Hubungan Sanitasi Lingkungan Rumah Tinggal Dengan Kejadian Demam Berdarah Dengue (DBD) di Kecamatan Rantau Utara Kabupaten Labuhanbatu Tahun 2016
Lampiran 1
SURAT PERSETUJUAN
(INFORMED CONCERNT)
Saya yang bertanda tangan di bawah ini:
Nama
:
Umur
:
Jenis Kelamin :
Alamat
:
Menyatakan bersedia untuk menjadi subyek penelitian dari :
Nama
: Yenni Afridayanti
NIM
: 121000256
Fakultas
: Fakultas Kesehatan Masyarakat Universitas Sumatera Utara
Setelah saya membaca prosedur penelitian yang terlampir, saya mengerti
dan memahami dengan benar prosedur penelitian dengan judul “HUBUNGAN
SANITASI LINGKUNGAN RUMAH TINGGAL DENGAN KEJADIAN
DEMAM BERDARAH DENGUE (DBD) DI KECAMATAN RANTAU
UTARA KABUPATEN LABUHANBATU TAHUN 2016”, saya menyatakan
bersedia menjadi sampel penelitian beserta segala risikonya dengan sebenarbenarnya tanpa paksaan dari pihak manapun.
Rantau Utara, .................2016
(.............................................)
86
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Lampiran 2
KUESIONER PENELITIAN
HUBUNGAN SANITASI LINGKUNGAN RUMAH TINGGAL
DENGAN KEJADIAN DEMAM BERDARAH DENGUE (DBD) DI
KECAMATAN RANTAU UTARA KABUPATEN LABUHANBATU
TAHUN 2016
A. IDENTITAS SAMPEL
Nomor Responden
: -----------------------------------------
Kelompok
: (kasus/kontrol) coret salah satu
Nama Penderita
: ----------------------------------------
Umur
: -----------------------------------------
Jenis Kelamin
: -----------------------------------------
B. DATA UMUM RESPONDEN
Nama Responden
: -----------------------------------------
Alamat
: Kelurahan ---------------------------RT/RW -------------------------------
Umur
: ----------------------------------------
Jenis Kelamin
: 1. Laki-Laki
2. Perempuan
Pendidikan
: 1. Tidak Sekolah
2. Tamat SD
3. Tamat SLTP
4. Tamat SLTA
5. Perguruan Tinggi (D-III/S-I)
Pekerjaan
: 1. Pedagang
2. Petani
3. PNS
4. Pegawai Swasta
87
Universitas Sumatera Utara
5. Buruh
6. Pelajar
7. Tidak Bekerja
8. Ibu Rumah Tangga
9. Lain-lain (Sebutkan) ------------
C. LEMBAR OBSERVASI
NO
KOMPONEN YANG DIAMATI
KRITERIA
Tempat Perindukan Nyamuk
1 Terdapat tempat penampungan air di dalam
atau di luar rumah
2 Tempat penampungan air (TPA) untuk
keperluan sehari-hari:
- Bak mandi
- Tanki reservoir
- Drum
- Tempayan
- Ember
- Gentong
- Dll..........
3 Tempat penampungan air (TPA) bukan untuk
keperluan sehari-hari:
- Vas bunga
- Tempat minum burung
- Bak kontrol
- Saluran pembuangan air
- Kulkas/dispenser
- Kaleng
- Botol
- Ban bekas
- Plastik bekas
- Dll.............
4 Tempat penampungan air (TPA) alamiah:
- Lubang pohon
- Lubang batu
- Pelepah daun
1. Ada
2. Tidak Ada
-
Ada/Tidak Ada
Ada/Tidak Ada
Ada/Tidak Ada
Ada/Tidak Ada
Ada/Tidak Ada
Ada/Tidak Ada
Ada/Tidak Ada
-
Ada/Tidak Ada
Ada/Tidak Ada
Ada/Tidak Ada
Ada/Tidak Ada
Ada/Tidak Ada
Ada/Tidak Ada
Ada/Tidak Ada
Ada/Tidak Ada
Ada/Tidak Ada
Ada/Tidak Ada
- Ada/Tidak Ada
- Ada/Tidak Ada
- Ada/Tidak Ada
88
Universitas Sumatera Utara
- Tempurung kelapa
- Pohon bambu
Sanitasi Lingkungan Rumah
- Kawat kasa pada ventilasi
5 Ventilasi di rumah
- Ada/Tidak Ada
- Ada/Tidak Ada
6
Menggunakan kawat kasa nyamuk pada
seluruh ventilasi rumah
- Kerapatan Dinding
7 Bahan yang digunakan untuk pembuatan
dinding rumah responden
8
Terdapat lubang pada dinding
- Langit-langit/plafon
9 Terdapat langit-langit/plafon
10
Ketinggian langit-langit/plafon
- Pencahayaan
11 Kondisi pencahayaan pada rumah repsonden
12
Pencahayaan dapat digunakan untuk
membaca
- Kelembaban
13 Kelembaban ruangan
- Pengelolaan sampah
14 Terdapat tempat sampah
15
1.
2.
1.
2.
Ada
Tidak Ada
Ya
Tidak
1.
2.
3.
4.
1.
2.
Bambu/ilalang
Papan
Tembok
Tembok diplester
Ya
Tidak
1.
2.
1.
2.
Ya
Tidak
< 2,5 m
≥ 2,5 m
1.
2.
3.
1.
2.
Tidak terang
Kurang terang
Terang
Ya
Tidak
1. < 40%
2. 40-70%
3. > 70%
1. Ya
2. Tidak
Jika ada, apakah memenuhi syarat:
- Tertutup
- Kedap air
- Mudah dibersihkan
- Mudah diangkut
- Tidak menjadi sarang vektor
-
Ya/Tidak
Ya/Tidak
Ya/Tidak
Ya/Tidak
Ya/Tidak
89
Universitas Sumatera Utara
16
Pengelolaan sampah yang dapat menampung
air (botol, kaleng, plastik, dll)
- Pembuangan air limbah
17 Tersedia SPAL rumah tangga
18
Jenis SPAL rumah tangga yang digunakan
19
Air tidak tergenang/mengalir dengan lancar
1. Dibuang
2. Dijual
3. Dibiarkan
terbuka
4. Dibakar
1.
2.
1.
2.
1.
2.
Ya
Tidak
Tertutup
Terbuka
Ya
Tidak
90
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Lampiran 3
MASTER DATA
Umur
Jen
Kel
Pddkn
Pkrjaan
TPA
harian
TPA
Non
harian
TPA
alamiah
Vntlasi
Dnding
Plafon
Penchyn
Kelmbbn
Sampah
PAL
Irfansyah
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
1
1
2
2
1
1
1
2
Ratna
2
2
2
2
1
2
1
1
1
2
2
2
1
1
1
Kaila Putri
1
2
1
1
2
2
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
4
2
Giem
2
2
2
1
2
2
2
1
2
1
2
1
1
1
5
1
Itis Mentari
1
2
1
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
2
2
1
1
6
2
Sri Rahayu
2
2
2
1
2
2
1
1
2
2
1
2
2
1
7
1
Rini
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
8
2
Ratibah
2
2
1
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
9
1
Alan Anggi
2
1
2
1
2
2
2
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
10
2
Sri Tia
2
2
2
1
1
2
2
1
2
1
2
2
2
1
11
1
Tio Wandani
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
1
2
2
2
1
2
1
12
2
Saminah
2
2
1
1
2
2
1
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
13
1
Emi
2
2
2
1
2
2
2
1
2
1
2
2
2
1
14
2
Lilis Supeni
2
2
2
1
2
2
1
1
2
1
1
2
2
1
15
1
Tiara
1
2
1
2
2
2
1
2
2
2
2
1
2
1
16
2
Tuti Sri Novita
2
2
2
1
2
2
1
1
2
1
2
2
2
1
17
1
Lilis Pebrianti
1
2
1
2
2
2
2
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
18
2
Wulan Safitri
2
2
2
1
2
2
1
1
2
2
2
2
1
1
19
1
Sinta
1
2
1
1
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
20
2
Anita
2
2
2
1
2
2
1
1
2
2
1
2
2
1
21
1
Mukhlis Ritonga
2
1
2
2
2
2
2
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
22
2
Mis Bawor
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
2
1
1
No
Status
Resp
1
1
2
3
Nama Responden
91
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Umur
Jen
Kel
Pddkn
Pkrjaan
TPA
harian
TPA
Non
harian
TPA
alamiah
Vntlasi
Dnding
Plafon
Penchyn
Kelmbbn
Sampah
PAL
Febri
1
1
1
1
2
2
1
1
2
2
1
2
1
1
2
Melyana
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
Daffa Al-Hafiz
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
2
Rahman
2
1
2
2
2
2
2
1
2
2
1
2
2
1
1
Tasya Melani
1
2
1
1
2
1
2
1
2
2
1
2
2
1
2
Hasnah
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
Dalilah Khairiyah
2
2
2
2
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
2
Henri Alim
2
1
2
1
2
2
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
Munawir
2
1
2
1
2
1
1
1
1
2
1
2
1
1
32
2
Suleman
2
1
2
2
2
2
1
1
2
2
1
2
1
1
33
1
Dewi Hotmaida
2
2
2
2
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
2
1
2
34
2
Tinsan Marpaung
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
2
2
2
2
1
35
1
Rafael Alexandro S
1
1
1
1
2
2
1
2
2
1
1
1
2
2
36
2
Lismah
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
37
1
Ruben Franchesia
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
2
1
2
2
1
38
2
Harungguan Siregar
2
1
1
2
2
2
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
39
1
Fadlan Habibi
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
40
2
Bambang R Ginting
2
1
2
1
2
2
1
2
2
2
1
2
2
2
41
1
Katerin
1
2
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
1
42
2
Mei Sari
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
43
1
Salsabila
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
1
2
2
1
2
2
1
44
2
Sangkot
2
1
2
2
2
2
1
2
2
2
2
1
2
2
45
1
Eka Destiani Safitri
2
2
2
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
46
2
1
Nofriyanti
M. Risky
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
2
2
2
2
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
2
2
2
2
1
1
No
Status
Resp
23
1
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
47
Nama Responden
92
Universitas Sumatera Utara
No
Status
Resp
48
2
49
1
50
Umur
Jen
Kel
Pddkn
Pkrjaan
TPA
harian
TPA
Non
harian
TPA
alamiah
Vntlasi
Dnding
Plafon
Penchyn
Kelmbbn
Sampah
PAL
Karina S
2
2
2
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
Yosua Sianipar
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
2
2
2
2
1
1
2
2
2
2
1
2
Nama Responden
2
Eben Ezer
Keterangan:
No
= Nomor Urut
Status Resp
= Status Responden (1=kasus ; 2=kontrol)
Umur
= Umur Responden (1= 0-15 tahun ; 2= >15 tahun)
Jen Kel
= Jenis Kelamin (1=laki-laki ; 2=perempuan)
Pddkn
= Pendidikan (1=rendah ; 2=tinggi)
Pkrjaan
= Pekerjaan (1=Tidak bekerja ; 2=Bekerja)
TPA harian
= Tempat penampungan air untuk keperluan sehari-hari (1=Ada ; 2=Tidak Ada)
TPA non harian
= Tempat penampungan air bukan untuk keperluan sehari-hari (1=Ada ; 2=Tidak Ada)
TPA Alamiah
= Tempat penampungan air alamiah (1=Ada ; 2=Tidak Ada)
Vntlasi
= Ventilasi (1=Tidak Berkasa ; 2=Berkasa)
Dnding
= Dinding (1=Tidak Rapat ; 2=Rapat)
Plafon
= Langit-langit/Plafon (1=tidak memenuhi syarat ; 2= memenuhi syarat)
Panchyn
