5

6

62

5

5

5

6

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

61

6

6

6

6

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

64

4

4

4

4

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

56

7

7

7

7

7

7

7

7

7

7

7

7

84

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

72

7

7

7

7

7

7

7

7

7

7

7

7

84

7

7

7

7

7

7

7

7

7

7

7

7

84

pSYSTEM QUALITY (X1)

X1.1
6

X1.2
7

X1.3
2

X1.4
7

X1.5
7

X1.6
6

X1.7
6

X1.8
7

X1.9
3

X1.10
2

TOTAL

5

5

3

5

5

5

5

3

4

2

42

7

5

6

6

5

6

7

5

4

6

57

5

5

1

1

5

5

5

5

4

5

41

6

5

6

6

5

6

7

5

4

6

56

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

4

49

53

5

5

4

6

5

3

5

6

5

6

50

5

5

4

6

5

3

5

6

5

6

50

6

5

4

6

6

6

5

3

2

4

47

5

5

4

6

5

3

5

6

5

6

50

4

5

5

5

5

5

4

5

5

5

48

5

5

5

6

7

6

6

6

6

6

58

5

5

5

7

7

7

6

5

5

5

57

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

60

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

40

6

3

3

6

5

5

6

6

5

5

50

6

5

4

6

6

6

5

6

6

4

54

6

7

7

6

6

6

6

4

5

5

58

5

7

7

7

7

7

6

5

5

5

61

6

7

7

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

62

5

7

7

7

6

6

6

5

5

5

59

5

5

3

6

5

5

4

5

4

3

45

7

7

3

6

6

6

5

3

3

6

52

7

7

6

6

6

6

5

4

4

4

55

7

7

7

6

6

6

6

4

4

4

57

4

6

7

7

6

6

6

6

6

6

60

7

7

7

7

7

7

7

7

7

7

70

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

60

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

60

7

7

7

7

7

7

7

7

7

7

70

INFORMATION QUALITY (X2)

X2.1

X2.2

X2.3

X2.4

X2.5

X2.6

TOTAL

5

5

3

6

6

6

31

5

5

5

5

5

5

30

7

7

7

5

4

6

36

5

5

5

5

5

5

30

7

7

7

7

6

5

39

5

5

5

5

5

5

30

5

4

6

5

5

6

31

5

4

6

5

5

6

31

5

5

5

5

4

4

28

5

4

6

5

5

6

31

5

5

5

4

4

4

27

4

4

4

4

4

4

24

5

5

5

5

5

5

30

5

5

5

5

5

5

30

4

4

4

4

4

4

24

5

5

5

5

5

5

30

6

6

6

6

6

6

36

4

4

4

4

4

4

24

5

5

5

5

5

5

30

5

5

5

5

5

5

30

5

5

5

5

5

5

30

5

5

5

5

5

5

30

5

5

5

5

5

4

29

5

5

5

5

5

5

30

4

4

4

4

4

4

24

5

5

5

5

5

5

30

7

7

7

7

7

7

42

7

7

7

7

7

7

42

6

6

6

6

6

6

36

6

6

6

6

6

6

36

SERVICE QUALITY (X3)

X3.1
5

X3.2
3

X3.3
5

X3.4
3

X3.5
4

X3.6
5

TOTAL

5

5

5

6

6

6

33

6

6

6

6

6

7

37

5

5

5

3

5

4

27

6

6

6

6

6

7

37

5

5

5

5

5

5

30

5

4

5

4

5

5

28

5

4

5

4

5

5

28

5

4

4

4

4

5

26

5

4

5

4

6

6

30

6

6

6

6

6

6

36

5

5

5

5

5

5

30

5

5

5

5

5

5

30

5

5

5

5

5

5

30

4

4

4

4

4

4

24

5

5

5

3

5

3

26

4

4

5

5

6

6

30

5

5

5

5

5

7

32

5

5

5

5

5

5

30

6

6

6

6

6

6

36

5

5

5

5

5

5

30

5

5

5

5

5

5

30

6

6

6

6

6

6

36

6

6

6

6

6

6

36

5

5

5

6

6

6

33

5

5

5

5

5

5

30

7

7

7

7

7

7

42

6

6

6

6

6

6

36

25

7

7

7

7

7

7

42

7

7

7

7

7

7

42

PERCEIVED USEFULNESS (Z)

