b. ULS
Maximum Cluster Size 5
Maximum Cluster Size 10
Maximum Cluster Size 20 Maximum Cluster Size 30
Maximum Cluster Size 40
Maximum Cluster Size 50
Appendix 5. Satscan and ULS Poverty Hotspots Comparison Using 50, 40,
30, 20, 10 and 5 Maximum Cluster Size
Municipality Priority
ULS Satscan
5 1
2 3
4 5
Reli abili
ty 5
1 2
3 4
5 Reli
abili ty
Trenggalek First
44.70 1.00
1.00 Batang
First 43.07
1.00 1.00
Bojonegoro First
37.62 1.00
1.00 Lumajang
First 36.25
1.00 1.00
Jember First
35.16 1.00
1.00 Pacitan
Second 34.52
1.00 1.00
Situbondo Second
34.51 1.00
0.50 Garut
Second 34.09
1.00 1.00
Temanggung Second
33.96 1.00
1.00 Magelang
Second 33.38
1.00 1.00
Kab.Blora Second
33.33 1.00
1.00 Kab.Malang
Second 32.78
0.83 0.83
Banjarnegara Second
32.57 1.00
1.00 Bondowoso
Second 32.55
0.83 0.83
Kab. Probolinggo
Second 29.88
0.83 0.33
Purworejo Second
29.32 0.83
1.00 Ngawi
Second 29.20
1.00 1.00
Wonosobo Second
29.15 0.83
1.00 Rembang
Second 29.10
1.00 0.50
Boyolali Second
29.08 0.83
0.83 Ponorogo
Second 29.04
1.00 1.00
Tuban Second
28.91 0.83
1.00 Wonogiri
Second 28.67
1.00 0.83
Cilacap Second
28.61 1.00
0.33 Pemalang
Second 28.29
1.00 0.33
Kebumen Second
27.36 0.67
0.83 Tasikmalaya
Second 27.29
1.00 1.00
Magetan Second
26.99 0.67
1.00 Kab.Kediri
Second 26.54
0.50 0.83
Purbalingga Second
26.28 0.67
0.17 Brebes
Second 25.89
0.67 0.17
Gunungkidul Second
25.00 0.50
0.33 Kab.Madiun
Third 24.86
0.50 1.00
Grobogan Third
24.73 0.33
0.33
Appendix 5. Satscan and ULS Poverty Hotspots Comparison Using 50, 40,
30, 20, 10 and 5 Maximum Cluster Size continued
Municipality Priority
ULS Satscan
5 1
2 3
4 5
Relia bility
5 1
2 3
4 5
Reli abil
ity
Jombang Third
24.16 0.17
0.83 Kab.Blitar
Third 24.13
0.17 0.50
Sragen Third
23.23 0.17
0.50 Sukoharjo
Third 23.15
0.17 0.50
Nganjuk Third
22.93 0.17
1.00 Kulonprogo
Third 22.81
0.17 0.00
Tegal Third
21.05 0.17
0.17 Demak
Third 20.57
0.17 0.00
Kab.Pasuruan Ok
19.95 0.00
0.33 Cianjur
Ok 19.24
1.00 0.00
Sukabumi Ok
18.32 0.17
0.00 Tulungagung
Ok 16.93
0.00 0.50
Karanganyar Ok
14.88 0.00
0.50 Banyuwangi
Ok 14.59
0.00 0.33
Sidoarjo Ok
11.22 0.00
0.33 Lamongan
Ok 10.00
0.00 0.33
Gresik Ok
4.97 0.00
0.33
Appendix 6. Comparison of ULS and Satscan Poverty Hotspots with Critical
Poverty Areas based on the Food Security Map Food Security Agency
Maximum Spatial
Cluster Size Priority
Method Significant
Hotspots Critical
Areas Based
on FSA Percent
Total of Similar
Hotspots
50 First
Priority ULS
5 5
100.00 5
Satscan 5
5 100.00
Second Priority
ULS 25
26 96.15
21 Satscan
22 26
84.62 Third
Priority ULS
10 12
83.33 7
Satscan 8
12 66.67
OK ULS
3 35
8.57 2
Satscan 8
35 22.86
40 First
Priority ULS
5 5
100.00 5
Satscan 5
5 100.00
Second Priority
ULS 25
26 96.15
18 Satscan
19 26
73.08 Third
Priority ULS
2 12
16.67 1
Satscan 5
12 41.67
OK ULS
3 35
8.57 2
Satscan 6
35 17.14
30 First
Priority ULS
5 5
100.00 5
Satscan 5
5 100.00
Second Priority
ULS 25
26 96.15
20 Satscan
20 26
76.92 Third
Priority ULS
1 12
8.33 1
Satscan 6
12 50.00
OK ULS
3 35
8.57 2
Satscan 5
35 14.29
20 First
Priority ULS
5 5
100.00 5
Satscan 5
5 100.00
Second Priority
ULS 23
26 88.46
17 Satscan
18 26
69.23 Third
Priority ULS
1 12
8.33 1
Satscan 5
12 41.67
OK ULS
2 35
5.71 1
Satscan 2
35 5.71
10 First
Priority ULS
5 5
100.00 5
Satscan 5
5 100.00
Second Priority
ULS 19
26 73.08
11 Satscan
22 26
84.62 Third
Priority ULS
1 12
8.33 1
Satscan 4
12 33.33
OK ULS
3 35
8.57 1
Satscan 2
35 5.71
Appendix 7. Map matrix for side-by-side comparison of different Food Scarcity
Hotspots Using 50, 40, 30, 20, 10 and 5 Maximum
Cluster Size a.
Satscan
Maximum Cluster Size 5
Maximum Cluster Size 10
Maximum Cluster Size 20 Maximum Cluster Size 30
Maximum Cluster Size 40
Maximum Cluster Size 50
b. ULS