Research Goal and Method
determining the source of the texts, conducting an initial interview, arranging some pointers for the interviews, conducting in-depth interviews, and describing
and interpreting the texts, as illustrated in Figure 3.2.
Figure 3.2. Research Procedure
Goal: Describing and interpreting graduate students’ lived experience in
writing academic papers PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
There were three illuminating participants in this study who have experienced the phenomenon. Not only that, they all were willing to share their experience.As
the first stage, conducting an initial interview enabled the researcher to create a good atmosphere with the participants. Therefore, this allowed the researcher
obtaining personal information of the participants. Then, the next step was conducting in-depth interviews. The in-depth interviews were all recorded and
transcribed. Therefore, the recordings were converted into texts. After having the texts from the in-depth interviews, the transcriptions were all
coded. Hence, coding the transcription allowed the researcher to narrow the text into several themes. It led the researcher, as the following step, to generate the
themes which later used in analyzing the phenomenon in this study. There were another four steps in this research procedure. Those steps were
describing the texts, interpreting the texts, doing member checking, and writing the final version. The description of the participants’ lived experience consisting
of both pre-figured and emerging themes were made in describing the texts. In addition, the description of the participants’ lived experience in writing academic
papers was based on the fields in lived experience, namely, understanding, belief, feeling, action and intention. Further, the researcher referred back to the texts and
tried to relate it with the theories in order to make the interpretation. In addition, this study employed member checking to validate the findings. Therefore, the
participants were all asked to check both interpretation and description of their lived experience in writing academic papers. As the last step, the researcher
revised the description and interpretation based on the member checking done by the participants.