X4.1

X4.2

X4.3

X4.4

X4.5

X4.6

TOTAL

3

5

5

5

5

5

28

4

5

5

5

5

5

29

6

6

6

6

6

7

37

5

5

5

5

5

5

30

6

6

6

6

6

7

37

5

5

5

5

5

5

30

6

6

5

6

5

5

33

6

6

5

6

5

5

33

5

5

5

5

5

5

30

6

6

5

6

5

5

33

5

5

5

5

5

5

30

5

5

5

5

5

5

30

5

5

5

5

5

5

30

5

5

5

5

5

5

30

4

4

4

4

4

4

24

5

5

5

5

5

5

30

6

6

6

6

6

6

36

5

5

5

5

5

5

30

5

5

5

5

5

5

30

5

5

5

5

5

5

30

5

5

5

5

5

5

30

5

5

5

5

5

5

30

4

6

6

6

6

6

34

4

5

5

5

5

5

29

5

5

5

5

5

5

30

5

5

5

5

5

5

30

7

7

7

7

7

7

42

7

7

7

7

7

7

42

6

6

6

6

6

6

36

6

6

6

6

6

6

36

Lampiran 16 Uji Validitas
Hasil Uji Validitas User Satisfaction (Y)
Correlations
Y1
Y Pearson
1

