The table above shows clearly that the score from the students is 91,18 in average. From the score, it means that the students think that this pop-up book
is very good.
e. Evaluating the medium
The evaluation was done after the implementation. The evaluators are the English teacher of SD N 2 Mranti and nine pre-service teachers of FEC and EFH.
FEC and EFH are English programs held by English Education Department on State University of Yogyakarta every year. Those programs are
mainly for children. The teachers are not only simply teaching the students, but also designing the program and the material themselves. Thus, the researcher
assumed that the teachers have enough experienced to evaluate the developed medium.
The following tables show the result of the evaluation: a.
Material aspect
Table 15: Score of Material Aspect Evaluation No
Indicator Score f
Expected Score N
Percentage P
1. The material is clear
38 40
95 2.
The material is easy to be learned
38 40
95 3.
The language used is easy to be understood
39 40
97,5 4.
The picture used to explain the material match well with
the learning concept for 3 grade students
37 40
92,5 5.
The activities done match well
with the
learning concept for 3 grade students
33 40
82,5
6. The tasks are clear and
suitable for the children 32
40 80
7. The tasks match well with
the material 31
40 77,5
Total 620
Average 88,57
The first table shows the score of material aspect given by the evaluators. They gave 88,57 for the materials aspects.
b. Instructional aspect
Table 16: Score of Instructional Aspect Evaluation No
Indicator Score f
Expected Score N
Percentage P
1. The learning activities
match well with the standard
competence and
basic of
competence 32
40 80
2. The indicators match
with the
basic of
competence 32
40 80
3. The objective of the
learning is clear 32
40 80
4. The
material is
complete 32
40 80
5. The instructions are
clear 32
40 80
6. The tasks match with
the standard
competence and basic of competence
33 40
82,5 7.
The tasks match with the indicators
32 40
80 Total
562.5 Average
80,36
The table above is about the instructional aspects. It shows that the evaluator gave 80,36 for this aspect.
c. Media aspect
Table 17: Score of Media Aspect Evaluation No
Indicator Score f
Expected Score N
Percentage P
1. The
medium is
interesting 38
40 95
2. The medium is easy to
be used 38
40 95
3. The medium is easy to
be brought and moved 38
40 95
4. The sections which can
be opened are working well
34 40
85 5.
The pictures are well selected
35 40
87,5 6.
The arrangement of the picture is good
37 40
92,5 7.
The presented material match
with the
learning activities 36
40 90
8. The
text used
is effective enough as an
input 34
40 85
Total 725
Average 90,62
The next aspect’s score showed in the table is the media. It shows that 90,62 of the evaluators think that the media is good.
d. Appearance aspect
Table 18: Score of Appearance Aspect Evaluation No
Indicator Score f
Expected Score N
Percentage P
1. The composition of the
illustrations’ color is attractive
38 40
95 2.
The text’s color is attractive
32 40
80
3. The choice of the font
and the font size are interesting
32 40
80 4.
The choose of the pictures is good
39 40
97,5 5.
The quality of the pictures are good
39 40
97,5 Total
450 Average
90 The last score showed in the table above is the appearance aspect. The
score is 97,5. It implies that the aspects of the appearance, such as colors, the font, and the quality of the pictures are good enough.
The average score of the evaluation from the evaluators is presented in the table below.
Table 19: Average Score Aspects
Score
Materials 88,57
Instructional 80,36
Media 90,62
Appearance 90
Total 349,55
Average 87,39
It can be seen clearly from the table above that the overall score percentage of the evaluation from the evaluators is 87,39. This result means that
the pop-up book is very good and it can be used as an instructional medium. However, all of the evaluators concluded that revisions are needed in some
aspects in order to make the medium more useful. There were some suggestions given by the evaluators who wanted some revision in the medium. To respond to
them, some revisions were done.
f. Revising the medium
