bi SCP – an overarching sustainable development priority – definitions and
2015 Discussion Paper 2
18 The most advanced material flow data available for Europe is provided by EUROSTAT. There are two
online data sets, one hosted by UNEP and other by CSIRO for Asia and the Pacific and for Latin America and the Caribbean see above.
Another important data source is the EXIOBASE database see at www.exiobase.eu, a global, and multi-regional environmentally extended input-output framework which includes environmental
satellites for emissions and resource extractions by industry. The international input-output table provided by EXIOBASE can be used for the analysis of the environmental impacts associated with the
final consumption of product groups in a country or a group of countries. UNEP s I te atio al Resource Panel has commissioned an assessment study on global material
flows and resource productivity with the aim of harmonizing the currently available global data sets and agreeing on one data set. From the available studies global material use is known to have grown
from 14 billion tons in 1950 to over 70 billion tons in 2010 see Figure 1a. Analysing the data, it becomes clear that material efficiency at the country-level improved
throughout the entire second half of the 20th century. There is a genuine trend observable in many countries of improvements in material efficiency as economies matured. The global trend in
improving material efficiency reversed, however, at the beginning of the twenty-first century, driven by a large shift of economic activity from material efficient-economies such as Europe and Japan to
much less resource-efficient economies such as China and India Figure 1b. It is important to note that the few examples of economies that have stabilized or reduced their
material throughput on the back of vast improvements in material efficiency
– examples include Japan and the United Kingdom
–have largely outsourced their material intensive production to other countries. Their improvement in material efficiency and absolute material use is artificial and
disappears once global resource extraction is attributed to final consumption in these countries by application of the material footprint approach Wiedmann et al. 2013. By attributing global primary
resource extraction to final consumption in countries, the material footprint study demonstrates that ou t ies use of o do esti esou es is, on average, about threefold larger than the physical
quantity of traded goods. The study also shows that there is no level of income yet at which material use would stabilize at the national level.
Figure 1a and b. Global material use and material efficiency
Source: CSIRO Global Material Flow Database, World Bank World Development Indicators
The forthcoming global material flows and resource productivity assessment study of the UNEP International Resource Panel will result in a publicly available data source on material flows for all
countries in the world covering four decades. These will be made available to government agencies, academics and the general public for further analysis of resource efficiency trends. The main
10,000 20,000
30,000 40,000
50,000 60,000
70,000 80,000
1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
m ill
ion t
on ne
s
Global material use
Construction minerals Ores and industrial
minerals Fossil fuels
Biomass 0.5
1 1.5
2 2.5
10,000 20,000
30,000 40,000
50,000 60,000
70,000 80,000
1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
m ill
ion t
on ne