A THESIS THE INFLUENCE OF DEFENSE MECHANISM ON JOHN’S PERSONALITY IN DAVID MAMET’S OLEANNA
um U surabaya niversitasMuhammadiyah Surabaya
A THESIS
THE INFLUENCE OF DEFENSE MECHANISM ON
JOHN’S PERSONALITY IN DAVID MAMET’S OLEANNA GUNAWAN PEBRUONO NIM 2012.1111.001 ADVISORS Ari Setyorini, SS., MA. Pramudana Ihsan, S. Hum., M. Pd. ENGLISH EDUCATION DEPARTMENT FACULTY OF EDUCATION AND TEACHER TRAININGMUHAMMADIYAH UNIVERSITY OF SURABAYA
2016THE INFLUENCE OF DEFENSE MECHANISM ON JOHN’S PERSONALITY IN DAVID MAMET’S OLEANNA
SKRIPSI
Diajukan untuk Memenuhi Salah Satu Syarat
Memperoleh Gelar Sarjana Pendidikan
GUNAWAN PEBRUONO NIM 2012.1111.001 PROGRAM STUDI PENDIDIKAN BAHASA INGGRIS FAKULTAS KEGURUAN DAN ILMU PENDIDIKAN UNIVERSITAS MUHAMMADIYAH SURABAYA 2016
HALAMAN PERSETUJUAN PEMBIMBING
Skripsi yang ditulis oleh Gunawan Pebruono ini telah disetujui ole dosen pembimbing untuk diujikan tanggal 16 Agustus 2016.
Dosen Pembimbing TandaTangan Tanggal I.
Ari Setyorini, S. S., M. A. ……………… ……………… II.
……………… Pramudana Ihsan, S. Hum., M. Pd. ………………
Mengetahui : Ketua Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris Sulton DediWijaya, S. Pd.
HALAMAN PENGESAHAN PANITIA UJIAN
Skripsi ini telah diuji dan dinyatakan sah oleh Panitia Ujian Tingkat Sarjana (S1) Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Muhammadiyah Surabaya sebagai salah satu syarat memperoleh gelar Sarjan aPendidikan, pada tanggal 16 Agustus 2016.
Dosen Penguji TandaTangan Tanggal
I. Ari Setyorini, S. S., M. A. ..……………… …...………….
II. Dra. Mas’ulah, M. A. ..……………… …...………….
III. Radius Setiyawan, S. Pd., M. A.
..……………… …...………….
Mengetahui Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan
Universitas Muhammadiyah Surabaya Dekan Dr. M. Ridlwan, M. Pd.
PERNYATAAN TIDAK MELAKUKAN PLAGIAT
Saya yang bertanda tangan dibawah ini: Nama : Gunawan Pebruono NIM : 20121111001 Program Studi : Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris Fakultas : Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan
Menyatakan bahwa Skripsi yang saya tulis ini benar
- – benar tulisan karya sendiri bukan hasil plagiasi, baik sebagian maupun keseluruhan. Bila di kemudian hari terbukti hasil plagiasi, maka saya bersedia menerima sanksi akademik sesuai ketentuan yang berlaku di Universitas Muhammadiyah Surabaya.
Surabaya, 15 Agustus 2016 Yang membuat pernyataan,
( Gunawan Pebruono )
MOTTO: “EXPECT VICTORY AND YOU MAKE A VICTORY” “LET YOUR HOPES, NOT YOUR HURTS TO SHAPE YOUR FUTURE”
Dedication: My Beloved Parent there in heaven
My Uncle “AchmadSubur S. Pd” as a superman in my life
My aunties “SitiSamsatun& Sri Wahyuni” who become as wonder women
My gang “CECOS” that always support each other
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Alhamdulillahirrabbil ’alamin first of all, the researcher would like to say thanks to God Allah SWT, The almighty who gives him all his blessing and becomes the power to finish his thesis, Sholawatsalam to prophet Muhammad SAW the last prophets who becomes the leader of Moslem and guides the human to the right way and also to all his families and his friends.
