Place and Time of the Research Method of the Study Istrument of the Research

26

CHAPTER IV RESEARCH FINDING AND DATA INTERPRETATION

A. Finding

The writer took one class in second year social of Fatahillah senior high school as the sample consisting of 24 students. The writer gave 25-items test which focused in using relative pronouns who, whom, which, whose. From the test, it is obtained the data of errors which are described as follows. Table 4.1 Recapitulation of Students Types of Error in Using Relative Pronouns which Students’ Made of Multiple Choice and Completion Items Students Name Types of Errors Omission Addition Misselection 1 2 3 4 1 1 - 4 2 1 2 6 3 1 2 6 4 1 - 10 5 2 2 11 6 3 1 5 7 1 2 6 8 1 2 8 9 3 - 6 10 2 - 6 11 1 2 7 12 2 1 7 13 3 - 3 14 3 - 5 15 4 - 9 16 2 - 10 17 2 - 10 18 3 1 4 19 2 3 8 20 1 - 6 21 3 - 6 22 3 - 6 23 - 2 12 24 2 1 5 Total 47 21 166 Note: 1. Students Number 2. Omission 3. Addition 4. Misselection Chart 4.1 Recapitulation Frequency of Students’ Type of Error in Using Relative Pronouns which Students’ Made of Multiple Choice and Completion Items A fter the writer classified the frequency students’ type of errors in using relative pronouns who, whom, which, whose of adjective clauses based on the target modification taxonomy, such as; addition, ommision, and misselection. The writer calculated the number of each error type to know the precentage of occurence of each error. 166 47 21 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 Misselection Omission Addition

1. Misselection

= x 100 = = 70. 94 2. Omission = x 100 = = 20.09 3. Addition = x 100 = = 8.97 Furthermore, to make easier to read, she presents it in following chart below: Chart 4.2 Recapitulation Precentage of Students’ Type of Error in Using Relative Pronouns which Students’ Made of Multiple Choice and Completion Items After classifying the types of error into each type, the writer would like to describe the frequency of error in using relative pronouns which students’made of multiple choice and completing items from the highest to the lowest. First, the students’errors are misselection with 166 errors or 70.94. For example in multiple choice item number 4: 70.94

20.09 8.97

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 Misselection Omission Addition

Dokumen yang terkait

An analysis of students’ error in learning noun clause: a case study in the second grade students of SMA Darul Ma’arif

0 8 64

An analysis on students’ error in using modal auxiliaries: a case study in the eighth grade students at SMP Muhammadiyah 17 Ciputat

0 2 1

An analysis on grammatical errors in students' recount paragraph writing (A case study at the second year of MTs N 8 jakarta Barat)

1 5 106

Error analysis on the second grade students of senior high school in using type two of conditional sentences at SMA Dua Mei Ciputat

0 3 110

Some difficulties in learning conditional sentences faced by islamic senior high school students : a case study at the second year of MA Al-Hikmaah Mampang Prapatan south Jakarta

0 10 51

An analysis on the reading passages in the textbook effective English for second year of Junior High school students : a case study at SMP Negeri 54 Jakarta Barat

0 4 62

An error analysis in making wh-questions: a case study of the second year students of SMP Islam Al-Syukro Universal

11 122 176

An analysis on students’ errors in using relative pronouns (Who, Whom, Which, Whose): a case study in the second year of Fatahillah senior high school

2 20 76

An analysis on the students’ errors in using degrees of comparison of adjectives: a case study at eighth grade students of SMP Muhammadiyah Gunung Putri Bogor

0 26 87

An analysis on students’ errors in using conditional sentences type II: a case study on second grade of natural sciences students of national senior high school 9 Kota Tangerang Selatan

0 7 78