commit to user 56
Mechanic = 5
5 x 1 Vocabulary
= 20 5 x 4
100  is  the  total  of  maximum  scores  Brown  and  Bailey,  1994  in  Reid, 1993: 244-245.
In  order  to  have  more  objective  result  of  the  scores,  the  students’ writings  are  scored  by  two  persons,  researcher  and  inter-rater.  The  inter-
rater is of course someone who understands how to score writing.
F. Technique of Analyzing the Data
There are two types of data in the research. First is numerical data or quantitative data. The numerical data are in the form of the writing scores. The
writing  scores  as  the  result  of  pre  –  test  or  post  –  test  in  this  research  were analyzed by comparing the means of each test to find out the improvement of
students’ achievement in writing. The formula to find out Mean:
= S
=
X n
X X
∑Χ  = Number of scores n     = number of students
The  second  types  of  data  are  in  the  form  of  non  –  numerical  data.  In analyzing non – numerical data or qualitative data, the researcher made use of
interactive  model  proposed  by  Miles    Huberman  1984:  21  –  23,  they  are data reduction, data display, and data verification:
Mean
commit to user 57
The scheme of interactive model analysis
a.  Data reduction is a process of selection, simplification, and transformation from source of data into a coherent description. In this case, the researcher
took  some  notes  and  described  the  real  condition  of  the  observation  that researcher did. Later, the researcher wrote a coherent description from the
observation  notes.  The  data  reduction  may  be  executed  by  summarizing, coding, or focusing on specific aspects.
b.  Data  display:  an  organized  information  that  lead  to  conclusion  and interpretation.  The  data  display  helps  the  researcher  understand  what  is
happening and what should do based on the understanding. c.  Data verification: in this case, the researcher made summary or conclusion
of the research. The conclusion was drawn continuously throughout of the course of study. In other word, the conclusion was made step by step. The
temporary conclusion was made in the first cycle, and then came to revise conclusion of the second cycle, third cycle, and  or the last cycle needed.
Here, the researcher wrote the conclusion according to his observation and interpretation.
Data Collection Data Display
Data Reduction
Conclusions: Drawing Verifying
commit to user
59
CHAPTER IV RESEARCH FINDINGS
This chapter describes the detail of several activities developed as part of implementing  Task  –  Based  Language  Teaching  TBLT  in  improving  students’
writing  ability  in  the  classroom  action  research.  The  objective  is  to  present  the research  findings  which  give  evidences  to  answer  the  problem  statements  in
Chapter  1,  namely  to  find  out  the  improvement  of  students’  writing  ability  by using Task – Based Language Teaching TBLT and to identify the strengths and
the weaknesses of the implementation of Task Based Language Teaching TBLT in improving students’ writing ability.
This chapter is divided into two sections. Section A discusses the process of  the  research  which  includes  the  condition  before  the  research,  the
implementation  of  the  research,  and  the  final  reflection.  Section  B  discusses  the findings  and  discussion.  Generally  this  action  research  consists  of  some  steps
which will be discussed below.
A. The Process of the Research
This research is divided into three parts, namely the condition before the research; research implementation, consisting of Cycle 1, Cycle 2, Cycle
3; and final reflection. The summary of the research is provided in Table 4.1