Analysis on a Situation which Suspends maxims
73
EXCERPT S02E11QLFL6
SI At Lily’s apartment, Barney was smoking facing over the opened window while
he was sick and it was winter. NA
Conversation 1
Robin: Barney. What the hell are you doing? Get in here, it’s freezing outside. Are you insane?
2 Barney: Hey, blame Lily and her oppressive ‘no cigars in the apartment
rule.’ God, it’s like Marshall’s marrying the Taliban.
SO Flouting maxim of quality
LM Exaggeration
TA Lily’s ‘No Cigar’s rule’
LA Using word ‘Taliban’
As appeared in the excerpt S02E11QLFL6, Barney’s utterance was the
punchline where the humor appeared. The humor arouse within a narrative strategy NA: conversation. The conversation was situated SI when Robin cared about
Barney’s condition by asking him to get inside. As Barney threw the guilt on Lily’s ‘No cigar’ rule in return TA, his utterance constituted flouting maxim of quality
in form of exaggeration by using word LA ‘Taliban’. Thus, the flouted maxim of quality, in terms of GTVH characterized as the Script Opposition SO as was
explained by Attardo 1994. Barney’s utterance “God, it’s like Marshall’s marrying the Taliban.”
was
seen as an incongruity in that script opposition, since his utterance was fictitious that somebody literally married to an Islamic
organization “Taliban”. Equipped with above resource knowledge, the humorous effects was expected to be generated within the logical mechanism LM. The
logical mechanism LM started to run as the exaggeration occurred in the conversation. In other words, the exaggeration represented impossibility which in
terms of incongruity theory was incongruous. The occurrence of the incongruous situation logically violated the audiences’ normal viewpoint of responses of certain
kinds of statement in such situation. Thus, the violation flouting maxim of quality was contributable to create humorous effect.
74