42
a. The Students’ Performance in Each Part of the Test
Table 4.1 shows the students’ scores in part A. There were ten numbers in part A. The total of the correct answer was multiplied by 10 to reach 100-scale. In
contrast, Table 4.2 shows the students’ scores in part B. A rubric was used to determine the students’ scores in this part Appendix A. Then, it was multiplied
by 10 to reach 100-scale.
Table 4.1 The Students’ Scores in Part A
Range of Scores Number of Students
Achieving the Range of Scores Percentage
90-100 80-89
70-79 60-69
50-59 40-49
30-39 20-29
10-19
0-9 3
9 13
11 2
3 4
6.67 20
28.89 24.44
4.44 6.67
8.89
Table 4.1 presents that three students 6.67 achieved the highest scores. Furthermore, nine students 20 achieved 80-89, 13 students 28.89 achieved
70-79, 11 students 24.44 achieved 60-69, two students 4.44 achieved 50- 59 and three students 6.67 achieved 40-49. However, four students 8.89
came in the range between 30-39. On the other hands, the Table 4.2 shows the students’ scores in part B. In
part B, the students’ scores shared almost the same proportion in every range of scores. The followings are the complete description and percentage of the
students’ scores in part B. PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
43
Table 4.2 The Students’ Scores in Part B
Range of Scores Number of Students
Achieving the Range of Scores Percentage
90-100 80-89
70-79 60-69
50-59 40-49
30-39 20-29
10-19
0-9 5
9 2
3 7
2 1
16 11.11
20 4.44
6.67 15.56
4.44 2.22
35.56
On the other hand, Table 4.2 presents that five students 11.11 achieved the highest scores. Conversely, 16 students 35.56 achieved the scores on the range
of 20-29. In between, nine students 20 achieved 80-89, two students 4.44 achieved 70-79, three students 6.67 achieved 60-69, seven students 15.56
achieved 50-59, two students 4.44 achieved 40-49, one student or 2.22 achieved 30-39.
b. The Students’ Final Scores
The students’ final scores should be firstly determined in order to know the students’ performance. The students’ final scores were the average of the
students’ scores in the test. Part A and part B was summed and the resulted score was divided by two to yield the students’ final scores.
Furthermore, the academic regulations of Sanata Dharma University 2004 were used to determined the students’ overall performance. The followings
are the students final scores and the overall students’ performance.
44
Table 4.3 The Students’ Final Scores
Range of Scores Number of Students
Achieving the Range of Scores Percentage
90-100 80-89
70-79 60-69
50-59 40-49
30-39 20-29
10-19
0-9 2
7 9
7 3
8 5
4 4.44
15.56 20
15.56 6.67
17.78 11.11
8.89
Table 4.3 shows that two students 4.44 achieved the highest score. There were seven students 15.56 achieved 80-89, nine students 20 achieved 70-79,
seven students 15.56 achieved 60-69, three students 6.67 achieved the scores between 50-59, eight students 17.78 achieved 40-49, five students
11.11 achieved 30-39. In addition, there were four students 8.89 achieved the scores between 20-29. Finally, the students’ final scores were compared to the
academic regulations to classify their performance. Referring to academic regulations of Sanata Dharma University 2004:
14, a student who achieves 56 of the total scores passes with sufficient level. The complete scores category is listed as follows.
Score Category
80-100 very good A
70-79 good
B 56-69
sufficient C
50-55 insufficient D
≤ 49 poor
E By referring to the academic regulations of Sanata Dharma University, the
students’ performance can be determined. The followings are the classifications of the students performance based on the regulations.
45
Table 4.4 The Students’ Scores in Relation to the Category
Score Category Number of Students
Achieving the Category Percentage
80-100 70-79
56-69 50-55
≤ 49 very good
good sufficient
insufficient poor
A B
C D
E 9
9 7
3
17 20
20 15.56
6.67 37.78
Referring to the Table 4.4 there were nine students 20 came in the category of very good. There were also nine students 20 were on the category of good. On
the other hands, seven students 15.56 were on the category of sufficient. In addition, there were three students 6.67 came into category of insufficient. The
rest of the students in which there were 17 students 37.78 came in the category of poor. Based on the category, 25 students 55.56 of the total students passed
the test. On the other hand, 20 students 44.44 of the total students failed on the test because of their final scores did not reach the category of sufficient. In
addition, descriptive statistics revealed the students’ performance in general and described the distribution of the score.
2. The Presentation of the Descriptive Statistics
Kategori