= Pencahayaan (1=tidak memenuhi syarat ; 2= memenuhi syarat)
Kelmbbn
= Kelembaban (1=tidak memenuhi syarat ; 2= memenuhi syarat)
Sampah
= Pengelolaan Sampah (1=tidak memenuhi syarat ; 2= memenuhi syarat)
PAL
= Pembuangan air limbah (1=tidak memenuhi syarat ; 2= memenuhi syarat)
93
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Lampiran 4
Output SPSS
Frequencies Responden Kasus
Statistics
Jeni
TP
U
s
A
mu Kela Pendi Peker Hari
r min dikan jaan an
N Vali
d
Miss
ing
25
25
25
25
0
0
0
0
TP
A
Venti Kerap
Pengel
non TPA lasi atan LangitKelemb olaan
hari Ala Berk Dindin langit/p Pencah aban Sampa SP
an miah asa
g
lafon ayaan
(%)
h
AL
25 25
0
25
25
25
25
25
25
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
25 25
0
0
Frequency Table
Umur
Frequency
Valid
0-15 Tahun
Percent
18
>15 Tahun
Total
Valid Percent
72.0
Cumulative Percent
72.0
72.0
100.0
7
28.0
28.0
25
100.0
100.0
Jenis Kelamin
Frequency
Valid
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
Laki-Laki
12
48.0
48.0
48.0
Perempuan
13
52.0
52.0
100.0
Total
25
100.0
100.0
Pendidikan
Frequency
Valid
Rendah (Tidak Sekolah, SD,
SLTP)
Tinggi (SLTA, Perguruan
Tinggi)
Total
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
18
72.0
72.0
72.0
7
28.0
28.0
100.0
25
100.0
100.0
Pekerjaan
Frequency
Valid
Tidak Bekerja
Bekerja
Total
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
20
80.0
80.0
80.0
5
20.0
20.0
100.0
25
100.0
100.0
TPA Harian
94
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Frequency
Valid
Ada
Percent
17
Tidak Ada
Total
Valid Percent
68.0
Cumulative Percent
68.0
68.0
100.0
8
32.0
32.0
25
100.0
100.0
TPA non harian
Frequency
Valid
Ada
Tidak Ada
Total
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
20
80.0
80.0
80.0
5
20.0
20.0
100.0
25
100.0
100.0
TPA Alamiah
Frequency
Valid
Ada
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
9
36.0
36.0
36.0
Tidak Ada
16
64.0
64.0
100.0
Total
25
100.0
100.0
Ventilasi Berkasa
Frequency
Valid
Tidak
Ya
Total
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
23
92.0
92.0
92.0
2
8.0
8.0
100.0
25
100.0
100.0
Kerapatan Dinding
Frequency
Valid
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
Tidak Rapat
10
40.0
40.0
40.0
Rapat
15
60.0
60.0
100.0
Total
25
100.0
100.0
Langit-langit/plafon
Frequency
Valid
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Tidak Memenuhi Syarat
15
60.0
60.0
60.0
Memenuhi Syarat
10
40.0
40.0
100.0
Total
25
100.0
100.0
Pencahayaan
Frequency
Valid
Tidak Memenuhi Syarat
Memenuhi Syarat
Total
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
19
76.0
76.0
76.0
6
24.0
24.0
100.0
25
100.0
100.0
95
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Kelembaban (%)
Frequency
Valid
Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid Percent
Tidak Memenuhi Syarat
10
40.0
40.0
40.0
Memenuhi Syarat
15
60.0
60.0
100.0
Total
25
100.0
100.0
Pengelolaan Sampah
Frequency
Valid
Tidak Memenuhi Syarat
Cumulative
Percent
Valid Percent
16
64.0
64.0
64.0
9
36.0
36.0
100.0
25
100.0
100.0
Memenuhi Syarat
Total
Percent
SPAL
Frequency
Valid
Tidak Memenuhi Syarat
Memenuhi Syarat
Total
Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid Percent
23
92.0
92.0
92.0
2
8.0
8.0
100.0
25
100.0
100.0
Frequencies Responden Kontrol
Statistics
Jeni
TP
U
s
A
mu Kela Pendi Peker Hari
r min dikan jaan an
N Vali
d
Miss
ing
25
25
25
25
0
0
0
0
TP
A
Venti Kerap
Pengel
non TPA lasi atan LangitKelemb olaan
hari Ala Berk Dindin langit/p Pencah aban Sampa SP
an miah asa
g
lafon ayaan
(%)
h
AL
25 25
0
25
25
25
25
25
25
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
25 25
0
0
Frequency Table
Umur
Frequency
Valid
>15 Tahun
Percent
25
100.0
Valid Percent
100.0
Cumulative Percent
100.0
Jenis Kelamin
Frequency
Valid
Laki-Laki
Percent
7
28.0
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
28.0
28.0
100.0
Perempuan
18
72.0
72.0
Total
25
100.0
100.0
96
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Pendidikan
Frequency
Valid
Rendah (Tidak Sekolah, SD,
SLTP)
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
3
12.0
12.0
12.0
Tinggi (SLTA, Perguruan
Tinggi)
22
88.0
88.0
100.0
Total
25
100.0
100.0
Pekerjaan
Frequency
Valid
Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid Percent
Tidak Bekerja
12
48.0
48.0
48.0
Bekerja
13
52.0
52.0
100.0
Total
25
100.0
100.0
TPA Harian
Frequency
Valid
Ada
Tidak Ada
Total
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
23
92.0
92.0
92.0
2
8.0
8.0
100.0
25
100.0
100.0
TPA non harian
Frequency
Valid
Ada
Percent
25
Valid Percent
100.0
Cumulative Percent
100.0
100.0
TPA Alamiah
Frequency
Valid
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
Ada
10
40.0
40.0
40.0
Tidak Ada
15
60.0
60.0
100.0
Total
25
100.0
100.0
Ventilasi Berkasa
Frequency
Valid
Tidak
Ya
Total
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
16
64.0
64.0
64.0
9
36.0
36.0
100.0
25
100.0
100.0
Kerapatan Dinding
Frequency
Valid
Tidak Rapat
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
3
12.0
12.0
12.0
Rapat
22
88.0
88.0
100.0
Total
25
100.0
100.0
97
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Langit-langit/plafon
Frequency
Valid
Tidak Memenuhi Syarat
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
7
28.0
28.0
28.0
Memenuhi Syarat
18
72.0
72.0
100.0
Total
25
100.0
100.0
Pencahayaan
Frequency
Valid
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Tidak Memenuhi Syarat
10
40.0
40.0
40.0
Memenuhi Syarat
15
60.0
60.0
100.0
Total
25
100.0
100.0
Kelembaban (%)
Frequency
Valid
Tidak Memenuhi Syarat
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
2
8.0
8.0
8.0
Memenuhi Syarat
23
92.0
92.0
100.0
Total
25
100.0
100.0
Pengelolaan Sampah
Frequency
Valid
Tidak Memenuhi Syarat
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
8
32.0
32.0
32.0
Memenuhi Syarat
17
68.0
68.0
100.0
Total
25
100.0
100.0
SPAL
Frequency
Valid
Tidak Memenuhi Syarat
15
Memenuhi Syarat
10
Total
25
Percent
Valid Percent
60.0
Cumulative
Percent
60.0
60.0
40.0
40.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
98
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Crosstabs
Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid
N
Umur * Status Responden
Jenis Kelamin * Status
Responden
Pendidikan * Status
Responden
Pekerjaan * Status
Responden
TPA Harian * Status
Responden
TPA non harian * Status
Responden
TPA Alamiah * Status
Responden
Ventilasi Berkasa * Status
Responden
Kerapatan Dinding * Status
Responden
Langit-langit/plafon * Status
Responden
Pencahayaan * Status
Responden
Kelembaban (%) * Status
Responden
Pengelolaan Sampah *
Status Responden
SPAL * Status Responden
Missing
Percent
N
Total
Percent
N
Percent
50
100.0%
0
.0%
50
100.0%
50
100.0%
0
.0%
50
100.0%
50
100.0%
0
.0%
50
100.0%
50
100.0%
0
.0%
50
100.0%
50
100.0%
0
.0%
50
100.0%
50
100.0%
0
.0%
50
100.0%
50
100.0%
0
.0%
50
100.0%
50
100.0%
0
.0%
50
100.0%
50
100.0%
0
.0%
50
100.0%
50
100.0%
0
.0%
50
100.0%
50
100.0%
0
.0%
50
100.0%
50
100.0%
0
.0%
50
100.0%
50
100.0%
0
.0%
50
100.0%
50
100.0%
0
.0%
50
100.0%
99
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Umur * Status Responden
Crosstab
Status Responden
Kasus
Umur
0-15 Tahun
18
0
18
Expected Count
9.0
9.0
18.0
100.0%
.0%
100.0%
% within Status Responden
72.0%
.0%
36.0%
% of Total
36.0%
.0%
36.0%
7
25
32
16.0
16.0
32.0
% within Umur
21.9%
78.1%
100.0%
% within Status Responden
28.0%
100.0%
64.0%
% of Total
14.0%
50.0%
64.0%
25
25
50
Count
Expected Count
Total
Total
Count
% within Umur
>15 Tahun
Kontrol
Count
Expected Count
% within Umur
% within Status Responden
% of Total
25.0
25.0
50.0
50.0%
50.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50.0%
50.0%
100.0%
Chi-Square Testsd
Value
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctionb
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
df
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
28.125a
25.087
35.694
1
1
1
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
27.562c
1
.000
.000
.000
Point
Probability
.000
50
Risk Estimate
95% Confidence Interval
Value
For cohort Status Responden = Kasus
N of Valid Cases
4.571
50
Lower
Upper
2.375
8.799
100
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Jenis Kelamin * Status Responden
Crosstab
Status Responden
Kasus
Jenis Kelamin
Laki-Laki
Perempuan
Total
Count
12
7
19
Expected Count
9.5
9.5
19.0
% within Jenis Kelamin
63.2%
36.8%
100.0%
% within Status Responden
48.0%
28.0%
38.0%
% of Total
24.0%
14.0%
38.0%
13
18
31
15.5
15.5
31.0
% within Jenis Kelamin
41.9%
58.1%
100.0%
% within Status Responden
52.0%
72.0%
62.0%
% of Total
26.0%
36.0%
62.0%
25
25
50
Count
Expected Count
Total
Kontrol
Count
Expected Count
% within Jenis Kelamin
% within Status Responden
% of Total
25.0
25.0
50.0
50.0%
50.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50.0%
50.0%
100.0%
Chi-Square Testsd
Value
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctionb
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
df
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
2.122a