Y2

Y3

1 .860

*

Y4

.864

*

Y5

.836

*

Y6

.824

*

Y7

.760

*

Y8

.760

*

Y9

.760

*

Y10

.868

*

.814

Y11
*

.814

Y12
*

.761

Y
*

.908**

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

.000

.000

.000

.000

.000

.000

.000

.000

.000

.000

.000

.000

26.70 20.60 21.80 22.80 20.10 18.70 18.50 18.70 22.10 22.20 22.20 19.20

253.6

Correlati
on
Sig. (2tailed)
Sum of
Squares

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

00

.921

.710

.752

.786

.693

.645

.638

.645

.762

.766

.766

.662

8.745

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

.904**

and
Crossproducts
Covaria
nce
N
Y Pearson
2

Correlati

.860

*

1 .960

.889

.814

.843

.795

.752

.779

.692

.733

.792

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

.000

.000

.000

.000

.000

.000

.000

.000

.000

.000

.000

.000

20.60 21.46 21.73 21.73 17.80 18.60 17.33 16.60 17.80 16.93 17.93 17.93

226.4

on
Sig. (2tailed)
Sum of
Squares

0

7

3

3

0

0

3

0

0

3

3

3

67

.710

.740

.749

.749

.614

.641

.598

.572

.614

.584

.618

.618

7.809

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

.923**

and
Crossproducts
Covaria
nce
N
Y Pearson
3

Correlati

.864

.960

1 .925

.798

.851

.812

.765

.806

.716

.794

.816

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

.000

.000

.000

.000

.000

.000

.000

.000

.000

.000

.000

.000

21.80 21.73 23.86 23.86 18.40 19.80 18.66 17.80 19.40 18.46 20.46 19.46

243.7

on
Sig. (2tailed)
Sum of
Squares

0

3

7

7

0

0

7

0

0

7

7

7

33

.752

.749

.823

.823

.634

.683

.644

.614

.669

.637

.706

.671

8.405

and
Crossproducts
Covaria
nce

N
Y Pearson
4

30

30

30

*

*

*

.836

.889

.925

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

.907**

1 .778

.747

.751

.747

.822

.770

.806

.832

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

.000

.000

.000

.000

.000

.000

.000

.000

.000

.000

.000

.000

22.80 21.73 23.86 27.86 19.40 18.80 18.66 18.80 21.40 21.46 22.46 21.46

258.7

Correlati
on
Sig. (2tailed)
Sum of
Squares

0

3

7

7

0

0

7

0

0

7

7

7

33

.786

.749

.823

.961

.669

.648

.644

.648

.738

.740

.775

.740

8.922

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

.881**

and
Crossproducts
Covaria
nce
N
Y Pearson
5

.824

.814

.798

.778

1 .849

.697

.671

.872

.786

.786

.763

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

.000

.000

.000

.000

.000

.000

.000

.000

.000

.000

.000

.000

20.10 17.80 18.40 19.40 22.30 19.10 15.50 15.10 20.30 19.60 19.60 17.60

224.8

Correlati
on
Sig. (2tailed)
Sum of
Squares

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

00

.693

.614

.634

.669

.769

.659

.534

.521

.700

.676

.676

.607

7.752

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

.888**

and
Crossproducts
Covaria
nce
N
Y Pearson
6

.760

.843

.851

.747

.849

1 .869

.824

.771

.684

.763

.782

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

.000

.000

.000

.000

.000

.000

.000

.000

.000

.000

.000

Correlati
on
Sig. (2-

.000

tailed)
Sum of

18.70 18.60 19.80 18.80 19.10 22.70 19.50 18.70 18.10 17.20 19.20 18.20 228.60

Squares

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

.645

.641

.683

.648

.659

.783

.672

.645

.624

.593

.662

.628

7.883

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

**

**

**

**

**

**

**

**

**

**

**

.921**

and
Crossproducts
Covarian
ce
N
Y7 Pearson
Correlati
on

.760

.795

.812

.751

.697

.869

1 .958

.840

.832

.872

.899

Sig. (2-

.000

.000

.000

.000

.000

.000

.000

.000

.000

.000

.000

.000

tailed)
Sum of

18.50 17.33 18.66 18.66 15.50 19.50 22.16 21.50 19.50 20.66 21.66 20.66 234.33

Squares

0

3

7

7

0

0

7

0

0

7

7

7

3

.638

.598

.644

.644

.534

.672

.764

.741

.672

.713

.747

.713

8.080

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

**

**

**

**

**

**

**

**

**

**

**

.899**

.000

.000

and
Crossproducts
Covarian
ce
N
Y8 Pearson

.760

.752

.765

.747

.671

.824

.958

1 .813

.803

.883

.868

Correlati
on
Sig. (2-

.000

.000

.000

.000

.000

.000

.000

.000

.000

.000

tailed)
Sum of

18.70 16.60 17.80 18.80 15.10 18.70 21.50 22.70 19.10 20.20 22.20 20.20 231.60

Squares

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

.645

.572

.614

.648

.521

.645

.741

.783

.659

.697

.766

.697

7.986

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

**

**

**

**

**

**

**

**

**

**

**

.945**

.000

.000

and
Crossproducts
Covarian
ce
N
Y9 Pearson

.868

.779

.806

.822

.872

.771

.840

.813

1 .945

.907

.897

Correlati
on
Sig. (2-

.000

.000

.000

.000

.000

.000

.000

.000

.000

.000

tailed)
Sum of

22.10 17.80 19.40 21.40 20.30 18.10 19.50 19.10 24.30 24.60 23.60 21.60 251.80

Squares

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

.762

.614

.669

.738

.700

.624

.672

.659

.838

.848

.814

.745

8.683

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

**

**

**

**

**

**

**

**

**

**

**

.900**

.000

.000

and
Crossproducts
Covarian
ce
N
Y1 Pearson
0

.814

.692

.716

.770

.786

.684

.832

.803

.945

1 .892

.887

Correlati
on
Sig. (2tailed)

