Infringing Maxim of relevance

83 LM Almost situation TA Barney’s manner in saying identical twins LA Obscure The excerpt above illustrated a conversation between Marshall and Barney NA. The humor appeared from Barney’s punchline. In the situation SI, Barney was cheering Marshall up after his failure of appealing a twin. The interesting point of Barney’s utterance was his fashion in constructing the utterance. His utterance was not brief as he uttered some proxility within. Besides, the language used LA, was allusive. In terms of CP, he flouted maxim of manner which as the seed of the script opposition. This script provided a knowledge to be interpreted logically LM as humor within given situation. The language of Barney’s utterance led to an opposition of sense Attardo, Hempelmann and Maio, 2002. Besides, his utterance was intriguing to the hearer. The manner of his utterance gave an almost situation as if it was an ejaculation process. Those knowledge resources, thus, were contributable to create humor Morreal, 1987.

b. Violating

Violating maxim of manner appeared in Barney’s two opposing expression, described as follows: EXCERPT S02E08MNVL5 SI There are the gang but Barney seems could not read the situation. He should’ve not said that to Marshall while there is Lily next to him. NA Conversation 1 Lily: We’re going to Atlantic City to Elope right now 2 Barney: Oh, congratulations, Lily. Marshall, you’re getting married? What the hell? SO Violating maxim of manner LM Ground reversal TA Barney’s congratulation LA Opposing expression The excerpt above illustrated a conversation NA between Lily, Marshall and Barney. The humor sprang up from Barney’s punchline in exchange to Lily’s 84 utterance. In the situation, Lily told the friends that she was going to elope with Marshall. Everyone seemed so happy to hear the news. However, the happy responses did not come all the way in return. Barney’s contradicting response came as surprise. In his utterance, he deliberately used two opposing utterances which separately aimed for Lily and Marshall. Consequently, he violated maxim of manner. The violation brought out a script opposition SO to be interpreted as humor. The interpretation through the logical mechanism LM came across, what Barney ought to say to both Lily and Marshall should not be different. In such manner, although he already addressed the specific hearers, Barney still appeared to be incongruous since both Marshall and Lily could still hear all the utterances Morreal, 1987 and Audrieth, 1998. This given condition was fruitful to create humorous effect.

c. Infringing

The drunkenness could affect speaker’s way of speaking. Consequently, it resulted to an obscure expression as appeared in the following excerpt: EXCERPT S02E08MNVL5 SI Lily, Ted and Robin were having breakfast at the restaurant. Robin was still drunk when the waiter served the menu. NA Conversation 1 Waiter: writing the order 2 Robin talking to the waiter: I’d take you with gravy. If my boyfriend wasn’t sitting right here. – Just kidding. I’m good. 3 Lily: What are you so chirpy about? SO Infringing maxim of manner LM Consequences TA Robin’s drunkenness LA Obscure The above excerpt illustrated a conversation between Robin, Lily and the waitress NA. Humor sprang up from Robin’s jab lines. In the situation SI, Ted, Robin and Lily were having breakfast in a restaurant. Last night, they drank alcohol