1.358
2.141
1
1
1
.145
.244
.143
.244
.122
.244
.244
.122
.122
2.080c
1
.149
.244
.122
Point
Probability
.082
50
Risk Estimate
95% Confidence Interval
Value
Odds Ratio for Jenis Kelamin (Laki-Laki /
Perempuan)
For cohort Status Responden = Kasus
For cohort Status Responden = Kontrol
N of Valid Cases
Lower
Upper
2.374
.734
7.677
1.506
.635
50
.879
.328
2.579
1.228
101
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Pendidikan * Status Responden
Crosstab
Status Responden
Kasus
Pendidikan
Rendah (Tidak Sekolah,
SD, SLTP)
Count
Total
18
3
21
10.5
10.5
21.0
% within Pendidikan
85.7%
14.3%
100.0%
% within Status
Responden
72.0%
12.0%
42.0%
% of Total
36.0%
6.0%
42.0%
7
22
29
14.5
14.5
29.0
% within Pendidikan
24.1%
75.9%
100.0%
% within Status
Responden
28.0%
88.0%
58.0%
% of Total
14.0%
44.0%
58.0%
25
25
50
25.0
25.0
50.0
50.0%
50.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50.0%
50.0%
100.0%
Expected Count
Tinggi (SLTA, Perguruan Count
Tinggi)
Expected Count
Total
Kontrol
Count
Expected Count
% within Pendidikan
% within Status
Responden
% of Total
Chi-Square Testsd
Value
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctionb
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
df
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
18.473a
16.092
20.035
1
1
1
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
18.103c
1
.000
.000
.000
Point
Probability
.000
50
Risk Estimate
95% Confidence Interval
Value
Odds Ratio for Pendidikan (Rendah
(Tidak Sekolah, SD, SLTP) / Tinggi
(SLTA, Perguruan Tinggi))
For cohort Status Responden = Kasus
For cohort Status Responden = Kontrol
N of Valid Cases
Lower
Upper
18.857
4.254
83.592
3.551
.188
50
1.820
.065
6.929
.548
102
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Pekerjaan * Status Responden
Crosstab
Status Responden
Kasus
Pekerjaan
Tidak Bekerja
Count
12
32
16.0
16.0
32.0
% within Pekerjaan
62.5%
37.5%
100.0%
% within Status Responden
80.0%
48.0%
64.0%
% of Total
40.0%
24.0%
64.0%
5
13
18
9.0
9.0
18.0
% within Pekerjaan
27.8%
72.2%
100.0%
% within Status Responden
20.0%
52.0%
36.0%
% of Total
10.0%
26.0%
36.0%
25
25
50
Count
Expected Count
Total
Total
20
Expected Count
Bekerja
Kontrol
Count
Expected Count
% within Pekerjaan
% within Status Responden
% of Total
25.0
25.0
50.0
50.0%
50.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50.0%
50.0%
100.0%
Chi-Square Testsd
Value
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctionb
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
df
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
5.556a
4.253
5.704
1
1
1
.018
.039
.017
.038
.019
.038
.038
.019
.019
5.444c
1
.020
.038
.019
Point
Probability
.015
50
Risk Estimate
95% Confidence Interval
Value
Odds Ratio for Pekerjaan (Tidak Bekerja
/ Bekerja)
For cohort Status Responden = Kasus
For cohort Status Responden = Kontrol
N of Valid Cases
Lower
Upper
4.333
1.235
15.206
2.250
.519
50
1.019
.305
4.966
.883
103
Universitas Sumatera Utara
TPA Harian * Status Responden
Crosstab
Status Responden
Kasus
TPA Harian
Ada
Count
23
40
20.0
20.0
40.0
% within TPA Harian
42.5%
57.5%
100.0%
% within Status Responden
68.0%
92.0%
80.0%
% of Total
34.0%
46.0%
80.0%
8
2
10
5.0
5.0
10.0
% within TPA Harian
80.0%
20.0%
100.0%
% within Status Responden
32.0%
8.0%
20.0%
% of Total
16.0%
4.0%
20.0%
25
25
50
Count
Expected Count
Total
Total
17
Expected Count
Tidak Ada
Kontrol
Count
Expected Count
% within TPA Harian
% within Status Responden
% of Total
25.0
25.0
50.0
50.0%
50.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50.0%
50.0%
100.0%
Chi-Square Testsd
Value
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctionb
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
df
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
4.500a
3.125
4.758
1
1
1
.034
.077
.029
.074
.037
.074
.074
.037
.037
4.410c
1
.036
.074
.037
Point
Probability
.032
50
Risk Estimate
95% Confidence Interval
Value
Odds Ratio for TPA Harian (Ada / Tidak
Ada)
For cohort Status Responden = Kasus
For cohort Status Responden = Kontrol
N of Valid Cases
Lower
Upper
.185
.035
.983
.531
2.875
50
.330
.809
.855
10.216
104
Universitas Sumatera Utara
TPA non harian * Status Responden
Crosstab
Status Responden
Kasus
TPA non harian
Ada
Count
25
45
22.5
22.5
45.0
% within TPA non harian
44.4%
55.6%
100.0%
% within Status Responden
80.0%
100.0%
90.0%
% of Total
40.0%
50.0%
90.0%
5
0
5
2.5
2.5
5.0
100.0%
.0%
100.0%
% within Status Responden
20.0%
.0%
10.0%
% of Total
10.0%
.0%
10.0%
25
25
50
Count
Expected Count
% within TPA non harian
Total
Total
20
Expected Count
Tidak Ada
Kontrol
Count
Expected Count
% within TPA non harian
% within Status Responden
% of Total
25.0
25.0
50.0
50.0%
50.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50.0%
50.0%
100.0%
Chi-Square Testsd
Value
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctionb
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
df
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
5.556a
3.556
7.488
1
1
1
.018
.059
.006
.050
.025
.050
.050
.025
.025
5.444c
1
.020
.050
.025
Point
Probability
.025
50
Risk Estimate
95% Confidence Interval
Value
For cohort Status Responden = Kasus
N of Valid Cases
Lower
.444
50
Upper
.321
.616
105
Universitas Sumatera Utara
TPA Alamiah * Status Responden
Crosstab
Status Responden
Kasus
TPA Alamiah
Ada
Count
10
19
9.5
9.5
19.0
% within TPA Alamiah
47.4%
52.6%
100.0%
% within Status Responden
36.0%
40.0%
38.0%
% of Total
18.0%
20.0%
38.0%
16
15
31
15.5
15.5
31.0
% within TPA Alamiah
51.6%
48.4%
100.0%
% within Status Responden
64.0%
60.0%
62.0%
% of Total
32.0%
30.0%
62.0%
25
25
50
Count
Expected Count
Total
Total
9
Expected Count
Tidak Ada
Kontrol
Count
Expected Count
% within TPA Alamiah
% within Status Responden
% of Total
25.0
25.0
50.0
50.0%
50.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50.0%
50.0%
100.0%
Chi-Square Testsd
Value
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctionb
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
df
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
.085a
.000
.085
1
1
1
.771
1.000
.771
1.000
.500
1.000
1.000
.500
.500
.083c
1
.773
1.000
.500
Point
Probability
.220
50
Risk Estimate
95% Confidence Interval
Value
Odds Ratio for TPA Alamiah (Ada / Tidak
Ada)
For cohort Status Responden = Kasus
For cohort Status Responden = Kontrol
N of Valid Cases
Lower
Upper
.844
.269
2.647
.918
1.088
50
.512
.621
1.645
1.905
106
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Ventilasi Berkasa * Status Responden
Crosstab
Status Responden
Kasus
Ventilasi Berkasa
Tidak
Count
16
39
19.5
19.5
39.0
% within Ventilasi Berkasa
59.0%
41.0%
100.0%
% within Status Responden
92.0%
64.0%
78.0%
% of Total
46.0%
32.0%
78.0%
2
9
11
5.5
5.5
11.0
% within Ventilasi Berkasa
18.2%
81.8%
100.0%
% within Status Responden
8.0%
36.0%
22.0%
% of Total
4.0%
18.0%
22.0%
25
25
50
Count
Expected Count
Total
Total
23
Expected Count
Ya
Kontrol
Count
Expected Count
25.0
25.0
50.0
% within Ventilasi Berkasa
50.0%
50.0%
100.0%
% within Status Responden
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50.0%
50.0%
100.0%
% of Total
Chi-Square Testsd
Value
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctionb
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
df
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
5.711a
4.196
6.081
1
1
1
.017
.041
.014
.037
.019
.037
.037
.019
.019
5.597c
1
.018
.037
.019
Point
Probability
.016
50
Risk Estimate
95% Confidence Interval
Value
Odds Ratio for Ventilasi Berkasa (Tidak /
Ya)
For cohort Status Responden = Kasus
For cohort Status Responden = Kontrol
N of Valid Cases
Lower
Upper
6.469
1.230
34.012
3.244
.501
50
.901
.314
11.673
.801
107
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Kerapatan Dinding * Status Responden
Status Responden
Kasus
Kerapatan Dinding
Tidak Rapat
Rapat
Total
Count
10
3
13
Expected Count
6.5
6.5
13.0
% within Kerapatan
Dinding
76.9%
23.1%
100.0%
% within Status
Responden
40.0%
12.0%
26.0%
% of Total
20.0%
6.0%
26.0%
15
22
37
18.5
18.5
37.0
% within Kerapatan
Dinding
40.5%
59.5%
100.0%
% within Status
Responden
60.0%
88.0%
74.0%
% of Total
30.0%
44.0%
74.0%
Count
Expected Count
Total
Kontrol
Count
25
25
50
25.0
25.0
50.0
50.0%
50.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50.0%
50.0%
100.0%
Expected Count
% within Kerapatan
Dinding
% within Status
Responden
% of Total
Chi-Square Testsd
Value
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctionb
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
df
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
5.094a
3.742
5.309
1
1
1
.024
.053
.021
.051
.025
.051
.051
.025
.025
4.992c
1
.025
.051
.025
Point
Probability
.021
50
Risk Estimate
95% Confidence Interval
Value
Odds Ratio for Kerapatan Dinding (Tidak
Rapat / Rapat)
For cohort Status Responden = Kasus
For cohort Status Responden = Kontrol
N of Valid Cases
Lower
Upper
4.889
1.150
20.790
1.897
