b. The Respondents’ Opinion on the Iconic Model
The data for the evaluation was about the participants‟ feedbacks,
opinions, comments, and suggestions on the designed materials that were obtained by using questionnaire. The questionnaire was divided into two categories, the
first one use Likert scale and the second one using open-ended questions. The explanation would be presented as follows:
1 The Descriptive Statistics of the Respondent s’ Opinion
In Likert scale, the researcher used five point scales which were Strongly Agree SA, Agree A, Doubt D, Disagree DA, and Strongly Disagree SD.
Choosing Strongly Agree SA had point of agreement which was 5. Choosing Agree A had 4 as the point of agreement. Choosing Doubt D had 3 as the point
of agreement. Choosing Disagree DA had 2 as the point of agreement. Choosing Strongly Disagree SD had 1 as the point of agreement. The second part of the
questionnaire was presented in the forms of narrative description. From the evaluation, it would be used to improve and revise the designed materials.
Table 3.9: Score and criteria of the Likert Scale
No. Criteria
Score
1. Strongly Agree
5 2.
Agree 4
3. Doubt
3 4.
Disagree 2
5. Strongly Disagree
1
In calculating the score to describe the result, finding the mean was needed. The formula to get mean can be presented as follows:
M = ∑x
N Note:
M= mean indicators of central tendency of the set of sources N= number of cases the number of respondents
Mean of each item was categorized into certain criteria. In order to categorize the mean criteria, the ideal mean Mi and ideal standard deviation
SDi should be obtained. Widyoko, 2014: p. 238 provides the interpretation of
point of agreement which is presented on a following table:
Table 3.10: The Interpretation of Score Criteria Widyoko, 2014: p. 238 No.
Criteria Score
Meaning
1. Very good
x 4,2 No revision
2. Good
3,4 x ≤ 4,2 Conduct more exploration on the existing
part of the design based on the statement 3.
Enough 2,6 x
≤ 3,4 Add more part or modify part of the design based on the lack on the statement
4. Poor
1,8 x ≤ 2,6 Replace the rejected part of the design
5. Very poor
x ≤ 1,8
Replace almost the whole part
2 The Respondents’ Comments and Suggestions
The next step was processing the result of the open-ended questionnaire. The researcher presented the results of the open-ended questionnaire would be
presented in the form of writing paragraph. The comments and suggestions from the respondents can help to improve the designed materials.
F. RESEARCH PROCEDURE
This section explained the procedure of conducting this research. The procedure of this research was listed in steps. The descriptions of the steps of the
procedure in this research were mentioned as follows: PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
Kategori