Difficulty Level Instruments of Data Collection

3.6.3 Difficulty Level

Arikunto 2013:210 explains that a good test is a test which is not too easy or vice versa too difficult to students. After administering and scoring the try out test, an item analysis was made to evaluate the effectiveness of the items. It aims to check whether each item may be the requirement of a good test item or not. Heaton 1975: 172 said that all items should be examined from the point of view of their difficulty level of discrimination. Very easy items are to build in some affective feelings of “success” among lower ability students and to serve as warm up items, and very difficult items can provide a challenge to the highest-ability students Brown, 2004:59. The index difficulty of an item simply shows how easy or difficult the particular item proved in the test. Arikunto 2013: 222 explains that the easy test is not able to stimulate students learning and the difficult test is able to make students desperate because of out of their reach. In measuring level of difficulty of an essay or oral tests or short answer items, I used the different formula test below: Zulaiha, 2008: 34 Where: P = item difficulty The criteria of difficulty level based on Arikunto 2013: 225 as follows: Interval Criteria 0.00 P ≤ 0.30 Difficult 0.30 P ≤ 0.70 Medium 0.70 P ≤ 1.00 Easy Table 3.5 Criteria of Difficulty Level The result of difficulty level between three raters: Table 3.6 The Difference Score between Three Raters Rater 1 The criteria of the difficulty index for the item based on rater 10.36 was medium. Rater 2 The criteria of the difficulty index for the item based on rater 2 0.28 was medium. Rater 1 Rater 2 Rater 3 Max Score 12 12 13 Min Score 6 5 6 Total Max Score 25 25 25 Mean 9.06 7.972 9.139 Rater 3 The criteria of the difficulty index for the item based on rater 3 0.37 was medium. After calculating the item, the index of difficulty level rater 1 was 0.36, rater 2 was 0.28 and rater 3 was 0.37. According to the criteria, rater 1 and rater 3 were medium and rater 2 was difficult. From the computation of item difficulty, it was found there was comparison between medium: difficult = 2: 1. Consequently, it could be concluded that item was medium. It means that the test can be used as a good instrument of evaluation. The index of other items could be seen in Appendix 11.

3.6.4 Discriminating Power

Dokumen yang terkait

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF ROLE PLAY TECHNIQUE IN TEACHING ENGLISH SPEAKING AT THE SECOND GRADE STUDENTS OF SMA MUHAMMADIYAH 3 BATU

0 16 15

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF USING NEAR-PEER ROLE MODELING (NPRM) ON STUDENTS’ SPEAKING ABILITY (A Quasi-Experimental Study at the First Grade of SMPN 3 South Tangerang)

0 32 113

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF PICTURE BOOKS IN IMPROVING STUDENTS’ SKILL IN WRITING NARRATIVE TEXT (A Quasi-Experimental Study at the Eighth Grade Students of SMP PGRI Ciputat)

1 18 147

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF “FIND SOMEONE WHO” GAME TOWARD STUDENTS’ SPEAKING SKILL (A Pre-experimental Study of First Grade Students of Culinary Department at SMK Negeri 3 Tangerang)

1 19 117

THE USE OF MEME COMIC AS MEDIA TO TEACH SPOOF TEXT An Experimental Research at the Eleventh Grade Students of SMA Negeri 1 Kutowinangun, Kebumen in the Academic Year of 20152016

1 40 127

THE TEACHING AND LEARNING PROCESS OF READING COMPREHENSION TO STUDENTS WITH VISUAL IMPAIRMENT (A Descriptive Research at the Seventh and Eighth Grade of SMP YKAB Surakarta in 20122013Academic Year)

0 0 56

THE USE OF ANIMATED FILM IN TEACHING STUDENTS WRITING NARRATIVE TEXT (A Pre-Experimental Study to the Eighth Grade Students of SMPN 4 Singkawang in Academic Year 20172018) AN ARTICLE By:

0 0 9

TI{E USE OF BIO-POEM STRATEGY IN TEACIIING WRITING DESCRIPTTVE TEXT (A Pre Experimental Study on the Tenth Grade Students of SMAN

0 0 11

IMPROVING STUDENTS’ WRITING SKILL USING FOUR SQUARE WRITING METHOD (A Collaborative Action Research at the Eighth Grade Students of SMP Negeri 19 Surakarta in 20092010)

0 0 108

THE USE OF DICE GAME TO IMPROVE THE STUDENTS’ WRITING SKILL OF DESCRIPTIVE TEXT (A Classroom Action Research for the Tenth Grade Students of MA NU Ibtidaul Falah Kudus in Academic Year 20142015)

2 5 18