.388
50
1.161
.139
3.100
1.084
108
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Langit-langit/plafon * Status Responden
Crosstab
Status Responden
Kasus
Langitlangit/plafon
Tidak Memenuhi
Syarat
Count
Memenuhi Syarat
Total
15
7
22
Expected Count
11.0
11.0
22.0
% within Langitlangit/plafon
68.2%
31.8%
100.0%
% within Status
Responden
60.0%
28.0%
44.0%
% of Total
30.0%
14.0%
44.0%
10
18
28
Expected Count
14.0
14.0
28.0
% within Langitlangit/plafon
35.7%
64.3%
100.0%
% within Status
Responden
40.0%
72.0%
56.0%
% of Total
20.0%
36.0%
56.0%
Count
Total
Kontrol
Count
25
25
50
Expected Count
25.0
25.0
50.0
% within Langitlangit/plafon
50.0%
50.0%
100.0%
% within Status
Responden
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50.0%
50.0%
100.0%
% of Total
Chi-Square Testsd
Value
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctionb
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
df
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
5.195a
3.977
5.295
1
1
1
.023
.046
.021
.045
.023
.045
.045
.023
.023
5.091c
1
.024
.045
.023
Point
Probability
.018
50
Risk Estimate
95% Confidence Interval
Value
Odds Ratio for Langit-langit/plafon (Tidak
Memenuhi Syarat / Memenuhi Syarat)
For cohort Status Responden = Kasus
For cohort Status Responden = Kontrol
N of Valid Cases
Lower
Upper
3.857
1.180
12.606
1.909
.495
50
1.076
.253
3.386
.968
109
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Pencahayaan * Status Responden
Crosstab
Status Responden
Kasus
Pencahayaan Tidak Memenuhi
Syarat
Count
10
29
14.5
14.5
29.0
% within Pencahayaan
65.5%
34.5%
100.0%
% within Status
Responden
76.0%
40.0%
58.0%
% of Total
38.0%
20.0%
58.0%
6
15
21
10.5
10.5
21.0
% within Pencahayaan
28.6%
71.4%
100.0%
% within Status
Responden
24.0%
60.0%
42.0%
% of Total
12.0%
30.0%
42.0%
25
25
50
25.0
25.0
50.0
50.0%
50.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50.0%
50.0%
100.0%
Count
Expected Count
Total
Total
19
Expected Count
Memenuhi Syarat
Kontrol
Count
Expected Count
% within Pencahayaan
% within Status
Responden
% of Total
Chi-Square Testsd
Value
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctionb
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
df
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
6.650a
5.255
6.825
1
1
1
.010
.022
.009
.021
.010
.021
.021
.010
.010
6.517c
1
.011
.021
.010
Point
Probability
.009
50
Risk Estimate
95% Confidence Interval
Value
Odds Ratio for Pencahayaan (Tidak
Memenuhi Syarat / Memenuhi Syarat)
For cohort Status Responden = Kasus
For cohort Status Responden = Kontrol
N of Valid Cases
Lower
Upper
4.750
1.406
16.051
2.293
.483
50
1.110
.273
4.739
.854
110
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Kelembaban (%) * Status Responden
Crosstab
Status Responden
Kasus
Kelembaban (%) Tidak Memenuhi
Syarat
Memenuhi Syarat
Total
Count
10
2
12
Expected Count
6.0
6.0
12.0
% within Kelembaban
(%)
83.3%
16.7%
100.0%
% within Status
Responden
40.0%
8.0%
24.0%
% of Total
20.0%
4.0%
24.0%
15
23
38
19.0
19.0
38.0
% within Kelembaban
(%)
39.5%
60.5%
100.0%
% within Status
Responden
60.0%
92.0%
76.0%
% of Total
30.0%
46.0%
76.0%
Count
Expected Count
Total
Kontrol
Count
25
25
50
25.0
25.0
50.0
50.0%
50.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50.0%
50.0%
100.0%
Expected Count
% within Kelembaban
(%)
% within Status
Responden
% of Total
Chi-Square Testsd
Value
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctionb
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
df
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
7.018a
5.373
7.519
1
1
1
.008
.020
.006
.018
.009
.018
.018
.009
.009
6.877c
1
.009
.018
.009
Point
Probability
.008
50
Risk Estimate
95% Confidence Interval
Value
Odds Ratio for Kelembaban (%) (Tidak
Memenuhi Syarat / Memenuhi Syarat)
For cohort Status Responden = Kasus
For cohort Status Responden = Kontrol
N of Valid Cases
Lower
Upper
7.667
1.470
39.987
2.111
.275
50
1.322
.076
3.371
1.001
111
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Pengelolaan Sampah * Status Responden
Crosstab
Status Responden
Kasus
Pengelolaan
Sampah
Tidak Memenuhi
Syarat
Count
8
24
12.0
12.0
24.0
% within Pengelolaan
Sampah
66.7%
33.3%
100.0%
% within Status
Responden
64.0%
32.0%
48.0%
% of Total
32.0%
16.0%
48.0%
9
17
26
13.0
13.0
26.0
% within Pengelolaan
Sampah
34.6%
65.4%
100.0%
% within Status
Responden
36.0%
68.0%
52.0%
% of Total
18.0%
34.0%
52.0%
Count
Expected Count
Total
Total
16
Expected Count
Memenuhi Syarat
Kontrol
Count
25
25
50
25.0
25.0
50.0
50.0%
50.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50.0%
50.0%
100.0%
Expected Count
% within Pengelolaan
Sampah
% within Status
Responden
% of Total
Chi-Square Testsd
Value
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctionb
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
df
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
5.128a
3.926
5.220
1
1
1
.024
.048
.022
.046
.023
.046
.046
.023
.023
5.026c
1
.025
.046
.023
Point
Probability
.018
50
Risk Estimate
95% Confidence Interval
Value
Odds Ratio for Pengelolaan Sampah
(Tidak Memenuhi Syarat / Memenuhi
Syarat)
For cohort Status Responden = Kasus
For cohort Status Responden = Kontrol
N of Valid Cases
Lower
Upper
3.778
1.170
12.194
1.926
.510
50
1.058
.271
3.507
.958
112
Universitas Sumatera Utara
SPAL * Status Responden
Crosstab
Status Responden
Kasus
SPAL
Tidak Memenuhi Syarat
Count
15
38
19.0
19.0
38.0
% within SPAL
60.5%
39.5%
100.0%
% within Status Responden
92.0%
60.0%
76.0%
% of Total
46.0%
30.0%
76.0%
2
10
12
6.0
6.0
12.0
16.7%
83.3%
100.0%
% within Status Responden
8.0%
40.0%
24.0%
% of Total
4.0%
20.0%
24.0%
25
25
50
Count
Expected Count
% within SPAL
Total
Total
23
Expected Count
Memenuhi Syarat
Kontrol
Count
Expected Count
% within SPAL
% within Status Responden
% of Total
25.0
25.0
50.0
50.0%
50.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50.0%
50.0%
100.0%
Chi-Square Testsd
Value
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctionb
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
df
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
7.018a
5.373
7.519
1
1
1
.008
.020
.006
.018
.009
.018
.018
.009
.009
6.877c
1
.009
.018
.009
Point
Probability
.008
50
Risk Estimate
95% Confidence Interval
Value
Odds Ratio for SPAL (Tidak Memenuhi
Syarat / Memenuhi Syarat)
For cohort Status Responden = Kasus
For cohort Status Responden = Kontrol
N of Valid Cases
Lower
Upper
7.667
1.470
39.987
3.632
.474
50
.999
.297
13.205
.756
113
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Lampiran 5
DOKUMENTASI PENELITIAN
Lampiran Gambar 1. Wawancara responden kasus bersama dengan tenaga
Dinas Kesehatan Kabupaten Labuhanbatu
Lampiran Gambar 2. Wawancara responden kasus bersama dengan tenaga
Dinas Kesehatan Kabupaten Labuhanbatu
114
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Gambar Lampiran 3. Kondisi Perumahan Responen Kasus
Gambar Lampiran 4. Kondisi halaman sekitar rumah responden kasus
115
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Gambar Lampiran 5. Halaman rumah responden Kasus
Gambar Lampiran 6. Tempat penampungan air untuk keperluan sehari-hari
di rumah responden Kasus
116
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Gambar Lampiran 7. Kondisi tempat penampungan air di rumah responden
kasus
Gambar Lampiran 8. Tempat penampungan air bukan untuk keperluan
sehari-hari di rumah responden kontrol
117
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Gambar Lampiran 9. Ventilasi Rumah Responden Kasus Tidak Berkasa
Gambar Lampiran 10. Pengukuran Kelembaban dengan menggunakan alat
hygrometer
118
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Gambar Lampiran 11. Pengelolaan sampah di rumah responden kasus
dengan cara dibakar
Gambar Lampiran 12. Saluran Pembuangan Air Limbah yang tidak
mengalir dengan lancar di rumah responden kasus
119
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Lampiran 6. Surat Permohonan Izin Survei Pendahuluan
120
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Lampiran 7. Surat Permohonan Izin Penelitian
121
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Lampiran 8. Surat Izin Penelitian dari Dinas Kesehatan Kabupaten
Labuhanbatu
122
Universitas Sumatera Utara
SURAT PERSETUJUAN
(INFORMED CONCERNT)
Saya yang bertanda tangan di bawah ini:
Nama
:
Umur
:
Jenis Kelamin :
Alamat
:
Menyatakan bersedia untuk menjadi subyek penelitian dari :
Nama
: Yenni Afridayanti
NIM
: 121000256
Fakultas
: Fakultas Kesehatan Masyarakat Universitas Sumatera Utara
Setelah saya membaca prosedur penelitian yang terlampir, saya mengerti
dan memahami dengan benar prosedur penelitian dengan judul “HUBUNGAN
SANITASI LINGKUNGAN RUMAH TINGGAL DENGAN KEJADIAN
DEMAM BERDARAH DENGUE (DBD) DI KECAMATAN RANTAU
UTARA KABUPATEN LABUHANBATU TAHUN 2016”, saya menyatakan
bersedia menjadi sampel penelitian beserta segala risikonya dengan sebenarbenarnya tanpa paksaan dari pihak manapun.
