The Validity of Data

P : percentage of students’ improvement y : pre-test result y2 : post-test 2

H. The Validity of Data

Validity is an essential criterion for evaluating the quality and acceptable of the research. Regarding validity in action research, the writer adopts Anderson, Herr, and Nihlen’s criteria that mention the validity of action research including democratic validity, outcome validity, process validity, catalytic validity, and dialogic validity. 8 In this study, the writer uses democratic, process, and dialogic validity. Anderson defines outcome validity as: Outcome validity requires that the action emerging from a particular study leads to the successful resolution of the problem that was being studied, that is, your study can be considered valid of you learn something that can be applied to the subsequent research cycle. 9 Based on the explanation above, the outcome validity could be seen from the result of the test. When the result of cycle two is better than cycle one, it means that the study is successful. Then, Process validity is “the validity that requires a study has been conducted in a “dependable” and “competent” manner.” 10 It could be seen from the outcome of observation. In this case, the writer notes all events happening during the CAR. When there might have some mistakes in the method of teaching, then the writer discusses with the teacher to modify the further strategies. Next, the dialogic validity; “it involves having a critical conversation with peers about research findings and practices.” 11 In this case, the writer and the teacher discuss and assess the students’ test result of cycle one and cycle two together. It is done in order to avoid invalid data. 8 Geoffrey E. Mills, Action Research: A Guide for the Teacher Researcher, New York: Prentice Hall, 2003, p. 84. 9 Geoffrey E. Mills, Action Research: A Guide for the Teacher Researcher, … . 10 Geoffrey E. Mills, Action Research: A Guide for the Teacher Researcher, … . 11 Geoffrey E. Mills, Action Research: A Guide for the Teacher Researcher, … p. 85. I. Criteria of the Action Success CAR is able to be called successful if it can exceed the criteria which have been determined, and fail if it is cannot exceed the criteria which have been detained. In this study, based on the agreement between the researcher and the teacher, when there is 75 of students achieve any improvement; gaining score 75 seventy five of grammar especially in adverbial clause of time test started from the pre-test until the second post-test in cycle two. It means that this research could be called success. Then the next action would be stopped, but if this condition has not been reached yet, the alternative action would be done in the next cycle. 35

CHAPTER IV FINDING OF THE RESEARCH

A. Before Implementing the Action

This chapter presents the result of research. In this case, it discusses the way to improve students’ ability in adverbial clause of time through Berlitz Method at XI IPS II class of SMA N 3 Kota Tangerang Selatan, the 20102011 academic year. Related to the discussion of the result, it was divided into three parts. Those were before implementing the action, the implementation of the action, and discussion of all the data after implementing the action. There were three parts related to before implementing the action. Those were interview, observation, and pretest. Those explanations as following:

1. The Result of Interview Before CAR

The interview conducted in this study was the unstructured interview. It was held on Monday, January 10 th 2010 started at 08.00 a.m. and finished at 09.00 a.m. The writer asked to the teacher some questions. The questions were divided into three categories of questions, involving: the general condition in English class primarily on students’ English grammar achievement and performance, the difficulties faced by students in their English grammar skill, and the kinds of strategies implemented by the teacher previously before Classroom Action Research CAR in solving the students’ difficulties in English grammar. First category discussed the general condition in English class primarily on students’ English grammar achievement of the test. Most of

Dokumen yang terkait

Improving students' ability in using prepositions of place through total physical response (TPR) (a classrom action research at first grade of SMPN 10 kota Tangerang selatan)

0 14 66

Improving students' discussion text writing skills through teacher indirect feedback technique: a classroom action research at the twelfth grade students of SMAN 8 Kota Tangerang Selatan

1 12 160

IMPROVING THE STUDENTS’ SPEAKING ABILITY THROUGH CHART AT THE SECOND YEAR OF SMKN 3 BANDAR LAMPUNG (CLASSROOM ACTION RESEARCH)

0 4 167

IMPROVING THE STUDENTS’ SPEAKING ABILITY THROUGH CHART AT THE SECOND YEAR OF SMKN 3 BANDAR LAMPUNG (CLASSROOM ACTION RESEARCH)

2 6 47

IMPLEMENTATION OF ROLE PLAY IN IMPROVING STUDENTS’ SPEAKING ABILITY AT THE FIRST GRADE OF SMAN 8 BANDAR LAMPUNG (A Classroom Action Research)

0 2 14

Improving Students' Ability in Using Conditional Sentence Type III Through Interactive Technique (A Classroom Action Research at the Eleventh Grade of SMAN 7 Kota Bekasi)

2 18 186

IMPROVING STUDENTS’ SPEAKING ABILITY THROUGH PROJECT WORK A Classroom Action Research at SMK Negeri 2 Surakarta in the Academic Year of 2008 2009

0 3 130

IMPROVING STUDENTS’ ABILITY IN WRITING DESCRIPTIVE TEXT THROUGH GROUP WORK AT THE FIRST YEAR OF SMA N 8 SURAKARTA (CLASSROOM ACTION RESEARCH).

0 0 6

IMPROVING STUDENTS’ PRONOUNCIATION ABILITY THROUGH REPETITION OF DRILL (A Classroom Action Research at the Second Grade Students of MTs NU Salatiga in the Academic Year of 2013/2014) - Test Repository

0 0 79

IMPROVING STUDENTS’ SPEAKING ABILITY THROUGH BAMBOO DANCE TECHNIQUE (A Classroom Action Research at Tenth Grade Students of SMAN 4 Purwokerto in Academic Year 20142015)

0 1 13