Technique of Data Analysis

1. Misselection

= x 100 = = 70. 94 2. Omission = x 100 = = 20.09 3. Addition = x 100 = = 8.97 Furthermore, to make easier to read, she presents it in following chart below: Chart 4.2 Recapitulation Precentage of Students’ Type of Error in Using Relative Pronouns which Students’ Made of Multiple Choice and Completion Items After classifying the types of error into each type, the writer would like to describe the frequency of error in using relative pronouns which students’made of multiple choice and completing items from the highest to the lowest. First, the students’errors are misselection with 166 errors or 70.94. For example in multiple choice item number 4: 70.94

20.09 8.97

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 Misselection Omission Addition 4. You have a cat ................... tail is very long. a. Which c. Whom b. Whose d. Who The students choose a. Which You have a cat which tail is very long. However, the right answer is b. Whose You have a cat whose tail is very long. In completion item number 5: 5. This is a book ........................ author J.K Rowling. The student writes relative pronoun Whom This is a book whom author J.K Rowling. However, the right answer is Whose This is a book whose author J.K Rowling. Second, in omission found in the students’ writing with 47 errors or 20.09. For example in completion item number 8. 8. The person ............................ I phoned last night is my teacher. The student writes relative pronoun Who in their worksheet The person who I phoned last night is my teacher. The student ommited morpheme “m”. The right answer is Whom The person whom I phoned last night is my teacher. Third, in addition found in the students’ writing with 21 errors or 8.97. For example in completion item number 6. 6. The writer .......................... won the competition studied in Australia. The student writes relative pronoun Whom in their worksheet The writer whom won the competition studied in Australia. The student add morpheme “m”. The right answer is Who The writer who won the competition studied in Australia. After knowing the precentage each type of errors in using relative pronouns who, whom, which, whose, the writer would like to express the frequency of errors in using relative pronouns that the students made of multiple choice items. Furthermore, to make easier to read, she presents it in following table below: Table 4.2 Frequency amd Precentage of Errors in Using Relative Pronouns that the Students Made of Multiple Choice Items No. Kinds of Relative Pronouns Item Number Frequency of Error Precentage of Error 1. Who 2 8 25.00 3 11

34.37 9

13 40.63 Total 3 32 100 2. whom 5 11 61.11 7 7

38.89 Total

2 18 100 3. Which 1 6 54.55 6 5

45.45 Total

2 11 100 4. Whose 4 15 39.47 8 10

26.32 10

13 34.21 Total 3 38 100 The table above shows the frequency of error in using relative pronoun such as who, whom, which, and whose that students made of multiple choice items. There were 25.00 or 8 students who made error in item number 2. There are 11 students or 34.37 who made error in item number 3. There are 40.63 or 13 students who made error in item number 9. There are 61.11 or 11 students who made error in item number 5. There are 7 students or 38.89 who made error in item number 7. Next, there are 54.55 or 6 students who made error in item number 1. There are 5 students or 45.45 who made error in item number 6. There are 39.47 or 15 students who made error in item number 4. There are 41.66 or 10 students who made error in item 8. There are 26.32 or 13 students who made error in item number 10.

Dokumen yang terkait

An analysis of students’ error in learning noun clause: a case study in the second grade students of SMA Darul Ma’arif

0 8 64

An analysis on students’ error in using modal auxiliaries: a case study in the eighth grade students at SMP Muhammadiyah 17 Ciputat

0 2 1

An analysis on grammatical errors in students' recount paragraph writing (A case study at the second year of MTs N 8 jakarta Barat)

1 5 106

Error analysis on the second grade students of senior high school in using type two of conditional sentences at SMA Dua Mei Ciputat

0 3 110

Some difficulties in learning conditional sentences faced by islamic senior high school students : a case study at the second year of MA Al-Hikmaah Mampang Prapatan south Jakarta

0 10 51

An analysis on the reading passages in the textbook effective English for second year of Junior High school students : a case study at SMP Negeri 54 Jakarta Barat

0 4 62

An error analysis in making wh-questions: a case study of the second year students of SMP Islam Al-Syukro Universal

11 122 176

An analysis on students’ errors in using relative pronouns (Who, Whom, Which, Whose): a case study in the second year of Fatahillah senior high school

2 20 76

An analysis on the students’ errors in using degrees of comparison of adjectives: a case study at eighth grade students of SMP Muhammadiyah Gunung Putri Bogor

0 26 87

An analysis on students’ errors in using conditional sentences type II: a case study on second grade of natural sciences students of national senior high school 9 Kota Tangerang Selatan

0 7 78