02 PENILAIAN DAN PENELUSURAN KI

OPTIMALISASI DAN PENYAMAAN PERSEPSI

  

PELAKSANAAN PENILAIAN ANGKA KREDIT

KENAIKAN PANGKAT/JABATAN AKADEMIK DOSEN

BATAM & MAKASSAR, 29-30 NOPEMBER 2017

PENILAIAN DAN PENELUSURAN KARYA ILMIAH

  Are You Stealing Intellectual Property? Adapted from Instructor Theresa Ireton’s in-class presentation

PENILAIAN DAN PENELUSURAN KARYA ILMIAH

  MATERI :

  1. PENILAIAN DAN PENELUSURAN KARYA ILMIAH

  3. PRAKTIK PAK DAN PENILAIAN-PENELUSURAN KARYA ILMIAH

  PENILAIAN DAN PENELUSURAN KARYA ILMIAH (SOP)

• BUKU (REFERENSI,

  MONOGRAF, BOOK

  ❷CEK KUALITAS

  CHAPTER)

  ARTIKEL

• KESIMPULAN:
• JURNAL (NASIONAL,

  1. DITERIMA .. ok NASIONAL

  2. DITOLAK .. ok TERAKREDITASI,

• TOLOK UKUR SESUAI FORMAT

  3. DIRAGUKAN

  INTERNASIONAL, PEER REVIEW (POINT 1, 2, 3)

• KLARIFIKASI:

  INTERNASIONAL

• POINT-1: KELENGKAPAN

  1. INDIKASI PLAGIASI BEREPUTASI) UNSUR ARTIKEL DAN

  2. MINTA PROSES

• PROSIDING (NASIONAL,

  KESESUAIAN BIDANG ILMU KORESPONDENSI

  INTERNASIONAL, PENGUSUL PROCEDIA/DISI SPESIAL)

• POINT-2: KEMUTAKHIRAN DAN

  ❸BILA

• KUALITAS

  METODOLOGI

  DIRAGUKAN:

  PENERBIT/PUBLISHER

• POINT-3: KEDALAMAN

  MINTAKAN ❶CEK KEBENARAN KLARIFIKASI KLAIM KELOMPOK KARYA ILMIAH

TERKAIT PENILAIAN

• • MERUPAKAN ACUAN MINIMAL YANG HARUS

  DIPENUHI

HARUS MEMILIKI KRITERIA:

• ASEMEN BERDIMENSI, KARENA ITU

  KUALITATIF PERLU DISEPAKATI. BERBEDA

  DENGAN SYARAT, TIDAK BOLEH DILANGGAR

   Tim PJA hanya memeriksa apa yang seharusnya dikerjakan oleh Editor dan apakah proses review artikel sudah baik dan benar Perlu diketahui bagaimana PROSES Tim PJA melakukan Penilaian Angka Kredit Kenaikan Jabatan Untuk menjawab bagaimana sebaiknya manajemen jurnal internasional bereputasi terkait Penilaian Angka Kredit, maka

  KETIKA TIM PJA MENILAI SUATU KARYA

  ILMIAH, MAKA YANG BERIKUT INI DIPERHATIKAN:

  Editorial boards  Apakah ada orang dikenal atau tidak. Pengecekan melalui Scopus maupun Google Scholar Daftar Isi  Apakah sesuai dengan ketentuan di Pedoman Operasional: Penulis dari berbagai negara Apakah ada Panduan Penulisan Karya Ilmiah (Guide for Authors/ Guide for Manuscript Preparation )

  Apakah penilaian karya ilmiah oleh reviewer dilakukan dengan benar

JURNAL INTERNASIONAL BEREPUTASI

  JURNAL TERINDEKS DI WEB OF SCIENCE DAN MEMPUNYAI JOURNAL IMPACT FACTOR JURNAL TERINDEKS DI SCIMAGOJR, QUARTILE 4 (Q4)

MESKIPUN JURNAL SUDAH TERINDEKS BELUM MENJADI JAMINAN ARTIKEL DAPAT DISETUJUI MEMENUHI PERSYARATAN KE PROFESOR. KAIDAH PENULISAN KARYA ILMIAH DIPERIKSA KEMBALI

  Struktur Karya Ilmiah Semua daftar isi dapat ditemukan dalam karya ilmiah dan tidak ada acuan yang tidak tercantum dalam daftar pustaka SEBAIKNYA TIDAK MENGULANG APA YANG PERNAH DI TULIS OLEH DIRI SENDIRI pada KARYA ILMIAH SEBELUMNYA ATAU MENGULANG KALIMAT DARI KARYA

