25
5. Re-arrange the questionnaire
The researcher re-arranged the questionnaire after conducting the pilot questionnaire. There were some questions of the questionnaire that should
be omitted. It was because the questions did not support the researcher to get the richer information.
6. Conducting interview
The researcher conducted the interviews starting from February until March 2016. The method which was used in the interview was semi
structure, in which the researcher had prepared the questions guideline to be asked to the participants. The researcher used the smart-phone to record
participants‟ answer of each question. The researcher transcribed the recording manually by listening to the recording then wrote all the answer of
the participants.
7. Calculate the close-ended of the questionnaire
The researcher tried to find out the result of the mean, median and modus in the questionnaire. The result of the mean would be the consideration of
the significance of the data. It showed the result in numerical data. The column in Likert scale data showed the degree of the disagreement. The
students should give the check mark whether they strongly Disagree 1, Disagree 2, Agree 3, or Strongly Agree 4. There were formulas use to
calculate the data. PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
26
8. Analyzing the Findings in the Questionnaires and Interviews
The researcher combined all of the students‟ answer in open-ended questionnaire based on the number of each point. The researcher translated
all of the points into English after categorizing the answer. Those points became the findings in this research. There were a lot of similar findings
found. The researcher combined all of the similar findings then paraphrased it into narrative paragraphs.
The researcher conducted the interview data after finishing the open- ended questionnaire part. The researcher transcribed the interview data by
transcribing all of the participants‟ recording manually. The researcher tried to find the findings then translated it to English. The researcher combined
the similar findings and then paraphrases it into narrative paragraphs. PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
27
CHAPTER IV RESEARCH RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
This chapter displayed the data analysis of the research result. The findings were about the significant experiences of ELESP students of Sanata Dharma
University batch 2011 until 2012 who had taken Service Program Design. After analyzing the findings, the researcher discussed the significant experiences
which were appropriate to help the students build their good character as a teacher candidate. The researcher tried to put the important points of the
experiences in this part. The ELESP students shared their stories through their experiences about the activities in SPD class that help them change their
character as a teacher candidate. This chapter presented to answer the research problem; 1. What kinds of significant learning experiences from SPD class
develop students‟ good characters as teacher candidates?
A. The Presentation of Close-ended Form Result
This part showed the table and the diagram of the character building of the ELESP students from the activities in the class. There were twenty-five
respondents in this research. They were expected to choose one of the options by giving the tick mark
√
in the column which correspond to the degree of agreement listed Strongly Disagree 1, Disagree 2, Agree 3, and Strongly
Agree 4. The detailed information about Table 4.3 was in appendix E on the analysis of the close-ended questionnaire.
Kategori