learners  should  be  to  use  their  language  proficiency  in  social  interaction.  Language learners  should  focus  on  the  meaning  of  what  they  are  saying  rather  than  on  the
particular language structure. In  contrast,  most  students  think  that  speaking  is  difficult  because  they  are
accustomed to use their native language in everyday situation. They get difficulties in understanding what others say and delivering  what they have in mind. The students
are  afraid  of  making  mistakes;  in  fact  practicing  is  the  best  way  to  improve  their speaking ability. Thus, teaching speaking should encourage and emphasis on practice
as  a  way  of  developing  communicative  skills.  The  teacher  should  give  speaking activities that encourage students to speak as natural as possible.
Based  on  this  study,  the  writer  would  like  to  use  philosophical  question  to teach  students‟  speaking  ability  at  second  grade  students  of  SMA  Negeri  4  Kota
Tangerang  Selatan  in  order  to  encourage  them  to  speak  English  fluently. Philosophical  questions  can  be  alternative  for  the  teacher  to
attract  students‟ motivation to participate in class discussion. Students work together to generate ideas
to answer their own question about the philosophical issue in the material. Based on the exploration above, it can be  assumed that  there is a significant
effect  of  using  philosophical  question  on students‟  speaking  ability  at  the  second
grade students of SMA Negeri 4 Kota Tangerang Selatan.
F. The Hypothesis of the Study
Based  on  the  theory  above,  there  are  two  kinds  of  hypothesis  which  can  be estimated here, those are:
Ha  : There  is  a  significant  effect  of  using  philosophical  question  on  students
speaking ability. H
: There  is  no  significant  effect  of  using  philosophical  question  on  students
speaking ability.
From  the  basic  problem  of  the  study  and  theoretical  framework  which  have been  started,  the  writer  draws  the  hypothesis  of  the  study  which  can  be  started  as
follows: “There  is  a  significant  effect  of  using  philosophical  question  on  students  speaking
ability at the second grade students of SMA Negeri 4 Kota T angerang Selatan”.
24
CHAPTER III RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
A. The Place and Time of the Study
This study took place at SMA Negeri 4 Kota Tangerang Selatan which is located at  Jl.  WR.  Supratman Komp.  Pertamina,  Pondok Ranji,  Ciputat Timur,  Kota
Tangerang  Selatan.  It  was  conducted  on the  first semester  20152016  academic year.
The writer conducted this research in four weeks. It began on July 27
th
2015 and ended August 21
th
2015.  In the  first  week,  the  writer  did  the  permission  to  the school’s  head  master  and  observed  the  teaching  learning  process.  After  that  on  the
second until fourth week the writer gave pre-test, treatment and post-test.
B. Method and Research Design
This research was a quantitative study in terms of gathering and evaluating data. According  to  Creswell,  a quantitative  method  is  a  method  which  the  investigation
focus  on  the  use  of  postpositive  statement  for  developing  knowledge,  the  use  of enquiry  strategies  such  as  experiment, surveys,  and  collect  data  on  predetermined
instruments to get specific statistics data.
1
Furthermore, Sugiyono also stated that quantitative research is an inquiry process of understanding based on distinct methodological traditions of inquiry that explore a
social or human problem. The researcher builds a complex, holistic, picture, analyzes words,  reports  detailed  views  of  informants  and  conducts  the  study  in  a  natural
setting.
2
Thus, this study was conducted to get empirical evidence about the effect of
1
John  W.  Creswell, Research  Design:  Qualitative,  Quantitative,  and  Mixed  Methods Approaches: Second Edition
, New York: Sage Publiication, 2003,  p.  21.
2
Sugiyono, Metode  Penelitian  Pendidikan;  Pendekatan  Kuantitatif,  Kualitatif,  dan  RD, Bandung: Alfabeta, 2013, p. 13.