The Background of the Study

2 How are those metaphors of modality used in “MTGW”? 3 In what contexts of situation are metaphors of modality used?

1.3 The Objectives of the Study

In relation to the problems, the objectives of the study are 1 to identify the orientations of metaphors of modality are found in “MTGW”. 2 to describe the theory how the metaphors of modality used in “MTGW”, and 3 to explain in what context of situation metaphors of modality in “MTGW” used.

1.4 The Scope of the Study

The scope of this study is limited into the metaphor of modality on MTGW program. There are three aspects which observed in this study. The types of orientations of modality are found in “MTGW”, the way of using metaphors of modality in “MTGW” and the context of situation in which metaphors of modality used in “MTGW”. This study applies the concept theories of the systemic functional linguistics SFL proposed by Halliday. This analysis is pointed to investigate the orientations of modality real ized in “MTGW” that he uses to express his judgment. The types of orientations are subjective implicit, objective implicit, subjective explicit, and objective explicit.

1.5 The Significance of the Study

A study which is designed to cover some intended result should have the significances. a. Theoretically The objective of this study is to show how the kinds of metaphors of modality are existed in the MTGW Program. Thus, theoretically the results of the study are expected to display the relationship between systems of metaphor of modality as the context of interpersonal metaphor is applied. b. Practically The objectives of this study are 1 Expanding the insights in terms of metaphor of modality and its application in the TV program. 2 Introducing to the readers the result of metaphor of modality and its application in the TV program. 3 Becoming references for further studies.

CHAPTER V CONCLUSIONS AND SUGGESTIONS

5.1 Conclusions

Having analyzed the data, the conclusions are drawn as the following. 1 There are four orientations of modality found in MTGW program, namely subjective implicit, objective implicit, subjective explicit and objective explicit. The speaker uses metaphor of modality to express his modality politely and to make his joke to be more polite. 2 The metaphor of modality in MTGW program used not only by using projecting clause and nominalizing the modality but also be Verb-en. 3 The context of situation of metaphor of modality in MTGW is highly dependent on the tenor.

5.2 Suggestions

In relation to the conclusions above, suggestions are staged as the following. 1 It is suggested that the students of English Department should be careful in choosing modality if they want to be more persuasive for the audience. As for the ordinary people in communications, the choice of different modality will give others different impression, which influences the chance of a successful communication. 2 It is suggested that other researcher do further research about metaphor of modality in different discourse in order to know the different significant from the previous discourses and it can be more intensively described. 62 3 The other findings from the research that the metaphor of modality in this discourse not only be used to express modality politely but also be used to express the humorous attitude but it needs further research to investigate it. REFERENCES Ahmed Hasan. 2014. International Journal of Basic and Applied Science, 3, No.1 July 2014, 28-33 Bogdan, R. C. Biklen, S. K. 1992. Qualitative Research for Education; Introduction to Theory and Methods. 2 nd Edition. Boston: Allyn and Bacon. Chang, Cheuguang. 2001. Interpersonal Grammar Metaphor in English Foreign Languages and Their Teaching. 7, 6-8. Chen, D.C. 2007. The Pedagogical System of English Modality in The Framework Of The Systemic Functional Grammar. Journal of Guangdong University of Foreign Studies, 183, 91-95. Eggins, S. 1994. An Introduction to Systemic Functional Linguistic. London: Printer Publishers. Feng, H.Liu. Y. H. 2010. Analysis of Interpersonal Meaning in Public Speeches – A Case Study Of Obamas Speech. Journal of Language Teaching and Research. 1 6, 825-829. Fowler, R. 1985. Linguistic Criticism. Oxfort: Oxfort University Press. Halliday, M.A.K. 1984. Language as Code and Language as Behaviour: A Systemic Functional Interpretation of The Nature And Ontogenesis Of Dialogue. In: Fawcett, Robin P., M.A.K. Halliday, Sydney Lamb Adam Makkai Eds. The Semiotics Of Culture And Language. Vol. 1: Language as Social Semiotic. Open Linguistics Series. London: Pinter. 3 –35. Halliday, M.A.K. 1985. Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Arnold. Halliday, M.A.K. 19941985. Introduction to Functional Grammar. 2nd Edition. London: Arnold. Halliday, M.A.K. and Ruqaiya Hasan. 1985. Language, Context, and Text: Aspects of Language In A Social-Semiotic Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Halliday, M. A. K. Martin, J. R. 1993. Writing Science: Literacy and Discursive Power. London: Falmer Press. Halliday, M., Matthiessen, C. 2004. An Introduction to Functional Grammar 3rd Ed.. London: Arnold. 64 Huang, Guowen. 2001. Theory and Practice of Discourse Analysis: A Research on Advertising Discourse. Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press. Hubermann, M. Miles, M. B. 1984.Qualitative Data Analysis: A Sourcebook of New Method. Beverly Hills: Sage Publication. Jian Xu. 2009. Interpreting Metaphor of Modality in Advertising English. Journal of English Language Teaching. 2 4, 117-122 Jienzhen Dong. 2014. Interpreting Metaphor of Modality in Legal Discourse. Journal of Language Teaching and Research. 4, 6, 1311-1321. Katrňaková, Hana. 2001. Sociolinguistic and Pragmatic Aspects Of Public Speaking Discourse. Studia Minora Facultatis Philosophicae Universitatis Brunensis. Kreidler, C.W. 1999. Introducing English Semantics. London:Routledge. Li, Zhanzi. 2000. Modality: An Extension from Sentence To Discourse. Foreign Language Research. 4,7-12. Lincoln, Y.S. Guba, E.G. 1985. Naturalistic Inquiry. California: Sage of Modern Foreign Language. Lyons, J. 1977. Semantics. Vol 2.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Martin, J.R. 1992. English Text: System and Structure. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Miles, M.B. Huberman,A.M. 1994. Qualtative Data Analysis: A Source Book of New Methods. Second Edition. New Burry, Cac Sage Pahlavannejad M. Shirvan Z. 2013. Congruent and Metaphorical Uses of Modulation in Persian: A Case Study About Advertising And Press Discourses. Asian Journal of Research in Social Sciences Humanities. Vol. 3, 36-40 Saragih, A. 2006. Bahasa Dalam Konteks Sosial, Pendekatan Linguistik Sistemik Fungsional Terhadap Tata Bahasa Dan Wacana. Saragih, A. 2010. Introducing Systemic Functional Grammar. Medan: Pasca Sarjana UNIMED Sidabutar, U. 2014. Modality on The Delegation Speeches Of Apec Conference 2013. Unpublished. Medan: UNIMED Sinar Silvana, Tenku. 2008. Teori dan Analisis Wacana: Pendekatan Sistemik Fungsional. Medan: Pustaka Bangsa Press.