commit to user 70
The  average  of  those  two  scores  of  organization  was  10.55 53, content was 12.91 43, syntax  grammar was 13.94 56,
mechanics was 3.06 61, and vocabulary was 10.49 52. Based  on  the  result  of  the  writing  pre  –  test,  the  researcher
understood that writing was the serious problem to be solved because the  class  target  of  writing  scores  which  should  be  at  least  75  have
not been achieved yet. Most of the students still lack of writing ability. All  of  the  components  in  their  writing  skill  such  as
organization, content,  grammar    syntax,  mechanics,  and  vocabulary
were commonly still not good.
b. Planning
1 Determining the efforts of overcoming the field problems
The  researcher  made  plans  to  hold  necessary  treatments  and overcome the whole components  in writing skill of the students.  The
components  of writing skill such as content, organization, grammar syntax, vocabulary, and mechanics were given intensively to improve
those skills. Writing  is  the  hardest  skill  compared  to  the  other  English
skills. To improve the writing skills, the researcher has to be aware of each component of writing. In order to improve students’ good control
of  content,
the  good  formation
organization,  and  correct  mechanics; the  researcher  explained  how  to  make  a  good  composition  by  using
various  tasks  in  Task  –  Based  Language  Teaching  TBLT.  In  the
commit to user 71
language  focus  activities,  the  students  focused  on  the  phases  that  led them  to  make  correct  grammar  and  good  sentence  structure  syntax.
To improve the vocabulary mastery, the material given was specified and  focused  on  the  theme  in  each  meeting.  The  application  of  some
tasks  would  give  them  many  chances  to  practice  writing  and  to explore their ideas and vocabularies as many as possible based on the
material.  Then  the  teacher  corrected  the  students’  works  on  the appropriate times to encourage them to know their mistakes.
Those steps were given in each treatment in the cycles.  In the teaching  –  learning  process,  to  gain  the  students’  writing  skill,  the
steps were involved in the application of some tasks of Task – Based Language Teaching TBLT.
2 Planning the Observation.
When the field problem had been formulated and the efforts in overcoming  the  problems  had  been  decided,  the  researcher  and  the
English  teacher  implemented  Task  –  Based  Language  Teaching TBLT in Cycle 1.
The  topic  that  was  given  in  Cycle  1  was  Describing  Things. The topic was suitable with the syllabus of novice level of vocational
school. The researcher and her collaborator handled and observed the teaching – learning process.
commit to user 72
2. Research Implementation.
Having  identified  students’  problems  in  writing,  the  researcher chose Task – Based Language Teaching TBLT to be the solution of the
problems.  Task  –  Based  Language  Teaching  TBLT  through  Action Research which consisted of three cycles.
The  result  of  the  first  Cycle  became  the  consideration  of  the planning of the second Cycle. And the result of the second cycle became a
consideration  in  deciding  and  planning  the  third  Cycle.  Every  cycle consisted of four meetings, three meeting were for presenting the material
and  one  meeting  for  a  writing  test.  Every  meeting  lasted  for  ninety minutes. The overall of research implementation can be seen in Table 4.5.
Table 4.5 Overall Implementation of the Research
1.  Problem      : Students had low writing ability 2.  Solution      : Teaching writing through TBLT
3.  Students     : Tenth Grade 4.  No of Cycle: 3
1. Cycle 1
Describing Things
Planning Giving  tasks  in  each  meeting  pre  –  task,  task,  and
language focus, using pictures and real objects. Action
Meeting 1: What is it? What are they? Meeting  2:  Describing  the  characteristics  of  the
objects Meeting 3: Describing the room
commit to user 73
Meeting 4: Post – test. Observation
Students    : Many students were interested in the activity and group work, tried to write, tried to explore
their ideas but some students were still confused what should they do.
The teacher: The teacher prepared worksheet, did not give enough example of written model and grammar
discussion, gave too many translation of English words to students, lack of monitoring.
Classroom situation: Enjoyable, alive, most students were active to participate in the class activities.
Reflection +:  There  were  various  activities  of  vocabulary
building, the exploration of ideas was increased make students  interested  to  write  with  logical  development
of ideas suitable to the topic content. -:  Lack  of  monitoring,  lack  discussion  about
grammar,  too  many  tasks  to  do  in  a  single  meeting, limited  time  because  so  much  time  to  review  the  last
material  basic English because the students forgot it, the  students  still  had  difficulties  in  organization,
syntax  grammar, and mechanics of writing.
2. Cycle 2
Describing People
Planning Meeting 1: Vocabulary building using various tasks in
commit to user 74
TBLT. Meeting 2: Main tasks.
Meeting 3: Language focus by explaining, analyzing and practicing materials in tasks using TBLT.
Meeting 4: Post – test. Action
Meeting 1: Pre – task. Meeting 2: Task: Describe a person
Meeting 3: Language Focus by explaining, analyzing and practicing materials in tasks using TBLT.
Meeting 4: Post – test. Observation
Students     : The students were more active. The  teacher:  The  teacher  was  more  innovative  by
giving  interesting  picture  and  activity,  giving  enough tasks, grammar and vocabulary discussion.
Classroom  situation:  More  alive,  more  fun  and enjoyable because the topic was interesting.
Reflection +: Encourage the students to participate, keep giving
enjoyable task and interesting pictures, giving enough tasks, grammar, and vocabulary discussion.
-  :  Waste  time  for  laughing  and  did  not  enough control  of  class,  the  students  made  many  Indonesian
translation  style,  the  students  too  often  to  look  into their  dictionary  to  translate  the  words,  the  evaluation
commit to user 75
could  not  be  done  right  away,  the  students  were  still had difficulties in organization and mechanics.
3. Cycle 3
Describing Event
Planning Meeting 1: Vocabulary building using various tasks in
TBLT. Meeting 2: Main task.
Meeting 3: Language focus by explaining, analyzing and practicing materials in tasks using TBLT.
Meeting 4: Post – test. Action
Meeting 1: Pre – task. Meeting 2: Task: Describe the event
Meeting 3: Language focus by explaining, analyzing and practicing materials in tasks using TBLT.
Meeting 4: Post - test. Observation
Students:  Their  writing  ability  improved  in  exploring their ideas and using many aspects of writing such as
organization,  content,  syntax    grammar,  mechanics, and vocabulary.
The  teacher:  More  innovative,  gave  clear  explanation and motivation to the students.
Classroom  situation:  More  alive  and  enjoyable  in doing the tasks.
Reflection +: Improve writing ability in organization, content,
commit to user 76
grammar, mechanics, and vocabulary, encourage the students to explore their ideas, class situation was
more alive, the students were more active, Indonesian translation style was reduced.
-: the challenging of tasks need to be increased. Final Reflection
Writing ability increased in all aspects of writing from cycle to cycle, Indonesian translation style was
reduced, and the students were active in conducting the tasks.
Classroom situation: The students’ participation was increased in exploring their ideas, the teacher was
more innovative, and the teacher explored the students’ potentials in writing.
The implementations of the research in its cycles are described on the following section.
a. Cycle 1