1. Home
  2. Lainnya

Place and Time of the Study Method of the Research

v.16 for Windows to do homogeneity test which is Analyze-Compare Means- One Way ANOVA.

3. Hypothesis Testing

For The Hypothesis Test, the researcher uses T-Test to find out whether there is the differences between two variables in this study. The researcher uses SPSS v.16 for Windows program to find the result. After gaining the t- value , the researcher compares T- value and T- table . Testing hypothesis uses criteria with significance degree 0.05. The conclusion is gained as follows: If t- value t- table , the H o is accepted. If t- value t- table , the H o is rejected or H 1 is accepted. 7 H 1 : There is an influence of Collaborative Strategic Reading CSR technique on the students’ achievement in reading comprehension of narrative text. H : There is no influence of Collaborative Strategic Reading CSR technique on the students’ achievement in reading comprehension of narrative text. 7 Suharsimi Arikunto, op. cit., p. 311. 29

CHAPTER IV RESULT AND INTERPRETATION

A. Result

1. The Description of the Data

In this research, the researcher gave treatments to both experimental class and control classabout reading narrative text. In the experimental class the researcher implemented Collaborative Strategic Reading CSR Technique, while in the control class the researcher implemented Grammar Translation Method GTM. After that, the researcher measured students’ reading comprehension achievement by using a test in multiple choice forms. The instrument of the study was 25 numbers of questions given to the 35 students of class XII IPA 1 of SMA PGRI 109 Kota Tangerang.The researcher conducted the validity and reliability instrument test before she administered the test to both classes.From the validity and reliability test, there were 16 valid questions from 25 questions which were gained. It should be 20 questions used in pre-test and post-test. Therefore, there were 4 numbers of questions should be revised. The Table 4.1 below shows the result of the test which analyzes the students ’ scores of pre-test and post-test in experimental class variable X. Table 4.1 Pre-test and Post-test Score of Experimental Class Students X Pre-test Post-test 1 55 75 2 55 70 3 40 95 4 80 85 5 70 75

Dokumen yang terkait

THE EFFECT OF COLLABORATIVE STRATEGIC READING (CSR) ON THE ELEVENTH GRADE STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION ACHIEVEMENT AT SMA NEGERI 2 BONDOWOSO

0 3 16

The Effect of Collaborative Strategic Reading (CSR) on the Eleventh Year Students' Reading Comprehension Achievement at MAN 2 Situbondo

0 6 4

The Effectiveness of Using Storyboard Technique on Students' Reading Comprehension of Narrative Text (A Quasi-experimental Study at the Tenth Grade of MAN 1 Tangerang Selatan)

3 41 145

Applying Think-aloud Technique in Improving Students' Reading Comprehension of Narrative Text (Quasi Experimental Study of Tenth Grade Students of SMK Bhakti 17 Jagakarsa)

0 11 119

The Effectiveness Of Using Story Mapping Technique Towards Students’ Reading Ability Of Narrative Text (A Quasi-Experimental Study At Tenth Grade Students Of Sma N 4 Tangerang Selatan)

4 78 108

The Effectiveness of Using Jigsaw Technique to Develop Students’ Reading Comprehension on Narrative Text; A Quasi Experimental Study at the Eleventh Grade Students of SMA Negeri 63 Jakarta Selatan

0 6 139

The Effectiveness of Using Mind Mapping in Improving Students' Reading Comprehension of Narrative Text A Quasi Experimental Study at the Second Grade of SMA Mathla’ul Huda Parung Panjang-Bogor.

0 5 126

The Effectiveness Of Using Collaborative Strategic Reading (Csr) On Students' Reading Comprehension Of Narrative Text" (A Quasi-Experimental Study at the First Grade ofSMA Mathia 'ul Huda Parung PanjangBogor in Academic Year of 201412015),

4 36 111

The Effectiveness Of Using Short Story Towards Students’ Reading Comprehension Of Narrative Text (A Quasi-experimental Study at the Second Grade Students of Mts. AT-TAQWA Batu Ceper- Tangerang)

0 21 184

THE EFFECT OF APPLYING COLLABORATIVE STRATEGIC READING (CSR) ON STUDENTS’ ACHIEVEMENT IN READING NARRATIVE TEXT.

0 3 24