Analysis of quantitative and qualitative parameters of green stem

3.6.1.2 Analysis of quantitative and qualitative parameters of green stem

Width of bark, cambium, xylem, pith, and the percentage of pith have been measured and calculated, respectively in green stem Figure 53. Transgenic line TS20A69 had wider cambium compared to wild-type and other transgenic lines. This result showed that TS20A69 had bigger the activity of cambium, because it might be due to transgene position effect. This effect probably influenced the cambium activity. The width of pith of TS20A75 was significantly different compared to wild-type and others transgenic lines. The pith or medulla is a tissue in the stem of vascular plants which store and transport nutrients throughout the plant. The size of pith is probably related with the capability of plant to grow and develop. Statistical analysis showed that TS19A46 had significant difference in total radius of green stem. The averages of total radius of green stem were 3237 µm for TS19A46. There was not any difference in percentage of pith between wild-type and transgenic lines Table 34. Table 34 Effect of lines on mean value of width from parts collected on green stem from various wild-type and transgenic lines overexpressing HbERF-IXc5 Construct Line Bark µm Cambium µm Xylem µm Pith µm Total radius of green stem µm Percentage of pith Wild-type CI07060 293 a 25 a 790 a 844 a 1953 a 42.4 a 35S::HbERF-IXc5 TS19A46 538 a 27 a 1041 a 1631 ab 3237 b 50.1 a 35S::HbERF-IXc5 TS19A90 435 a 27 a 642 a 1246 ab 2349 ab 53.0 a HEV2.1::HbERF-IXc5 TS20A69 435 a 62 b 1135 a 1280 ab 2911 ab 44.0 a HEV2.1::HbERF-IXc5 TS20A75 397 a 32 a 572 a 1833 b 2834 ab 65.0 a The data were analysed with XLSTAT software. Statistical analysis was performed with an ANOVA followed by Tukey 5 test. Values with the same letter are not significantly different at the 0.05 probability level. Statistical analysis of effect of construct used 3 replicates for wild-type and 3 replicates for each construct. Pith size increased dramatically in transgenic plants compared to wild-type 42.4 of total radius and this difference become significant for construct HEV2.1::HbERF-IXc5 65.0. Construct 35S::HbERF-IXc5 had a significant difference in bark. Construct HEV2.1::HbERF-IXc5 had a significant difference in percentage of pith, and for both construct 35S::HbERF-IXc5 and HEV2.1::HbERF-IXc5 had significant difference in radius of pith and total radius of green stem. These data suggested that both constructs promoted the capability of transgenic plants to grow more vigorously and became taller Table 35. Table 35 Effect of promoters driving the HbERF-IXc5 gene on mean value of width from parts collected on green stem from wild-type line CI07060 and various transgenic lines Construct Line Bark µm Cambium µm Xylem µm Pith µm Total radius of green stem µm Percentage of pith Wild-type CI07060 293 a 25 a 790 a 844 a 1953 a 42.4 a 35S::HbERF-IXc5 TS19A46 538 b 27 a 1041 a 1631 b 3237 b 50.1 ab HEV2.1::HbERF-IXc5 TS20A75 397 ab 32 a 572 a 1833 b 2834 b 65.0 b The data were analysed with XLSTAT software. Statistical analysis was performed with an ANOVA followed by Tukey 5 test. Values with the same letter are not significantly different at the 0.05 probability level. Starch content was found in all parts of green stem section bark, xylem, and pith with almost the same percentage in wild-type and transgenic plants. Likewise, the content of polyphenol was found with lower percentage in all parts of tissue. Primary latex cell PLC and secondary laticifer SL was found in the leaves for all lines. It was interesting to notice the number of PLC and SL for TS19A46 35S::HbERF-IXc5 was higher compared the other followed by TS20A75 HEV2.1::HbERF-IXc5 Table 36. Laticifer differentiation from vascular cambium in Hevea stems are good model for observing cell differentiation from the cambium. On the green stem, SL has not yet performed the ring of laticifer. The number of SL was high but they are still separated or in a group, not yet formed the anastomoses. Laticifer cells had thick cell wall, non-transparent, elastic cytoplasm, and stained in pink-red. Most of SL is distributed randomly Figure 53. Table 36 Evaluation of starch, polyphenol contents, primary latex cells PLC, and secondary laticifer SL on green stem from various wild-type and transgenic lines. Notes: -: absence; +: rare; ++: 10-20 ; +++: 20-50 ; ++++: 50 Construct Line Starch Polyphenol PLC SL Bark Xylem Pith Bark Xylem Pith Wild-type CI07060 + + + + + - + + 35S::HbERF-IXc5 TS19A46 + + + ++ + + +++ +++ 35S::HbERF-IXc5 TS19A90 +++ ++ +++ ++ + ++ + + HEV2.1::HbERF-IXc5 TS20A69 +++ ++ ++ + + + + + HEV2.1::HbERF-IXc5 TS20A75 + ++ + + + + ++ ++ Figure 53 Histo-cytological descriptions of latex cells on green stem. A wild-type clone PB260, B transgenic line TS19A46. The histological sections were stained with Oil Red O. Cross-sections of green stem were annotated: B. bark; PLC. primary latex cells; SL. secondary laticifer

3.6.1.3 Analysis of quantitative and qualitative parameter of lignified stem