= =
= 14.267 = 12.667
c. Determining Deviation Standard of d. Determining Deviation Standard Score of Variable X: Score of Variable Y:
SD
1
=
√
∑
SD
2
=
√
∑
=
√
=
√
= √ = √
= 9.040 = 6.798
e. Determining Standard Error of f. Determining Standard Error of Mean Variable X: Mean Variable Y:
SE
M1
=
√
SE
M2
=
√
=
√
=
√
=
√
=
√
=
= =
1.678 = 1,262
g. Determining Standard Error of difference of Mean Variable X and Mean Variable Y:
SE
M1 - M2
= √
= √
= √
= √
= 2.099 h. Determining t
o
with formula:
t
o
=
=
=
=
0.762 i. Determaining t
table
on significance degree 5, on degrees of freedom: df =
N
1
+ N
2
– 2 = 30+30 -2
= 60-2 = 58
From the calculation above it was shown that t was 0.762 and the degree of
freedom df was 58, with significant level 5. It meant that the value of t
table
with degree of freedom 58 and significant level 5 was 1.672.
D. Hypothesis Testing
The last calculation was hypothesis testing, this testing was done to prove whether there was significant level of using blended learning model on students
reading comprehension in eleventh grade of social class at SMA N 4 Kota Tangerang Selatan. The statistical hypothesis was stated as follows.
1. Null Hypothesis H = It means there is no
significant difference of students’ reading comprehension achievement of exposition text between students who
are taught through blended learning and students who are taught without blended learning.
2. Alternative Hypothesis H
a
= It means there is a significant difference of
students’ reading comprehension achievement of exposition text between
students who are taught through blended learning and students who are taught without blended learning.
The criteria to prove the hypothesis are as follows: 1. If t
t
value
t
t
t
table
H is rejected and H
a
is accepted in significance degree 5, or in SPSS if
p α or sig 2-tailed is smaller than alpha 0.05. 2. If t
t
value
t
t
t
table
, H is accepted in significance degree 5 or in SPSS if p
α or sig 2-tailed is greater than alpha 0.05. Moreover, based on SPSS calculation it showed that the significance was
0.466 p=0.466. It meant the p was greater then α 0.466 0.05. Furthermore,
based on manual calculation it showed that the value of t
table
with degree of freedom 58 and significance level 5 was 1,672 and the calculation of t
was 0.762. It meant that t
t
value
t
t
t
table
0.762 1.672. Both calculation proved that Null hypothesis H
was accepted. It meant there was no significant difference of students’ reading comprehension achievement of exposition text
between students who were taught through blended learning and students who were taught without blended learning.
E. Discussion
This study was conducted to prove whether implementing blended learning model in teaching reading comprehension of exposition text could effect on
students reading comprehension achievement at eleventh grade students at SMA N 4 Tangerang Selatan. However, the result of hypothesis proved that implementing
blended learning model was not effective. It could be seen that the p was greater then α 0,466 0.05 and t
t
t
0.762 1,672. Nevertheless, the result of mean score showed improvement from pre-test 59.93 to post test 72.87 on
experimental class. There may some foctors that affecting the result, here the writer would try to convey some posibly factors as the follows:
First, based on the writer previous study by Asih Wahyuni and Fatemah Behejat both of them conducted the reserch on university level. However, the
writer conducted the research in school ages. It may the factor that students were
not ready yet i n learning via online. It was proved by the “skrpsi” which was
conducted by Aziz Awaludin, where he tried to prove whether peer-assessment via facebook could effect on students writing skill at tenth grade students.
1
The result showed that he failed to prove that peer-assessment using Facebook did not
give any effect on students writing skill. Second, students’ not ready yet in learning via online. It was proved based on
the writer informal interview with some students they said: that they have never done learning via online before. Even they were facilitated by wifi conection at
school and home and they also provided by sophisticated technology such as smartphone, laptop, and personal computer. Moreover, even the writer had done
the online platform trial on one meeting before treatment. Some of them still a little bit confused in using its.
Third, Students are not ready yet in learning independently, especially on online learning. It was proved, because the writer always had to remind them
personally to do their online task and some of them also sometimes forgot their online task. The writer also found the differences some of students performance in
online task and face-to-face task, they got good score in online not good in face- to-face. The writer assumed that students doing cheating in online or they asked
someone for doing their online task. There were some possible reasons why the result of the research failed that the writer could convey. However, the writer did
not mean to generalize all students based on thode three factors, it was just students at XI IPS 2 and 3 academic years 20152016 at SMA N 4 Kota Tangerang
Selatan as the writer sample of this research.
1
Aziz Awaludin, The Effectiveness of Peer-Assessment Trough Facebook Toward Students’ Writing Skill in Narrtive Text , Jakarta: Islamic State University Syarif Hidayatullah,
2015.
45
CHAPTER V CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION
This chapter presents the conclusion of this study, this chapter also gives some suggetsions for teacher and future researchers who want to use blended
learning model in teaching reading comprehension.
A. Conclusion
This study was quasi-experimental design, this study was conducted in order to prove whether implementing blended learning model in teaching reading
comprehension was effecteive or not to students at eleventh grade in SMA N 4 Kota Tangerang Selatan. The result showed that teaching reading comprehension
through blended learning was not effective. According to the result of the data analysis in post-test score by using SPSS the result showed that the significance
was 0.101 p=0.101, it was greater tha n α= 0.05 0.1010.05. It meant that there
was no significance differences between experimental class and controlled class. Moreover, the writer also calculate the gained score by using SPSS and manual,
the result showed that the significance was 0,466, the p=0,466 was greater then α=0.55 0.4660.05. Furthermore, manual calculation also showed that t
was 0,762 and it was smaller then t
t
which was 1.672 the t t
t
0.7621.672. Hence, Null hypotheisis was accepted H
, it meant there was no significant differences between students in experimental class and controlled class.
B. Suggestion
The writer tried to give suggestion for future researcher who needs to conduct similar research and subject teacher who wish to implement blended learning
model in their classes. Since this study was contributing technology and online platform, the researcher should give more time in trial the online platform to
students, because they would be more familiar with online platform and minimize the technical problem. Furthermore, teachers or researcher should choose the right
online platform suitable for students needs, the platform also gave some features
