Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Kinerja Perawat di Rumah Sakit Tingkat II Putri Hijau Kesdam I Bukit Barisan Medan

FAKTOR-FAKTOR YANG MEMENGARUHI KINERJA PERAWAT DI
RUMAH SAKIT TK II PUTRI HIJAU MEDAN

A. KARAKTERISTIK INDIVIDU
Petunjuk pengisian:
Isilah jawaban pada pertanyaan dibawah ini atau beri tanda chek lish (√) pada
kolom jawaban yang teman sejawat pilih. Data ini akan dirahasiakan dan hanya
dibaca oleh peneliti
1.

Nomor Kode

:

2.

Umur

:

3.

Jenis Kelamin

:

4.

Status Perkawinan

:

5.

Pendidikan

:

6.

Lama Bekerja

:

(Diisi oleh peneliti)
Tahun

B. Motivasi
No.
1.
2.
3.
4.

Pernyataan
Dalam bekerja saya memiliki motivasi yang tinggi.
Saya selaku termotivasi membantu pasien.
Pada semua kondisi saya bekerja dengan baik.
Saya mendapat motivasi dari kepala ruangan.

Ya Tidak

C. Pendapatan
No.
1.
2.
3.
4.

Pernyataan
Ya Tidak
Gaji saya dapat memenuhi kebutuhan sehari-hari.
Gaji yang saya terima sesuai dengan keinginan saya.
Gaji sesuai dengan pekerjaan yang dilakukan.
Selain gaji saya mendapat intensif yang mendorong saya
untuk bekerja lebih.

Universitas Sumatera Utara

D. Keluarga
No.

1.
2.
3.
4.

Pernyataan
Ya Tidak
Keluarga mendukung kerjaan saya.
Keluarga selalu mengerti pekerjaan saya.
Keluarga mengerti profesi saya sebagai perawat.
Keluarga dapat mengerti apabila saya mendapat tugas
tambahan.

E. Organisasi
No.
1.
2.
3.
4.

Pernyataan
Ya Tidak
Suasana ditempat kerja saya kondusif.
Pekerjaan saya lakukan sesuai dengan pendidikan saya.
Semua perawat diperlakukan dengan adil.
Semua tindakan keperawatan mempunyai uraian tugas yang
jelas.

F. Supervisi
No.
1.
2.
3.
4.

Pernyataan
Ya Tidak
Kepala ruangan secara rutin memonitor pekerjaan saya.
Kepala ruangan memberi masukan terhadap pekerjaan saya.
Kepala ruangan memuji pekerjaan saya.

Kepala ruangan terlalu sering memonitor pekerjaan yang
saya lakukan sehingga mengganggu pekerjaan saya.

G. Pengembangan Karier
No.
Pernyataan
Ya Tidak
1. Saya bekerja dengan sungguh-sungguh agar mendapat
promosi.
2. Pengembangan karier sesuai kinerja.
3. Saya mendapatkan promosi dari pihak ruangan.
4. Perawat yang memiliki kinerja yang baik akan dibiayai
untuk mengikuti pelatihan atau pendidikan dan dibiayai.

Universitas Sumatera Utara

KINERJA PERAWAT
Petunjuk Pengisian
1. Bacalah dengan cermat dan teliti setiap item pertanyaan dibawah ini.
2. Pilih salah satu jawaban yang saudara anggap paling sesuai dengan kenyataan

yang saudara hadapi, dengan ketentuan sebagai berikut:
(4) Jika sangat sering dilakukan
(3) Jika sering dilakukan
(2) Jika jarang dilakukan
(1) Jika tidak pernah dilakukan
3. Berilah tanda silang (X) pada alternatif jawaban yang telah disediakan.

No
A

Jawaban

Pertanyaan

4

Format pengkajian di isi dengan lengkap

2

Mencatat data sesuai dengan pedoman pencatatan

3

Mengelompokkan bio-psiko-sosial, dan spiritual

4

Mengkaji pasien sejak dirawat sampai pulang

5

Merumuskan masalah untuk diagnosa keperawatan awal

B

Diagnosa Keperawatan

7

Membuat diagnosa keperawatan berdasarkan masalah
yang dirumuskan
Diagnosa keperawatan didasarkan pada masalah
kesehatan, penyebab dan gejala yang ada pada klien

8

Merumuskan diagnosa keperawatan aktual

9

Merumuskan diagnosa keperawatan potensial

C

Perencanaan

10
11

2

Pengkajian

1

6

3

Membuat prioritas diagnosa keperawatan berdasarkan
kebutuhan klien
Menentukan tujuan dari asuhan keperawatan

Universitas Sumatera Utara

1

12

Mengembangkan rencana keperawatan dengan
melibatkan keluarga

13

Membuat perencanaan tindakan keperawatan observasi

14

Membuat tindakan keperawatan kolaborasi

15

16

17
D
18

19

20

21
22
23
E
24
25

Membuat tindakan keperawatan bersifat pendidikan
Keperawatan
Membuat perencanaan mengacu pada tujuan dengan
kalimat perintah, terinci dan jelas.
Membuat rencana tindakan keperawatan sesuai standar
asuhan keperawatan
Implementasi
Melaksanakan tindakan keperawatan mengacu pada
rencana
Melaksanakan tindakan keperawatan dengan komunikasi
yang teurapetik
Melaksanakan tindakan keperawatan sesuai dengan
asuhan keperawatan
Mengobservasi respon klien terhadap tindakan
keperawatan
Merevisi tindakan berdasarkan hasil evaluasi
Mencatat semua tindakan keperawatan yang telah
dilaksanakan dengan jelas dan ringkas
Evaluasi
Mengevaluasi asuhan keperawatan klien berdasarkan
tujuan yang ditetapkan
Mencatat semua asuhan keperawatan klien

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Lampiran 2 : Hasil Uji Validitas dan Uji Reliabilitas

HASIL UJI VALIDITAS FAKTOR MOTIVASI YANG MEMENGARUHI
KINERJA PERAWAT
Correlations
M1
M1

Pearson Correlation

M2
1

,860(**)

,860(**)

,000

,000

,000

30

30

30

30

,926(**)

1

,783(**)

,783(**)

,000

,000

N
Pearson Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)

,000

N
M3

Pearson Correlation

30

30

,860(**)

,783(**)

1

,713(**)

,000

,000

30

30

30

30

,860(**)

,783(**)

,713(**)

1

,000

,000

,000

30
,902(**
)
,000

30

30

30

30

30

,979(**)

,937(**)

,902(**)

,902(**)

1

,000

,000

,000

,000

30

30

30

30

Sig. (2-tailed)
N
JLHM

Pearson Correlation

30
,937(**
)
,000

30

N
Pearson Correlation

JLHM
,979(**
)
,000

30

Sig. (2-tailed)
M4

M4

,926(**)

Sig. (2-tailed)
M2

M3

Sig. (2-tailed)
N

,000

30
,902(**
)
,000

30

** Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

HASIL UJI VALIDITAS FAKTOR PENDAPATAN YANG MEMENGARUHI
KINERJA PERAWAT
Correlations
PN1
PN1

Pearson
Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)

PN2

N
Pearson
Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)

PN3

N
Pearson
Correlation

PN2
1

PN3

PN4

JLHPN

,713(**)

,932(**)

,675(**)

,928(**)

,000

,000

,000

,000

30

30

30

30

30

,713(**)

1

,649(**)

,813(**)

,889(**)

,000

,000

,000

,000

30

30

30

30

30

,932(**)

,649(**)

1

,600(**)

,890(**)

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Sig. (2-tailed)

,000

,000

,000

,000

30

30

30

30

30

,675(**)

,813(**)

,600(**)

1

,866(**)

,000
30

,000
30

,000
30

30

,000
30

,928(**)

,889(**)

,890(**)

,866(**)

