Cycle 2 a. Planning Phase

Second meeting Theme: I want to buy a gadget. 1 Opening As usual, the teacher starts the class by saying salam and asks students condition. To stimulate students‟ motivation to learn the teacher gives a brain storming and then asks their readiness in joining the class. 2 Core activity Still with the same topic but different theme, the teacher gave another material that related to that theme. The materials were given to students; it was also about dialogue and expressions concerning with how to bargain, declining or accepting a request, and also how to make a request. Desy : good morning mom,,,,. Mother : good morning, honey. what is the matter with you? Desy : my cell phone is broken mom. Mother : I see. How come? Desy : it has fallen down from 3 rd floor. Mother : ok, let‟s we go to department store for buying a new gadget. Role play There are sales people and Desy and her mother go to department store. Mother Good morning Seller Good morning, can I help you ? Mother Yea, I am looking for a new gadget for my daughter. Seller What kind of gadget do you want sweety? Desy I want an usual gadget, the important one is sending a message and calling. Seller How about nokia 108 mom? This is good for your daughter . Mother How much does it cost ? Seller Its cheap , only 400 thousand rupiah Mother What are the specification? Seller This phone has radio, camera, mp3, recorder, slot MMC, and many more. Mother Ok, I will take this. What do you think desy? Desy Ya, I agree with you mother. After considering, students have had enough understanding of the material, the teacher strengthens it by using role play. It was about describing symptoms. First of all, students divided into 4 groups based on their seat. After forming the group, then the teacher told the role play procedure. It was act as a seller and a customer. Firstly each group makes a small discussion to decide how to describe the symptoms and how to act as the customer or seller. Each group practice it five minutes, after that each group has to decide the person who will come forward to be customer or seller. 3 Closing The teacher asks students‟ difficulties regarding the material given during the learning process. He also gave feedback concerning with the students work. The last, he closes the class by saying salam. Third meeting Theme : Buying and selling a gadget 1 Opening The teacher starts the class by saying salam, asking students condition, and giving ice breaking. A small discussion was considering needed to give students opportunities to share their experience last meeting. 2 Core activity The teacher gives the material to students, ask students to explore the materials and they have to make role play in group work. Give the students several minutes to prepare their performance. Ask them to perform in group work. 3 Closing The teacher calls the students‟ name to ensure that they attend the class. After finishing it, the teacher gives feedback then he closes the class by saying salam.

c. Observing Phase

This phase is as the same as in observation phase within the first cycle. The observer duty is notice everything that happens in the classroom during the teaching and learning process. She also notes whatever he found involving; students‟ activities, teacher‟s performance, and the classroom situation. As for her, in teaching English the teacher has implemented the technique better than in first cycle. The classroom situation controlling also can be handled by him, so when students were acting or using role play, the overall students were participating enthusiastically, students seem more enjoyed joining the activities.

d. Reflecting Phase

Acting phase within the second cycle is completely accomplished. Data that were obtained from test and observations also have been collected. It is the time to analyze those data, reflects the all activities, and proves the students progress in learning English by using role play techniques. From the observation data and the post test result of the second cycle. The writer and the teacher felt satisfied to the action research result, because the implementation of role play technique in teaching English especially teaching speaking showed amount changes. For example, student who is at the first time feeling afraid of making mistake in grammatical and the vocabulary, after learning by using role play, now they begin to understand the use of expressions in speaking even in simple sentence by which students can use the vocabularies that have been stored in their brain. Then, student who is at the first time feeling awkward to say in English, and after learning by using role play in which expressions are involved their daily activities, so students can practice which bring about habit of using English orally, so in this technique all students can be acting.

C. Post-Implementation of the Action

1. The Result of Post Test I Table 4.4 The Students’ Speaking Score of Post Test I No Stud ents Pronun ciation Gram mar Vocab ulary Flue ncy Compre hension Avera ge Score 1 S1 4 5 5 4 5 4.6 73 2 S2 2 4 4 4 3 3.4 60 3 S3 3 3 4 3 3 3.2 58 4 S4 3 3 4 3 3 3.2 58 5 S5 3 4 3 3 4 3.4 60 6 S6 3 3 3 3 4 3.2 58 7 S7 3 3 4 4 3 3.4 60 8 S8 4 4 3 3 3 3.4 60 9 S9 3 5 3 3 4 3.6 62 10 S10 3 4 3 3 3 3.2 58 11 S11 3 3 4 3 4 3.4 60 12 S12 3 4 3 3 3 3.2 58 13 S13 3 4 4 3 3 3.4 60 14 S14 2 3 2 2 3 2.4 50 15 S15 3 3 3 3 3 3 56 No Stud ents Pronun ciation Gram mar Vocab ulary Flue ncy Compre hension Avera ge Score 16 S16 2 3 3 3 3 2.8 54 17 S17 4 5 4 4 5 4.4 71 18 S18 3 4 3 3 4 3.4 60 19 S19 4 4 5 4 5 4.4 71 20 S20 3 4 4 3 3 3.4 60 21 S21 4 5 4 4 5 4.4 71 22 S22 3 4 3 4 4 3.6 63 23 S23 2 3 4 4 2 3 56 24 S24 4 5 5 5 4 4.6 73 25 S25 4 4 3 4 2 3.4 60 26 S26 3 4 3 3 4 3.4 60 27 S27 4 4 4 5 5 4.4 71 NB : Highlight Score : Students pass the criterion minimum 70 : Criterion Minimum of Completeness KKM The average of students‟ post test I scores is: Σ Post test I = 1661 Σ Post test I = ΣX N = 1661 27 = 61.51 From the calculation of students‟ post test I score, it can be inferred that there are some improvement toward students‟ speaking score after implementing the role play in teaching English. It is proven by students‟ mean test result comparison between pre test and post test in cycle I, the mean of pre test is 54.77 while the mean of post test result is 61.51. It means there are 6.74 improvements toward students speaking score. This improvement is also can be calculated in percentage by calculating students‟ pre test score with their post test 1 score. In which it calculates by using this formula below: P = y1 - y x 100 y P = 61.51 – 54.77 x 100 54.77 P = 0.1301 x 100 P = 13.01 Meanwhile the percentage calculation which shows the class percentage of students‟ score who pass the KKM are: P = F x 100 N P = 6 x 100 27 P = 22.22 It means that there are about 11.11 22.22 – 11.11 = 11.11 of students‟ score passed the KKM after learning English by using role play. On the other hand, there are 6 students finally passed the KKM and the other 21 students are still in lower score.

