wait until the teacher permitted them to speak up. But, overall it could be handled. The students shared the information needed cooperatively.
4 Students’ self confidence
Only 5 students who were always actively answering the teacher questions. Most of the students kept passive and didn’t want to share their idea. It could be influenced
by their hesitancy to their speaking ability. Yet, the interaction between the teacher and the students started to be built. About 13 students started to give positive
response to the teacher and interact with the teacher. 5
Students’ understanding All of the students who attended the class that day gave their participation in the
pretest. They did the pretest well.
4.3.2. The analysis of observation check list and observation list in the Cycle one process
From the result of observation checklist list during cycle one process see appendix 24 on page 158, the researcher got the conclusion which was described in
observation list see appendix 28 on page 166 as follows: 1
Students’ presence All of the students attended the class that day. None was absent at that time. So, the
precenta ge of the students’ presence was 100.
2 Students’ attention to the teacher
The number of the students who gave attention tow ards teacher’s explanation
increased although there were still several students seemed doing other activities
when the teacher was explaining the material. In doing the teacher instruction especially when Three Steps Interview Technique was applied, the students got
difficulty in the beginning to understand the instruction. Some of them felt confused of what they should do. Teacher needed to repeat the activities in doing Three Steps
Interview because in the first trial students’ did the wrong steps. In the second trial,
almost students ’ did well in executing the teacher’s instruction after the teacher
explained the steps slowly. 3
Students’ cooperation The students started to listen to others while waiting their turn to speak up. Most of
the students cooperated well. They were able to share communicatively to their friends. They did their job well in the group. They helped each other. Some of the
students seemed to have the discussion with their friends to solve the problem they faced. The students shared the information needed very cooperatively.
4 Students’ self confidence
The students who came in the class responded the teacher’s questions well although
some of them still had difficulties in delivering their answer. Almost of the students tried to give their participation in the class that day. The students who came in class
showed their effort to be active in class. They actively did all the t eacher’s
instruction to practices using Three Steps Interview Technique . The didn’t feel shy to
ask whenever they had difficulty in understanding teacher’s instruction and explanation.
5 Students’ understanding
All of the students had already known their own part. They did the instructions and task from the teacher well.
4.3.3. The analysis of observation check list and observation list in the Cycle Two Process
The next data coming from the result of observation checklist list during the cycle two process see appendix 25 on page 160. The researcher got the conclusion which
is described in observation list see appendix 29 on page 168 as follows: 1
Students’ presence All of the students attended the class that day. None was absent. So, the precentage
of the students’ presence was100. 2
Students’ attention to the teacher All of the students gave their participation in the class that day. They followed the
teacher’s instruction to practices speaking in English by using Three Steps Interview Technique. They did better than the previous meeting.
3 Students’ cooperation
All of the students coorperated well. They shared information and worked communicatively with the teacher and their friends. Students had taken a part in the
activities either in pairs or in groups. They help each other and participated in every part of discussion. They listened to other and waited for their turn. Students started to
understand that they had to respect other including their teacher and their friend.
4 Stu
dents’ self confidence All of the students who came in the class respond the teacher’s questions well. They
took all the opportunities that could help them improved their speaking skill. All of the students had a better confidence to interact with the teacher so that they were
active in answering teacher’s questions. 5
Students’ understanding Students did the test well and in good order as the instruction given.
4.3.4. The analysis of observation check list and observation list in the Post Test