1

,000

,000

,000

,000

30

30

30

N
PN4

Pearson
Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)
N

JLHPN

Pearson
Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)
N

30
** Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

30

HASIL UJI VALIDITAS FAKTOR KELUARGA YANG MEMENGARUHI
KINERJA PERAWAT
Correlations
K1
K1

K2

K3

K4

JLHK

Pearson
Correlation
Sig. (2tailed)
N
Pearson
Correlation
Sig. (2tailed)
N
Pearson
Correlation
Sig. (2tailed)
N
Pearson
Correlation
Sig. (2tailed)
N
Pearson
Correlation
Sig. (2tailed)
N

K2
1

K3

K4

JLHK

,929(**)

,666(**)

,722(**)

,950(**)

,000

,000

,000

,000

30

30

30

30

30

,929(**)

1

,591(**)

,649(**)

,907(**)

,001

,000

,000

,000
30

30

30

30

30

,666(**)

,591(**)

1

,522(**)

,800(**)

,000

,001

,003

,000

30

30

30

30

30

,722(**)

,649(**)

,522(**)

1

,830(**)

,000

,000

,003

30

30

30

30

30

,950(**)

,907(**)

,800(**)

,830(**)

1

,000

,000

,000

,000

30

30

30

30

,000

30

** Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

Universitas Sumatera Utara

HASIL UJI VALIDITAS FAKTOR ORGANISASI YANG MEMENGARUHI
KINERJA PERAWAT
Correlations
O1
O1

N
O2

O3

Pearson
Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)
N
Pearson
Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)
N

O4

JLHO

O2

Pearson
Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)

Pearson
Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)
N
Pearson
Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)
N

1

O3

O4

JLHO

,685(**)

,302

,068

,861(**)

,000

,105

,721

,000

30

30

30

30

30

,685(**)

1

-,084

-,019

,683(**)

,000

,657

,920

,000

30

30

30

30

30

,302

-,084

1

,184

,546(**)

,105

,657

,332

,002

30

30

30

30

30

,068

-,019

,184

1

,401(*)

,721
30

,920
30

,332
30

30

,028
30

,861(**)

,683(**)

,546(**)

,401(*)

1

,000

,000

,002

,028

30

30

30

30
** Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
* Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).

30

HASIL UJI VALIDITAS FAKTOR SUPERVISI YANG MEMENGARUHI
KINERJA PERAWAT
Correlations
S1
S1

Pearson
Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)
N

S2

Pearson
Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)
N

S3

Pearson
Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)

S2

S3

S4

JLHS

,685(**)

,849(**)

,783(**)

,929(**)

,000

,000

,000

,000

30

30

30

30

30

,685(**)

1

,533(**)

,890(**)

,870(**)

,002

,000

,000

1

,000
30

30

30

30

30

,849(**)

,533(**)

1

,632(**)

,845(**)

,000

,002

,000

,000

Universitas Sumatera Utara

N
S4

JLHS

Pearson
Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)
N
Pearson
Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)

30

30

30

30

30

,783(**)

,890(**)

,632(**)

1

,925(**)

,000

,000

,000

30

30

30

30

30

,929(**)

,870(**)

,845(**)

,925(**)

1

,000

,000

,000

,000

30

30

30

30

N

,000

30

** Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

HASIL UJI VALIDITAS FAKTOR PENGEMBANGAN YANG
MEMENGARUHI KINERJA PERAWAT
Correlations
P1
P1

Pearson Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)
N
Pearson Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)
N
Pearson Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)
N
Pearson Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)
N
Pearson Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)
N

1

30
,685(**)
,000
30
P3
,592(**)
,001
30
P4
1,000(**)
,000
30
JLHP
,912(**)
,000
30
** Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
P2

P2
,685(**)
,000
30
1
30
,889(**)
,000
30
,685(**)
,000
30
,909(**)
,000
30

P3
,592(**)
,001
30
,889(**)
,000
30
1
30
,592(**)
,001
30
,857(**)
,000
30

P4
1,000(**)
,000
30
,685(**)
,000
30
,592(**)
,001
30
1
30
,912(**)
,000
30

JLHP
,912(**)
,000
30
,909(**)
,000
30
,857(**)
,000
30
,912(**)
,000
30
1
30

Universitas Sumatera Utara

HASIL UJI VALIDITAS PENERAPAN STANDAR ASUHAN
KEPERAWATAN BERDASARKAN PENGKAJIAN
Correlations
P1
P1

P2

P3

P4

P5

JLHPE

Pearson Correl ation
Sig. (2-tailed)
N
Pearson Correl ation
Sig. (2-tailed)
N
Pearson Correl ation
Sig. (2-tailed)
N
Pearson Correl ation
Sig. (2-tailed)
N
Pearson Correl ation
Sig. (2-tailed)
N
Pearson Correl ation
Sig. (2-tailed)
N

P2
,685**
,000
30
1

1
30
,685**
,000
30
,302
,105
30
,068
,721
30
,213
,257
30
,787**
,000
30

P3
,302
,105
30
-,084
,657
30
1

30
-,084
,657
30
-,019
,920
30
-,094
,621
30
,534**
,002
30

30
,184
,332
30
,425*
,019
30
,598**
,000
30

P4
,068
,721
30
-,019
,920
30
,184
,332
30
1
30
,407*
,026
30
,471**
,009
30

P5
,213
,257
30
-,094
,621
30
,425*
,019
30
,407*
,026
30
1
30
,627**
,000
30

JLHPE
,787**
,000
30
,534**
,002
30
,598**
,000
30
,471**
,009
30
,627**
,000
30
1
30

**. Correlation is s ignificant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
*. Correlation is s ignificant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).

HASIL UJI VALIDITAS PENERAPAN STANDAR ASUHAN
KEPERAWATAN BERDASARKAN DIAGNOSA KEPERAWATAN
Correlations
D6
D6

D7

D8

D9

JLHD

Pearson Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)
N
Pearson Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)
N
Pearson Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)
N
Pearson Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)
N
Pearson Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)
N

1
30
,685**
,000
30
,849**
,000
30
,783**
,000
30
,929**
,000
30

D7
,685**
,000
30
1
30
,533**
,002
30
,890**
,000
30
,870**
,000
30

D8
,849**
,000
30
,533**
,002
30
1
30
,632**
,000
30
,845**
,000
30

D9
,783**
,000
30
,890**
,000
30
,632**
,000
30
1
30
,925**
,000
30

JLHD
,929**
,000
30
,870**
,000
30
,845**
,000
30
,925**
,000
30
1

**. Correlation is si gnifi cant at the 0.01 level (2-tail ed).

Universitas Sumatera Utara

30

HASIL UJI VALIDITAS PENERAPAN STANDAR ASUHAN
KEPERAWATAN BERDASARKAN PERENCANAAN
Correlations
PE10
PE10

PE11

PE12

PE13

PE14

PE15

PE16

PE17

JLHPER

Pearson Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)
N
Pearson Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)
N
Pearson Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)
N
Pearson Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)
N
Pearson Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)
N
Pearson Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)
N
Pearson Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)
N
Pearson Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)
N
Pearson Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)
N

PE11
,685**
,000
30
1

1
30
,685**
,000
30
,592**
,001
30
1,000**
,000
30
,685**
,000
30
,592**
,001
30
,588**
,001
30
,543**
,002
30
,797**
,000
30

30
,889**
,000
30
,685**
,000
30
1,000**
,000
30
,889**
,000
30
,878**
,000
30
,830**
,000
30
,962**
,000
30

PE12
,592**
,001
30
,889**
,000
30
1
30
,592**
,001
30
,889**
,000
30
,767**
,000
30
,754**
,000
30
,694**
,000
30
,867**
,000
30

PE13
1,000**
,000
30
,685**
,000
30
,592**
,001
30
1
30
,685**
,000
30
,592**
,001
30
,588**
,001
30
,543**
,002
30
,797**
,000
30