Rantau Utara, .................2016
(.............................................)
86
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Lampiran 2
KUESIONER PENELITIAN
HUBUNGAN SANITASI LINGKUNGAN RUMAH TINGGAL
DENGAN KEJADIAN DEMAM BERDARAH DENGUE (DBD) DI
KECAMATAN RANTAU UTARA KABUPATEN LABUHANBATU
TAHUN 2016
A. IDENTITAS SAMPEL
Nomor Responden
: -----------------------------------------
Kelompok
: (kasus/kontrol) coret salah satu
Nama Penderita
: ----------------------------------------
Umur
: -----------------------------------------
Jenis Kelamin
: -----------------------------------------
B. DATA UMUM RESPONDEN
Nama Responden
: -----------------------------------------
Alamat
: Kelurahan ---------------------------RT/RW -------------------------------
Umur
: ----------------------------------------
Jenis Kelamin
: 1. Laki-Laki
2. Perempuan
Pendidikan
: 1. Tidak Sekolah
2. Tamat SD
3. Tamat SLTP
4. Tamat SLTA
5. Perguruan Tinggi (D-III/S-I)
Pekerjaan
: 1. Pedagang
2. Petani
3. PNS
4. Pegawai Swasta
87
Universitas Sumatera Utara
5. Buruh
6. Pelajar
7. Tidak Bekerja
8. Ibu Rumah Tangga
9. Lain-lain (Sebutkan) ------------
C. LEMBAR OBSERVASI
NO
KOMPONEN YANG DIAMATI
KRITERIA
Tempat Perindukan Nyamuk
1 Terdapat tempat penampungan air di dalam
atau di luar rumah
2 Tempat penampungan air (TPA) untuk
keperluan sehari-hari:
- Bak mandi
- Tanki reservoir
- Drum
- Tempayan
- Ember
- Gentong
- Dll..........
3 Tempat penampungan air (TPA) bukan untuk
keperluan sehari-hari:
- Vas bunga
- Tempat minum burung
- Bak kontrol
- Saluran pembuangan air
- Kulkas/dispenser
- Kaleng
- Botol
- Ban bekas
- Plastik bekas
- Dll.............
4 Tempat penampungan air (TPA) alamiah:
- Lubang pohon
- Lubang batu
- Pelepah daun
1. Ada
2. Tidak Ada
-
Ada/Tidak Ada
Ada/Tidak Ada
Ada/Tidak Ada
Ada/Tidak Ada
Ada/Tidak Ada
Ada/Tidak Ada
Ada/Tidak Ada
-
Ada/Tidak Ada
Ada/Tidak Ada
Ada/Tidak Ada
Ada/Tidak Ada
Ada/Tidak Ada
Ada/Tidak Ada
Ada/Tidak Ada
Ada/Tidak Ada
Ada/Tidak Ada
Ada/Tidak Ada
- Ada/Tidak Ada
- Ada/Tidak Ada
- Ada/Tidak Ada
88
Universitas Sumatera Utara
- Tempurung kelapa
- Pohon bambu
Sanitasi Lingkungan Rumah
- Kawat kasa pada ventilasi
5 Ventilasi di rumah
- Ada/Tidak Ada
- Ada/Tidak Ada
6
Menggunakan kawat kasa nyamuk pada
seluruh ventilasi rumah
- Kerapatan Dinding
7 Bahan yang digunakan untuk pembuatan
dinding rumah responden
8
Terdapat lubang pada dinding
- Langit-langit/plafon
9 Terdapat langit-langit/plafon
10
Ketinggian langit-langit/plafon
- Pencahayaan
11 Kondisi pencahayaan pada rumah repsonden
12
Pencahayaan dapat digunakan untuk
membaca
- Kelembaban
13 Kelembaban ruangan
- Pengelolaan sampah
14 Terdapat tempat sampah
15
1.
2.
1.
2.
Ada
Tidak Ada
Ya
Tidak
1.
2.
3.
4.
1.
2.
Bambu/ilalang
Papan
Tembok
Tembok diplester
Ya
Tidak
1.
2.
1.
2.
Ya
Tidak
< 2,5 m
≥ 2,5 m
1.
2.
3.
1.
2.
Tidak terang
Kurang terang
Terang
Ya
Tidak
1. < 40%
2. 40-70%
3. > 70%
1. Ya
2. Tidak
Jika ada, apakah memenuhi syarat:
- Tertutup
- Kedap air
- Mudah dibersihkan
- Mudah diangkut
- Tidak menjadi sarang vektor
-
Ya/Tidak
Ya/Tidak
Ya/Tidak
Ya/Tidak
Ya/Tidak
89
Universitas Sumatera Utara
16
Pengelolaan sampah yang dapat menampung
air (botol, kaleng, plastik, dll)
- Pembuangan air limbah
17 Tersedia SPAL rumah tangga
18
Jenis SPAL rumah tangga yang digunakan
19
Air tidak tergenang/mengalir dengan lancar
1. Dibuang
2. Dijual
3. Dibiarkan
terbuka
4. Dibakar
1.
2.
1.
2.
1.
2.
Ya
Tidak
Tertutup
Terbuka
Ya
Tidak
90
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Lampiran 3
MASTER DATA
Umur
Jen
Kel
Pddkn
Pkrjaan
TPA
harian
TPA
Non
harian
TPA
alamiah
Vntlasi
Dnding
Plafon
Penchyn
Kelmbbn
Sampah
PAL
Irfansyah
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
1
1
2
2
1
1
1
2
Ratna
2
2
2
2
1
2
1
1
1
2
2
2
1
1
1
Kaila Putri
1
2
1
1
2
2
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
4
2
Giem
2
2
2
1
2
2
2
1
2
1
2
1
1
1
5
1
Itis Mentari
1
2
1
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
2
2
1
1
6
2
Sri Rahayu
2
2
2
1
2
2
1
1
2
2
1
2
2
1
7
1
Rini
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
8
2
Ratibah
2
2
1
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
9
1
Alan Anggi
2
1
2
1
2
2
2
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
10
2
Sri Tia
2
2
2
1
1
2
2
1
2
1
2
2
2
1
11
1
Tio Wandani
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
1
2
2
2
1
2
1
12
2
Saminah
2
2
1
1
2
2
1
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
13
1
Emi
2
2
2
1
2
2
2
1
2
1
2
2
2
1
14
2
Lilis Supeni
2
2
2
1
2
2
1
1
2
1
1
2
2
1
15
1
Tiara
1
2
1
2
2
2
1
2
2
2
2
1
2
1
16
2
Tuti Sri Novita
2
2
2
1
2
2
1
1
2
1
2
2
2
1
17
1
Lilis Pebrianti
1
2
1
2
2
2
2
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
18
2
Wulan Safitri
2
2
2
1
2
2
1
1
2
2
2
2
1
1
19
1
Sinta
1
2
1
1
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
20
2
Anita
2
2
2
1
2
2
1
1
2
2
1
2
2
1
21
1
Mukhlis Ritonga
2
1
2
2
2
2
2
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
22
2
Mis Bawor
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
2
1
1
No
Status
Resp
1
1
2
3
Nama Responden
91
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Umur
Jen
Kel
Pddkn
Pkrjaan
TPA
harian
TPA
Non
harian
TPA
alamiah
Vntlasi
Dnding
Plafon
Penchyn
Kelmbbn
Sampah
PAL
Febri
1
1
1
1
2
2
1
1
2
2
1
2
1
1
2
Melyana
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
Daffa Al-Hafiz
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
2
Rahman
2
1
2
2
2
2
2
1
2
2
1
2
2
1
1
Tasya Melani
1
2
1
1
2
1
2
1
2
2
1
2
2
1
2
Hasnah
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
Dalilah Khairiyah
2
2
2
2
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
2
Henri Alim
2
1
2
1
2
2
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
Munawir
2
1
2
1
2
1
1
1
1
2
1
2
1
1
32
2
Suleman
2
1
2
2
2
2
1
1
2
2
1
2
1
1
33
1
Dewi Hotmaida
2
2
2
2
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
2
1
2
34
2
Tinsan Marpaung
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
2
2
2
2
1
35
1
Rafael Alexandro S
1
1
1
1
2
2
1
2
2
1
1
1
2
2
36
2
Lismah
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
37
1
Ruben Franchesia
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
2
1
2
2
1
38
2
Harungguan Siregar
2
1
1
2
2
2
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
39
1
Fadlan Habibi
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
40
2
Bambang R Ginting
2
1
2
1
2
2
1
2
2
2
1
2
2
2
41
1
Katerin
1
2
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
1
42
2
Mei Sari
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
43
1
Salsabila
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
1
2
2
1
2
2
1
44
2
Sangkot
2
1
2
2
2
2
1
2
2
2
2
1
2
2
45
1
Eka Destiani Safitri
2
2
2
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
46
2
1
Nofriyanti
M. Risky
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
2
2
2
2
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
2
2
2
2
1
1
No
Status
Resp
23
1
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
47
Nama Responden
92
Universitas Sumatera Utara
No
Status
Resp
48
2
49
1
50
Umur
Jen
Kel
Pddkn
Pkrjaan
TPA
harian
TPA
Non
harian
TPA
alamiah
Vntlasi
Dnding
Plafon
Penchyn
Kelmbbn
Sampah
PAL
Karina S
2
2
2
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
Yosua Sianipar
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
2
2
2
2
1
1
2
2
2
2
1
2
Nama Responden
2
Eben Ezer
Keterangan:
No
= Nomor Urut
Status Resp
= Status Responden (1=kasus ; 2=kontrol)
Umur
= Umur Responden (1= 0-15 tahun ; 2= >15 tahun)
Jen Kel
= Jenis Kelamin (1=laki-laki ; 2=perempuan)
Pddkn
= Pendidikan (1=rendah ; 2=tinggi)
Pkrjaan
= Pekerjaan (1=Tidak bekerja ; 2=Bekerja)
TPA harian
= Tempat penampungan air untuk keperluan sehari-hari (1=Ada ; 2=Tidak Ada)
TPA non harian
= Tempat penampungan air bukan untuk keperluan sehari-hari (1=Ada ; 2=Tidak Ada)
TPA Alamiah
= Tempat penampungan air alamiah (1=Ada ; 2=Tidak Ada)
Vntlasi
= Ventilasi (1=Tidak Berkasa ; 2=Berkasa)
Dnding
= Dinding (1=Tidak Rapat ; 2=Rapat)
Plafon
= Langit-langit/Plafon (1=tidak memenuhi syarat ; 2= memenuhi syarat)
Panchyn
= Pencahayaan (1=tidak memenuhi syarat ; 2= memenuhi syarat)
Kelmbbn
= Kelembaban (1=tidak memenuhi syarat ; 2= memenuhi syarat)
Sampah
= Pengelolaan Sampah (1=tidak memenuhi syarat ; 2= memenuhi syarat)
PAL
= Pembuangan air limbah (1=tidak memenuhi syarat ; 2= memenuhi syarat)
93
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Lampiran 4
Output SPSS
Frequencies Responden Kasus
Statistics
Jeni
TP
U
s
A
mu Kela Pendi Peker Hari
r min dikan jaan an
N Vali
d
Miss
ing
25
25
25
25
0
0
