Analyzing Non-observance Maxims in the Connection with the GTVH and Drawing Conclusions

41 characters. The distribution of those types of maxims are described in the following chart: In the chart above, each of clusters described the maxims of CP which were violated by the way of non-observance maxims. In the clusters, violating maxim of quality was the most frequent above all and infringing maxim of quality was the least, occurred in humorous conversations. As it appeared in the chart, all maxims were violated. However, only four of five types of non-observance maxims employed in humorous conversations Viz. flouting, violation, infringing, and suspending. In this section, the researcher discussed and analyzed the violated maxims discovered from the episodes of How I Met Your Mother season 2 in accordance with the non-observance maxims of CP and the theory of basic structure within conversations. Each of excerpts was exclusively presented based on its category of non-observance: flouting maxim, violating maxim, infringing maxim and suspending maxim. 6 27 11 10 15 4 1 2 2 4 5 10 15 20 25 30 Quality Quantity Relevance Manner Multiple

4.1 Chart of distribution of violation maxims based on the non- observance maxims types

Flouting Violating Infringing Suspending 42

1. The Analysis on a Situation which Flouts Maxims

Flouting a maxim occurred when a participant in a conversation chose to ignore one or more of the maxims by using a conversational implicature Thomas 1995, p. 65. In this research, the all four maxims of CP were discovered to be flouted by the characters.

a. Flouting Maxim of Quality

This category chanced when the speaker blatantly intended to say something untrue or lied and denied something. The speaker misrepresented his information in order to make the hearer understand the intended meaning of an utterance Levinson, 1983, p. 110. Its implicature could be drawn when the contribution was untrue or lack of adequate evidences. Flouting maxim of quality discovered from the excerpts were done by exaggerating, using metaphor and delivering sarcastic tone Essay, 2013. 1 Using Exaggeration The following excerpts illustrated the example of the situation in which maxim of quantity was flouted: S02E01QLFL1 The year 2030, the narrator, Ted was telling his kids a very long story about how he met their mother. 1 Ted: Okay, where were we? It was June of 2006 and life had just taken an unexpected turn. 2 Daughter: Dad, can’t you just skip ahead to the part where you meet Mom? I feel like you’ve been talking for like a year. S02E11QLFL6 At Lily’s apartment, Barney was smoking facing over the opened window while he was sick and it was winter. 1 Robin: Barney. What the hell are you doing? Get in here, it’s freezing outside. Are you insane? 2 Barney: Hey, blame Lily and her oppressive ‘no cigars in the apartment rule.’ God, it’s like Marshall’s marrying the Taliban.