Review of Literature REVIEW OF LITERATURE, CONCEPTS, AND
Another research, which is related to this study, was done by Juliarta 2007 entitled The Meaning of Terchnical Terms Used in Football Game With Reference
to Football Video Highlight. Problems discussed in that research were the meaning of technical terms and the lexicalization of the phrasal terms. The data of
the research were taken from five video highlights of footbal game such as FIFA Fever, Manchester United Video Annual 2003, ARSENAL 20052006 Farewell to
Highbury Season Review, Goal, and Soccer Drills Vol. 3. Theory applied in that research is the theory of meaning proposed by Lyons 1995 in analyzing the
meaning, and theory proposed by Laurie Bauer 1983 to analyze the lexicalization of the phrasal terms. The theory proposed by Nida is also used to
show the difference between terms and common words. He found that the meaning of technical terms in football game are identified into four categories,
they are: i the referential denotational meaning, such as dribble, shot, block, etc, ii the ideational mentalistic meaning, such as assist, home, etc, iii the
behaviorist meaning such as through pass and one two pass, iv the meaning is use meaning such as season and goal. It is also found that all the technical terms
discussed in this study has lexicalization as the result of addition of semantic information. The strength of that study is that he can describe the meaning of the
technical terms along with the lexicalization of the phrasal term, but lack of classification of jargon based on its kind. The relevance with this study is only in
the topic discussed, but in order to cover the weakness of his study, this study will not only talk about the meaning of the jargon, but also its word formation process.
There is also a study done by Yuniasih 2013 entitled An Analysis Of Jargon In Opera Van Java. Problems discussed in that research were the form, meaning,
and function of jargon. The data of the research were taken from Opera Van Java program ‘s videos. Theory applied in that research is the theory proposed by Ives
1999 in analyzing the function of the jargon. She found that the form of jargon in Opera Van Java are identified into three instead of four categories, they are: i
word, such as Prikitiew, Ngihuy, etc, ii phrase, such as Sami Sareng iii in form of abbreviation such as TKP. It is also found that the meaning of the jargon is
classified as denotative and connotative meaning, also there are three functions of jargon, they are i Jargon can give a person a sense of belonging to a specific
group, ii Jargon can also make it easier for a person to communicate with their friends, and iii Jargon as effective signals for identification. The strength of that
study is that she focused on three things; form, meaning, and function of jargon, but there is only a little number of jargon that is found. The relevance of his work
with this study is the topic discussed, but in order to cover the weakness of her study, this study will provide richer data.
There is an article entitled ‗The Impact of Using Many Jargon Words, while Communicating with the Organization
Employees ‘ written by Patoko and Yazdanifard 2014 in American Journal of Industrial and Business Management
Volume 4. The study discuss about impact of using many jargon words while communicating with the organization employees especially because of the result
of diverse cultures within organizations as well as different ways in which organization managers convey or communicate to their employees, such
communication leads to conflicts and misunderstandings. Theory applied in that study were theory proposed by Nordquist 2014 in his writing entitled Jargon
— Definition and Examples of Jargon and the theory proposed by Lauring and
Selmer 2012 in their writing entitled Positive Dissimilarity Attitudes in Multicultural Organizations: The Role of Language Diversity and Communication
Frequency, Corporate Communications. The result showed that many jargon words are being used in daily communication, but it becomes worthless when it
gets in a way of communicating ideas or information, as a result, it tends to negatively impact the effective and efficient communication in the organization.
Furthermore, the use of jargons makes employees feel irritated and left out, hence they end up misunderstanding whatever has been communicated to them and that
affect individual productivity as well as the organization ‘s productivity and its profit margin. The relevance with this study is only in the topic discussed.
Hirst 2003, in his writing entitled ‗Scientific Jargon, Good and Bad‘ in Technical Writing and Communication Volume 33 Suppl. 3 discussed about the
classification of jargon into good and bad jargon. Theory applied in that study were theory proposed by Wilkinson 1992 in his book entitled Jargon and the
Passive Voice: Prescriptions and Proscriptions for Scientific Writing and the theory proposed by Nash 1993 in his book entitled Jargon: Its Uses and Abuses.
The result showed that there are two kinds of jargon, they are good jargon which is well-formed, well-used jargon, and bad jargon which is badly-used and ill-
formed. For a variety of reasons, jargon are supercharged. Badly manufactured or mishandled, jargon can destroy understanding; made and handled expertly, they
remove barriers to understanding; they carve out thought efficiently, quickly, precisely. The relevance with this study is only in the topic discussed.