PE14
,685**
,000
30
1,000**
,000
30
,889**
,000
30
,685**
,000
30
1
30
,889**
,000
30
,878**
,000
30
,830**
,000
30
,962**
,000
30

PE15
,592**
,001
30
,889**
,000
30
,767**
,000
30
,592**
,001
30
,889**
,000
30
1
30
,987**
,000
30
,937**
,000
30
,933**
,000
30

PE16
,588**
,001
30
,878**
,000
30
,754**
,000
30
,588**
,001
30
,878**
,000
30
,987**
,000
30
1
30
,948**
,000
30
,928**
,000
30

PE17
JLHPER
,543**
,797**
,002
,000
30
30
,830**
,962**
,000
,000
30
30
,694**
,867**
,000
,000
30
30
,543**
,797**
,002
,000
30
30
,830**
,962**
,000
,000
30
30
,937**
,933**
,000
,000
30
30
,948**
,928**
,000
,000
30
30
1
,886**
,000
30
30
,886**
1
,000
30
30

**. Correlation is s ignificant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

HASIL UJI VALIDITAS PENERAPAN STANDAR ASUHAN
KEPERAWATAN BERDASARKAN IMPLEMENTASI
Correl ations
I18
I18

I19

I20

I21

I22

I23

JLHIM

Pearson Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)
N
Pearson Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)
N
Pearson Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)
N
Pearson Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)
N
Pearson Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)
N
Pearson Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)
N
Pearson Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)
N

1
30
,702**
,000
30
,902**
,000
30
,732**
,000
30
,902**
,000
30
,764**
,000
30
,925**
,000
30

I19
,702**
,000
30
1
30
,604**
,000
30
,849**
,000
30
,604**
,000
30
,838**
,000
30
,851**
,000
30

I20
,902**
,000
30
,604**
,000
30
1
30
,632**
,000
30
1,000**
,000
30
,764**
,000
30
,907**
,000
30

I21
,732**
,000
30
,849**
,000
30
,632**
,000
30
1
30
,632**
,000
30
,905**
,000
30
,880**
,000
30

I22
,902**
,000
30
,604**
,000
30
1,000**
,000
30
,632**
,000
30
1
30
,764**
,000
30
,907**
,000
30

I23
,764**
,000
30
,838**
,000
30
,764**
,000
30
,905**
,000
30
,764**
,000
30
1
30
,933**
,000
30

JLHIM
,925**
,000
30
,851**
,000
30
,907**
,000
30
,880**
,000
30
,907**
,000
30
,933**
,000
30
1
30

**. Correlation is s ignificant at t he 0.01 level (2-t ailed).

Universitas Sumatera Utara

HASIL UJI VALIDITAS PENERAPAN STANDAR ASUHAN
KEPERAWATAN BERDASARKAN EVALUASI
Co rre l a tio ns
E2 4
E2 4

Pe arso n Correl ation
Sig . (2 -taile d)
N
Pe arso n Correl ation
Sig . (2 -taile d)
N
Pe arso n Correl ation
Sig . (2 -taile d)
N

E2 5

JL HE

1
30
,69 4**
,00 0
30
,91 7**
,00 0
30

E2 5
,69 4**
,00 0
30
1
30
,92 4**
,00 0
30

JL HE
,91 7**
,00 0
30
,92 4**
,00 0
30
1
30

**. Co rrela tion is s ignifican t at t he 0 .01 level (2-t ailed ).

HASIL UJI RELIABILITY FAKTOR MOTIVASI YANG MEMENGARUHI
KINERJA PERAWAT
Ca se P rocessing Sum ma ry
N
Cases

Valid
Ex cludeda
Total

30
0
30

%
100,0
,0
100,0

a. Lis twis e deletion based on all
variables in the procedure.
Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's
Alpha
,847

N of Items
5

HASIL UJI RELIABILITY FAKTOR PENDAPATAN YANG
MEMENGARUHI KINERJA PERAWAT
Ca se P rocessing Sum ma ry
N
Cases

Valid
Ex cludeda
Total

30
0
30

%
100,0
,0
100,0

a. Lis twis e deletion based on all
variables in the procedure.

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's
Alpha
,840

N of Items
5

HASIL UJI RELIABILITY FAKTOR KELUARGA YANG MEMENGARUHI
KINERJA PERAWAT
Ca se P rocessing Sum ma ry
N
Cases

Valid
Ex cludeda
Total

30
0
30

%
100,0
,0
100,0

a. Lis twis e deletion based on all
variables in the procedure.
Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's
Alpha
,834

N of Items
5

HASIL UJI RELIABILITY FAKTOR ORGANISASI YANG
MEMENGARUHI KINERJA PERAWAT
Ca se P rocessing Sum ma ry
N
Cases

Valid
Ex cludeda
Total

30
0
30

%
100,0
,0
100,0

a. Lis twis e deletion based on all
variables in the procedure.
Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's
Alpha
,744

N of Items
5

Universitas Sumatera Utara

HASIL UJI RELIABILITY FAKTOR SUPERVISI YANG MEMENGARUHI
KINERJA PERAWAT
Ca se P rocessing Sum ma ry
N
Cases

Valid
Ex cludeda
Total

30
0
30

%
100,0
,0
100,0

a. Lis twis e deletion based on all
variables in the procedure.
Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's
Alpha
,839

N of Items
5

HASIL UJI RELIABILITY FAKTOR PENGEMBANGAN YANG
MEMENGARUHI KINERJA PERAWAT
Ca se P rocessing Sum ma ry
N
Cases

Valid
Ex cludeda
Total

30
0
30

%
100,0
,0
100,0

a. Lis twis e deletion based on all
variables in the procedure.
Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's
Alpha
,840

N of Items
5

Universitas Sumatera Utara

HASIL UJI RELIABILITY PENERAPAN STANDAR ASUHAN
KEPERAWATAN BERDASARKAN PENGKAJIAN
Ca se P rocessing Sum ma ry
N
Cases

Valid
Ex cludeda
Total

30
0
30

%
100,0
,0
100,0

a. Lis twis e deletion based on all
variables in the procedure.
Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's
Alpha
,737

N of Items
6

HASIL UJI RELIABILITY PENERAPAN STANDAR ASUHAN
KEPERAWATAN BERDASARKAN DIAGNOSA KEPERAWATAN
Ca se P rocessing Sum ma ry
N
Cases

Valid
Ex cludeda
Total

30
0
30

%
100,0
,0
100,0

a. Lis twis e deletion based on all
variables in the procedure.
Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's
Alpha
,839

N of Items
5

Universitas Sumatera Utara

HASIL UJI RELIABILITY PENERAPAN STANDAR ASUHAN
KEPERAWATAN BERDASARKAN PERENCANAAN
Ca se P rocessing Sum ma ry
N
Cases

Valid
Ex cludeda
Total

30
0
30

%
100,0
,0
100,0

a. Lis twis e deletion based on all
variables in the procedure.
Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's
Alpha
,800

N of Items
9

HASIL UJI RELIABILITY PENERAPAN STANDAR ASUHAN
KEPERAWATAN BERDASARKAN IMPLEMENTASI
Ca se P rocessing Sum ma ry
N
Cases

Valid
Ex cludeda
Total

30
0
30

%
100,0
,0
100,0

a. Lis twis e deletion based on all
variables in the procedure.
Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's
Alpha
,815

N of Items
7

Universitas Sumatera Utara

HASIL UJI RELIABILITY PENERAPAN STANDAR ASUHAN
KEPERAWATAN BERDASARKAN EVALUASI
Ca se P rocessing Sum ma ry
N
Cases

Valid
Ex cludeda
Total

30
0
30

%
100,0
,0
100,0

a. Lis twis e deletion based on all
variables in the procedure.
Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's
Alpha
,904

N of Items
3

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Lampiran : Distribusi Frekuensi (Uji Univariat)