The completion of this thesis witness to encouragement, support and guidance of many individuals. It is with sincere gratitude that I think:
1. My beloved parents in heaven: Alm. Mr. Nyamun Sufiyanto and Almh. Mrs. Lik ’ana.
2. All of my family that support me in every ways. My uncle: Mr.
AchmadSuburS.Pd and my aunties: Mrs. SitiSamsatun and Mrs. Sri Wahyuni.
3. Dr. M. Ridlwan, M. Pd., Dekan Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Muhammadiyah Surabaya.
4. Sulton Dedi Wijaya, S. Pd. as the head of English Department Muhammadiyah University of Surabaya, for giving me the permission to conduct this study.
5. Ari Setyorini, S. S., M. A. is my first advisor, for her suggestions, criticism, support and help to finish this thesis.
6. PramudanaIhsan, S. Hum.,M. Pd. is my second advisor for his support, contributions and advice in completing this thesis.
7. All lectures at English Department Muhammadiyah University of Surabaya, who have taught, motivated, and given guidance the time of study.
8. All of member in CECOS: Habiburahman, Oky Fajar S., Aida Farah
F., Debby Dwi L., Selvika Ratna D., and Anis Marchamah. Thanks for our togetherness and become such as my family.
9. All of my friends in English Department especially Morning Class.
Thanks for togetherness 10.
All people who names I cannot mention one by one. Thanks for everything.
Surabaya, August15, 2016 The Researcher
Gunawan Pebruono 20121111001
TABLE OF CONTENT
1.5 Scope and Limitation …………………………………………………
9
9 2.2.2.2 Sublimation ……………………………………………..
8 2.2.2.1 Reaction Formation ……………………………………..
7 2.
6
5 2.2 Psychoanalysis .. ………………………………………………………
2.1 Psychology in Literature ….…………………………………………..
5
4 CHAPTER II REVIEW OF THE LITTERATURE …………………......
4
PAGE COVER PAGE ………………………………………………………….. i HALAMAN PERSETUJUAN ………………………………………….. iii HALAMAN PENGESAHAN PANITIA UJIAN ………………………. iv
1.4 Significance of the Study …………………………………………….
3
1.3 Objective of the Study ……………………………………………….
3
1.2 Statements of the Problem …………………………………………...
1
1.1 Background of the Study …………………………………………….
1
TABLE OF CO NTENT …………………………………………………. ix BIBLIOGRAPHY…..…………………………………………………. xi CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION ………………………………………...
PERNYATAAN KEASLIAN TULISAN ………………………………. v MOTTO AND DEDICATION ………………………………………….. vi ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ……………………………………………….. vii
2.2.1 Structure of Personality ……………………………………..
2.2 Defense Mechanism ……….………………………………..
9 2.2.2.3 Denial …………………………………………………...
10
2.2.2.4 Rationalization …………………………………………
2.3Review of the
10 Previous Study ………………………………………..
13 CHAPTER III RESEARCH METHODOLOGY ……………………......
13
3.1 The Nature of the Research …………………………………………
14 3.2 The Source of Data …………………………………………………..
3.2.1
14 The Main Data ……………………………………………..
14 3.2.2 The Supporting the Data …………………………………..
3.3
14 Data Collection ………………………………………………………
3.4
15 The Data Analysis ……………………………………………………
16 CHAPTER IV ANALYSIS ……………………………………………...
16 4.1 John’s Defense Mechanism ………………………………………….
17 4.1.1 John’s Reaction Formation ………………………………...
19 4.1.2 John’s Sublimation ………………………………………...
21
4.1.3 John’s Denial and Rationalization …………………………
24 4.2 The Influence of The Defense Mechanism on John’s Personality …..
4.2.1 J 24 ohn as an Empathic Person ……………………………….
29 4.2.2 John as a Lustful Person …………………………………..
