CHAPTER V CONCLUSIONS AND SUGGESTIONS
5.1 Conclusions
Basically, normal people speak something, hear something and respond something. In the process of communication, people should able to assume what they
partner trying to say or the point of their saying which called as presupposition. In this thesis, the type of presupposition found are four types: existential presupposition,
lexical presupposition, factive presupposition, and non-factive presupposition which means those four types of presupposition often contain of allegory meaning.
By analyzing presupposition and its comprehend truth, the writer has found some factors that should be considered for people to suppose what other people say.
The first factor is the word choosing which affect the different meaning of an utterance. The second is the words said are allegory where the words factually refer
to something else e.g. in politics, ‘rat’ refers to the corruptor. The third is the slang language which usually only understood by one community or people from limited
area. Sometimes, although the slang word may have the positive meaning, if the listener does not understand it, it can convey a negative meaning or turn into bad
meaning. Before supposing the truth of an utterance, it seems better to clarify the correct meaning of slang. The fourth is the condition where people stop their saying
in middle of the utterance.Here is found in the second theme of talk show which analyzed in this thesis. Sometimes, people stop saying something in the middle of
conversation although their words have not finished yet. Here may because there is something they do not want to say and it is being the job of the listener to assume
what they want to say. And the last is the habit of the speaker’s background. Here is
Universitas Sumatera Utara
because background of someone has the influence in how heshe chooses the word to say. Two people can say the same thing in the same way, but the background of
listener can make himher suppose something differently.
5.2 Suggestions
For avoiding the misunderstanding of a communication, people need to suppose something correctly. In this thesis, the writer has analyzed how people
suppose an utterance taken from Kick Andy talk show and the writer suggests that before answering an utterance, people should presuppose the truth and find out the
point of the utterance itself. If the listener does not get the point of the speaker’s saying, it’s better to ask for avoiding the misunderstanding conversation. For the
people who want to study about presupposition, the writer suggests to explore the presupposition by seeing them from many aspects. Hopefully, this thesis can be
useful for the reader to learn about presupposition further.
Universitas Sumatera Utara
REFERENCES
Aulia, Adisti Maryam. 2010. “A Brief Description of Code Switching and Code Mixing in Informal Conversation used by 2009 Batch Students of English
Department University of Sumatera Utara”. Unpublished Thesis. Medan: Universitas Sumatera Utara.
Bogdan, R. and Biklen, S. 1982. Methods of Social Research. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Bogdan, R. and Biklen, S. 1992. Qualitative Research for Education: An Introduction to Theory and Methods 2nd Ed.. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Caffi, C. 2006. Pragmatic Presupposition. Italy Switzerland: Elsevier. Dia, Eva Eri. 2012. Analisis Praanggapan. Malang: Madani.
Koyama, W. 2006. The Pragmatics and Semanticsn. Jepang: Elsavier. Leech, Geofrey. 1993. Prinsip - Prinsip Pragmatik. Jakarta: UI Press.
Levinson, Stephen C. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Marlisa, Yeni. 2008. Analysis of Types of Presupposition Used In The Editorial
Articles of The Jakarta Post News Paper. Unpublished Thesis. Jakarta: Universitas Bina Nusantara.
Moleong, J Lexy. 2005. Metodology Penulisan Kualitatif. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Mulyana. 2005. Kajian Wacana. Teori, Metode dan Aplikasi Prinsip-Prinsip Analisis Wacana. Yogyakarta: Tiara Wacana.
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Nadya Paramytha, Gayatri. 2009. Praanggapan Dalam Film Janji Joni. Unpublished Thesis. Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia.
Noya, Andy F. 2012. Kick Andy: Kisah Inspiratif 3. Yogyakarta: Bentang. Peccei, Jean Stilwell. 1990. Pragmatics. China: Taylor Francis.
Purwo, Bambang Kaswati. 1990. Pragmatik Dan Pengajaran Bahasa. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.
Rahardi, R.Kunjaya. 2008. Pragmatik: Kesantunan Imperatif Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Reza Essra, Try. 2011. An Analysis of Presupposition In Newsweek Advertisement Slogans. Unpublished Thesis. Medan: Universitas Sumatera Utara
Soejono dan Abdurrahman. 2005. Metode Penelitian Suatu Pemikiran dan Penerapan. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Sudaryat, Yayat. 2008. Makna Dalam Wacana. Bandung: Yrama Widya. Yule, George. 1996. Pragmatics. New York: Oxford University Press.
Zeevat, H. 2006. Pragmatics: Optimality Theory. Amsterdam: Elsavier. http:www.perpuskita.commacam-talkshow157, retrieved on 6 Juni 2013.
http:www.perpuskita.compengertian-talk-show149, retrieved on 6 Juni 2013. http:www.thefreedictionary.comTalk+shows, retrieved on 6 Juni 2013.
http:www.youtube.comresults?search_query=kick+andy+berguru+ke+negri+kang guru, retrieved on 8 February 2014.
Universitas Sumatera Utara
APPENDICES
i. Politik Karikatur