HASIL UNIVARIAT

Ka tegoriUmur

Valid

< 30 tahun
30-40 tahun
> 40 tahun
Total

Frequency
43
51
16
110

Percent
39.1
46.4
14.5
100.0

Valid P erc ent
39.1
46.4
14.5
100.0

Cumulative
Percent
39.1
85.5
100.0

JenisKelamin

Valid

Perem puan
Laki-laki
Total

Frequency
89
21
110

Percent
80.9
19.1
100.0

Valid Percent
80.9
19.1
100.0

Cumulative
Percent
80.9
100.0

StatusPerkawinan

Valid

Belum Kawin
Kawin
Total

Frequency
32
78
110

Percent
29.1
70.9
100.0

Valid Percent
29.1
70.9
100.0

Cumulative
Percent
29.1
100.0

Pe ndi dika n

Valid

DIII
S1
SP K
Total

Frequency
53
40
17
110

Percent
48.2
36.4
15.5
100.0

Valid P ercent
48.2
36.4
15.5
100.0

Cumul ative
Percent
48.2
84.5
100.0

97

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Pengalaman

Valid

< 5 Tahun
> 5 Tahun
Total

Frequency
59
51
110

Percent
53.6
46.4
100.0

Valid Percent
53.6
46.4
100.0

Cumul ative
Percent
53.6
100.0

Dalam bekerja saya memiliki motivasi yang tinggi.

Valid

Tidak
Ya
Total

Frequency
28
82
110

Percent
25.5
74.5
100.0

Valid Percent
25.5
74.5
100.0

Cumul ative
Percent
25.5
100.0

Saya selaku termotivasi membantu pasien.

Valid

Tidak
Ya
Total

Frequency
25
85
110

Percent
22.7
77.3
100.0

Valid Percent
22.7
77.3
100.0

Cumul ative
Percent
22.7
100.0

Pada semua kondisi saya bekerja dengan baik.

Valid

Tidak
Ya
Total

Frequency
23
87
110

Percent
20.9
79.1
100.0

Valid Percent
20.9
79.1
100.0

Cumul ative
Percent
20.9
100.0

Saya mendapat motivasi dari kepala ruangan.

Valid

Tidak
Ya
Total

Frequency
44
66
110

Percent
40.0
60.0
100.0

Valid Percent
40.0
60.0
100.0

Cumul ative
Percent
40.0
100.0

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Motivasi

Valid

Tidak Baik
Baik
Total

Frequency
60
50
110

Percent
54.5
45.5
100.0

Valid Percent
54.5
45.5
100.0

Cumul ative
Percent
54.5
100.0

Gaji saya dapat memenuhi kebutuhan sehari-hari.

Valid

Tidak
Ya
Total

Frequency
45
65
110

Percent
40.9
59.1
100.0

Valid Percent
40.9
59.1
100.0

Cumul ative
Percent
40.9
100.0

Gaji yang saya terima sesuai dengan keinginan saya.

Valid

Tidak
Ya
Total

Frequency
32
78
110

Percent
29.1
70.9
100.0

Valid Percent
29.1
70.9
100.0

Cumul ative
Percent
29.1
100.0

Gaji sesuai dengan pekerjaan yang dilakukan.

Valid

Tidak
Ya
Total

Frequency
32
78
110

Percent
29.1
70.9
100.0

Valid Percent
29.1
70.9
100.0

Cumul ative
Percent
29.1
100.0

Se lain gaj i sa ya m endapa t intensif ya ng mendorong saya untuk bek
lebih.

Valid

Tidak
Ya
Total

Frequency
47
63
110

Percent
42.7
57.3
100.0

Valid P ercent
42.7
57.3
100.0

Cumul ative
Percent
42.7
100.0

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Pendapatan

Valid

Tidak Baik
Baik
Total

Frequency
78
32
110

Percent
70.9
29.1
100.0

Cumul ative
Percent
70.9
100.0

Valid Percent
70.9
29.1
100.0

Keluarga mendukung kerjaan saya.

Valid

Tidak
Ya
Total

Frequency
30
80
110

Percent
27.3
72.7
100.0

Cumul ative
Percent
27.3
100.0

Valid Percent
27.3
72.7
100.0

Keluarga selalu mengerti pekerjaan saya.

Valid

Tidak
Ya
Total

Frequency
30
80
110

Percent
27.3
72.7
100.0

Valid Percent
27.3
72.7
100.0

Cumul ative
Percent
27.3
100.0

Keluarga mengerti profesi saya sebagai perawat.

Valid

Tidak
Ya
Total

Frequency
28
82
110

Percent
25.5
74.5
100.0

Valid Percent
25.5
74.5
100.0

Cumul ative
Percent
25.5
100.0

Keluarga dapat mengerti apabila saya mendapat tugas tambahan.

Valid

Tidak
Ya
Total

Frequency
42
68
110

Percent
38.2
61.8
100.0

Valid Percent
38.2
61.8
100.0

Cumul ative
Percent
38.2
100.0

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Keluarga

Valid

Tidak Baik
Baik
Total

Frequency
65
45
110

Percent
59.1
40.9
100.0

Valid Percent
59.1
40.9
100.0

Cumul ative
Percent
59.1
100.0

Suasana ditempat kerja saya kondusif.

Valid

Tidak
Ya
Total

Frequency
34
76
110

Percent
30.9
69.1
100.0

Valid Percent
30.9
69.1
100.0

Cumul ative
Percent
30.9
100.0

Pekerjaan saya lakukan sesuai dengan pendidikan saya.

Valid

Tidak
Ya
Total

Frequency
26
84
110

Percent
23.6
76.4
100.0

Valid Percent
23.6
76.4
100.0

Cumul ative
Percent
23.6
100.0

Semua perawat diperlakukan dengan adil.

Valid

Tidak
Ya
Total

Frequency
28
82
110

Percent
25.5
74.5
100.0

Valid Percent
25.5
74.5
100.0

Cumul ative
Percent
25.5
100.0

Semua tindakan keperawatan mempunyai uraian tugas yang jelas.

Valid

Tidak
Ya
Total

Frequency
35
75
110

Percent
31.8
68.2
100.0

Valid Percent
31.8
68.2
100.0

Cumul ative
Percent
31.8
100.0

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Organisasi

Valid

Tidak Baik
Baik
Total

Frequency
62
48
110

Percent
56.4
43.6
100.0

Valid Percent
56.4
43.6
100.0

Cumul ative
Percent
56.4
100.0

Kepala ruangan secara rutin memonitor pekerjaan saya.

Valid

Tidak
Ya
Total

Frequency
39
71
110

Percent
35.5
64.5
100.0

Valid Percent
35.5
64.5
100.0

Cumul ative
Percent
35.5
100.0

Kepala ruangan memberi masukan terhadap pekerjaan saya.

Valid

Tidak
Ya
Total

Frequency
36
74
110

Percent
32.7
67.3
100.0

Valid Percent
32.7
67.3
100.0

Cumul ative
Percent
32.7
100.0

Kepala ruangan memuji pekerjaan saya.

Valid

Tidak
Ya
Total

Frequency
32
78
110

Percent
29.1
70.9
100.0

Valid Percent
29.1
70.9
100.0

Cumul ative
Percent
29.1
100.0

Ke pal a ru ang an te rlal u se ring me mo nito r pe kerj aan yan g sa ya l aku
se hing ga men gga ngg u pe kerjaan saya.

Valid

Tidak
Ya
Total

Frequency
47
63
110

Percent
42.7
57.3
100.0

Valid P ercent
42.7
57.3
100.0

Cumul ative
Percent
42.7
100.0

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Supervisi

Valid

Tidak Baik
Baik
Total

Frequency
77
33
110

Percent
70.0
30.0
100.0

Valid Percent
70.0
30.0
100.0

Cumul ative
Percent
70.0
100.0

Saya bekerja dengan sungguh-sungguh agar mendapat promosi.

