73 mengidentifikasi generic structure yang terdapat pada text tersebut
” did not appear in the design of learning activities. Therefore, the researcher considered
that there was no coherence in this lesson plan.
3. Lesson Plan 3
In this lesson plan, the formulation of learning objectives had fulfilled the criteria of clearly stated learning objectives as proposed by Pasch et al. 1991.
However, the researcher found one learning objective that did not describe the appropriate learning outcome. It did not derive from the basic competence.
The design of learning activities had not applied all of the six principles proposed by Pasch et al. 1991. The organization principle was not applied well
by the participant. However, the expected audience, behavior, condition, degree and the level of thinking presented in the learning objectives appeared in the
design of learning activities. Therefore, the researcher considered that there was coherence between learning objectives and learning activities designed by the
participant.
4. Lesson Plan 4
The learning objectives formulated by the participants did not fulfill the criteria of clearly stated learning objectives as proposed by Pasch et al. 1991.
The participant did not write the condition and the degree of learning there. The participant also did not formulate learning objective in affective domain.
In this lesson plan, the participant had not applied the six principles proposed by Pasch et al. 1991 in designing learning activities. The congruence,
organization and higher level of thinking principle were not applied well by the
74 participant. The expected behavior and the level of thinking in cognitive domain
presented in the learning objectives did not appear in the design of learning activities. Therefore, the researcher considered that there was no coherence
between learning objectives and learning activities designed by the participant.
5. Lesson Plan 5
The participant had formulated the indicators in all domains, which was cognitive, affective and psychomotor domain as proposed by Bloom 1964.
However, it had not fulfilled the criteria of clearly stated learning objectives as proposed by Pasch et al. 1991 since the condition and degree of learning did not
appear. In this lesson plan, the participant had applied the six principles proposed
by Pasch et al. 1991 in designing learning activities. The expected audience, behavior and the level of thinking in all domains presented in the learning
objectives appeared in the design of learning activities. Therefore, the researcher considered that there was coherence between learning objectives and learning
activities designed by the participant.
6. Lesson Plan 6