0
0
TP
A
Venti Kerap
Pengel
non TPA lasi atan LangitKelemb olaan
hari Ala Berk Dindin langit/p Pencah aban Sampa SP
an miah asa
g
lafon ayaan
(%)
h
AL
25 25
0
25
25
25
25
25
25
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
25 25
0
0
Frequency Table
Umur
Frequency
Valid
0-15 Tahun
Percent
18
>15 Tahun
Total
Valid Percent
72.0
Cumulative Percent
72.0
72.0
100.0
7
28.0
28.0
25
100.0
100.0
Jenis Kelamin
Frequency
Valid
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
Laki-Laki
12
48.0
48.0
48.0
Perempuan
13
52.0
52.0
100.0
Total
25
100.0
100.0
Pendidikan
Frequency
Valid
Rendah (Tidak Sekolah, SD,
SLTP)
Tinggi (SLTA, Perguruan
Tinggi)
Total
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
18
72.0
72.0
72.0
7
28.0
28.0
100.0
25
100.0
100.0
Pekerjaan
Frequency
Valid
Tidak Bekerja
Bekerja
Total
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
20
80.0
80.0
80.0
5
20.0
20.0
100.0
25
100.0
100.0
TPA Harian
94
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Frequency
Valid
Ada
Percent
17
Tidak Ada
Total
Valid Percent
68.0
Cumulative Percent
68.0
68.0
100.0
8
32.0
32.0
25
100.0
100.0
TPA non harian
Frequency
Valid
Ada
Tidak Ada
Total
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
20
80.0
80.0
80.0
5
20.0
20.0
100.0
25
100.0
100.0
TPA Alamiah
Frequency
Valid
Ada
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
9
36.0
36.0
36.0
Tidak Ada
16
64.0
64.0
100.0
Total
25
100.0
100.0
Ventilasi Berkasa
Frequency
Valid
Tidak
Ya
Total
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
23
92.0
92.0
92.0
2
8.0
8.0
100.0
25
100.0
100.0
Kerapatan Dinding
Frequency
Valid
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
Tidak Rapat
10
40.0
40.0
40.0
Rapat
15
60.0
60.0
100.0
Total
25
100.0
100.0
Langit-langit/plafon
Frequency
Valid
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Tidak Memenuhi Syarat
15
60.0
60.0
60.0
Memenuhi Syarat
10
40.0
40.0
100.0
Total
25
100.0
100.0
Pencahayaan
Frequency
Valid
Tidak Memenuhi Syarat
Memenuhi Syarat
Total
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
19
76.0
76.0
76.0
6
24.0
24.0
100.0
25
100.0
100.0
95
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Kelembaban (%)
Frequency
Valid
Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid Percent
Tidak Memenuhi Syarat
10
40.0
40.0
40.0
Memenuhi Syarat
15
60.0
60.0
100.0
Total
25
100.0
100.0
Pengelolaan Sampah
Frequency
Valid
Tidak Memenuhi Syarat
Cumulative
Percent
Valid Percent
16
64.0
64.0
64.0
9
36.0
36.0
100.0
25
100.0
100.0
Memenuhi Syarat
Total
Percent
SPAL
Frequency
Valid
Tidak Memenuhi Syarat
Memenuhi Syarat
Total
Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid Percent
23
92.0
92.0
92.0
2
8.0
8.0
100.0
25
100.0
100.0
Frequencies Responden Kontrol
Statistics
Jeni
TP
U
s
A
mu Kela Pendi Peker Hari
r min dikan jaan an
N Vali
d
Miss
ing
25
25
25
25
0
0
0
0
TP
A
Venti Kerap
Pengel
non TPA lasi atan LangitKelemb olaan
hari Ala Berk Dindin langit/p Pencah aban Sampa SP
an miah asa
g
lafon ayaan
(%)
h
AL
25 25
0
25
25
25
25
25
25
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
25 25
0
0
Frequency Table
Umur
Frequency
Valid
>15 Tahun
Percent
25
100.0
Valid Percent
100.0
Cumulative Percent
100.0
Jenis Kelamin
Frequency
Valid
Laki-Laki
Percent
7
28.0
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
28.0
28.0
100.0
Perempuan
18
72.0
72.0
Total
25
100.0
100.0
96
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Pendidikan
Frequency
Valid
Rendah (Tidak Sekolah, SD,
SLTP)
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
3
12.0
12.0
12.0
Tinggi (SLTA, Perguruan
Tinggi)
22
88.0
88.0
100.0
Total
25
100.0
100.0
Pekerjaan
Frequency
Valid
Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid Percent
Tidak Bekerja
12
48.0
48.0
48.0
Bekerja
13
52.0
52.0
100.0
Total
25
100.0
100.0
TPA Harian
Frequency
Valid
Ada
Tidak Ada
Total
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
23
92.0
92.0
92.0
2
8.0
8.0
100.0
25
100.0
100.0
TPA non harian
Frequency
Valid
Ada
Percent
25
Valid Percent
100.0
Cumulative Percent
100.0
100.0
TPA Alamiah
Frequency
Valid
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
Ada
10
40.0
40.0
40.0
Tidak Ada
15
60.0
60.0
100.0
Total
25
100.0
100.0
Ventilasi Berkasa
Frequency
Valid
Tidak
Ya
Total
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
16
64.0
64.0
64.0
9
36.0
36.0
100.0
25
100.0
100.0
Kerapatan Dinding
Frequency
Valid
Tidak Rapat
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
3
12.0
12.0
12.0
Rapat
22
88.0
88.0
100.0
Total
25
100.0
100.0
97
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Langit-langit/plafon
Frequency
Valid
Tidak Memenuhi Syarat
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
7
28.0
28.0
28.0
Memenuhi Syarat
18
72.0
72.0
100.0
Total
25
100.0
100.0
Pencahayaan
Frequency
Valid
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Tidak Memenuhi Syarat
10
40.0
40.0
40.0
Memenuhi Syarat
15
60.0
60.0
100.0
Total
25
100.0
100.0
Kelembaban (%)
Frequency
Valid
Tidak Memenuhi Syarat
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
2
8.0
8.0
8.0
Memenuhi Syarat
23
92.0
92.0
100.0
Total
25
100.0
100.0
Pengelolaan Sampah
Frequency
Valid
Tidak Memenuhi Syarat
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
8
32.0
32.0
32.0
Memenuhi Syarat
17
68.0
68.0
100.0
Total
25
100.0
100.0
SPAL
Frequency
Valid
Tidak Memenuhi Syarat
15
Memenuhi Syarat
10
Total
25
Percent
Valid Percent
60.0
Cumulative
Percent
60.0
60.0
40.0
40.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
98
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Crosstabs
Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid
N
Umur * Status Responden
Jenis Kelamin * Status
Responden
Pendidikan * Status
Responden
Pekerjaan * Status
Responden
TPA Harian * Status
Responden
TPA non harian * Status
Responden
TPA Alamiah * Status
Responden
Ventilasi Berkasa * Status
Responden
Kerapatan Dinding * Status
Responden
Langit-langit/plafon * Status
Responden
Pencahayaan * Status
Responden
Kelembaban (%) * Status
Responden
Pengelolaan Sampah *
Status Responden
SPAL * Status Responden
Missing
Percent
N
Total
Percent
N
Percent
50
100.0%
0
.0%
50
100.0%
50
100.0%
0
.0%
50
100.0%
50
100.0%
0
.0%
50
100.0%
50
100.0%
0
.0%
50
100.0%
50
100.0%
0
.0%
50
100.0%
50
100.0%
0
.0%
50
100.0%
50
100.0%
0
.0%
50
100.0%
50
100.0%
0
.0%
50
100.0%
50
100.0%
0
.0%
50
100.0%
50
100.0%
0
.0%
50
100.0%
50
100.0%
0
.0%
50
100.0%
50
100.0%
0
.0%
50
100.0%
50
100.0%
0
.0%
50
100.0%
50
100.0%
0
.0%
50
100.0%
99
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Umur * Status Responden
Crosstab
Status Responden
Kasus
Umur
0-15 Tahun
18
0
18
Expected Count
9.0
9.0
18.0
100.0%
.0%
100.0%
% within Status Responden
72.0%
.0%
36.0%
% of Total
36.0%
.0%
36.0%
7
25
32
16.0
16.0
32.0
% within Umur
21.9%
78.1%
100.0%
% within Status Responden
28.0%
100.0%
64.0%
% of Total
14.0%
50.0%
64.0%
25
25
50
Count
Expected Count
Total
Total
Count
% within Umur
>15 Tahun
Kontrol
Count
Expected Count
% within Umur
% within Status Responden
% of Total
25.0
25.0
50.0
50.0%
50.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50.0%
50.0%
100.0%
Chi-Square Testsd
Value
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctionb
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
df
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
28.125a
25.087
35.694
1
1
1
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
27.562c
1
.000
.000
.000
Point
Probability
.000
50
Risk Estimate
95% Confidence Interval
Value
For cohort Status Responden = Kasus
N of Valid Cases
4.571
50
Lower
Upper
2.375
8.799
100
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Jenis Kelamin * Status Responden
Crosstab
Status Responden
Kasus
Jenis Kelamin
Laki-Laki
Perempuan
Total
Count
12
7
19
Expected Count
9.5
9.5
19.0
% within Jenis Kelamin
63.2%
36.8%
100.0%
% within Status Responden
48.0%
28.0%
38.0%
% of Total
24.0%
14.0%
38.0%
13
18
31
15.5
15.5
31.0
% within Jenis Kelamin
41.9%
58.1%
100.0%
% within Status Responden
52.0%
72.0%
62.0%
% of Total
26.0%
36.0%
62.0%
25
25
50
Count
Expected Count
Total
Kontrol
Count
Expected Count
% within Jenis Kelamin
% within Status Responden
% of Total
25.0
25.0
50.0
50.0%
50.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50.0%
50.0%
100.0%
Chi-Square Testsd
Value
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctionb
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
df
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
2.122a
1.358
2.141
1
1
1
.145
.244
.143
.244
.122
.244
.244
.122
.122
2.080c
1
.149
