ULS CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION

b. ULS

Maximum Cluster Size 5 Maximum Cluster Size 10 Maximum Cluster Size 20 Maximum Cluster Size 30 Maximum Cluster Size 40 Maximum Cluster Size 50 Appendix 5. Satscan and ULS Poverty Hotspots Comparison Using 50, 40,

30, 20, 10 and 5 Maximum Cluster Size

Municipality Priority ULS Satscan 5 1 2 3 4 5 Reli abili ty 5 1 2 3 4 5 Reli abili ty Trenggalek First 44.70 1.00 1.00 Batang First 43.07 1.00 1.00 Bojonegoro First 37.62 1.00 1.00 Lumajang First 36.25 1.00 1.00 Jember First 35.16 1.00 1.00 Pacitan Second 34.52 1.00 1.00 Situbondo Second 34.51 1.00 0.50 Garut Second 34.09 1.00 1.00 Temanggung Second 33.96 1.00 1.00 Magelang Second 33.38 1.00 1.00 Kab.Blora Second 33.33 1.00 1.00 Kab.Malang Second 32.78 0.83 0.83 Banjarnegara Second 32.57 1.00 1.00 Bondowoso Second 32.55 0.83 0.83 Kab. Probolinggo Second 29.88 0.83 0.33 Purworejo Second 29.32 0.83 1.00 Ngawi Second 29.20 1.00 1.00 Wonosobo Second 29.15 0.83 1.00 Rembang Second 29.10 1.00 0.50 Boyolali Second 29.08 0.83 0.83 Ponorogo Second 29.04 1.00 1.00 Tuban Second 28.91 0.83 1.00 Wonogiri Second 28.67 1.00 0.83 Cilacap Second 28.61 1.00 0.33 Pemalang Second 28.29 1.00 0.33 Kebumen Second 27.36 0.67 0.83 Tasikmalaya Second 27.29 1.00 1.00 Magetan Second 26.99 0.67 1.00 Kab.Kediri Second 26.54 0.50 0.83 Purbalingga Second 26.28 0.67 0.17 Brebes Second 25.89 0.67 0.17 Gunungkidul Second 25.00 0.50 0.33 Kab.Madiun Third 24.86 0.50 1.00 Grobogan Third 24.73 0.33 0.33 Appendix 5. Satscan and ULS Poverty Hotspots Comparison Using 50, 40,

30, 20, 10 and 5 Maximum Cluster Size continued

Municipality Priority ULS Satscan 5 1 2 3 4 5 Relia bility 5 1 2 3 4 5 Reli abil ity Jombang Third 24.16 0.17 0.83 Kab.Blitar Third 24.13 0.17 0.50 Sragen Third 23.23 0.17 0.50 Sukoharjo Third 23.15 0.17 0.50 Nganjuk Third 22.93 0.17 1.00 Kulonprogo Third 22.81 0.17 0.00 Tegal Third 21.05 0.17 0.17 Demak Third 20.57 0.17 0.00 Kab.Pasuruan Ok 19.95 0.00 0.33 Cianjur Ok 19.24 1.00 0.00 Sukabumi Ok 18.32 0.17 0.00 Tulungagung Ok 16.93 0.00 0.50 Karanganyar Ok 14.88 0.00 0.50 Banyuwangi Ok 14.59 0.00 0.33 Sidoarjo Ok 11.22 0.00 0.33 Lamongan Ok 10.00 0.00 0.33 Gresik Ok 4.97 0.00 0.33 Appendix 6. Comparison of ULS and Satscan Poverty Hotspots with Critical Poverty Areas based on the Food Security Map Food Security Agency Maximum Spatial Cluster Size Priority Method Significant Hotspots Critical Areas Based on FSA Percent Total of Similar Hotspots 50 First Priority ULS 5 5 100.00 5 Satscan 5 5 100.00 Second Priority ULS 25 26 96.15 21 Satscan 22 26 84.62 Third Priority ULS 10 12 83.33 7 Satscan 8 12 66.67 OK ULS 3 35 8.57 2 Satscan 8 35 22.86 40 First Priority ULS 5 5 100.00 5 Satscan 5 5 100.00 Second Priority ULS 25 26 96.15 18 Satscan 19 26 73.08 Third Priority ULS 2 12 16.67 1 Satscan 5 12 41.67 OK ULS 3 35 8.57 2 Satscan 6 35 17.14 30 First Priority ULS 5 5 100.00 5 Satscan 5 5 100.00 Second Priority ULS 25 26 96.15 20 Satscan 20 26 76.92 Third Priority ULS 1 12 8.33 1 Satscan 6 12 50.00 OK ULS 3 35 8.57 2 Satscan 5 35 14.29 20 First Priority ULS 5 5 100.00 5 Satscan 5 5 100.00 Second Priority ULS 23 26 88.46 17 Satscan 18 26 69.23 Third Priority ULS 1 12 8.33 1 Satscan 5 12 41.67 OK ULS 2 35 5.71 1 Satscan 2 35 5.71 10 First Priority ULS 5 5 100.00 5 Satscan 5 5 100.00 Second Priority ULS 19 26 73.08 11 Satscan 22 26 84.62 Third Priority ULS 1 12 8.33 1 Satscan 4 12 33.33 OK ULS 3 35 8.57 1 Satscan 2 35 5.71 Appendix 7. Map matrix for side-by-side comparison of different Food Scarcity Hotspots Using 50, 40, 30, 20, 10 and 5 Maximum Cluster Size a. Satscan Maximum Cluster Size 5 Maximum Cluster Size 10 Maximum Cluster Size 20 Maximum Cluster Size 30 Maximum Cluster Size 40 Maximum Cluster Size 50

b. ULS