34
expert tested, analysed, and evaluated the first draft of the developed interactive multimedia from the materials and media aspects. The expert also gave feedbacks,
suggestions, and validations whether the first draft of the interactive multimedia was appropriate or not to be used by the students. The results of the expert
judgment were then used to improve the first draft. 5.
Revision The researcher analysed the expert judgment results and noted what the
researcher should revise on the first draft of the interactive multimedia. The scores of the questionnaires were calculated to figure out whether the first draft was
appropriate or not. The comments and suggestions from the expert also became the consideration in revising the first draft. Thus, as the needed revision had been
reviewed and corrected, the developed interactive multimedia was considered as the final draft.
D. Data Collection
The researcher used the following data collection techniques and instruments in conducting the research.
1. Data Collection Techniques
This research collected the quantitative data using survey. There were two types of questionnaires used in the survey. The first questionnaire was filled by
the students to gather needs analysis data. The second questionnaire was given to the expert to evaluate the first draft of the product.
35
2. Data Collection Instruments
The data collection instrument of this research was questionnaire. It was used to collect quantitative data through closed-ended questions. There were two
kinds of questionnaires used in this research, the first was for the students to gather needs analysis data, while the other one was for the expert to evaluate the
product. The needs analysis questionnaire was distributed to Grade VIII A and Grade VIII B of SMP Negeri 4 Yogyakarta to get the target and learning needs
data.
Table 4: The Organization of the Needs Analysis Questionnaire No.
Aspects Item
Number The Purpose of The
Questions References
Students’ Profile 1.
General information of
the students Part A
To find out the students’ general information.
Graves 2000: 103
Learning Needs 2.
Goals 1, 2
To identify the students’ opinion and interest of
learning English. Nunan
2004: 41 Graves
2000: 103
3. Lacks
3-5 To find out the gap between
students’ current competences and target
competences. Hutchinson
and Waters 1987: 56
4. Wants
6, 7 To find out students’ wants
related to the topics of the materials.
Hutchinson and Waters
1987: 56
Target Needs 5.
Input 8, 11
To find out the information about students’ preferences
related to kinds of input texts.
Nunan 2004: 47-
49
6. Teacher’s role
12 To find out the teacher’s
role in the teaching-learning process.
Nunan 2004: 64-
70
7. Learners’ role
13 To find out the students’
Nunan
36
role in the teaching-learning process.
2004: 64- 72
Development of Interactive Multimedia 8.
Students’ experience
9, 10 To find out the student’s
experience and preference towards interactive
multimedia. Graves
2000: 103- 104
9. Learning media
14 To find out the English
learning reading media that students’ need.
Vaughan 2008: 2-9
10. Multimedia
design 15
– 20 To find out students’ preferences for the
interactive multimedia design.
Stemler 1997: 339-
359 Hutchinson
and Waters 1987: 56
Meanwhile, the second questionnaire was distributed to the expert. The questionnaire was divided into two parts which were materials and media aspects.
The questionnaire was distributed to the expert to get the evaluation, suggestion and validation for revising the first draft of the interactive multimedia. Table 5
shows the organization of the expert judgment questionnaire.
Table 5: The Organization of the Expert Judgment Questionnaire No.
Aspects Item
Number The Objective of The
Questions References
Materials Aspects 1.
Content appropriateness
1-10 To evaluate the
appropriateness of the developed materials.
BSNP 2006
2. Language
appropriateness 11-14
To evaluate the appropriateness of the
language of the developed materials..
BSNP 2006
3. Presentation
appropriateness 15-25
To evaluate the appropriateness of the
presentation of the developed materials.
BSNP 2006
Multimedia Aspects 4.
Screen display 1-4
To evaluate the appropriateness of the
Stemler 1997: 340-
37
developed interactive learning multimedia in
terms of its screen appearance.
343
5. Multimedia
element 5-9
To evaluate the appropriateness of the
multimedia elements used in the interactive learning
multimedia. Stemler
1997: 348- 350
6. Program
navigation 10-13
To evaluate the appropriateness of the
developed interactive learning multimedia in
terms of its navigation system.
Stemler 1997: 344-
346
7. Interaction and
feedback 14, 15
To evaluate the appropriateness of the
user’s interaction and feedback when they use
the program. Stemler
1997: 343- 344
E. Data Analysis Techniques