.000

.000

.000

.000

.000

.000

.000

.000

.000

.000

Sum of

22.20 16.93 18.46 21.46 19.60 17.20 20.66 20.20 24.60 27.86 24.86 22.86 256.93

Squares

0

3

7

7

0

0

7

0

0

7

7

7

3

.766

.584

.637

.740

.676

.593

.713

.697

.848

.961

.857

.789

8.860

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

**

**

**

**

**

**

**

**

**

**

**

.929**

.000

.000

and
Crossproducts
Covarian
ce
N
Y1 Pearson
1

.814

.733

.794

.806

.786

.763

.872

.883

.907

.892

1 .887

Correlati
on
Sig. (2-

.000

.000

.000

.000

.000

.000

.000

.000

.000

.000

tailed)
Sum of

22.20 17.93 20.46 22.46 19.60 19.20 21.66 22.20 23.60 24.86 27.86 22.86 264.93

Squares

0

3

7

7

0

0

7

0

0

7

7

7

3

.766

.618

.706

.775

.676

.662

.747

.766

.814

.857

.961

.789

9.136

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

**

**

**

**

**

**

**

**

**

**

**

1 .931**

.000

.000

and
Crossproducts
Covarian
ce
N
Y1 Pearson
2

.761

.792

.816

.832

.763

.782

.899

.868

.897

.887

.887

Correlati
on
Sig. (2-

.000

.000

.000

.000

.000

.000

.000

.000

.000

.000

tailed)
Sum of

19.20 17.93 19.46 21.46 17.60 18.20 20.66 20.20 21.60 22.86 22.86 23.86 245.93

Squares

0

3

7

7

0

0

7

0

0

7

7

7

3

.662

.618

.671

.740

.607

.628

.713

.697

.745

.789

.789

.823

8.480

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

**

**

**

**

**

**

**

**

**

**

**

**

1

and
Crossproducts
Covarian
ce
N
Y Pearson

.908

.904

.923

.907

.881

.888

.921

.899

.945

.900

.929

.931

Correlati
on
Sig. (2tailed)

.000

.000

.000

.000

.000

.000

.000

.000

.000

.000

.000

.000

Sum of

253.6 226.4 243.7 258.7 224.8 228.6 234.3 231.6 251.8 256.9 264.9 245.9 2921.4

Squares

00

67

33

33

00

00

33

00

00

33

33

33

67

and
Crossproducts
Covarian

8.745 7.809 8.405 8.922 7.752 7.883 8.080 7.986 8.683 8.860 9.136 8.480 100.74

ce

0

N

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

X1.9

X1.10

30

**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

Hasil Uji Validitas System Quality (X1)

Correlations
X1.1

X1.2

X1.3

X1.4

X1.5

**

.247

.286

.009

.189

.125

24.967 13.700 11.367

8.900

X1.1 Pearson

1

.468

X1.6

X1.7

X1

.019

-.015

.195

.502**

.002

.922

.938

.302

.005

8.433 14.233 12.600

.567

-.467

.479

**

X1.8
**

.384

*

.548

Correlation
Sig. (2-

.036

.007

tailed)
Sum of

6.733 101.033

Squares
and Crossproducts
Covariance
N
X1.2 Pearson

.861

.472

.392

.307

.291

.491

.434

.020

-.016

.232

3.484

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

1

**

*

**

**

*

.059

.158

.138

.646**

.035

.758

.405

.466

.000

13.700 34.300 29.300 15.100 16.900 19.100 10.400

2.100

5.800

.468

**

.543

.414

.656

.548

.386

Correlation
Sig. (2-

.009

.002

.023

.000

.002

tailed)
Sum of

5.600 152.300

Squares
and Crossproducts
Covariance
N
X1.3 Pearson

.472

1.183

1.010

.521

.583

.659

.359

.072

.200

.193

5.252

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

1

**

*

**

**

.156

**

**

.796**

.001

.412

.007

.000

.247

.543

**

.542

.400

.500

.575

.538

.485

Correlation
Sig. (2tailed)