  ILMIAH ORANG LAIN. SERING TERJADI PARAGRAPH DI PENDAHULUAN DI ULANG DAN BEBERAPA GAMBAR DI PAKAI KEMBALI DI METHODOLOGY Gambar dan Tabel semua di mention dalam teks karya ilmiah Bahasa inggris yang benar, tidak campur bhs lain

  ILMIAH S E C T

  PENULISAN KARYA ILMIAH: STRUKTUR KARYA

• Title: Describes clearly the content
• Authors: Ensures recognition for the writer/s
• Abstract: Describes succinctly what was done
• Keyword: Ensures the article is correctly identified in abstracting and indexing services

  I O N P U R P O S

  Introduction: explains the hypothesis M Methods: explains how the data were collected A

  I Results: describes what was discovered N Discussion: discusses the implications of the findings T

  Conclusion: comment on important, validity, and E generality of conclusion

  X Acknowledgments: ensures those who helped in the research are recognized T References: ensures previously published work is S recognized

  AUTHORSHIP CONFLICT OF INTEREST PLAGIARISM & SELF PLAGIARISM RESEARCH FRAUD SALAMI SLICING or SALAMI / SEGMENTED PUBLICATION DUPLICATE SUBMISSION ETIKA PUBLIKASI ILMIAH

  Kriteria Authorship

Menurut International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE)

  1. Berkontribusi substansial thd konsepsi atau desain pekerjaan tsb; atau akuisisi, analisis, atau interpretasi data untuk pekerjaan tsb; DAN

  2. Mendraf kerja tsb atau merevisinya secara seksama; DAN

  3. Memberikan persetujuan final untuk publikasi; DAN 4. Bertanggung jawab thd akurasi atau integritas pekerjaan tsb.

  Jika seseorang memiliki kriteria kurang dari 4, maka dia disebutkan dalam ACKNOWLEDGMENTS saja

  SISTEM SKOR HAK KEPENGARANGAN SEBUAH KARYA TULIS ILMIAH (NATURE) Masukan Intelektual (skor 20) Masukan Fisik Menangkap Data (skor 20) Masukan Pengolahan Data (skor 20) Masukan Kepakaran/Keahlian (skor 20) Masukan Kesastraan (skor 20) Seseorang baru berhak ikut menjadi pengarang

SISTEM SKOR HAK KEPENGARANGAN SEBUAH KARYA TULIS ILMIAH

A. Masukan Intelektual (skor 20)

  (identifikasi masalah, gagasan pendekatan, perencanaan, dan perancangan )

  Tidak ada sumbangan berarti

   00 Dua tiga kali diskusi

   05 Beberapa kali diskusi terinci

   10 Pertemuan dan pembicaraan tak terhitung 15 Pembahasan mendalam dan terus menerus 20

KARYA TULIS ILMIAH

B. Masukan Fisik dalam MenANgkap Data (skor 20)

  (penataan peranti, pengamatan, pengumpulan, perekaman dan penyarian data )

  Tidak pernah terlibat secara berarti

  00 Terlibat tidak langsung, hanya dua tiga kali

  05 Keterlibatan langsung, beberapa kali

  10 Keterlibatan berkali-kali, tak terhitung

  15 Terlibat secara penuh dan mendalam

  20 SISTEM SKOR HAK KEPENGARANGAN SEBUAH

  

SISTEM SKOR HAK KEPENGARANGAN SEBUAH

KARYA TULIS ILMIAH

C. Masukan Pengolahan Data (skor 20)

  (pengorganisasian, pemrosesan, analisis dan sintesis )

  Tidak ada sumbangan secara berarti

  00 Keterlibatan pendek, dua-tiga kali

  05 Beberapa kali terlibat

  10 Ikut cukup lama

  15 Ikut terus menerus dari awal sampai akhir 20

D. Masukan Kepakaran/Keahlian (skor 20)

  (konsultasi, nasehat, pandangan, pemikiran dan pendapat ; penyimpulan, pengihtisaran, perampatan, serta pencetusan teori )

  Tidak ada sumbangan berarti

  00 Nasehat pendek, penyimpulan sebagian

  05 Pandangan cukup bermakna, pengihtisaran sebagian besar

  10 Bantuan pemikiran dan perampatan menyeluruh

  15 Pendapat yang mendasari penyimpulan dan pencetusan teori SISTEM SKOR HAK KEPENGARANGAN SEBUAH KARYA TULIS ILMIAH

KARYA TULIS ILMIAH

E. Masukan Kesastraan (skor 20)

  (sumbangan terhadap buram naskah lengkap pertama ) Tidak ada sumbangan berarti

  00 Membaca+menyunting bagian tertentu naskah

  05 Membaca+menulis beberapa bagian naskah

  10 Ikut menulis sebagian besar naskah

  15 Menulis buram hampir keseluruhan naskah

  20 SISTEM SKOR HAK KEPENGARANGAN SEBUAH

CONFLICT OF

  

