Conclusions CONCLUSIONS AND SUGGESTIONS

REFERENCES

A. Printed Sources

Bogdan, R.C. and Biklen, S. K. 1982. Qualitative Research for Education: An Introduction to Theories and Methods . Boston, Massachussetts: Allyn and Bacon, Inc. Cruse, A. 2006. A Glossary of Semantics and Pragmatics. Edinburg: Edinburg University Press. Cutting, J. 2002. Pragmatics and Discourse: A Resource Book for Students. New York: Routledge. Denscombe, M. 2007. The Good Research Guide for Small-Scale Social Research Projects 3 rd Edition . Berkshire: Open University Press. Flick, U. 2009. An Introduction of Qualitative Research 4 th Edition. London: Sage Publications. Inc. Griffiths, P. 2006. An Introduction to English Semantics and Pragmatics. Edinburg: Edinburg University Press. Grundy, P. 2000. Doing Pragmatics 3 rd Edition . New York: Oxford University Press. Heigham, J. and R. Croker. 2009. Qualitative Research in Applied Linguistics: A Practical Approach. London: Palgrave Macmillan. Jensen, K. and Jankowski, N. W. 1991. A Handbook of Qualitative Methodologies for Mass Communication Research . New York: Routledge. Kusumaningrum, J.A. 2007. A-Socio Pragmatic Analysis of the Flouting of Cooperative Principle Maxim Done by the Male Character in Cinderella Man. Undergraduate Thesis. Yogyakarta: Yogyakarta State University. Unpublished. Leech, G. 1983. Principles in Pragmatics. New York: Longman Group Ltd. Levinson, L. C. 1983. Pragmatics. New York: Cambridge University Press. Mey, J.L. 1993. Pragmatics: An Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell. Nurhayati, F. 2007. A Pragmatic Analysis of Maxim Flouting Reflected in the Oprah Winfrey Show in the Exclusive Interview with J.K.Rowling. Undergraduate Thesis. Yogyakarta: Yogyakarta State University. Unpublished. 85 Peccei, J.S. 1999. Pragmatics: Language Workbooks. New York: Taylor Francais Routledge. Thomas, J. 1995. Meaning in Interaction: An Introduction to Pragmatics. New York: Routledge. Yule, G. 1996. Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Vanderstoep, S. W. and Johston, D. D. 2009.Research Method for Everyday Life: Blending Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches . San Francisco: John Willey Sons Inc.

B. Electronic Source

Drew ‟s Script O Rama. 2003. “This Boy‟s Life Script: Dialogue Transcript”, http:www.script-o-rama.commovie_scriptstthis-boys-life-script- transcript.html. Retrieved on Wednesday, 17 September 2014 at 9:48 pm. Appendixes 1. Data Sheet of A Pragmatic Analysis of Maxim Flouting Performed by the Characters in This Boy`s Life Movie Codes: 1QnUn Types of maxim flouting: Strategies: 1: Data Number Qn: Quantity Maxim Flouting Ta: Tautology Ir: Irony Qn: Types of Maxim Flouting Ql: Quality Maxim Flouting Ov: Overstatement Bn: Banter Un: Strategies of Maxim Flouting Mn: Manner Maxim Flouting Un: Understatement Sr: Sarcasm Rl: Relation Maxim Flouting Mt: Metaphor Ct: Changing the Topic Hy: Hyperbole Ob: Being Obscure not brief Code Data Qn Ql Rl Mn Explanation Ta Ov Un Mt Hy Ir Bn Sr Ct Ob 1MnOb Toby: I spy with my little eye something that begins with C. Caroline: Cactus. Cactus. Toby: Nope. Caroline: No? Toby: It ’s upwards. Up. Up in t he… √ The setting is in the desert of Utah. Two people, Toby and Caroline, are driving from Florida to Utah looking for uranium. They are having hard conversation inside the Nash. While listening to Tony Bennett singing Rags to Riches on the soundtrack, Toby asks his mother to guess what he says about something that begins with C. In this case, Toby breaks the rule of maxim of manner which regulates people to avoid obscuring word when they are having a 87 88 Code Data Qn Ql Rl Mn Explanation Ta Ov Un Mt Hy Ir Bn Sr Ct Ob conversation. By being not brief with the word that he says, Toby tries to exclude a third party about something that begins with C. 2QtOv Toby: But we were too late in Moab, and that guy at the office said nobody found any uranium in Salt Lake City. Caroline: Well, that means well have the place pretty much to ourselves, huh? Toby: Yeah Caroline: Honey, this could be a big break for us. If this works out, oh, just think about it. Well get us a house, get rid of this damn Nash Ambassador -- no money worries. √ Toby is sitting beside Caroline. He holds a complicated-looking, black contraption which looks like an antique flashlight. This thing makes uranium traces glow. He asks about the place he can find uranium. Caroline answers his question by providing too much information. She gives long explanation about the future if they can find uranium. Caroline tries to explain more about her expectation if she can find herself a place which is full of uranium.