Valid

Tidak
Ya
Total

Frequency
36
74
110

Percent
32.7
67.3
100.0

Valid Percent
32.7
67.3
100.0

Cumul ative
Percent
32.7
100.0

Pengembangan karier sesuai kinerja.

Valid

Tidak
Ya
Total

Frequency
36
74
110

Percent
32.7
67.3
100.0

Valid Percent
32.7
67.3
100.0

Cumul ative
Percent
32.7
100.0

Saya mendapatkan promosi dari pihak ruangan.

Valid

Tidak
Ya
Total

Frequency
24
86
110

Percent
21.8
78.2
100.0

Valid Percent
21.8
78.2
100.0

Cumul ative
Percent
21.8
100.0

Pe raw at yang me mili ki ki nerj a ya ng baik aka n dibia yai untuk m eng
pe latihan atau pe ndidikan da n di biayai.

Valid

Tidak
Ya
Total

Frequency
41
69
110

Percent
37.3
62.7
100.0

Valid P ercent
37.3
62.7
100.0

Cumul ative
Percent
37.3
100.0

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Pengembangan

Valid

Tidak Baik
Baik
Total

Frequency
69
41
110

Percent
62.7
37.3
100.0

Valid Percent
62.7
37.3
100.0

Cumul ative
Percent
62.7
100.0

Format pengkajian di isi dengan lengkap

Valid

Tidak pernah dilakukan
Jarang dilakukan
Sering dilakukan
Sangat sering dilakukan
Total

Frequency
2
62
11
35
110

Percent
1.8
56.4
10.0
31.8
100.0

Valid Percent
1.8
56.4
10.0
31.8
100.0

Cumulative
Percent
1.8
58.2
68.2
100.0

Mencatat data sesuai dengan pedoman pencatatan

Valid

Tidak pernah dilakukan
Jarang dilakukan
Sering dilakukan
Sangat sering dilakukan
Total

Frequency
3
61
4
42
110

Percent
2.7
55.5
3.6
38.2
100.0

Valid Percent
2.7
55.5
3.6
38.2
100.0

Cumulative
Percent
2.7
58.2
61.8
100.0

Mengelompokkan bio-psiko-sosial, dan spiritual

Valid

Tidak pernah dilakukan
Jarang dilakukan
Sering dilakukan
Sangat sering dilakukan
Total

Frequency
1
63
3
43
110

Percent
.9
57.3
2.7
39.1
100.0

Valid Percent
.9
57.3
2.7
39.1
100.0

Cumulative
Percent
.9
58.2
60.9
100.0

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Mengkaji pasien sejak dirawat sampai pulang

Valid

Jarang dilakukan
Sangat sering dilakukan
Total

Frequency
64
46
110

Percent
58.2
41.8
100.0

Valid Percent
58.2
41.8
100.0

Cumulative
Percent
58.2
100.0

Merumuskan masalah untuk diagnosa keperawatan awal

Valid

Jarang dilakukan
Sangat sering dilakukan
Total

Frequency
64
46
110

Percent
58.2
41.8
100.0

Valid Percent
58.2
41.8
100.0

Cumulative
Percent
58.2
100.0

Me mbuat dia gnosa kepe raw atan be rda sarkan m asalah ya ng dirum uskan

Valid

Frequency
Jarang dilakuk an
64
Sering dilakukan
3
Sangat sering dilak ukan
43
Total
110

Percent
58.2
2.7
39.1
100.0

Valid P erc ent
58.2
2.7
39.1
100.0

Cumulative
Percent
58.2
60.9
100.0

Diagnosa keperawatan didasarkan pada masalah kesehatan, penyebab dan gejala yang
ada pada klien

Valid

Tidak pernah dilakukan
Jarang dilakukan
Sering dilakukan
Sangat sering dilakukan
Total

Frequency
1
63
2
44
110

Percent
.9
57.3
1.8
40.0
100.0

Valid Percent
.9
57.3
1.8
40.0
100.0

Cumulative
Percent
.9
58.2
60.0
100.0

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Merumuskan diagnosa keperawatan aktual

Valid

Tidak pernah dilakukan
Jarang dilakukan
Sering dilakukan
Sangat sering dilakukan
Total

Frequency
1
63
3
43
110

Percent
.9
57.3
2.7
39.1
100.0

Valid Percent
.9
57.3
2.7
39.1
100.0

Cumulative
Percent
.9
58.2
60.9
100.0

Me rum uskan diagnosa ke pe raw atan potensial

Valid

Frequency
Jarang dilakuk an
64
Sering dilakukan
3
Sangat sering dilak ukan
43
Total
110

Percent
58.2
2.7
39.1
100.0

Valid P erc ent
58.2
2.7
39.1
100.0

Cumulative
Percent
58.2
60.9
100.0

Me mbuat priorita s di agnosa keperaw ata n berdasarkan kebutuhan klie n

Valid

Frequency
Jarang dilakuk an
64
Sering dilakukan
3
Sangat sering dilak ukan
43
Total
110

Percent
58.2
2.7
39.1
100.0

Valid P erc ent
58.2
2.7
39.1
100.0

Cumulative
Percent
58.2
60.9
100.0

Menentukan tujuan dari asuhan keperawatan

Valid

Tidak pernah dilakukan
Jarang dilakukan
Sering dilakukan
Sangat sering dilakukan
Total

Frequency
1
63
1
45
110

Percent
.9
57.3
.9
40.9
100.0

Valid Percent
.9
57.3
.9
40.9
100.0

Cumulative
Percent
.9
58.2
59.1
100.0

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Mengembangkan rencana keperawatan dengan melibatkan keluarga

Valid

Tidak pernah dilakukan
Jarang dilakukan
Sering dilakukan
Sangat sering dilakukan
Total

Frequency
1
63
1
45
110

Percent
.9
57.3
.9
40.9
100.0

Valid Percent
.9
57.3
.9
40.9
100.0

Cumulative
Percent
.9
58.2
59.1
100.0

Membuat perencanaan tindakan keperawatan observasi

Valid

Jarang dilakukan
Sangat sering dilakukan
Total

Frequency
64
46
110

Percent
58.2
41.8
100.0

Valid Percent
58.2
41.8
100.0

Cumulative
Percent
58.2
100.0

Membuat tindakan keperawatan kolaborasi

Valid

Jarang dilakukan
Sangat sering dilakukan
Total

Frequency
64
46
110

Percent
58.2
41.8
100.0

Valid Percent
58.2
41.8
100.0

Cumulative
Percent
58.2
100.0

Membuat tindakan keperawatan bersifat pendidikan keperawatan

Valid

Jarang dilakukan
Sangat sering dilakukan
Total

Frequency
64
46
110

Percent
58.2
41.8
100.0

Valid Percent
58.2
41.8
100.0

Cumulative
Percent
58.2
100.0

Membuat perencanaan mengacu pada tujuan dengan kalimat perintah, terinci dan jelas.

