17
1. Questionnaire
Questionnaire is a research instrument in which the respondents or theparticipants provide the answer whether in the form of written responses or
mark items that indicates their responses. The questionnaire which was used in this research consists of two parts.
The first part was open-ended question and the second part is close-ended questions. According to Foddyas cited in Reja at al, 2003, the open-ended
questions allow theparticipants to express their opinions without being influenced, while in theclose-ended questions, the participants only chose the answer based on
the options given. For the implementation of this research, the researcher used questionnaire
as the main instrument to collect the data. The questionnaire consisted of 30 close ended questions which were divided into three categories. The first category
consisted of thirteen statements about the implementation of role play in Speaking II class. In this category, the students were asked about the whole activity of role
play done in the class. The second category consisted of ten statements about the advantages of role play in Speaking II class. In this category, the students were
asked about what they have learned from therole play activity in Speaking II class. The third category consisted of seven statements about the
students’ perception on the use of role play technique in Speaking II class. In this part the students were
asked about their general opinionon the use of role play in Speaking II class.
18 .
Table 3.1. Categories of Statements No. Categories of Statement
Number of Statement
1. The Implementation of Role play
2 – 14
2. The Advantages of Role play
15 – 24
3. Students’ perceptions on the Use of Role Play
1, 26 – 30
To evaluate the questionnaire, the researcher used Likert scale. Likert scale is a summated ratings method which assessed the attitudes towards the topic
by presenting a set of statement about the topic and asking the respondents to indicate for each whether they are strongly agree, agree, undecided, disagree, and
strongly disagreeAry, Jacobs, Sorensen, and Razavieh, 2010. In this research, the researcher used numerical symbol to represent the indicator of the responds.
Table 3.2. Example of Questionnaires No
Statement SA
A D
SD …
4 I am cooperative in preparing the role play.
5 I pay attention to the lecturer’s explanation and
instruction before performing the role play. SA : strongly agree
A : agree
D : disagree SD
: strongly disagree
2. Observation
The second technique used in this research was observation. In this research, the researcher used a checklist to collect the data needed. According to
Ary at al. 2010, checklist is the simplest devise that can be use in qualitative research; it is made in a list of some points that is observed. In the observation, the
researcher focused on 8 points in order to get some supporting data. The example of the observation sheet can be seen in the Table 3.3:
19
Table 3.3. Observation Guidelines
3. Interview
The third instrument used in this research was interview. Generally, interview is described as a process of oral questioning of a subject Ary at al,
2010. According to Bogdan and Biklenas cited in Hoepfl, 1997, interview can be used as the primary strategy for the data collection or in conjunction with
observation, document analysis, or other technique. The researcher used the interview to strengthen the data from the questionnaire and the observation, to
gain additional information or data, and toclarify the results of the questionnaire and the observation.
In this interview, the researcher took ten students of the participants as the sample of interview. These ten students consisted of five students who had
positive perception and five students who had negative perception on the use of role play in Speaking II class. This interview used purposive sampling in deciding
the sample who were interviewed.
No. Statement
Yes No
Notes
1. There are 2-3 members in a group of
role play.
2. The topic of role play is based on a
daily life situation.
3. The role play is done by memorizing
the dialogue.