6 ( enam) karya ilmiah dari penulis yang sama dalam satu nomor edisi penerbitan

vol 64 no 4 , 2013

  INTEREST

  INGIN LEBIH CEPAT NAIK PEMERINGKATAN

  EDITORIAL

BOARDS NOT

APROPRIATE

  PADA BULAN JUNI 2016 NAMA EDITORIAL BOARD DARI PTS DI

KOPERTIS IV JABAR SUDAH TIDAK ADA DAN DIGANTIKAN OLEH NAMA

DOSEN PTN DI JAWA TIMUR

  

Artikel: Phenol Removal from water by pulsed power disharge, Penulis: MMM AAA

BBB, S.T.,M.Eng.,Ph.D, Nama Jurnal: Jurnal TTTT (Sciences and Engineering),

Volume Jurnal: 64, Nomor Jurnal: 4, Halaman: 125-130, ISSN: XXXXXX, Penerbit:

UUU Press, Elsevier B.V. All Right Reserved Scop Artikel: On-site partial discharge monitoring system in generator at Tanjung bin power, Penulis: MMM AAA BBB, S.T.,M.Eng.,Ph.D, Nama Jurnal: Jurnal TTTT (Science and Engineering), Volume Jurnal: 64, Nomor Jurnal: 4 , Halaman: 131-135,

  ISSN: 0948-7921, Penerbit: UUU

6 paper di spesial edition dari satu orang penulis di vol dan no

yang sama. Disetarakan dengan jurnal edisi khusus, karya ilmiah tidak dapat dianggap sebagai karya di jurnal internasional bereputasi

  Dua persamaan yang sama diulang !

  

AUTHORSHIPS

Publisher

Virtus enterprise

BUKAN JURNAL INTERNASIONAL TERINDEKS DI SCOPUS

ARCHIVES IF BUSINESS RESEARCH

  ENGLISH

  INDONESIA

  SEBUAH NASIONAL JURNAL YANG DITERBITKAN DI INDONESIA TIMUR, PENILAIAN 2015

  MASIH ORANG YANG SAMA , PENILAIAN JULI 2017

  

DARI DISKUSI DAPAT DITUNJUKKAN BAHWA TERDAPAT

KONVERGENSI BILA SUATU JURNAL AKAN TERINDEKS DI WEB

OF SCIENCE

• Jurnal Publishing standards
• Editorial contents
• International diversity

• •Citation Analysis

  THOMSON REUTERS: INDONESIA EDITORS DAY ITB, 7 APRIL 2016

MEMILIH JURNAL UNTUK PUBLIKASI

  

  Are you submitting your research to a trusted journal? Is it the right journal for your work?  More research is being published worldwide.

   New journals are launched each week.

 Stories of publisher malpractice and deception are also on

the rise.

   It can be challenging to find up-to-date guidance when choosing where to publish.

  

 How can you be sure the journal you are considering is the

right journal for your research?

  Reference this list for your chosen journal to check if it is trusted.

   Do you or your colleagues know the journal?

• - Have you read any articles in the journal before? -Is it easy to discover the latest papers in the journal?

   Can you easily identify and contact the publisher?

• – Is the publisher name clearly displayed on the journal website? – Can you contact the publisher by telephone, email, and post?

   Is the journal clear about the type of peer review it uses?  Are articles indexed in services that you use?  Is it clear what fees will be charged?

• – Does the journal site explain what these fees are for and when

  they will be charged?

  LANJUTAN  Do you recognize the editorial board?

• – Have you heard of the editorial board members? – Do the editorial board mention the journal on their own websites?

   Is the publisher a member of a recognized industry initiative? ?

• – Do they belong to the

  

• – If the journal is open access, is it listed in the

  ?

• – If the journal is open access, does the publisher belong to the

   ?

  platforms (for

• – Is the journal hosted on one of INASP’s journals published in Bangladesh, Nepal, Sri Lanka, Central America and Mongolia) (AJOL, for African journals)?

  

MENCARI KONFERENSI YANG LAYAK

UNTUK PRESENTASI PAPER

  

Andy Nobes provides a checklist of questions to consider

before you register for your next conference

   It’s very important to make sure that the conference you

attend is suitable for your purposes, whether it’s a small,

niche conference or a large, international conference

• – will you be presenting your valuable research to the right audience and making useful contacts? Will the conference presentation look good on your CV?

