The Calculating of Frequency Distribution, Mean, Variance, The Calculating of Frequency Distribution, Mean, Variance,

APPENDIX 3

A. The Calculating of Frequency Distribution, Mean, Variance,

Standard Deviation Pre-test Experimental Class 1. Sample total n 30 2. Distribution of score 52 52 52 52 56 56 56 56 60 60 60 60 64 64 64 68 68 72 72 72 72 76 76 76 76 80 84 84 88 92 3. Maximal Score : 92 Minimum Score: 52 4. Range R R= X max – X min R = 92-52 = 40 5. Number of class K = 1 + 3.3 log n K= 1+ 3.3 log 30 1+ 3.3. 1.477 = 6 6. Length of Interval class P P = R = 40 = 7 K 6 Table 1.1 Frequency Distibution Pre-test Experimental class N o Interval Fi Xi Xi 2 fixi fixi 2 Low class bound ary Upper class bounda ry Fk 1 52-58 8 55 3025 440 193600 51.5 58.5 8 2 59-65 7 62 3844 434 188356 58.5 65.5 15 3 66-72 6 69 4761 414 171396 65.5 72.5 21 4 73-79 4 76 5776 304 92416 72,5 79.5 25 5 80-87 3 83.5 6972.25 250.5 62750.25 79.5 87.5 28 6 88-94 2 91 8281 182 33124 87.5 94.5 30 Total 30 32659.25 2024. 5 741642.25 Xi – X Xi-X 2 f Xi- X 2 -12,33 152.028 1216.23 -5,33 28.408 198.856 1,67 2.788 16.728 8,67 75.168 300.672 16,17 216.46 649.38 23,67 560.26 1120.52 3502.386 7. Mean X M x = = 2024,5 = 67.48 30 8. Variance = 3502,386 = 116.746 30 9. Standard Deviation S S= √ = √ = √ = 10.80

B. The Calculating of Frequency Distribution, Mean, Variance,

Standard Deviation Pre-test Controlled Class 1. Sample total n 30 2. Distribution of score 52 52 56 60 60 60 60 60 60 64 64 64 64 68 68 72 72 72 72 76 76 76 76 80 80 80 80 80 80 88 3. Maximal Score : 88 Minimum Score: 52 4. Range R R= X max – X min R = 88-52 = 36 5. Number of class K = 1 + 3,3 log n K= 1+ 3,3 log 30 1+ 3.3. 1,477 = 6 6. Length of Interval class P P = R = 36 = 6 K 6 Table 1.2 Frequency Distribution Pre-test Controlled class No Interval Fi Xi Xi 2 fixi fixi 2 Low class boundary Upper class boundary Fk 1 52-57 3 54,5 2970,25 163,5 26732,25 51,5 57,5 3 2 58-63 6 60,5 3660,25 363 131769 57,5 63,5 9 3 64-69 6 66,5 4422,25 399 159201 63,5 69,5 15 4 70-75 4 72,5 5256,25 290 84100 69,5 75,5 19 5 76-82 10 79 6241 790 624100 75,5 82,5 29 6 83-88 1 85,5 7310,25 85,5 7310,25 82,5 88,5 30 Total 30 29860,25 2091 1033212,5 Xi – X Xi-X 2 f Xi- X 2 -14,56 211,99 635,98 -8,56 73,27 439,62 -2,56 6,55 39,30 3,44 11,83 47,32 9,94 98,8 988 16,44 270,27 270,27 2420,49 7. Mean X M x = = 2091 = 69,7 30 8. Variance = 2420,49 = 80,683 30 9. Standard Deviation S S= √ = √ = √ = 8,982 APPENDIX 4

C. The Calculating of Frequency Distribution, Mean, Variance,

Dokumen yang terkait

Applying Think-aloud Technique in Improving Students' Reading Comprehension of Narrative Text (Quasi Experimental Study of Tenth Grade Students of SMK Bhakti 17 Jagakarsa)

0 11 119

The Influence Of Collaborative Strategic Reading (Csr) Technique On Students’ Achievement In Reading Comprehension Of Narrative Text (A Quasi Experimental Study On The Implementation Of Csr At Sma Pgri 109 Kota Tangerang)

1 13 129

The Influence of Directed Reading - Thinking Activity (DR-TA) Strategy on Students' Reading Comprehension of Narrative Text

3 40 170

The Effectiveness Of Using Collaborative Strategic Reading (Csr) On Students' Reading Comprehension Of Narrative Text" (A Quasi-Experimental Study at the First Grade ofSMA Mathia 'ul Huda Parung PanjangBogor in Academic Year of 201412015),

4 36 111

The Effectiveness of Story Mapping Technique toward Students' Reading Comprehension of Narrative Text

0 9 138

THE EFFECT OF PREDICTION STRATEGY ON STUDENTS READING COMPREHENSION IN NARRATIVE TEXT.

1 9 21

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF SUGGESTOPEDIA IN TEACHING READING COMPREHENSION OF NARRATIVE TEXT.

6 30 32

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF “THE POWER OF TWO” STRATEGY IN STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION IN NARRATIVE TEXT (An experimental research on the 2

0 0 15

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF “THE POWER OF TWO” STRATEGY IN STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION IN NARRATIVE TEXT - repository perpustakaan

1 1 6

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF DIRECTED READING THINKING ACTIVITY (DRTA) STRATEGY FOR STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION IN NARRATIVE TEXT

0 0 15