Data Analysis Technique English reading habit of student teachers at english teacher education department of Sunan Ampel State Islamic University: level and common factor analysis.

digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id 38 common factor that influence students’ reading habit. The subjects of the study have to complete those questions. b. Analyzing data separately In analyzing the data, the researcher provided several steps. First is preparing the data. The researcher prepared the data from questionnaire and interview. In questionnaire, the researcher gave numeric score for each responses in the optional answers in the instrument, for example Always=3, Sometimes=2, Almost Never = 1 and so on. Researcher used three choices in optional answers because the need of the research. The researcher wanted to indicate the level of reading habit including constant readers, moderate readers and seldom reader. Because of those three levels, so the researcher needed three choices that can indicate the level. Always can be indicated as constant readers, Sometimes can be indicated as moderate readers, the last is Almost Never can be indicated as seldom readers. Then, inputting the data using SPSS 20 to know the descriptive statistic including mean, median and mode of the data. The researcher used the codescore that the researcher has been decided in SPSS. In interview, the researcher categorized the answers of the subjects and made diagram related to how many students who answer motivation for reading and how many students who answer the advancement of technology. Second is the researcher analyzed using descriptive quantitative in questionnaire because the researcher wanted to indicate the general tendencies such as mean, median, mode. After analyzing the questionnaire, researcher could interpret the reading habit level. For qualitative data using interview, the researcher made the diagram that related to the common factors influencing reading habit. From the percentage, the researcher can know what the most common factor that influences students’ reading habit is. digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id 39 c. Combining quantitative data and qualitative data After finishing both quantitative and qualitative data analysis, the researcher combined both of them and made the correlation. Basically, the researcher also correlated the data with triangulation for qualitative study when the gathered data, experts and theories are in the same line. d. Concluding the result of the research After finishing the whole sections above, the researcher concluded this research including the students’ reading habit level and the most common factor that influence their reading habit based on the findings and also the theories that have been discussed. digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id 40 CHAPTER IV : RESEARCH FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION This chapter discusses the collected data from questionnaire and interview guideline of student teachers in English Teacher Education Department UINSA and the analysis of them. Statistical report of descriptive statistics and student t eachers’ answer of the most common factor that influence their reading habit are shown as research findings. Furthermore , the analyzed data of student teachers’ level of reading habit based on the standard of American Library Association and the analyzed data of the common factors that influence student teachers’ reading habit based on Wigfiel d and Liu’s theories were shown as research discussion.

A. Research Findings

Research findings report the information that is discovered by the researcher through research instruments. Because there are two research questions, certainly this chapter requires two main points of research findings and also two main points of research discussion. It is broken down into several details information related with the finding. Then, the findings correlate to the theories to make clear and strong explanation. Describing about research questions, certainly research instruments are needed as the tools in order to answer the research questions. Explaining about the instruments of this research, the researcher recalls the research question and the instruments of this study. The following table shows the research questions, aspects, instrument and also number of question in instrument.

Dokumen yang terkait

Logical statement in student’s research proposal at English Teacher Education Department Islamic State University Sunan Ampel Surabaya.

0 1 63

The effectiveness of critical reading strategies on students’ critical thinking ability at English teacher education Department of State Islamic University of Sunan Ampel.

0 2 77

The languange attitude of English Education Department students in Sunan Ampel Islamic State University in learning english.

1 4 93

Conversational hand gestures of student teachers to give instruction in microteaching class of English Teacher Education Department at Sunan Ampel State Islamic University Surabaya.

0 1 120

VOCABULARY LEARNING STRATEGIES IN INTERNSHIP PROGRAM AT ENGLISH TEACHER EDUCATION DEPARTMENT OF SUNAN AMPEL STATE ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY SURABAYA.

0 0 108

LANGUAGE FUNCTIONS IN STUDENT TEACHERS’ UTTERANCE: AN ANALYSIS OF STUDENT TEACHERS’ UTTERANCE IN PRE-SERVICE TEACHING : PPL 1 CLASSROOMS AT ENGLISH TEACHER EDUCATION DEPARTMENT OF STATE ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY OF SUNAN AMPEL SURABAYA ACADEMIC YEAR 2014-2015.

0 0 148

STUDENT TEACHERS’ ABILITY IN DESIGNING ASSESSMENT INSTRUMENT AT ENGLISH TEACHER EDUCATION DEPARTMENT UIN SUNAN AMPEL SURABAYA.

0 0 108

THE STUDENTS` ABILITY TO THINK CRITICALLY IN CRITICAL READING CLASS AT ENGLISH TEACHER EDUCATION DEPARTMENT OF FACULTY OF EDUCATION AND TEACHER TRAINING OF STATE ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY OF SUNAN AMPEL SURABAYA 2015.

0 0 71

STUDENTS’ ABILITY IN WRITING ARGUMENTATIVE ESSAY AT ENGLISH TEACHER EDUCATION DEPARTMENT OF THE STATE ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY OF SUNAN AMPEL SURABAYA.

0 1 85

CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ LEARNING STYLE AND ACHIEVEMENT IN CRITICAL READING CLASS OF ENGLISH TEACHER EDUCATION DEPARTMENT AT SUNAN AMPEL STATE ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY SURABAYA.

0 0 78