.189

.002

.002

.028

.005

.002

Sum of

11.367 29.300 84.967 31.100 16.233 27.433 24.400

8.767 31.133 30.933 295.633

Squares
and Crossproducts
Covariance
N
X1.4 Pearson

.392

1.010

2.930

1.072

.560

.946

.841

.302

1.074

1.067

10.194

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

.286

*

**

1

**

*

**

.308

.271

.191

.675**

.007

.098

.147

.313

.000

.414

.542

.595

.397

.482

Correlation
Sig. (2-

.125

.023

.002

.001

.030

tailed)
Sum of

8.900 15.100 31.100 38.700 16.300 14.700 13.800 11.700 10.600

8.200 169.100

Squares
and Crossproducts
Covariance
N
X1.5 Pearson

.307

.521

1.072

1.334

.562

.507

.476

.403

.366

.283

5.831

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

*

**

*

**

1

**

**

.321

.328

.180

.742**

.002

.084

.077

.342

.000

8.433 16.900 16.233 16.300 19.367 19.967 11.200

8.633

9.067

.384

.656

.400

.595

.763

.553

Correlation
Sig. (2-

.036

.000

.028

.001

.000

tailed)
Sum of

5.467 131.567

Squares
and Crossproducts
Covariance
N
X1.6 Pearson

.291

.583

.560

.562

.668

.689

.386

.298

.313

.189

4.537

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

**

**

**

*

**

1

**

.028

.195

.094

.667**

.000

.881

.303

.621

.000

14.233 19.100 27.433 14.700 19.967 35.367 16.800

1.033

7.267

.479

.548

.500

.397

.763

.614

Correlation
Sig. (2-

.007

.002

.005

.030

.000

tailed)
Sum of

3.867 159.767

Squares
and Crossproducts
Covariance
N
X1.7 Pearson

.491

.659

.946

.507

.689

1.220

.579

.036

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

**

*

**

**

**

**

1

*

.548

.386

.575

.482

.553

.614

.419

.251

.133

5.509

30

30

30

*

**

.805**

.005

.000

.394

.496

Correlation
Sig. (2tailed)

.002

.035

.001

.007

.002

.000

.021

.031

Sum of

12.600 10.400 24.400 13.800 11.200 16.800 21.200 11.800 11.400 15.800 149.400

Squares
and Crossproducts
Covariance
N
X1.8 Pearson

.434

.359

.841

.476

.386

.579

.731

.407

.393

.545

5.152

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

*

1

**

*

.517**

.015

.003

.019

.059

.156

.308

.321

.028

.419

.701

.438

.922

.758

.412

.098

.084

.881

.567

2.100

8.767 11.700

8.633

.020

.072

.302

.403

.298

.036

.407

1.289

.929

.639

4.394

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

-.015

.158

**

.271

.328

.195

*

**

1

**

.662**

.938

.405

.002

.147

.077

.303

.000

.000

5.800 31.133 10.600

9.067

Correlation
Sig. (2-

.021

.000

tailed)
Sum of

1.033 11.800 37.367 26.933 18.533 127.433

Squares
and Crossproducts
Covariance
N
X1.9 Pearson

.538

.394

.701

.604

Correlation
Sig. (2-

.031

.000

tailed)
Sum of

-.467

7.267 11.400 26.933 39.467 26.267 167.467

Squares
and Crossproducts
Covariance
N
X1.10 Pearson

-.016

.200

1.074

.366

.313

.251

.393

.929

1.361

.906

5.775

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

.195

.138

**

.191

.180

.094

**

*

**

1

.607**

.302

.466

.007

.313

.342

.621

5.600 30.933

8.200

5.467

.485

.496

.438

.604

Correlation
Sig. (2-

.005

.015

.000

.000

tailed)
Sum of

6.733

3.867 15.800 18.533 26.267 47.867 169.267

Squares
and Crossproducts
Covariance
N
X1

Pearson

.232

.193

1.067

.283

.189

.133

.545

.639

.906

1.651

5.837

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

**

**

**

**

**

**

**

**

**

**

1

.502

.646

.796

.675

.742

.667

.805

.517

.662

.607

Correlation
Sig. (2tailed)

.005

.000

.000

.000

.000

.000

.000

.003

.000

.000

Sum of

101.033 152.300 295.633 169.100 131.567 159.767 149.400 127.433 167.467 169.267 1622.967

Squares
and Crossproducts
Covariance

3.484

N

5.252 10.194

30

30

30

5.831

4.537

5.509

5.152

4.394

5.775

5.837

55.964

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
*. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).

