Conclusions CONCLUSIONS AND SUGGESTIONS

talking to each other. In this case, Molly works as a nanny for Ray. That is why she should create a comfortable atmospher. The third position that appears in the data is generosity maxim. In showing her interest to Ray, Molly used this principle in her conversation. Molly tends to put the cost to herself rather than to Ray or the hearer. The fourth position that appears in the data is approbation maxim. In this principle, there is only Molly who uses this principle. It is because Molly wants to make Ray feel that the re is someone who cares about her. It is because Ray’s parents did not care enough about Ray. So, she applies this strategy when she is working as Ray’s nanny. Meanwhile, modesty maxim reaches the lowest number because Molly prefers to give praise to Ray than dispraise to herself. It is because she wants to teach how to appreciate herself in front of the hearer or others. In this research, sympathy maxim is never used in the data. It is because Ray as the main character, is so stubborn that she never complains about anything. Molly prefers to use ta ct maxim in the conversation since she works as Ray’s nanny.

B. Suggestions

Based on the findings of the study, the researcher suggests that further research provide deeper investigations, especially on the concept of politeness strategies and politeness principles. It is because there are still many unresolved problems in this research. In this research, not all of the sub-strategies and principles are found. In fact, the researcher found that several sub-strategies and principles do not emerge in the data. Therefore, other researchers are suggested to find other relevant objects to complete all of the sub-strategies and principles that are proposed in the theory. 67 REFERENCES A. Printed Sources Anderson, W.L. and Stageberg, N.C. Eds. 1996. Introductory Reading on Language . New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston Inc. Black, E. 2006. Pragmatic Stylistics . Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. Booij, G. 2007. The Grammar of Words . New York: Oxford University Press. Bousfield, D. 2008. Impoliteness in Interaction . Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. Clark, V., Paul .E., Alfred, R. Eds.1972. Language Introductory Reading . New York: St. Martin Press. Cohen, L.et.al. 2000. Research Methods in Education . Fifth Edition. London: Taylor and Francis Group. Cutting, J. 2002. Pragmatics and Discourse: A Resource Book for Students . New York: Routledge. Dey, I. 1993. Qualitative Data Analysis . New York: Taylor and Francis Group. Hasmi, M. 2013. A Pragmatic Analysis of Politeness Strategies Reflected in Nanny Mcphee Movie . Unpublished Thesis. Yogyakarta: Study Program of English Language and Literature, English Education Department, Faculty of Languages and Arts, Yogyakarta State University. Holtgraves, T. 2005. Language as Socialaction: Social Psychology and Language Use. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Mey, J.L. 1994. Pragmatics . New Jersey: Blackwell Publishers. Mills, S. 2003. Gender and Politeness . New York: Cambridge University Press. Lakoff, R.T. 2005. Broadening the Horizon of Linguistic Politeness . Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Co. Leech, G. 1991. Principle of Pragmatics: Eight Impressions. New York: Longman Group UK Ltd. Vanderstoep, S. 2009. Research Methods for Everyday Life. California: Jossey Bass. Watts, R.J. 2003. Politeness . New York: Cambridge University Press. Yule, G. 1998. Pragmatics Revised Ed . Oxford: Oxford University Press.

B. Electronic sources

Anonymous. 2003. Uptown Girls . http:www.imdb.comtitlett0263757 retrieved on December 12 th , 2013. Hogan, P. 2003. Uptown Girls Script . http:www.script-o- rama.commovie_scriptsuuptown-girls-dakota-fanning.html On 15 July 2013. Saadiyah, I. 2003. Politeness Strategies Used by Indonesian Chatters in Internet Relay Chat . http:www.infoskripsi.comArtikel-PenelitianArtikel-Skripsi- Politeness-Strategies.html retrieved on November 3 rd , 2012.