An Analysis Of Student’s Speech Act At Canteen Faculty Of Cultural Studies University Of Sumatera Utara
AN ANALYSIS OF STUDENT’S SPEECH ACT AT CANTEEN FACULTY OF CULTURAL STUDIES UNIVERSITY OF SUMATERA UTARA A THESIS BY FAISAL EFENDI REG. NO : 100705001
DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH FACULTY OF CULTURAL SCIENCE UNIVERSITY OF SUMATERA UTARA MEDAN 2015
Approved by THE ENGLISH DEPARTMENT OF FACULTY OF CULTURAL
STUDIES, UNIVERSITY OF SUMATERA UTARA (USU) MEDAN as a thesis for THE
Head, Secretary, Dr. H. Muhizar Muchtar, M.S. Rahmadsyah Rangkuti, M.A Ph.D NIP. 19541117 198003 1 002 NIP. 197502092008122002
Accepted by the Board of Examiners in partial fulfillment of requirements for the degree of
Sarjana Sastra from the English Department, Faculty of Cultural Studies University of Sumatera
Utara.
The examination is held in the Faculty of Cultural Studies University of Sumatera Utara on
Saturday April 25, 2015.The Dean of Faculty of Cultural Studies University of Sumatera Utara Dr. H. Syahron Lubis, MA NIP. 19511013 197603 001 Board of Examiners Dr. H. Muhizar Muchtar, MS ……………………….
Rahmadsyah Rangkuti, MA, Ph.D ………………………. Dr. Edi Setia, M.Ed TESP ………………………. Dr. H. Syahron Lubis, MA …………………….....
Dr. Deliana, M. Hum …………………….....
AUTHOR’S DECLARATION
I M. FAISAL EFENDI DECLARE THAT I AM THE SOLE AUTHOR OF THIS THESIS
EXCEPT WHERE REFERENCES IS MADE IN THE TEXT OF THIS THESIS. THIS
THESIS CONTAINS NO MATERIAL PUBLISHED ELSEWHERE OR EXTRACTED IN
WHOLE OR IN PART FROM A THESIS BY WHICH I HAVE QUALIFIED FOR OR
AWARDED ANOTEHR DEGREE. NO OTHER PERSON’S WORK HAS BEEN USED
WITHOUT DUE ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS IN THE MAIN TEXT OF THE THESIS.
Signed: Date : 23 April 2015
COPYRIGHT DECLATARATION NAME : FAISAL EFENDI TITLE OF THESIS : AN ANALYSIS OF STUDENT’S SPEECH ACT AT CANTEEN FACULTY OF CULTURAL STUDIES UNIVERSITY OF SUMATERA UTARA QUALIFICATION : S-1/SARJANA SASTRA DEPARTMENT : ENGLISH
I AM WILLING THAT MY THESIS SHOULD BE AVAILABLE FOR
REPRODUCTION AT THE DISCREATION OF THE LIBRARIAN OF DEPARTMENT
OF ENGLISH, FACULTY OF CULTURAL STUDIES, UNIVERSITY OF SUMATERA
UTARA ON THE UNDERSTANDING THAT USERS ARE MADE AWARE OF THEIR
OBLIGATION UNDER THE LAW OF THE REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA Signed : Date : 23 April 2015Acknowledments Bismillaahirrahmaanirrahiim, Alhamdulilah, first of Allah all. The writer would like to expreess his thankfullness to the almighthy Allah swt, who always gives her health, chance, strenght, courrage and all his blessing thar enable her to finish her study, espesially in the completion of this thesis. The writer would like to express her deep gratitude and appreciation to Gratefulness to chairman and secretary of english deparment, who have given her facilities and opportunities to complete this thesis. The writer would also like to thank very much all lecturers who have given their precious thought and valuable knowledge throught the academic years. Finally, the writer devotes her big thanks to her dearest and sweetest friends for their help, support and warm frienship and colorful days during her study in faculty.