2. The Result of Post Test II

Table 4.5 The Students’ Speaking Score of Post Test II No Stud ents Pronun ciation Gram mar Vocab ulary Flue ncy Compre hension Aver age Score 1 S1 5 5 5 4 6 5 76 2 S2 3 4 5 4 3 3.8 64 3 S3 3 4 4 4 5 4 66 4 S4 4 5 4 5 4 4.4 71 5 S5 3 5 4 5 5 4.4 71 No Stud ents Pronun ciation Gram mar Vocab ulary Flue ncy Compre hension Aver age Score 6 S6 4 5 4 4 5 4.4 71 7 S7 4 5 4 5 5 4.6 73 8 S8 4 5 4 5 4 4.4 71 9 S9 3 5 4 4 4 4 66 10 S10 4 4 3 4 3 3.6 62 11 S11 4 5 4 4 5 4.4 71 12 S12 4 5 4 5 5 4.6 73 13 S13 4 6 5 4 4 4.6 73 14 S14 3 5 4 3 4 3.8 64 15 S15 4 5 5 3 5 4.4 71 16 S16 4 4 4 3 6 4.2 70 17 S17 5 5 5 4 6 5 76 18 S18 4 6 5 3 5 4.6 73 19 S19 5 5 6 4 6 5.2 78 20 S20 4 5 5 4 4 4.4 71 21 S21 5 6 5 4 6 5.2 78 22 S22 4 5 5 4 5 4.6 73 23 S23 4 5 5 4 4 4.4 71 24 S24 5 6 6 5 6 5.6 82 25 S25 4 5 5 4 4 4.4 71 26 S26 4 5 4 4 5 4.4 71 27 S27 5 6 6 5 5 5.4 80 NB: Highlight Score : Students pass the criterion minimum 70 : Criterion Minimum of Completeness KKM Based on the data above, it can be interpreted that the average of students‟ post- test II scores was: Σ Post Test II = 1937 Σ x Post Test II = ΣX N = 1937 = 71.74 27

Dokumen yang terkait

A ROLE PLAY TECHNIQUE TO IMPROVE STUDENTS’ SPEAKING ABILITY AT SEVENTH GRADE STUDENTS OF SMP NEGERI 1 PAGU-KEDIRI

0 39 24

Improving students' speaking ability by using role play: a classroom action research at VII Grade of SMPN 251 Jakarta - Timur

1 12 71

The use of role play to anhance students speaking skill (a classroom action research at second grade of SMP Darul Ma'arif Fatmawati)

0 6 105

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF USING NEAR-PEER ROLE MODELING (NPRM) ON STUDENTS’ SPEAKING ABILITY (A Quasi-Experimental Study at the First Grade of SMPN 3 South Tangerang)

0 32 113

IMPLEMENTATION OF ROLE PLAY IN IMPROVING STUDENTS’ SPEAKING ABILITY AT THE FIRST GRADE OF SMAN 8 BANDAR LAMPUNG (A Classroom Action Research)

0 2 14

The Use of Diary Writing to Improve Eight Grade Students' Writing Skill at SMPN 3 Malang

0 16 8

IMPROVING STUDENTS SPEAKING ABILITY BY USING ROLE-PLAY (A CLASSROOM ACTION RESEARCH AT THE SIXTH GRADE IMPROVING STUDENTS SPEAKING ABILITY BY USING ROLE-PLAY (A CLASSROOM ACTION RESEARCH AT THE SIXTH GRADE OF SDN 01 KARANGTURI-LASEM).

0 3 15

INTRODUCTION IMPROVING STUDENTS SPEAKING ABILITY BY USING ROLE-PLAY (A CLASSROOM ACTION RESEARCH AT THE SIXTH GRADE OF SDN 01 KARANGTURI-LASEM).

0 3 9

IMPROVING STUDENTS’ SPEAKING SKILL BY USING ROLE PLAY (AN ACTION RESEARCH AT THE IMPROVING STUDENTS’ SPEAKING SKILL BY USING ROLE PLAY (AN ACTION RESEARCH AT THE TENTH YEAR OF SMA N 1 GEMOLONG IN 2010/2011 ACADEMIC YEAR).

0 2 15

USING PICTURE TECHNIQUE TO IMPROVE STUDENTS’ SPEAKING SKILL AT THE SIXTH YEAR OF Using Picture Technique To Improve Students' Speaking Skill At The Sixth Year of SD Muhammadiyah 24 Surakarta: Classroom Action Research.

0 1 14