Valid

Jarang dilakukan
Sangat sering dilakukan
Total

Frequency
64
46
110

Percent
58.2
41.8
100.0

Valid Percent
58.2
41.8
100.0

Cumulative
Percent
58.2
100.0

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Membuat rencana tindakan keperawatan sesuai standar asuhan keperawatan

Valid

Jarang dilakukan
Sangat sering dilakukan
Total

Frequency
64
46
110

Percent
58.2
41.8
100.0

Valid Percent
58.2
41.8
100.0

Cumulative
Percent
58.2
100.0

Melaksanakan tindakan keperawatan mengacu pada rencana

Valid

Jarang dilakukan
Sangat sering dilakukan
Total

Frequency
64
46
110

Percent
58.2
41.8
100.0

Valid Percent
58.2
41.8
100.0

Cumulative
Percent
58.2
100.0

Melaksanakan tindakan keperawatan dengan komunikasi yang teurapetik

Valid

Jarang dilakukan
Sangat sering dilakukan
Total

Frequency
64
46
110

Percent
58.2
41.8
100.0

Valid Percent
58.2
41.8
100.0

Cumulative
Percent
58.2
100.0

Me laksanaka n tindakan kepe raw ata n se sua i de nga n a suha n kepe raw atan

Valid

Frequency
Tidak pernah dilakukan
1
Jarang dilakuk an
63
Sangat sering dilak ukan
46
Total
110

Percent
.9
57.3
41.8
100.0

Valid P erc ent
.9
57.3
41.8
100.0

Cumulative
Percent
.9
58.2
100.0

Mengobservasi respon klien terhadap tindakan keperawatan

Valid

Jarang dilakukan
Sangat sering dilakukan
Total

Frequency
64
46
110

Percent
58.2
41.8
100.0

Valid Percent
58.2
41.8
100.0

Cumulative
Percent
58.2
100.0

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Merevisi tindakan berdasarkan hasil evaluasi

Valid

Jarang dilakukan
Sangat sering dilakukan
Total

Frequency
64
46
110

Percent
58.2
41.8
100.0

Valid Percent
58.2
41.8
100.0

Cumulative
Percent
58.2
100.0

Mencatat semua tindakan keperawatan yang telah dilaksanakan dengan jelas dan
ringkas

Valid

Jarang dilakukan
Sering dilakukan
Sangat sering dilakukan
Total

Frequency
64
1
45
110

Percent
58.2
.9
40.9
100.0

Valid Percent
58.2
.9
40.9
100.0

Cumulative
Percent
58.2
59.1
100.0

Me nge val uasi asuhan ke perawa tan klie n be rda sarkan tujuan yang ditetapkan

Valid

Frequency
Jarang dilakuk an
64
Sering dilakukan
5
Sangat sering dilak ukan
41
Total
110

Percent
58.2
4.5
37.3
100.0

Valid P erc ent
58.2
4.5
37.3
100.0

Cumulative
Percent
58.2
62.7
100.0

Me nca tat sem ua asuhan kepera wata n klien

Valid

Frequency
Jarang dilakuk an
64
Sering dilakukan
3
Sangat sering dilak ukan
43
Total
110

Percent
58.2
2.7
39.1
100.0

Valid P erc ent
58.2
2.7
39.1
100.0

Cumulative
Percent
58.2
60.9
100.0

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Kinerja

Valid

Tidak Baik
Baik
Total

Frequency
64
46
110

Percent
58.2
41.8
100.0

Valid Percent
58.2
41.8
100.0

Cumul ative
Percent
58.2
100.0

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Lampiran 4 : Hasil Uji Bivariat
HASIL BIVARIAT

KategoriUmur * Kinerja
Crosstab

KategoriUmur

1

2

3

Total

Count
% within KategoriUmur
% within Kinerja
% of Total
Count
% within KategoriUmur
% within Kinerja
% of Total
Count
% within KategoriUmur
% within Kinerja
% of Total
Count
% within KategoriUmur
% within Kinerja
% of Total

Kinerja
Tidak Baik
25
58.1%
39.7%
22.7%
30
58.8%
47.6%
27.3%
8
50.0%
12.7%
7.3%
63
57.3%
100.0%
57.3%

Baik

Total

18
41.9%
38.3%
16.4%
21
41.2%
44.7%
19.1%
8
50.0%
17.0%
7.3%
47
42.7%
100.0%
42.7%

43
100.0%
39.1%
39.1%
51
100.0%
46.4%
46.4%
16
100.0%
14.5%
14.5%
110
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%

Ch i-Sq uar e Te sts

Pearson Chi-S quare
Lik elihood Rati o
Linear-by-Linear
As soc iation
N of V alid Cases

Value
.409a
.406
.183

2
2

As ymp. Si g.
(2-sided)
.815
.816

1

.669

df

110

a. 0 c ells (.0% ) have expected count less than 5. The
mi nimum expected count is 6.84.

111

Universitas Sumatera Utara

JenisKelamin * Kinerja
Crosstab

JenisKelamin

Perempuan

Laki-laki

Total

Count
% within JenisKelamin
% within Kinerja
% of Total
Count
% within JenisKelamin
% within Kinerja
% of Total
Count
% within JenisKelamin
% within Kinerja
% of Total

Kinerja
Tidak Baik
Baik
50
39
56.2%
43.8%
79.4%
83.0%
45.5%
35.5%
13
8
61.9%
38.1%
20.6%
17.0%
11.8%
7.3%
63
47
57.3%
42.7%
100.0%
100.0%
57.3%
42.7%

Total
89
100.0%
80.9%
80.9%
21
100.0%
19.1%
19.1%
110
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correction a
Likelihood Ratio
Fis her's Exact Test
Linear-by-Linear
As sociation
N of Valid Cases

Value
.228b
.054
.229

.225

df
1
1
1

1

As ymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
.633
.817
.632

Exact Sig.
(2-sided)

Exact Sig.
(1-sided)

.807

.411

.635

110

a. Computed only for a 2x2 table
b. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 8.
97.

Universitas Sumatera Utara

StatusPerkawinan * Kinerja
Crosstab

St atus Perk awinan

Belum Kawin

Kawin

Total

Count
% within
St atus Perk awinan
% within Kinerja
% of Total
Count
% within
St atus Perk awinan
% within Kinerja
% of Total
Count
% within
St atus Perk awinan
% within Kinerja
% of Total

Kinerja
Tidak Baik
Baik
20
12

Total
32

62.5%

37.5%

100.0%

31.7%
18.2%
43

25.5%
10.9%
35

29.1%
29.1%
78

55.1%

44.9%

100.0%

68.3%
39.1%
63

74.5%
31.8%
47

70.9%
70.9%
110

57.3%

42.7%

100.0%

100.0%
57.3%

100.0%
42.7%

100.0%
100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correction a
Likelihood Ratio
Fis her's Exact Test
Linear-by-Linear
As sociation
N of Valid Cases

Value
.504b
.248
.508

.499

df
1
1
1

1

As ymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
.478
.619
.476

Exact Sig.
(2-sided)

Exact Sig.
(1-sided)

.529

.311

.480

110

a. Computed only for a 2x2 table
b. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 13.
67.

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Pendidikan * Kinerja
Crosstab

Pendidikan

SPK

DIII

S1

Total

Count
% within Pendidikan
% within Kinerja
% of Total
Count
% within Pendidikan
% within Kinerja
% of Total
Count
% within Pendidikan
% within Kinerja
% of Total
Count
% within Pendidikan
% within Kinerja
% of Total

Kinerja
Tidak Baik
37
69.8%
58.7%
33.6%
17
42.5%
27.0%
15.5%
9
52.9%
14.3%
8.2%
63
57.3%
100.0%
57.3%

Baik

Total

16
30.2%
34.0%
14.5%
23
57.5%
48.9%
20.9%
8
47.1%
17.0%
7.3%
47
42.7%
100.0%
42.7%

53
100.0%
48.2%
48.2%
40
100.0%
36.4%
36.4%
17
100.0%
15.5%
15.5%
110
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%

Ch i-Sq uar e Te sts

Pearson Chi-S quare
Lik elihood Rati o
Linear-by-Linear
As soc iation
N of V alid Cases

Value
7.103a
7.180
3.790

2
2

As ymp. Si g.
(2-sided)
.029
.028

1

.052

df

110

a. 0 c ells (.0% ) have expected count less than 5. The
mi nimum expected count is 7.26.