Hasil Uji Validitas Information Quality (X2)
Correlations
X2.1
X2.1Pearson Correlation

X.2
1 .946

Sig. (2-tailed)

X2.3
**

.000

.866

X2.4
**

.000

.859

X2.5
**

.000

.705

**

.000

X2.6

X2
**

.962**

.000

.000

.728

Sum of Squares and Cross-products 21.367 22.067 21.133 17.833 14.533 15.833 112.767
Covariance
N
X.2 Pearson Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)

.737

.761

.729

.615

.501

.546

3.889

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

**

**

**

**

.882**

.001

.000

.946

**

1 .711

.000

.000

.809

.000

.655

.000

.561

Sum of Squares and Cross-products 22.067 25.467 18.933 18.333 14.733 13.333 112.867
Covariance
N
X2.3Pearson Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)

.761

.878

.653

.632

.508

.460

3.892

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

**

**

**

**

**

.842**

.000

.000

.866

.000

.711

1 .661

.000

.000

.530

.003

.671

Sum of Squares and Cross-products 21.133 18.933 27.867 15.667 12.467 16.667 112.733
Covariance
N
X2.4Pearson Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)

.729

.653

.961

.540

.430

.575

3.887

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

**

**

**

**

**

.938**

.000

.000

.859

.000

.809

.000

.661

1 .933

.000

.000

.765

Sum of Squares and Cross-products 17.833 18.333 15.667 20.167 18.667 16.167 106.833
Covariance
N
X2.5Pearson Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)

.615

.632

.540

.695

.644

.557

3.684

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

**

**

**

**

**

.858**

.000

.000

.705

.000

.655

.000

.530

.003

.933

1 .794

.000

Sum of Squares and Cross-products 14.533 14.733 12.467 18.667 19.867 16.667 96.933
Covariance
N
X2.6Pearson Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)

.501

.508

.430

.644

.685

.575

3.343

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

**

**

**

**

**

1 .845**

.000

.000

.728

.000

.561

.001

.671

.000

.765

.000

.794

Sum of Squares and Cross-products 15.833 13.333 16.667 16.167 16.667 22.167 100.833
Covariance

.546

.460

.575

.557

.575

.764

3.477

N
X2 Pearson Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

**

**

**

**

**

**

1

.962

.000

.882

.000

.842

.938

.000

.858

.000

.845

.000

.000

Sum of Squares and Cross-products 112.767112.867 112.733106.833 96.933100.833 642.967
Covariance
N

3.889

3.892

3.887

30

30

30

3.684 3.343 3.477 22.171
30

30

30

30

**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

Hasil Uji Validitas Service Quality (X3)
Correlations
X3.1

X3.2

X3.3

X3.4

.000

Sum of Squares and Cross-products 16.967 19.167 15.967 18.533 13.867 14.767

99.267

Covariance
N
X3.2 Pearson Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)

.000

.941

.000

.735

.000

.763

**

X3

.000

Sig. (2-tailed)

.877

**

X3.6

.902**

1

**

X3.5

**

X3.1 Pearson Correlation

**

.000

.662

.585

.661

.551

.639

.478

.509

3.423

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

1

**

**

**

**

.914**

.000

.000

.877

**

.000

.877

.000

.841

.000

.797

.000

.597

Sum of Squares and Cross-products 19.167 28.167 19.167 27.333 18.667 17.167 129.667
Covariance
N
X3.3 Pearson Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)

.661

.971

.661

.943

.644

.592

4.471

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

**

**

1

**

**

**

.938**

.000

.000

.941

.000

.877

.000

.775

.000

.873

.000

.706

Sum of Squares and Cross-products 15.967 19.167 16.967 19.533 15.867 15.767 103.267
Covariance
N
X3.4 Pearson Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)

.551

.661

.585

.674

.547

.544

3.561

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

**

**

**

1

**

**

.928**

.000

.000

.735

.000

.841

.000

.775

.000

.820

.000

.806

Sum of Squares and Cross-products 18.533 27.333 19.533 37.467 22.133 26.733 151.733
Covariance
N
X3.5 Pearson Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)

.639

.943

.674

1.292

.763

.922

5.232

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

**

**

**

**

1

**

.917**

.000

.000

.763

.000

.797

.000

.873

.000

.820

.000

.756

Sum of Squares and Cross-products 13.867 18.667 15.867 22.133 19.467 18.067 108.067
Covariance
N
X3.6 Pearson Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)

