The four matrixes are about classroom interaction pattern in first meeting until fourth meeting. They are indicated that interaction is not dominated by the teacher.
The distribution of each type of talk is also balance with one to another. It can be seen from the number of the teacher talk tail 1-7 and the student talk tail 8-10.
Furthermore, it is found that the number of talks also increases. Based on the observation, in the first meeting the class activity is not as many as other meetings
since the activity is only class discussion without any simulation about the topic. Another point is the number of silence tail 10 has very low frequent. It showed that
students are active in participating classroom discussion.
4.1.2.1 Teacher Talk and Student Talk
Before the researcher shows the percentage result of the teacher’s talk and the
student’s talk, the researcher defines the differences of percentage of the teacher talk and the percentage of student talk. The definitions are suggested by from Flander
1970 cited in Hai and Bee 2006. First, the percentage of teacher talk represented the amount of the total class
time during which the teacher is speaking. To find the percentage of teacher talk, the total number of column 1-7 is divided by the total number of columns in the matrix.
Second, the percentage of student talk indicated the amount of the total class time during which a student is speaking. The percentage of student talk is found by
dividing the total number of columns 8 and 9 by the total number of columns in the matrix. Below is the result of teacher talk proportion in each meeting 1
st
-4
th
meeting. The complete result can be seen in appendix 2. PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
Table 4.5
The Results of Students’ Talk and Teacher’s Talk
No Meeting Teacher Talk
Student Talk Silence
Quantity Quantity
Quantity
1 First
52 53
39 41.5
6 5.5
2 Second
59 49.5
55 47
4 3.5
3 Third
62 51.5
60 47
2 1.5
4 Fourth
63 54
72 53.2
4 2.8
478 Total
236 49.5
226 47.2
16 3.3
In order to describe the table above, the total number of teacher talk will be compared with the number of student talk category. The teacher talk and the student
talk will be compared in the four meeting observations. The result shows that the teacher talk and the student talk is not really different
49.5 and 47.2 for students’ talk. Further a lot information about the observation result in teacher-student
interaction will be presented. The table shows that the total number of talk during interaction is 478 of utterances. Those utterances will be divided into two main
categories teacher talk and student talk. The proportion of student talk is 226 or 49. Those utterances will be classified into 3 parts. The proportion of teacher talk is 236
or 51 the teacher talk will be classified into direct and indirect influence. The result of teacher talk can be seen in table 4.6 about classroom interaction in 4 different
pattern. PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
Table 4.6 Result Summary of Classroom Interaction Pattern
No Profile
First Meeting
Second Meeting
Third Meeting
Fourth Meeting
Total Meeting
1 Content Cross
31.53 27
28 21.6
26.28
2 Teacher Control
13.63 14.16
12.2 14
13.74
3 Teacher Support
11.57 13.66
10.8 18.4
12.10
4
Students’ Participation 43.27
45.85 46
54 45.47
To describe the table above, the total number of teachers’ and students; talk will be categorized into four different patterns content cross, teacher control, teacher support
and student participation. The percentage of each patterns have been counted using Flander Interaction Analysis System FIAS formulas. After that it will compared with all
observation meeting result to get the accumulation of each pattern. The result shows the student participation become the most predominant pattern. The proportion of student
participation pattern is high in the whole four meeting is 43.27, 45.85, 46 and 54. It means that the students are active enough in the classroom interaction. The second
predominant pattern is content cross. The proportion is 31.53, 27, 28 and 26, 28. It spend 26.28 of teaching learning time, it mean teacher spent more her talking time in
lecturing. She was giving facts or opinion about content or procedure with her own ideas to give comprehensible input for the students.
4.1.3 The Interview Result