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Pengalaman * Kinerja
Crosstab

Pengalaman

< 5 Tahun

> 5 Tahun

Total

Count
% within P engalaman
% within K inerja
% of Total
Count
% within P engalaman
% within K inerja
% of Total
Count
% within P engalaman
% within K inerja
% of Total

Kinerja
Tidak B aik
Baik
41
18
69.5%
30.5%
38.3%
65.1%
37.3%
16.4%
22
29
43.1%
56.9%
34.9%
61.7%
20.0%
26.4%
63
47
42.7%
57.3%
100.0%
100.0%
57.3%
42.7%

Total
59
100.0%
53.6%
53.6%
51
100.0%
46.4%
46.4%
110
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correction a
Likelihood Ratio
Fis her's Exact Test
Linear-by-Linear
As sociation
N of Valid Cases

Value
7.764b
6.724
7.837

7.693

df
1
1
1

1

As ymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
.005
.010
.005

Exact Sig.
(2-sided)

Exact Sig.
(1-sided)

.007

.005

.006

110

a. Computed only for a 2x2 table
b. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 21.
79.

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Motivasi * Kinerja
Crosstab

Motivas i

Tidak Baik

Baik

Total

Count
% within Motivas i
% within Kinerja
% of Total
Count
% within Motivas i
% within Kinerja
% of Total
Count
% within Motivas i
% within Kinerja
% of Total

Kinerja
Tidak Baik
48
80.0%
76.2%
43.6%
15
30.0%
23.8%
13.6%
63
57.3%
100.0%
57.3%

Baik

Total

12
20.0%
25.5%
10.9%
35
70.0%
74.5%
31.8%
47
42.7%
100.0%
42.7%

60
100.0%
54.5%
54.5%
50
100.0%
45.5%
45.5%
110
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correction a
Likelihood Ratio
Fis her's Exact Test
Linear-by-Linear
As sociation
N of Valid Cases

Value
27.862 b
25.856
29.022

27.609

df
1
1
1

1

As ymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
.000
.000
.000

Exact Sig.
(2-sided)

Exact Sig.
(1-sided)

.000

.000

.000

110

a. Computed only for a 2x2 table
b. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 21.
36.

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Pendapatan * Kinerja
Crosstab

Pendapatan

Tidak B aik

Baik

Total

Kinerja
Tidak B aik
Baik
Count
53
25
% within P endapatan
67.9%
32.1%
% within K inerja
53.2%
84.1%
% of Total
48.2%
22.7%
Count
10
22
% within P endapatan
31.3%
68.8%
% within K inerja
15.9%
46.8%
% of Total
9.1%
20.0%
Count
63
47
% within P endapatan
42.7%
57.3%
% within K inerja
100.0%
100.0%
% of Total
57.3%
42.7%

Total
78
100.0%
70.9%
70.9%
32
100.0%
29.1%
29.1%
110
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correction a
Likelihood Ratio
Fis her's Exact Test
Linear-by-Linear
As sociation
N of Valid Cases

Value
12.488 b
11.034
12.555

12.375

df
1
1
1

1

As ymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
.000
.001
.000

Exact Sig.
(2-sided)

Exact Sig.
(1-sided)

.001

.000

.000

110

a. Computed only for a 2x2 table
b. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 13.
67.

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Keluarga * Kinerja
Crosstab

Keluarga

Tidak B aik

Baik

Total

Count
% within K eluarga
% within K inerja
% of Total
Count
% within K eluarga
% within K inerja
% of Total
Count
% within K eluarga
% within K inerja
% of Total

Kinerja
Tidak B aik
Baik
48
17
73.8%
26.2%
76.2%
36.2%
43.6%
15.5%
15
30
33.3%
66.7%
23.8%
63.8%
13.6%
27.3%
63
47
57.3%
42.7%
100.0%
100.0%
57.3%
42.7%

Total
65
100.0%
59.1%
59.1%
45
100.0%
40.9%
40.9%
110
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correction a
Likelihood Ratio
Fis her's Exact Test
Linear-by-Linear
As sociation
N of Valid Cases

Value
17.835 b
16.218
18.165

17.673

df
1
1
1

1

As ymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
.000
.000
.000

Exact Sig.
(2-sided)

Exact Sig.
(1-sided)

.000

.000

.000

110

a. Computed only for a 2x2 table
b. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 19.
23.

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Organisasi * Kinerja
Crosstab

Organisasi

Tidak Baik

Baik

Total

Count
% within Organisas i
% within Kinerja
% of Total
Count
% within Organisas i
% within Kinerja
% of Total
Count
% within Organisas i
% within Kinerja
% of Total

Kinerja
Tidak Baik
49
79.0%
77.8%
44.5%
14
29.2%
22.2%
12.7%
63
57.3%
100.0%
57.3%

Baik

Total

13
21.0%
27.7%
11.8%
34
70.8%
72.3%
30.9%
47
42.7%
100.0%
42.7%

62
100.0%
56.4%
56.4%
48
100.0%
43.6%
43.6%
110
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%

Exact Sig.
(2-sided)

Exact Sig.
(1-sided)

.000

.000

Chi-Square Tests

Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correction a
Likelihood Ratio
Fis her's Exact Test
Linear-by-Linear
As sociation
N of Valid Cases

Value
27.491 b
25.491
28.530

27.241

df
1
1
1

1

As ymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
.000
.000
.000

.000

110

a. Computed only for a 2x2 table
b. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 20.
51.

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Supervisi * Kinerja
Crosstab

Supervisi

Tidak B aik

Baik

Total

Count
% within S upervisi
% within K inerja
% of Total
Count
% within S upervisi
% within K inerja
% of Total
Count
% within S upervisi
% within K inerja
% of Total

Kinerja
Baik
Tidak B aik
53
24
68.8%
31.2%
84.1%
51.1%
48.2%
21.8%
10
23
30.3%
69.7%
15.9%
48.9%
9.1%
20.9%
63
47
57.3%
42.7%
100.0%
100.0%
57.3%
42.7%

Total
77
100.0%
70.0%
70.0%
33
100.0%
30.0%
30.0%
110
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correction a
Likelihood Ratio
Fis her's Exact Test
Linear-by-Linear
As sociation
N of Valid Cases

Value
14.012 b
12.482
14.123

13.885

df
1
1
1

1

As ymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
.000
.000
.000

Exact Sig.
(2-sided)

Exact Sig.
(1-sided)

.000

.000

.000

110

a. Computed only for a 2x2 table
b. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 14.
10.

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Pengembangan * Kinerja
Crosstab

Pengembangan

Tidak Baik

Baik

Total

Kinerja
Tidak Baik
Baik
Count
50
19
% within Pengembangan
72.5%
27.5%
% within Kinerja
79.4%
40.4%
% of Total
45.5%
17.3%
Count
13
28
% within Pengembangan
31.7%
68.3%
% within Kinerja
20.6%
59.6%
% of Total
11.8%
25.5%
Count
63
47
% within Pengembangan
57.3%
42.7%
% within Kinerja
100.0%
100.0%
% of Total
57.3%
42.7%

Total
69
100.0%
62.7%
62.7%
41
100.0%
37.3%
37.3%
110
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correction a
Likelihood Ratio
Fis her's Exact Test
Linear-by-Linear
As sociation
N of Valid Cases

Value
17.457 b
15.832
17.720

17.299

df
1
1
1

1

As ymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
.000
.000
.000

Exact Sig.
(2-sided)

Exact Sig.
(1-sided)

.000

.000

.000

110

a. Computed only for a 2x2 table
b. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 17.
52.

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Lampiran 5 : Hasil Unji Multivariat

HASIL MULTIVARIAT

Logistic Regression
Case Processing Summary
Unweighted Cases
Selected Cases

a

N
Included in Analysis
Mis sing Cases
Total

Unselected Cas es
Total

110
0
110
0
110

Percent
100,0
,0
100,0
,0
100,0

a. If weight is in effect, s ee class ification table for the total
number of cases.

