digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id 93
CHAPTER V
CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION
In this chapter, the conclusion of the research regarding with the analysis of student teachers’ assessment instrument and the suggestion from the researcher are
presented as follows:
A. Conclusion
Based on the research findings which were presented in the previous chapter, there are several points that can be concluded as following description;
1. In case of fulfilling the requirement of test standardization, both of cognitive and knowledge competency has the same types of assessment instrument. The
finding showed that, from six assessment techniques which were used by student teacher, there are 47 of student teachers who were able to fulfill the
entire test requirement, then 37 of student teachers miss one of the indicators and 16 of student teachers miss two of the indicators. Although
37 of them could not meet one of the indicators and 16 of them could not meet two indicators, still their assessment is categorized as good assessment.
Since their assessment instrument is in good level, it means that their assessment instrument had already fulfilled the standardization of cognitive
and knowledge assessment.
digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id 94
2. Based on interview result about the causing factor of their weakness point, the researcher had found 4 main reasons. The detail of the percentage of the
student who stated that reasons are described as follows; a. Forgot about detail
This factor was stated by 31 of student teachers who designed multiple choice and descriptive question. Here, in multiple choice and descriptive
question they have to write the instruction how to do the question, and most of them forgot about it.
b. Assumed that it was not important thing This reasons or factor was stated by 31 of student teachers who
designed descriptive question and true and false assessment. When the researcher showed them about the indicators which were not able to meet
by them, they just thought that the indicator was not important and there was no use to use it in their assessment.
c. They did not know about that indicator This reasons or factor was stated by 31 of student teachers who
designed fill in the blank, matching and true and false technique. They did not know if the indicator which they were unable to meet is the test
requirement.
digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id 95
d. They did not like with it It is a unique reason which was stated by 7 of student teachers who
designed descriptive questions. She did not like put the interjection mark in the statement, so she omitted it.
B. Suggestion
Based on the result of this study, there are some significant suggestions from the researcher which is stated as follows:
1. For student teacher Based on the finding above, the entire assessment instrument which
was designed by student teacher is categorized as a good assessment. However there were some of them who could not meet some of the
indicator. Some of the indicator who could not meet by the student teacher is caused by many factors. In this case for the student teachers who are going
to face their internship program, the fault or the reason above might become their reflection and suggestion to make assessment which fulfills the test
requirement. 2. For lecturer
Although the entire assessment instrument which was designed by student teacher is categorized as a good assessment, still they have some
weakness point on it. It is proven by the analysis result which stated that 37 of them could not meet one of the indicators, and 16 of them could
not meet two of the indicator. The lecturer is expected to acknowledge their
digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id 96
weakness point and the reasons of why they could not meet the indicator. In this case the lecture can help the students in improving their weakness point,
so there will be no weakness point or reasons which make them unable to fulfill the indicator.
3. For future researcher Based on the result of this study, the researcher comes with
suggestions for future researcher who are interested to conduct the research related with the student teacher’s ability in designing assessment instrument.
In this research, the researcher has limited the research scope on cognitive and knowledge competency, for future researcher they can focus on other
competencies which are possible to be designed by student teacher. In addition, the researcher focus on the causing factor of the weakness point,
for future researcher, they can also extend the area of this study by focusing on the strength point of the assessment instrument.
