commit to user 146
TBLT does not stop at the task phase. Task only is not enough. Language  focus  is  done  after  the  task  phase;  it  is  applied  in  the
activity  of  examining  and  discussing  specific  features  of  the  task; including  grammatical  pattern  used  in  the  task  Willis,  1996:  54.  In
language  focus,  teacher  also  applies  discussion  about  using  correct mechanics,  content,  and  organization.  Teacher  conducts  practices  of
new words, phrases, and grammatical pattern and they can be done in written form with those correct aspects of writing.
b. The improvement of the class situation.
1 Task  –  Based  Language  Teaching  TBLT  makes  the  class
situation more alive .
TBLT makes the class more alive by the application of various activities  during  the  teaching  –  learning  process.  Activities  such  as
describing objects, guessing objects, describing people, and describing events  are  interesting  and  motivating  for  the  students  to  use  the
language  to  express  their  ideas  and  then  write  it  down  to  be  a composition.
To  support  the  teaching  –  learning  process,  the  students’ activities  were  guided  by  worksheets  and  by  using  visual  media,
namely  power point and video. The use of visual media is beneficial because they can provide concrete referent for ideas, serving as easier
as  remembered  the  original  ideas;  and  they  can  motivate  learners  by
commit to user 147
attracting  their  attention,  generating  emotional  expression,  and simplifying information Heinich, 1996: 114.
2 Task  –  Based  Language  Teaching  TBLT  can  increase
students’ participation in writing class.
The  research  findings  reveal  that  TBLT  can  improve  the students’ participation in the writing class. Before the implementation
of TBLT, they tried to avoid the turn to write their answer in front of the  class  because  they  claimed  that  they  could  not  write  it  with  the
right  spelling  even  though  they  could  answer  it  orally.  The  students also  did  not  enjoy  in  the  writing  class  because  they  felt  that  writing
was  boring,  difficult,  and  needed  long  time.  So,  when  the  teacher asked  them  to  make  a  composition,  they  made  few  sentences  even
they only wrote its title. The reason was  they  felt difficult to express their  ideas,  to  choose  the  appropriate  English  words,  and  to  use  the
correct  grammar,  mechanics,  content,  and  organization  in  their composition.
The situation changed after the implementation of TBLT. The students  showed  high  participation  in  the  writing  class.  During  the
research,  the  students  were  enthusiast  in  doing  the  tasks.  The improvement  of  the  students’  participation  was  achieved  because
TBLT  is  interesting  and  therefore  it  is  motivating.  This  finding  is  in line with Bukart 2006 who states that task is familiar to the students;
therefore  it  is  motivating  for  the  students  in  learning  in  the  target
commit to user 148
language. Richard and Rodger 2000: 229 support this idea by stating that task is said to improve students’ motivation and therefore promote
learning. Furthermore,  Littlewood  1981:  17  states  that  task  can
improve  motivation  because  task  can  fulfill  the  ultimate  objective  of the students, in this case to use the target language in the writing form.
Students’ participation is improved because the students find that the classroom  learning  is  related  to  this  objective  and  help  them  to
achieve this objective with increasing success.
c. The strengths of implementation of TBLT.