De pendent V aria ble Encodi ng
Original Value
Tidak Baik
Baik

Int ernal Value
0
1

Block 0: Beginning Block
Classification Table a,b
Predicted

Step 0

Observed
Kinerja

Tidak Baik
Baik

Kinerja
Tidak Baik
Baik
63
0
47
0

Overall Percentage

Percentage
Correct
100,0
,0
57,3

a. Constant is included in the model.
b. The cut value is ,500

Va riables in the Equa tion
St ep 0

Constant

B
-,293

S. E.
,193

W ald
2,311

df
1

Sig.
,128

Ex p(B )
,746

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Va riables not in the Equa tion
St ep
0

Variables

Pendidikan
Pengalaman
Motivasi
Pendapatan
Keluarga
Organisasi
Supervisi
Pengembangan

Overall Statistics

Sc ore
3,825
7,764
27,862
12,488
17,835
27,491
14,012
17,457
64,184

df
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
8

Sig.
,050
,005
,000
,000
,000
,000
,000
,000
,000

Block 1: Method = Enter
Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients
Step 1

Step
Block
Model

Chi-square
89,722
89,722
89,722

df
8
8
8

Sig.
,000
,000
,000

Model Summary
Step
1

-2 Log
Cox & Snell
likelihood
R Square
60,435 a
,558

Nagelkerke
R Square
,749

a. Es timation terminated at iteration number 7 because
parameter estimates changed by les s than ,001.

Classification Table a
Predicted

Step 1

Observed
Kinerja
Overall Percentage

Tidak Baik
Baik

Kinerja
Tidak Baik
Baik
60
3
10
37

Percentage
Correct
95,2
78,7
88,2

a. The cut value is ,500

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Variables in the Equation
Step
a
1

Pendidikan
Pengalaman
Motivas i
Pendapatan
Keluarga
Organisasi
Supervisi
Pengembangan
Constant

B
-,306
-1,283
3,669
2,595
3,148
2,974
2,155
1,743
-20,291

S.E.
,506
,879
1,111
,955
,891
,867
,930
,919
4,743

Wald
,366
2,129
10,900
7,379
12,492
11,764
5,362
3,595
18,305

df
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1

Sig.
,545
,145
,001
,007
,000
,001
,021
,058
,000

Exp(B)
,736
,277
39,225
13,403
23,279
19,574
8,624
5,717
,000

a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: Pendidikan, Pengalaman, Motivasi, Pendapatan, Keluarga,
Organisasi, Supervis i, Pengembangan.

Case Processing Summary
Unweighted Cases
Selected Cases

a

N
Included in Analysis
Mis sing Cases
Total

Unselected Cas es
Total

110
0
110
0
110

Percent
100,0
,0
100,0
,0
100,0

a. If weight is in effect, s ee class ification table for the total
number of cases.

De pendent V aria ble Encodi ng
Original Value
Tidak Baik
Baik

Int ernal Value
0
1

Block 0: Beginning Block
Classification Table a,b
Predicted

Step 0

Observed
Kinerja

Tidak Baik
Baik

Overall Percentage

Kinerja
Tidak Baik
Baik
63
0
47
0

Percentage
Correct
100,0
,0
57,3

a. Constant is included in the model.
b. The cut value is ,500

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Va riables in the Equa tion
St ep 0

B
-,293

Constant

S. E.
,193

W ald
2,311

df
1

Sig.
,128

1
1
1
1
1
1
1
7

Sig.
,005
,000
,000
,000
,000
,000
,000
,000

Ex p(B )
,746

Variables not in the Equation
Step
0

Variables

Pengalaman
Motivas i
Pendapatan
Keluarga
Organisasi
Supervisi
Pengembangan

Overall Statistics

Score
7,764
27,862
12,488
17,835
27,491
14,012
17,457
63,881

df

Block 1: Method = Enter
Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients
Step 1

Step
Block
Model

Chi-square
89,346
89,346
89,346

df
7
7
7

Sig.
,000
,000
,000

Model Summary
Step
1

-2 Log
Cox & Snell
likelihood
R Square
,556
60,811 a

Nagelkerke
R Square
,747

a. Es timation terminated at iteration number 7 because
parameter estimates changed by les s than ,001.

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Classification Table a
Predicted

Step 1

Observed
Kinerja

Kinerja
Tidak Baik
Baik
60
3
8
39

Tidak Baik
Baik

Overall Percentage

Percentage
Correct
95,2
83,0
90,0

a. The cut value is ,500

Va riables in the Equa tion
Sta ep
1

Pengalaman
Motivasi
Pendapatan
Keluarga
Organisasi
Supervisi
Pengembangan
Constant

B
-1, 296
3,566
2,640
3,095
2,956
1,943
1,639
-20,213

S. E.
,883
1,080
,944
,875
,867
,849
,900
4,654

W ald
2,157
10,896
7,827
12,498
11,633
5,242
3,314
18,863

df
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1

Sig.
,142
,001
,005
,000
,001
,022
,069
,000

Ex p(B)
,274
35,382
14,016
22,085
19,216
6,982
5,151
,000

a. Variable(s) entered on s tep 1: P engalaman, Motivasi, Pendapatan, Keluarga, Organisasi,
Supervisi, P engembangan.

Logistic Regression
Case Processing Summary
Unweighted Cases
Selected Cases

Unselected Cas es
Total

a

N
Included in Analysis
Mis sing Cases
Total

110
0
110
0
110

Percent
100,0
,0
100,0
,0
100,0

a. If weight is in effect, s ee class ification table for the total
number of cases.

Universitas Sumatera Utara

De pendent V aria ble Encodi ng
Original Value
Tidak Baik
Baik

Int ernal Value
0
1

Block 0: Beginning Block
Classification Table a,b
Predicted

Step 0

Observed
Kinerja

Kinerja
Tidak Baik
Baik
63
0
47
0

Tidak Baik
Baik

Overall Percentage

Percentage
Correct
100,0
,0
57,3

a. Constant is included in the model.
b. The cut value is ,500

Va riables in the Equa tion
St ep 0

B
-,293

Constant

S. E.
,193

W ald
2,311

df
1

Sig.
,128

1
1
1
1
1
1
6

Sig.
,000
,000
,000
,000
,000
,000
,000

Ex p(B )
,746

Variables not in the Equation
Step
0

Variables

Motivas i
Pendapatan
Keluarga
Organisasi
Supervisi
Pengembangan

Overall Statistics

Score
27,862
12,488
17,835
27,491
14,012
17,457
61,469

df

Block 1: Method = Enter
Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients
Step 1

Step
Block
Model

Chi-square
86,937
86,937
86,937

df
6
6
6

Sig.
,000
,000
,000

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Model Summary
Step
1

-2 Log
Cox & Snell
likelihood
R Square
63,220 a
,546

Nagelkerke
R Square
,734

a. Es timation terminated at iteration number 7 because
parameter estimates changed by les s than ,001.

Classification Table a
Predicted

Step 1

Observed
Kinerja

Kinerja
Tidak Baik
Baik
62
1
11
36

Tidak Baik
Baik

Overall Percentage

Percentage
Correct
98,4
76,6
89,1

a. The cut value is ,500

Va riables in the Equa tion
Sta ep
1

Motivasi
Pendapatan
Keluarga
Organisasi
Supervisi
Pengembangan
Constant

B
2,747
2,657
2,902
2,906
1,947
1,744
-20,765

S. E.
,868
,915
,844
,842
,845
,893
4,624

W ald
10,020
8,422
11,812
11,902
5,314
3,816
20,165

df
1
1
1
1
1
1
1

Sig.
,002
,004
,001
,001
,021
,051
,000

Ex p(B)
15,600
14,249
18,212
18,291
7,010
5,721
,000

a. Variable(s) entered on s tep 1: Motivasi, P endapatan, Keluarga, Organisas i, Supervisi,
Pengembangan.

Universitas Sumatera Utara