60
Repeating 5
1.59 6
1.97 Acknowledging
28 8.93
54 17.77
Kidding 6
1.91 2
0.66 Giving answer
7 2.23
22 7.24
Translating 9
2.86 -
-
Subtotal 65
20.70 164
53.95
The comparison of teacher and students verbally response
28.38 71.62
Physically 1
0.32 72
23.69
Subtotal 1
0.32 72
23.69
The comparison of teacher and students physically response
1,37 98.63
Total Response 66 21.02
236 77.64
The comparison of teacher and students response
21.85 78.15
The analysis result from indoor category tends to recur in outdoor category. However, some functions were different in the result of frequency and percentage,
but not really significant. Some functions are high frequent in indoor but decreases in outdoor, and conversely. For example in verbally response, the
highest frequent function recurred was acknowledging. It representing 28 or 8.93, the decreases occurred about 0.69 compare in indoor category.
Translating represents 9 or 2.86 from the total of teacher talk in outdoor
category. Giving answer appears to constitute 7 or 2.23. Kidding and confirming represent the same total of frequent, e.g. 6or 1.91, it increases around 1.72
compare to indoor category. Repeating represents5 or 1.59, it drops to slightly more than 0.37 compare from indoor category. Teacher‟s responding greetings
appears to constitute 4 or 1.27 it does not really increase significantly from indoor category. It increases around 0.89
. The last function was teacher‟s responding physically,
it represents only 1 or 0.32 from the total of teacher‟s response in outdoor category. In a nut shell, the highest presentation function in
61
teacher‟s response in verbal category was acknowledging which constitutes 28 or 8.93
. The comparison between teacher‟ verbally response in indoor and outdoor activities was 26,43 and 26,60 . The comparison between teacher response in
indoor and outdoor activities was 24.36 and 21.02 . The percentage of stud
ents‟ verbally response in outdoor category shows some significant differences. It can be seen from the total of students‟ response in
indoor category was 213 compare with outdoor category was 164 numbers. Student‟s responding physically 72 numbers in outdoor or 23.69, dropping to 4
. Acknowledging constitutes 54 or 17.77. It decreases around 5.92 from indoor category. Some increases show in showing satisfaction where the frequent
number represents 23 or 7.56 from the total of student talk in outdoor category. Students‟ giving answer also dropping to 22 or 7.24 from the total of student
talk. Interrupting states in the same frequent that is 21 or 6.91 from the total of student responses. Showing unsatisfying increases form 9 to 18 numbers or equals
to 5.92 from the total of student response in outdoor category. Completing increases in numbers of frequent, it represents 11 or 3.62. Student
s‟ respond to teacher‟s greeting constitutes 6 or 1.97, it increase slightly to 1.20. Students‟
repeating also constitutes 6 or 1.97
from the total frequent number of students‟ responses. And the last was, kidding by student constitutes 2 numbers or equal to
0.66 from the total of students‟ responses in outdoor category. The last very little numbers of function was confirming, it represents 1 or 0.33. It shows that,
the highest frequent functions occurred in students‟ response was physically response
72 or 23.69. The comparison of students verbally response in indoor