   To help you decide, we’ve put together some questions you

should ask if you are in any doubt about registering for a

conference:

  Conference subject and scope  Have your peers and senior colleagues in your field heard of, or attended this conference? Would they recommend it?

   Is the content of the conference relevant to your field?

 Is the topic of the conference focused enough for you to a) hear about

relevant research and b) meet relevant researchers? For example, an “International Conference of Social Sciences” or “International Conference on Business and Economics” may be too broad and probably raises questions about the purpose of the conference.

   Does the conference prioritize the academic value of the conference

more than the tourist destination? (You should judge the conference

on its content rather than its location.)

   If the conference title includes the word ‘international’, are you confident that it is a good-quality, truly international event?

  Conference website

 Does the conference website seem knowledgeable about your subject

field? Does it spell key technical terms correctly, and is it up-to-date

on key themes in your field?

   Does the conference programme list respected speakers who you or

your colleagues have heard of? Consider checking their credentials

on Google if you are unsure.

   Does the conference website have full contact details (email, phone

and postal address) so that you can contact them to ask questions?

  

Is there a report on the previous year’s conference? (Unless this is a

new conference.)

   Does the website look reputable, with good spelling and grammar?  Is the conference listed on a source (e.g. a magazine, journal, blog,

website, or sector-specific source) that you trust? This is especially

important if you heard about the conference via an unsolicited email.

  Conference organizers  Who is organizing the conference, and for what reason? Is the goal or theme of the conference clear and specific? (Please note that generic phrases such as ‘to promote scientific innovation’ or ‘to facilitate dissemination of research findings’ are not specific.)

   Do the organizers seem fully focused on making this a high-quality conference? Or are they involved in multiple events in the same day/week/month?

  

 If the conference is being hosted by a university or research institution, do

they seem like the most appropriate host? Are they also advertising the

conference on their website or at their campus?

   Is the conference organized by a scholarly or non-profit organisation who you have heard of? Does this organization list the conference on their website?

   If the conference is organized by a commercial company:

• Is there a clear partnership with a reputable institution/society/research

  The answer to most of these questions should be ‘Yes’ then you are in the right way to participate in the conference ( this end text slightly modified from the original in order to give more clear conclusion)

  INFORMASI SELENGKAPNYA DI URL

  By AuthorAID Team | Feb. 6, 2017

PENILAIAN DAN PENELUSURAN KARYA ILMIAH

  MATERI :

  1. PENILAIAN DAN PENELUSURAN KARYA ILMIAH

  3. PRAKTIK PAK DAN PENILAIAN-PENELUSURAN KARYA ILMIAH

  

PRAKTIK PAK & PENILAIAN KI

MOCKUP 1: MENENTUKAN (KEBUTUHAN MINIMAL, PENILAIAN AK DAN SYARAT KHUSUS, SERTA PENETAPAN ANGKA KREDIT) MOCKUP 2: PENILAIAN KARYA ILMIAH (KLAIM KRITERIA JURNAL dan TEST KEMIRIPAN)

  

COBA CEK KARYA ILMIAH BERIKUT, TERMASUK PADA PUBLISH KELOMPOK JURNAL YANG MANA (JURNAL

NASIONAL, JURNAL NASIONAL TERAKREDITASI, JURNAL INTERNASIONAL, JURNAL INTERNASIONAL

BEREPUTASI): HARD DAN SOFTFILE SERTA AKSES ONLINE TERSEDIA.

• Karya Ilmiah-1. Sripum, C., Kukreja, R.K., Charoenkiatkul, S., Kriengsinyos, W. and Suttisansanee, U. 2017. The effect of extraction conditions on antioxidant activities and total phenolic contents of different processed Thai Jasmine rice. International Food Research Journal 24(4): 1644-1650 (August 2017) . Online Journal:
• Karya Ilmiah-2.

  Kylie Wong, , Qumrul Ahsan, Azma Putra, Sivarao, Subramonian, and Mohd jailani Mohd Nor. 2017. Preliminary study

  on the sound absorption behavior of spent tea leaves filled with natural rubber latex binder. Jurnal Teknologi vol. 79(5- 2):59-64. Online Jou

  Q & A

  Permendikbud no.88

• -PERMENPANRB 17/2013 Tahun 2013: jo 46/2013

  Pengangkatan Dosen

  PERDIRJEN -PB MENDIKBUD-BKN

  Tidak Tetap dalam JAFA

  DIKBUD -PERMENDIKBUD 92/2014

  pada PTN (Membatalkan

  2014 -PO 01-04-2015

  Permendikbud no. 40

• -SE

  tahun 2012)