30 4.2.3 John as an Emotional Person ……………………………...
35 CHAPTER V CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION ………………….
35 5.1 Conclusion ………………………………………………….
36 5.2 Suggestion …………………………………………………. APPENDIX I APPENDIX II
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Creswell, John. 2012. Educational Research: Planning, and Evaluating
Klarer, Mario. 1999. An Introduction to Literary Studies. London: Routledge Lexmond, Jen and Reeves, Richard. 2009. Building Character. London: Demos Liang, Yamin. 2011. The Id, Ego and Super-ego in Pride and Prejudice.
Hughes, Doug. 2009. Between the Lines: Oleanna by David Mamet. Los Angeles: Center Theatre Group
Ewen, Robert B. 2003. Theories of Personality. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
January 27, 2016.
Editor. 2015. David Mamet Biography. The Biography (Online). Retrieved from
Quantitative and Qualitative Research. U.S.A: Pericson Education
Personality Psychology . New York: Cambridge University Press
Barone, David F., Hersen, Michel and Hasselt, Vincent B. Van. 1998. Advanced
Corr, Philip J. and Matthews, Gerald. 2009. The Cambridge Handbook of
communication in higher education as reflected in David Mamet’s
Oleanna. Canadian Journal of Higher Education. Vol 44 P(38-51).
Chiaramonte, Peter. 2014. Power play: The dynamics of power and interpersonal
Critism and Theory. England: Pearson
Bennett, Andrew and Royle, Nicholas. 2004. An Introduction to Literature,
Personality . New York: Springer Science+Bussiness Media
International Education Studies, Vol 4, Pg (177-181) Manson, Mark. 2011. The Three Loves Theory. Mark Manson (Online). Retrieved from: Minderop, Albertine.2011. PsikologiSastra: KaryaSastra, Metode, Teori,
danContohKasus . Jakarta: YayasanPustakaObor Indonesia
Kutsiyah, H., M. Adiana., B. Imam. 2013. An Analysis of Ego Defense
Mechanisms of Mr. Borkmani nHenrik Ibsen’s John Gabriel Borkman.
Page 1-8. Passer, Michael W. and Smith, Ronald E. 2009. Psychology: The Science of Mind
and Behavior. New York: McGraw-Hill
Ridgway, Ian. 2007. Theory & Practice 1: Lecture 3 SIGMUND FREUD (1856-
1939). My Auz (Online). Retrieved from: myauz.com/ianr/articles/lect3freud07.pdfMey 04, 2016.
Rycorft, Charles. 1992. A Critical Dictionary of Psychoanalysis. England: Penguin Book.
Schultz, Duane P. 2009. Theories of Personality, Ninth Edition. United States of America: Michele Sordi
Shiner, Rebecca L. and DeYoung, Colin G. 2011. The Structure of Temperament
and Personality Traits: A Developmental Perspective . Chicago: Human Capital and Economic Opportunity Working Group. Working Paper No.
2011-025. Statt, David A. 1998. The Concise Dictionary of Psychology. London: Harper &
Row Strongman, Kenneth T. 2003. The Psychology of Emotion: From Everyday Llife.
England: John Wiley & Sons Ltd Suchet, David and Williams, David. 1992. Oleanna by David Mamet. The
Archieve (Online). Retrieved from:
January 27, 2016.
Tyson, Lois. 2006. Critical Theory Today. New York: Routledge
Wahyuni, ShobrinaEka. 2015.
A Psychological Study on Helen Keller’s Structure of Personality as seen in The Story of My Life Novel by Helen Keller.
Thesis. Winnicott, D. W. 1965. The Maturational Processes and the Facilitating
Environment: Studies in the Theory of Emotional Development . London:
The Hogarth Press and the Institute of Psycho-Analysis Wolman, Benjamin B. 1992. Personality Dynamics. New York: Springer Science
- Business Media, LLC