Interview Data Data Analysis Technique

32 Academic Essay Writing course. The process of determining the respondents was based on the result of questionnaires. During the interview, the researcher asked five questions for each student and used audio recorder to save the complete information from the interview. The interviews were held on 10 and 12 December 2014. Then, the researcher interviewed the lecturer on 5 June 2015.

3. Analyzing and Interpreting the Data Results

The last step of the research procedure was analyzing and interpreting the data from two previous steps: distributing questionnaire and interviewing students. The result of interpreting and analyzing the data were stated as the result of the research and it would be explained and presented further. After all the procedures were done, the findings were presented in Chapter IV. 33

CHAPTER IV RESEARCH FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION

In this chapter, the researcher presents the finding and data analysis which have been gathered by employing two research instruments: questionnaire and interview. From the data analysis, the researcher presents the findings which answer the two research questions stated in Chapter 1. The first part is the findings. In this section, the researcher presents the findings from the questionnaires and the interviews which have been gathered. The numerical data on the questionnaire was converted into statements and the interview data are related to the questionnaire as the supporting data. There are two sub tittles: 1 The students’ Perception on The Implementation of Student- Teacher Consultation 2 The Influences of Student-Teacher Consultation. The last section is the discussion. This part overviews the general result of the students’ perception on student-teacher consultation and the influences of student-teacher consultation on the students’ writing proficiency.

A. Findings

The questionnaire was distributed to thirty students of Academic Essay Writing AEW course at the English Language Education Study Program of Sanata Dharma University. Since student-teacher consultation was implemented in AEW class F, the researcher chose this class to be observed. The agreement scales were provided in questionnaire in the form of Likert scale. The respondents had to choose one of the degrees of frequencies that were provided. In the