The Main Result of the Students’ Improvement

68

B. The Improvement of the Students’ Ability to Construct Simple Sentences

In this part, the researcher would like to present the improvement of the students’ ability to construct simple sentences using jumbled words into two parts. The first part is the main result of the students’ improvement in constructing simple sentences and the second part is the supporting result of the students’ improvement.

1. The Main Result of the Students’ Improvement

In this part, the researcher would present the result of the preliminary study, cycle 1, and cycle 2 which showed the improvement that had been achieved when the use of jumbled words was implemented in the class. The result would be the answer of the research problem which was whether jumbled words improved the students’ ability in constructing simple sentences or not. The result was satisfying since the use of jumbled words could improve the students of SMA Santo Mikael Sleman’s ability to construct simple sentences. It could be seen from table 4.4. From the data, there were eight students who had improved their quality of simple sentences they constructed while there were three students from 11 students who failed as their improvement was not consistent. Hence, it could be concluded that more than half of the students had improved their ability to construct simple sentences. 69 Table 4.4: Improvement of the Students’ Ability to Construct Simple Sentences . No. Name of the Student Errors in students’ writings preliminary study Errors in students’ writings cycle 1 Errors in students’ writings cycle 2 Note 1. Albania 100 5 failed 2. Angola 58.33 22.22 5 succeeded 3. Bolivia Absent Moving to other school Moving to other school - 4. Brazil 66.67 18.18 succeeded 5. Canada 37.5 33.33 5.56 succeeded 6. Denmark 100 7.14 succeeded 7. England 64.29 35 succeeded 8. Finland Absent Moving to other school Moving to other school - 9. France 28.57 35.71 failed 10. Japan Absent 5 succeeded 11. Oman 37.5 10 failed 12. Romania 50 Preparing for competition Joining competition - 13. Russia Absent Preparing for competition Joining competition - 14. Venezuela Moving to other school Moving to other school - 15. Vietnam 85.71 14.29 succeeded 16. Wales 100 40 5 succeeded Average percentage: 58.33 percentage: 18.52 percentage: 6.02 Decreased 70 The result could also be summarized in the chart to see the significant reduction of the average of error percentage in the students’ writings from the preliminary study to cycle 2. Figure 4.1 the Average of Error Percentage in the Students’ Writings In the preliminary study, the result was really poor. Most of the students wrote sentences without a subject and a finite verb in the complete sentence. From the data, the error percentage average was 58.33. It meant there were only 41.67 of the correct simple sentences the students had constructed. In the first cycle, the average of error percentage in the students’ writings decreased. It decreased significantly seeing as the error percentage reduced from 58.33 to 18.52. It could be seen that most of them were able to construct simple sentences correctly. They had understood what a sentence meant. 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 Students error percentages of simple sentences 71 In the second cycle, the result was satisfying. The average of error percentage was 6.02. The average of the correct sentences was 93.98. Most of the students had constructed simple sentences correctly. The average of error percentage in the preliminary study, first cycle and second cycle were 58.33, 18.52, and 6.02. From the data, there was significant reduction from the preliminary study to cycle 2. It could be concluded that the average of error percentage in students’ writings decreased significantly.

2. The Supporting Results of the Students’ Improvement