Medan,25 Apr 2015 The writer Faisal Efendi
Abstrak Dalam skiripsi ini yang berjudul An Analysis of Student’s Speech Act At
Canteen Faculty of Cultural Studies University Sumatera Utara. Penulis
menganalisis tindak tutur yang terdapat pada mahasiswa Fakultas Ilmu Budaya USU, dalam hal ini saya akan menganalisis tindak tutur tersebut, saya akan terlibat dalam lapangan, adapun tujuan penulis menjadikan skiripsi agar menemukan bentuk bentuk tindak tutur yang terdapat pada mahasiswa Fakultas Ilmu Budaya USU dan akan mendiskripsikan makna secara pragmatics dari ujaran – ujaran, dalam penulisan skiripsi ini, saya menggunakan metode observasi lapangan dan menggunakan alat perekam, langkah selanjutnya saya akan mengumpulkan data data yang saya peroleh dari lapangan akan saya buat dalam bentuk teks, selanjutnya penulis akan melakukan analisis apa yang dimaksud si penutur apakah itu bentuk penawaran, peringatan, perintah, ucapan selamat, ucapan maaf, atau lainnya. Langkah terakhir adalah pengambilan kesimpulan bahwa bentuk ujaran dan akan menganalisis makna apa yang mahasiswa ujarkan dalam kampus tersebut.In this observation, the writer has already found type of speech act reflected at Faculty of Cultural Studies University of Sumatera
14,9%
Utara.Representatives consist of 60 acts Directives Consist of 304 acts 75,8% Commisives consist of 4 act 0,33% Declaratives consist of 1 act 0,24% Expressives consist of 32 acts 7,98%.
Kata kunci : Students Speech Act : Pragmatics
Abstract In this thesis entitled An Analysis of Student's Speech Act At Canteen Faculty of Cultural Studies University of Sumatra Utara. The authors analyze the speech acts contained in the USU students of the Faculty of Cultural Studies, in which case I will analyze the speech acts, I will be involved in the field, while the author's purpose in order to make thesis find forms of speech acts contained in the USU students of the Faculty of Cultural Studies and will describe the significance pragmatics of speech acts, in writing this thesis, I use the method of observation and using a tape recorder, my next step will be to collect data that I obtained the data from the field I will make in the form of text, then the author will do what analysis referred to the speaker if it forms a quote, warning, command, congratulations, apology, or other. The final step is making a conclusion that the form of speech and will analyze the meaning of what the students act in the campus. In this observation, the writer has already found the type of speech act reflected Faculty of Cultural Studies at the University of North Sumatra. Representatives Consist of 60 acts Directives Consist of 14.9% 75.8% 304 acts Commisives Consist of 4 act 0,33% Declaratives Consist of one act of 0.24% Expressives Consist of 32 acts 7.98%.
Kata kunci : Students Speech Act : Pragmatics
TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ........................................................................... i ABSTRACT ..................................................................................................... ii TABLE OF CONTENT ................................................................................. iii
CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION
1.1 The Background of Study .............................................. 1
1.2 The Problems of Study ................................................... 3
1.3 The Objectives of the Study ............................................ 3
1.4Scope of the Study ........................................................... 3
1.5 The Significant of The Study ......................................... 4
1.6The Method of the study ............................................................................ 3
CHAPTER IIAN OVERVIEW OF PRAGMATIC THEORY
2.1. The Understanding of Pragmatic Theory ......................... 6
2.2. The Goals of Pragmatics Theory ........................................ 8
2.3. The Relationship Between Bragmatics Theory and Semantic ........................................................................................................... 9
2.4 Speech Acts ........................................................................... 10
2.4.1 Definition of Speech Acts ........................................... 10
2.4.2. Types of Speech Acts ................................................. 11
2.4.3. Types of Meaning ....................................................... 13
2.4.4. Literal Meaning ........................................................... 18
2.4.5. Non-Literal Meaning .................................................. 18
CHAPTER III METHODS OF ANALYSIS
3.1. Location .............................................................................. 25 3.2. Research Method ...........................................................................
