Difficulty Level Discriminating Power

Where : 11 r = index reliability k = number of item 2 b σ ∑ = item variance 2 t σ = total variance Meanwhile, in order to find out the variance of each item, the formula is: Then, the formula to calculate the total variance is: Having obtained the t-value, each number of items is then checked by critical value of t-table. If the t-value is bigger than t-table, the test is said to be reliable.

3.6.2.3 Difficulty Level

The difficulty level of test shows how easy, sustain, or difficult the item is. If the index of difficulty is high, an item is considered as an easy item, or vice versa. It is indicated by the percentage of the students who get the items right. In this N N Y Y 2 2 2 ∑ − ∑ = t σ N N X X 2 2 2 ∑ − ∑ = b σ study, it is proved by the students’ score of each item maximum score. In order to compute difficulty level, the formula used is : In which, P = item difficulty B = the number of students who answer the item correctly JS = the number of students Table 3.3 The Criteria of Difficulty of the Test Interval of Difficulty Level Criteria 0.00 P 0.30 Difficult 0.30 P 0.70 Medium 0.70 P 1.00 Easy

3.6.2.4 Discriminating Power

Harris 1969:106 states that the discriminating power is “a measure of the effectiveness of an item discriminating between high and low scores of the whole test.” In addition, Heaton 1974:173 also views that “the discrimination index of an item indicates the extent to which the item discriminates between testers, separating the more able testers from the less able.” Discriminating power will measure how well the test items arranged to identify the differences in the students’ competence. In order to find out the discriminating power of each item of the scoring system in this study, the following steps were done: 1 Arranging the score of the students in rank order from the highest score to the lowest. 2 Classifying the students into two groups, namely the upper group and the lower one. The upper group is the students having high score, while the lower group is the students having low scores. The number of students in both groups should be the same. 3 Counting the number of the upper group students who did the aspect items of writing correctly. Then, the number of students in the lower group who did the aspect items of writing incorrectly was counted. 4 Computing discriminating power by using the following formula: t = Where: t : Item discrimination MH : Mean for upper group ML : Mean for lower group ∑ 2 1 X : The sum of deviation scores for upper group ∑ 2 2 X : The sum of deviation score for lower group n 1 : The number of students for upper or lower group 27xN N : The number of students taking the test ⎪⎭ ⎪ ⎬ ⎫ ⎪⎩ ⎪ ⎨ ⎧ − + − ∑ ∑ 1 2 2 2 1 i i n n X X ML MH The t value then was compared by the t table. If the t value is higher than the t table, so the test could be categorized significantly discriminate the students.

3.6.3 Pre-Test

Dokumen yang terkait

“The Effectiveness of Contextual Teaching and Learning to Improve the Students’ Writing Skill in Descriptive Text in the Second Year of SMP 1 Muhammadiyah Malang in Academic Year 2015/2016”

1 24 16

An Analysis of the Seventh Year Students’ Morphological Errors in Descriptive Paragraph Writing at SMPN 1 Kalibaru in the 2010/2011 Academic Year;

0 4 15

A Descriptive Study of the Eight Grade Students’ Ability in Writing A Descriptive Paragraph by Using Individual Pictures at SMPN 3 Kencong, Jember in the 2010/2011 Academic Year

0 7 14

The effect of Role play in improving students' speaking Ability of tje elementary I level students of BBC English course Jember in the 2000/2001 Academic Year

0 4 63

The Effect of Using Free Writing Technique on the Tenth Year Students’ Writing Fluency at SMA Negeri 1 Pakusari Jember in the 2010 – 2011 Academic Year

0 16 14

Grammatical Error Analysis of the Eighth Grade Students in Writing Descriptive Text at SMP Negeri 1 Jember in the 2013/2014 Academic Year

1 7 3

Improving the Eleventh Grade Students' Writing Achievement by Using Controlled Writing Technique at SMAN 2 Lamongan in 2014/2015 Academic Year

0 4 4

The Effectiveness of Personal Vocabulary Notes (PVN) Technique on Students’ Vocabulary Understanding; An Experimental Research in the Seventh Grade Students in MTs. Salafiyah Bedahan in Academic Year 2013/2014

2 11 136

The Effectiveness of Numbered Heads Together Technique (NHT) Toward Students’ Reading Ability on Descriptive Text A Quasi Experimental Study at the Second Grade of SMPN 2 Tangerang Selatan in Academic Year 2013/2014

1 9 128

An Item Analysis of English Summative Test; An Analysis Study in the Second Grade of SMA Negeri 6 Depok in the 2013/2014 Academic Year

0 8 86