.478

.644

.547

.763

.671

.623

3.726

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

**

**

**

**

**

1

.842**

.662

.000

.597

.000

.706

.000

.806

.000

.756

.000

.000

Sum of Squares and Cross-products 14.767 17.167 15.767 26.733 18.067 29.367 121.867
Covariance
N

.509

.592

.544

.922

.623

1.013

4.202

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

X3 Pearson Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)

.902**

.914**

.938**

.928**

.917**

.842**

.000

.000

.000

.000

.000

.000

1

Sum of Squares and Cross-products 99.267 129.667 103.267 151.733 108.067 121.867 713.867
Covariance
N

3.423

4.471

3.561

5.232

3.726

4.202

24.616

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

Hasil Uji Validitas Perceived Usefulness (Z)
Correlations
Z1.1
Z1.1 Pearson Correlation

Z1.2

1 .784

Sig. (2-tailed)

Z1.3

**

.000

.669

Z1.4

**

.000

.784

Z1.5

**

.000

.669

Z1.6

**

.000

Z

**

.829**

.000

.000

.651

Sum of Squares and Cross-products 22.800 13.600 11.200 13.600 11.200 12.800 85.200
Covariance
N
Z1.2 Pearson Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)

.786

.469

.386

.469

.386

.441

2.938

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

**

**

**

**

.965**

.000

.000

.000

.000

.784

**

1 .895 1.000

.000

.895

.000

.842

Sum of Squares and Cross-products 13.600 13.200 11.400 13.200 11.400 12.600 75.400
Covariance
N
Z1.3 Pearson Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)

.469

.455

.393

.455

.393

.434

2.600

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

**

**

**

**

**

.958**

.000

.000

.000

.000

.669

.000

.895

1 .895 1.000

.000

.948

Sum of Squares and Cross-products 11.200 11.400 12.300 11.400 12.300 13.700 72.300
Covariance
N
Z1.4 Pearson Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed

Dokumen yang terkait

Kontribusi teknologi informasi terhadap kepuasan dan kinerja pengguna studi kasus : sistem informasi akademik (sia) Universitas Mercu Buana

0 4 13

Analisis Pengaruh Service Quality dan Perceived Usefulness Terhadap Brand Image Serta Dampaknya Pada Brand Trust (Studi Kasus GO-JEK di DKI Jakarta)

3 29 177

Pengaruh Perceived Service Quality dan Perceived Value pada Trust: Satisfaction sebagai Variabel Mediasi.

0 0 20

Pengaruh System Quality, Information Quality Dan Service Quality Terhadap User Satisfaction Sap R 3 Dengan Perceived Usefulness Sebagai Variabel Moderating Di PT.Indosat Medan

0 1 16

Pengaruh System Quality, Information Quality Dan Service Quality Terhadap User Satisfaction Sap R 3 Dengan Perceived Usefulness Sebagai Variabel Moderating Di PT.Indosat Medan

0 0 2

Pengaruh System Quality, Information Quality Dan Service Quality Terhadap User Satisfaction Sap R 3 Dengan Perceived Usefulness Sebagai Variabel Moderating Di PT.Indosat Medan

0 1 8

Pengaruh System Quality, Information Quality Dan Service Quality Terhadap User Satisfaction Sap R 3 Dengan Perceived Usefulness Sebagai Variabel Moderating Di PT.Indosat Medan

0 0 31

Pengaruh System Quality, Information Quality Dan Service Quality Terhadap User Satisfaction Sap R 3 Dengan Perceived Usefulness Sebagai Variabel Moderating Di PT.Indosat Medan

0 0 6

TAPPDF.COM PDF DOWNLOAD PENGARUH PERCEIVED SERVICE QUALITY , PERCEIVED VALUE, SATISFACTION 1 SM

0 0 10

PENGARUH SYSTEM QUALITY, INFORMATION QUALITY DAN SERVICE QUALITY TERHADAP E-COMMERCE END-USER COMPUTING SATISFACTION (EUCS) - Perbanas Institutional Repository

0 1 24