.244
.122
Point
Probability
.082
50
Risk Estimate
95% Confidence Interval
Value
Odds Ratio for Jenis Kelamin (Laki-Laki /
Perempuan)
For cohort Status Responden = Kasus
For cohort Status Responden = Kontrol
N of Valid Cases
Lower
Upper
2.374
.734
7.677
1.506
.635
50
.879
.328
2.579
1.228
101
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Pendidikan * Status Responden
Crosstab
Status Responden
Kasus
Pendidikan
Rendah (Tidak Sekolah,
SD, SLTP)
Count
Total
18
3
21
10.5
10.5
21.0
% within Pendidikan
85.7%
14.3%
100.0%
% within Status
Responden
72.0%
12.0%
42.0%
% of Total
36.0%
6.0%
42.0%
7
22
29
14.5
14.5
29.0
% within Pendidikan
24.1%
75.9%
100.0%
% within Status
Responden
28.0%
88.0%
58.0%
% of Total
14.0%
44.0%
58.0%
25
25
50
25.0
25.0
50.0
50.0%
50.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50.0%
50.0%
100.0%
Expected Count
Tinggi (SLTA, Perguruan Count
Tinggi)
Expected Count
Total
Kontrol
Count
Expected Count
% within Pendidikan
% within Status
Responden
% of Total
Chi-Square Testsd
Value
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctionb
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
df
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
18.473a
16.092
20.035
1
1
1
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
18.103c
1
.000
.000
.000
Point
Probability
.000
50
Risk Estimate
95% Confidence Interval
Value
Odds Ratio for Pendidikan (Rendah
(Tidak Sekolah, SD, SLTP) / Tinggi
(SLTA, Perguruan Tinggi))
For cohort Status Responden = Kasus
For cohort Status Responden = Kontrol
N of Valid Cases
Lower
Upper
18.857
4.254
83.592
3.551
.188
50
1.820
.065
6.929
.548
102
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Pekerjaan * Status Responden
Crosstab
Status Responden
Kasus
Pekerjaan
Tidak Bekerja
Count
12
32
16.0
16.0
32.0
% within Pekerjaan
62.5%
37.5%
100.0%
% within Status Responden
80.0%
48.0%
64.0%
% of Total
40.0%
24.0%
64.0%
5
13
18
9.0
9.0
18.0
% within Pekerjaan
27.8%
72.2%
100.0%
% within Status Responden
20.0%
52.0%
36.0%
% of Total
10.0%
26.0%
36.0%
25
25
50
Count
Expected Count
Total
Total
20
Expected Count
Bekerja
Kontrol
Count
Expected Count
% within Pekerjaan
% within Status Responden
% of Total
25.0
25.0
50.0
50.0%
50.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50.0%
50.0%
100.0%
Chi-Square Testsd
Value
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctionb
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
df
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
5.556a
4.253
5.704
1
1
1
.018
.039
.017
.038
.019
.038
.038
.019
.019
5.444c
1
.020
.038
.019
Point
Probability
.015
50
Risk Estimate
95% Confidence Interval
Value
Odds Ratio for Pekerjaan (Tidak Bekerja
/ Bekerja)
For cohort Status Responden = Kasus
For cohort Status Responden = Kontrol
N of Valid Cases
Lower
Upper
4.333
1.235
15.206
2.250
.519
50
1.019
.305
4.966
.883
103
Universitas Sumatera Utara
TPA Harian * Status Responden
Crosstab
Status Responden
Kasus
TPA Harian
Ada
Count
23
40
20.0
20.0
40.0
% within TPA Harian
42.5%
57.5%
100.0%
% within Status Responden
68.0%
92.0%
80.0%
% of Total
34.0%
46.0%
80.0%
8
2
10
5.0
5.0
10.0
% within TPA Harian
80.0%
20.0%
100.0%
% within Status Responden
32.0%
8.0%
20.0%
% of Total
16.0%
4.0%
20.0%
25
25
50
Count
Expected Count
Total
Total
17
Expected Count
Tidak Ada
Kontrol
Count
Expected Count
% within TPA Harian
% within Status Responden
% of Total
25.0
25.0
50.0
50.0%
50.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50.0%
50.0%
100.0%
Chi-Square Testsd
Value
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctionb
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
df
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
4.500a
3.125
4.758
1
1
1
.034
.077
.029
.074
.037
.074
.074
.037
.037
4.410c
1
.036
.074
.037
Point
Probability
.032
50
Risk Estimate
95% Confidence Interval
Value
Odds Ratio for TPA Harian (Ada / Tidak
Ada)
For cohort Status Responden = Kasus
For cohort Status Responden = Kontrol
N of Valid Cases
Lower
Upper
.185
.035
.983
.531
2.875
50
.330
.809
.855
10.216
104
Universitas Sumatera Utara
TPA non harian * Status Responden
Crosstab
Status Responden
Kasus
TPA non harian
Ada
Count
25
45
22.5
22.5
45.0
% within TPA non harian
44.4%
55.6%
100.0%
% within Status Responden
80.0%
100.0%
90.0%
% of Total
40.0%
50.0%
90.0%
5
0
5
2.5
2.5
5.0
100.0%
.0%
100.0%
% within Status Responden
20.0%
.0%
10.0%
% of Total
10.0%
.0%
10.0%
25
25
50
Count
Expected Count
% within TPA non harian
Total
Total
20
Expected Count
Tidak Ada
Kontrol
Count
Expected Count
% within TPA non harian
% within Status Responden
% of Total
25.0
25.0
50.0
50.0%
50.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50.0%
50.0%
100.0%
Chi-Square Testsd
Value
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctionb
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
df
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
5.556a
3.556
7.488
1
1
1
.018
.059
.006
.050
.025
.050
.050
.025
.025
5.444c
1
.020
.050
.025
Point
Probability
.025
50
Risk Estimate
95% Confidence Interval
Value
For cohort Status Responden = Kasus
N of Valid Cases
Lower
.444
50
Upper
.321
.616
105
Universitas Sumatera Utara
TPA Alamiah * Status Responden
Crosstab
Status Responden
Kasus
TPA Alamiah
Ada
Count
10
19
9.5
9.5
19.0
% within TPA Alamiah
47.4%
52.6%
100.0%
% within Status Responden
36.0%
40.0%
38.0%
% of Total
18.0%
20.0%
38.0%
16
15
31
15.5
15.5
31.0
% within TPA Alamiah
51.6%
48.4%
100.0%
% within Status Responden
64.0%
60.0%
62.0%
% of Total
32.0%
30.0%
62.0%
25
25
50
Count
Expected Count
Total
Total
9
Expected Count
Tidak Ada
Kontrol
Count
Expected Count
% within TPA Alamiah
% within Status Responden
% of Total
25.0
25.0
50.0
50.0%
50.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50.0%
50.0%
100.0%
Chi-Square Testsd
Value
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctionb
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
df
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
.085a
.000
.085
1
1
1
.771
1.000
.771
1.000
.500
1.000
1.000
.500
.500
.083c
1
.773
1.000
.500
Point
Probability
.220
50
Risk Estimate
95% Confidence Interval
Value
Odds Ratio for TPA Alamiah (Ada / Tidak
Ada)
For cohort Status Responden = Kasus
For cohort Status Responden = Kontrol
N of Valid Cases
Lower
Upper
.844
.269
2.647
.918
1.088
50
.512
.621
1.645
1.905
106
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Ventilasi Berkasa * Status Responden
Crosstab
Status Responden
Kasus
Ventilasi Berkasa
Tidak
Count
16
39
19.5
19.5
39.0
% within Ventilasi Berkasa
59.0%
41.0%
100.0%
% within Status Responden
92.0%
64.0%
78.0%
% of Total
46.0%
32.0%
78.0%
2
9
11
5.5
5.5
11.0
% within Ventilasi Berkasa
18.2%
81.8%
100.0%
% within Status Responden
8.0%
36.0%
22.0%
% of Total
4.0%
18.0%
22.0%
25
25
50
Count
Expected Count
Total
Total
23
Expected Count
Ya
Kontrol
Count
Expected Count
25.0
25.0
50.0
% within Ventilasi Berkasa
50.0%
50.0%
100.0%
% within Status Responden
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50.0%
50.0%
100.0%
% of Total
Chi-Square Testsd
Value
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctionb
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
df
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
5.711a
4.196
6.081
1
1
1
.017
.041
.014
.037
.019
.037
.037
.019
.019
5.597c
1
.018
.037
.019
Point
Probability
.016
50
Risk Estimate
95% Confidence Interval
Value
Odds Ratio for Ventilasi Berkasa (Tidak /
Ya)
For cohort Status Responden = Kasus
For cohort Status Responden = Kontrol
N of Valid Cases
Lower
Upper
6.469
1.230
34.012
3.244
.501
50
.901
.314
11.673
.801
107
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Kerapatan Dinding * Status Responden
Status Responden
Kasus
Kerapatan Dinding
Tidak Rapat
Rapat
Total
Count
10
3
13
Expected Count
6.5
6.5
13.0
% within Kerapatan
Dinding
76.9%
23.1%
100.0%
% within Status
Responden
40.0%
12.0%
26.0%
% of Total
20.0%
6.0%
26.0%
15
22
37
18.5
18.5
37.0
% within Kerapatan
Dinding
40.5%
59.5%
100.0%
% within Status
Responden
60.0%
88.0%
74.0%
% of Total
30.0%
44.0%
74.0%
Count
Expected Count
Total
Kontrol
Count
25
25
50
25.0
25.0
50.0
50.0%
50.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50.0%
50.0%
100.0%
Expected Count
% within Kerapatan
Dinding
% within Status
Responden
% of Total
Chi-Square Testsd
Value
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctionb
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
df
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
5.094a
3.742
5.309
1
1
1
.024
.053
