them the Indonesian version of the questionnaires to avoid the misinterpretation by the students.
2. Preliminary Field Testing Instruments
In this step, the writer used questionnaires to evaluate the designed materials. The questionnaires were distributed to two English teachers in SMA
Stella Duce I Yogyakarta and two lecturers of English Language Education Study Program of Sanata Dharma University.
D. Data Gathering Techniques
There are two kinds of data gathered in this study; they are the data of target needs and of the designed materials evaluation. The data of target needs
was gathered by distributing questionnaires and conducting informal interview with the students of the tenth grade and the English teacher in SMA Stella Duce I.
The data of designed materials evaluation was gathered by distributing questionnaires to some English teachers in SMA Stella Duce I and English
lecturers of the English Education Study Program of Sanata Dharma University.
E. Data Analysis Techniques
The writer analyzed the interview results with one of the tenth grade English teacher in SMA Stella Duce I Yogyakarta. The interview results were
analyzed descriptively. The data from the interview results were analyzed by
deriving a conclusion for each answer of each question and then made it into one main idea.
After collecting the data needed from the result of questionnaires of designed materials evaluation that were distributed to English teachers of Stella
Duce I Yogyakarta and English lecturers of the English Education Study Program of Sanata Dharma University, the next step was analyzing the data. Since the data
gathered could be quantified, the findings could be displayed using descriptive statistics. The writer used five-point agreement to measure the respondents
opinions of the designed materials, they are: 1 = If you strongly disagree with the statement
2 = If you disagree with the statement 3 = undecided with the statement
4 = If you agree with the statement 5 = if you strongly agree with the statement
In concluding the data, the writer used the Mean, since it is appropriate way to conclude the data tendency. The table of central tendency is presented as
below:
Table 3.1 Table of Central Tendency
No Respondent’s Opinion
Central Tendency N
Mn
Note: N
: Number of resp Mn
: Mean
The formula used for me
= mean = the sum of all sco
X = raw score
N = number of respon
F. Research Procedure