25
3.3. Population Sample ............................................................. 25
3.4. Data Collecting Methods ................................................... 26
3.5. Data Analysis Methods ...................................................... 26
CHAPTER IV “ANALYSIS OF STUDENT’S SPEECH ACTS ATCANTEEN FACULTY OF CULTURAL STUDIES UNIVERSITY OF SUMATERA UTARA”
4.1. Presentation of data ................................................................................. 26
4.1.1.1. Speech Act Reflected At Canteen Faculty of Cultural Studies University Sumatera Utara 26
4.1.1.1.2. Analysis of Data I (English Department 2010) 26
4.1.1.1.3 Data II (English Department 2011) ................ 28
4.1.1.1.4 Analysis of Data II (English Department 2011) 28
4.1.1.1.5 Data III (English Department 2012) .............. 29
4.1.1.1.6 Analysis of Data III (English Department 2012) ............................................................................... 31
4.1.1.1.7 Data IV (English Department 2013) .............. .35
4.1.1.1.8 Analysis of Data IV (English Department 2013).37
4.1.1.1.9 Data V (English Department 2014) ................ .40
4.1.1.1.10 Analysis of Data V (English Department 2014) ............................................................................... 40
4.1.1.1.11 Data VI ((Arabic Department 2010) ............ 42
4.1.1.1.12 Analysis of Data VI (Arabic Department 2010) ............................................................................... 43
4.1.1.13 Data VII (Arabic Department 2011) ................ 45
4.1.1.14 Analysis of Data VII (Arabic Department 2011) 46
4.1.1.15 Data VIII (Arabic Department 2012) .............. 49
4.1.1.16 Analysis of Data VIII (Arabic Department 2012) 50
4.1.1.17 Data IX (Arabic Department 2013) .................. 52
4.1.1.18 Analysis of Data IX (Arabic Department 2014) .. 53
4.1.1.19 Data X (Japanese Department 2010) ............... 56
4.1.1.20Analysis of Data X (Japanese Department 2010) 67
4.1.1.21 Data XI (Japanese Department 2011) .............. 60
4.1.1.1.21 Analysis of Data XI (Japanese Department 2011) ............................................................................... 61
4.1.1.1.22 Data XII (Japanese Department 2012) ......... 63
4.1.1.1.23 Analysis of Data XII (Japanese Department 2012) ......................................... 64
4.1.1.1.24 Data XIII (Japanese Department 2013) ....... 66
4.1.1.1.25 Analysis of Data XIII (Japanese Department 2013) ............................................. 66
4.1.1.1.26 Data XIV .......................................................... 66
4.1.1.1.27 Analysis of Data XIV ....................................... 69
4.1.1.1.28 Data ................................................................ 70 4.1.1.1.29 ........................................................................... 74 4.1.1.1.30 .......................................................................... 75
4.1.1.1.31Data XXI (Chinese Department 2011) .......... 79
4.1.1.1.32An Analysis of Data XXI (Chinese Department 2011) .......................... 80
4.1.1.1.33Data XXII (Chinese Department 2012) ........ 84
4.1.1.1.34An Analysis of Data XXII (Chinese Department 2012) .......................... 85
4.1.1.1.35Data XXIII (Chinese Department 2013) ....... 88
4.1.1.1.36An Analysis of Data XXIII (Chinese Department 2013) .......................... 89
4.1.1.1.37 Data XXV (Chinese Department 2014) ...... 93
4.1.1.1.38An Analysis of Data XXV (Chinese Department 2014) ......................... 94
4.2. Findings ............................................................................ 99
CHAPTER V CONCLUTION AND SUGGESTIONS
5.1. Conclusion.……………………………………………..101
5.2.Suggestions……………………………………………...102 APPENDIX …………………………………………………………………104 BIBLIOGRAPHY…………………………………………………………..104