.021
.051
.025
.051
.051
.025
.025
4.992c
1
.025
.051
.025
Point
Probability
.021
50
Risk Estimate
95% Confidence Interval
Value
Odds Ratio for Kerapatan Dinding (Tidak
Rapat / Rapat)
For cohort Status Responden = Kasus
For cohort Status Responden = Kontrol
N of Valid Cases
Lower
Upper
4.889
1.150
20.790
1.897
.388
50
1.161
.139
3.100
1.084
108
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Langit-langit/plafon * Status Responden
Crosstab
Status Responden
Kasus
Langitlangit/plafon
Tidak Memenuhi
Syarat
Count
Memenuhi Syarat
Total
15
7
22
Expected Count
11.0
11.0
22.0
% within Langitlangit/plafon
68.2%
31.8%
100.0%
% within Status
Responden
60.0%
28.0%
44.0%
% of Total
30.0%
14.0%
44.0%
10
18
28
Expected Count
14.0
14.0
28.0
% within Langitlangit/plafon
35.7%
64.3%
100.0%
% within Status
Responden
40.0%
72.0%
56.0%
% of Total
20.0%
36.0%
56.0%
Count
Total
Kontrol
Count
25
25
50
Expected Count
25.0
25.0
50.0
% within Langitlangit/plafon
50.0%
50.0%
100.0%
% within Status
Responden
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50.0%
50.0%
100.0%
% of Total
Chi-Square Testsd
Value
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctionb
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
df
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
5.195a
3.977
5.295
1
1
1
.023
.046
.021
.045
.023
.045
.045
.023
.023
5.091c
1
.024
.045
.023
Point
Probability
.018
50
Risk Estimate
95% Confidence Interval
Value
Odds Ratio for Langit-langit/plafon (Tidak
Memenuhi Syarat / Memenuhi Syarat)
For cohort Status Responden = Kasus
For cohort Status Responden = Kontrol
N of Valid Cases
Lower
Upper
3.857
1.180
12.606
1.909
.495
50
1.076
.253
3.386
.968
109
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Pencahayaan * Status Responden
Crosstab
Status Responden
Kasus
Pencahayaan Tidak Memenuhi
Syarat
Count
10
29
14.5
14.5
29.0
% within Pencahayaan
65.5%
34.5%
100.0%
% within Status
Responden
76.0%
40.0%
58.0%
% of Total
38.0%
20.0%
58.0%
6
15
21
10.5
10.5
21.0
% within Pencahayaan
28.6%
71.4%
100.0%
% within Status
Responden
24.0%
60.0%
42.0%
% of Total
12.0%
30.0%
42.0%
25
25
50
25.0
25.0
50.0
50.0%
50.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50.0%
50.0%
100.0%
Count
Expected Count
Total
Total
19
Expected Count
Memenuhi Syarat
Kontrol
Count
Expected Count
% within Pencahayaan
% within Status
Responden
% of Total
Chi-Square Testsd
Value
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctionb
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
df
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
6.650a
5.255
6.825
1
1
1
.010
.022
.009
.021
.010
.021
.021
.010
.010
6.517c
1
.011
.021
.010
Point
Probability
.009
50
Risk Estimate
95% Confidence Interval
Value
Odds Ratio for Pencahayaan (Tidak
Memenuhi Syarat / Memenuhi Syarat)
For cohort Status Responden = Kasus
For cohort Status Responden = Kontrol
N of Valid Cases
Lower
Upper
4.750
1.406
16.051
2.293
.483
50
1.110
.273
4.739
.854
110
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Kelembaban (%) * Status Responden
Crosstab
Status Responden
Kasus
Kelembaban (%) Tidak Memenuhi
Syarat
Memenuhi Syarat
Total
Count
10
2
12
Expected Count
6.0
6.0
12.0
% within Kelembaban
(%)
83.3%
16.7%
100.0%
% within Status
Responden
40.0%
8.0%
24.0%
% of Total
20.0%
4.0%
24.0%
15
23
38
19.0
19.0
38.0
% within Kelembaban
(%)
39.5%
60.5%
100.0%
% within Status
Responden
60.0%
92.0%
76.0%
% of Total
30.0%
46.0%
76.0%
Count
Expected Count
Total
Kontrol
Count
25
25
50
25.0
25.0
50.0
50.0%
50.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50.0%
50.0%
100.0%
Expected Count
% within Kelembaban
(%)
% within Status
Responden
% of Total
Chi-Square Testsd
Value
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctionb
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
df
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
7.018a
5.373
7.519
1
1
1
.008
.020
.006
.018
.009
.018
.018
.009
.009
6.877c
1
.009
.018
.009
Point
Probability
.008
50
Risk Estimate
95% Confidence Interval
Value
Odds Ratio for Kelembaban (%) (Tidak
Memenuhi Syarat / Memenuhi Syarat)
For cohort Status Responden = Kasus
For cohort Status Responden = Kontrol
N of Valid Cases
Lower
Upper
7.667
1.470
39.987
2.111
.275
50
1.322
.076
3.371
1.001
111
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Pengelolaan Sampah * Status Responden
Crosstab
Status Responden
Kasus
Pengelolaan
Sampah
Tidak Memenuhi
Syarat
Count
8
24
12.0
12.0
24.0
% within Pengelolaan
Sampah
66.7%
33.3%
100.0%
% within Status
Responden
64.0%
32.0%
48.0%
% of Total
32.0%
16.0%
48.0%
9
17
26
13.0
13.0
26.0
% within Pengelolaan
Sampah
34.6%
65.4%
100.0%
% within Status
Responden
36.0%
68.0%
52.0%
% of Total
18.0%
34.0%
52.0%
Count
Expected Count
Total
Total
16
Expected Count
Memenuhi Syarat
Kontrol
Count
25
25
50
25.0
25.0
50.0
50.0%
50.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50.0%
50.0%
100.0%
Expected Count
% within Pengelolaan
Sampah
% within Status
Responden
% of Total
Chi-Square Testsd
Value
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctionb
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
df
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
5.128a
3.926
5.220
1
1
1
.024
.048
.022
.046
.023
.046
.046
.023
.023
5.026c
1
.025
.046
.023
Point
Probability
.018
50
Risk Estimate
95% Confidence Interval
Value
Odds Ratio for Pengelolaan Sampah
(Tidak Memenuhi Syarat / Memenuhi
Syarat)
For cohort Status Responden = Kasus
For cohort Status Responden = Kontrol
N of Valid Cases
Lower
Upper
3.778
1.170
12.194
1.926
.510
50
1.058
.271
3.507
.958
112
Universitas Sumatera Utara
SPAL * Status Responden
Crosstab
Status Responden
Kasus
SPAL
Tidak Memenuhi Syarat
Count
15
38
19.0
19.0
38.0
% within SPAL
60.5%
39.5%
100.0%
% within Status Responden
92.0%
60.0%
76.0%
% of Total
46.0%
30.0%
76.0%
2
10
12
6.0
6.0
12.0
16.7%
83.3%
100.0%
% within Status Responden
8.0%
40.0%
24.0%
% of Total
4.0%
20.0%
24.0%
25
25
50
Count
Expected Count
% within SPAL
Total
Total
23
Expected Count
Memenuhi Syarat
Kontrol
Count
Expected Count
% within SPAL
% within Status Responden
% of Total
25.0
25.0
50.0
50.0%
50.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50.0%
50.0%
100.0%
Chi-Square Testsd
Value
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctionb
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
df
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
7.018a
5.373
7.519
1
1
1
.008
.020
.006
.018
.009
.018
.018
.009
.009
6.877c
1
.009
.018
.009
Point
Probability
.008
50
Risk Estimate
95% Confidence Interval
Value
Odds Ratio for SPAL (Tidak Memenuhi
Syarat / Memenuhi Syarat)
For cohort Status Responden = Kasus
For cohort Status Responden = Kontrol
N of Valid Cases
Lower
Upper
7.667
1.470
39.987
3.632
.474
50
.999
.297
13.205
.756
113
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Lampiran 5
DOKUMENTASI PENELITIAN
Lampiran Gambar 1. Wawancara responden kasus bersama dengan tenaga
Dinas Kesehatan Kabupaten Labuhanbatu
Lampiran Gambar 2. Wawancara responden kasus bersama dengan tenaga
Dinas Kesehatan Kabupaten Labuhanbatu
114
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Gambar Lampiran 3. Kondisi Perumahan Responen Kasus
Gambar Lampiran 4. Kondisi halaman sekitar rumah responden kasus
115
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Gambar Lampiran 5. Halaman rumah responden Kasus
Gambar Lampiran 6. Tempat penampungan air untuk keperluan sehari-hari
di rumah responden Kasus
116
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Gambar Lampiran 7. Kondisi tempat penampungan air di rumah responden
kasus
Gambar Lampiran 8. Tempat penampungan air bukan untuk keperluan
sehari-hari di rumah responden kontrol
117
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Gambar Lampiran 9. Ventilasi Rumah Responden Kasus Tidak Berkasa
Gambar Lampiran 10. Pengukuran Kelembaban dengan menggunakan alat
hygrometer
118
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Gambar Lampiran 11. Pengelolaan sampah di rumah responden kasus
dengan cara dibakar
Gambar Lampiran 12. Saluran Pembuangan Air Limbah yang tidak
mengalir dengan lancar di rumah responden kasus
119
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Lampiran 6. Surat Permohonan Izin Survei Pendahuluan
120
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Lampiran 7. Surat Permohonan Izin Penelitian
121
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Lampiran 8. Surat Izin Penelitian dari Dinas Kesehatan Kabupaten
Labuhanbatu
122
Universitas Sumatera Utara