Conclusion Suggestion CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION

42

CHAPTER V CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION

This chapter presents the conclusion of the study and suggestions for teacher and further researcher in term reading comprehension in narrative text.

A. Conclusion

The result of the statistical hypothesis on significance level α=0.05 that showed t value was higher than t table 2.07 1.68, thus the H Null hypothesis was rejected and H a Alternative hypothesis was accepted. Besides, the main effect size to know the strength of suggestopedia as a treatment on students’ reading comprehension in narrative text by statistical calculators The Effect Size Cohen’s d Calculator for a Student t-Test was 0.59 from the category of table it means that medium effect. Therefore, there was a significant difference using Suggestopedia on students’ reading comprehension in narrative text at the Third Grade Students of MTsN II Pamulang.

B. Suggestion

Based on the result of the study, the writer gives suggestion as follow: a. Suggestopedia is suitable to apply in the classroom especially for English as foreign language EFL on students’ reading comprehension activity to make a different atmosphere in the teaching and learning process. b. Teacher should be more creative, attractive, and confident during teaching and learning process. Moreover the teacher should manage the material better in the class to make students focus and interest on the material in reading comprehension. c. Teacher should encourage, motivate students to attract in reading comprehension, create the different atmosphere, give a pay attention in learning process, and make them relax and fun before learning process began. Thus, teacher should give students to build their imagination. d. For other researcher, the result of this study can be used as reference or basic information to do the further investigation and can be apply this method in the class. BIBLIOGRAPHY Alderson, J. Charles. Clapham Caroline and Wall Dianne. Language Test Construction and Evaluation. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1995 Allington, Richard. And Strange, Michael. Learning Through Reading in the Content Areas, Canada: D.C Heath and Company, 1980 Anderson, Mark. Text Types in English 2. South Yarra: Macmillan, 2003 Anderson, Mark. Text Types in English 3. South Yarra: Macmillan, 2003 Badan Standar Nasional Pendidikan BSNP, Standar Isi: Standar Kompetensi dan Kompetensi Dasar SMPMTs. Jakarta 2006 Bancroft, W. Jane. Suggestopedia and Language Acquisition Variation on a Theme, Netherland: The Gordon and Breach Publisher, 1999 Bancroft, W. Jane. Suggestopedia and Memory Training in the foreign language classroom. Reports-EvaluativeFeasibility. Eric Document Reproduction Service No. ED 376 696 Bancroft, W. Jane. The Two-Sided Mind: Teaching and Suggetopedia. Eric Document Reproduction Service ED 384 244 FL 023 09, 1995 Baumel, J.M.S. Reading Comprehension: Research Inform Us. http:www.greatschools.org.special-education Berry, H. James. Levels of Reading Comprehension, 2005. SC4. jberrysc4.edu http;www.sc4.edu Brummit, J. What is Reading Comprehension, 2008. http:www.k12reader.comwhat-is-reading-comprehension Cohen, H. Barry and Lea, R.Brooke. Essentials of Statistics for the Social and Behavioral Sciences. New Jersey: John Wiley sons Inc, 2004 Grabe, W.S. Teaching and Researching Reading. New York: Pearson Education Limited, 2002 Grellet, Francoise. Developing Reading Skills. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press, 1981 Harmer, Jeremy. How to Teach English, New Edition. New York: Pearson Edition, 2007 Harmer, Jeremy. The Practice of English Language Teaching, New Edition. New York: Longman, 1991 He,Tung-hsien. Reading for Different Goals: The Interplay of EFL College Students’Multiple Goals, Reading Strategy Use and Reading Comprehension. Journal of Research in Reading. ISSN 0141-0423 Volume 31 Issue 2, 2008 Hughes, Arthur. Testing for Language Teaching. New York: Cambridge, 2003 Kadir, Statistika Untuk Penelitian Ilmu-ilmu Sosial. Jakarta: Rosemata Sampurna, 2010. Larsen-Freeman. Diane .Techniques and Principles in Language Teaching. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000 Meyers, Alan. Gateways to Academic Writing. New York: Pearson Education, Inc, 2005 Muijis, Daniel. Doing Quantitative Research in Education.London: Sage Publications, 2004 Pardiyono. Pasti Bisa Teaching Genre-Based Writing. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Andi, 2007 Phelan, Colin and Wren, Julie. Exploring Reliability in Academic Assessment. Graduate Assistant. UNI office of Academic Assessment, 2005-2006 Pramarta, Oka. Padmadewi and Suarnaja. The Effect of Desuggestopedia on the Writing Competence of the Second Semester Students with Different Temperament of FKIP UNMAS Denpasar. Journal UNMAS Denpasar, Volume 1, 2013 Richard, Jack C and Willy A. Renandya, Methodology in Language Teaching,. New York: Cambridge University Press,2002 Richards, C. Jack and Rodgers. S. Theodore. Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1992 Richards, C. Jack and Rodgers. S. Theodore. Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1999 Setiawati, Windu. Rahayu. “Improving students’ vocabulary Mastery through Suggestopedia An action research of Eighth Grade at SMP Negery 4 Widodaren Ngawi”. Thesis 2011 Sheng, Ji. He. A cognitive Model for Teaching Reading Comprehension. English Teaching Forum Vol. 38 No.4 October- December, 2000 Silberstein, Sandra. Techniques and Resources in Teaching Reading. New York: Oxford American English, 1994 Snow, Cathrine. Reading for Understanding Toward an RD Program in Reading Comprehension. New York: RAND Education, 2002 Stevick, W. Earl. Memory Meaning and Method some psychological perspectives on language learning. USA: Newburry House Publisher, 1976 Sudjianto, Metode Pengajaran bahasa Asing dan Implikasinya terhadap pengajaran bahasa Jepang, http:file.upi.eduDirektoriFPBSJUR._PE , 2010 Sudjono, Anas. Pengantar Statistik Pendidikan. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, 2012 Sugiyono. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan: Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan RD. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2008 Susetyo, Budi. Statistika untuk Analisis Data Penelitian. Bandung: Aditama, 2010 Teaching English for all. English Teaching Forum Vol. 38 No.4, October- December, 2000 Westwood, Peter. Reading and Learning Difficulties. Victoria: Acer Press, 2001. APPENDIX 1 The Score of Pre-test and Post-test Experimental class No Students Pre-test Post-test Gained Score Code X1 X2 X 1 A 88 88 2 B 92 88 -4 3 C 84 92 8 4 D 84 76 -8 5 E 80 80 6 F 76 84 8 7 G 76 76 8 H 76 96 20 9 I 76 92 16 10 J 72 80 8 11 K 72 80 8 12 L 72 76 4 13 M 72 80 8 14 N 68 80 12 15 O 68 64 -4 16 P 64 84 20 17 Q 64 80 16 18 R 64 72 8 19 S 60 80 20 20 T 60 76 16 21 U 60 68 8 22 V 60 60 23 W 56 76 20 24 X 56 80 24 25 Y 56 80 24 26 Z 56 72 16 27 AA 52 68 16 28 BB 52 84 32 29 CC 52 68 16 30 DD 52 64 12 Total score 2020 2344 324 Mean score X 67.3 78.13 10.8 Max 92 96 32 Min 52 60 -8 APPENDIX 2 The Score of Pre-test and Post-test Controlled class No Students Pre-test Post-test Gained Score Code Y1 Y2 Y 1 AB 88 68 -20 2 CD 80 80 3 EF 80 80 4 GH 80 60 -20 5 IJ 80 72 -8 6 KL 80 80 7 MN 80 56 -24 8 OP 76 76 9 QR 76 72 -4 10 ST 76 72 -4 11 UV 76 76 12 WX 72 88 16 13 YZ 72 84 12 14 IM 72 80 8 15 AZ 72 56 -16 16 FH 68 68 17 IN 68 68 18 SH 64 88 24 19 AR 64 56 -8 20 NN 64 76 12 21 SL 64 72 8 22 SH 60 84 24 23 SB 60 72 12 24 ZR 60 76 16 25 AL 60 80 20 26 MD 60 56 -4 27 AD 60 76 16 28 GF 56 76 20 29 UL 52 60 8 30 HN 52 60 8 Total score 2072 2168 96 Mean score X 69.06 72.26 3.2 Max 88 88 24 Min 52 56 -24 APPENDIX 3

A. The Calculating of Frequency Distribution, Mean, Variance,