Normality Homogenity Analyzing the Data

further. The data, then, were analyzed the difference between two means of the experimental and control groups. Afterwards, the t‐test formula was applied in order to determine the significance between the two means, resulting with the conclusion of the data finding by examining the hypotheses.

4.3.1 Normality

It is necessary to make sure that the data are normal before computed by the t‐test computation. Thus, the normality of the data were analyzed after the data gathered. The data of this study found that the x 2 value of pre‐test and post‐test of the experimental group were 4.269 and 6.093, while the pre‐test and post‐test of the control group were 5.362 and 6.221. The next step was consulting those data result with critical value of x 2 value αdk with α = 0.05 and dk = 3, resulting in 7.815 points. Since the value of x 2 value αdk of the pre ‐test and post‐test score of those two groups were lower than 7.815, the data then were considered to be normally distributed. The computation of the normality tests can be seen in Appendices 14, 16, 19, and 21.

4.3.2 Homogenity

Either normality or homogenity is important to be checked before analyzing the data further. Through homogenity it is able to be checked whether the data are homogeny or not. The formula in computing homogenity is: 2 1 V V F = By using such formula, the homogenity of pre‐test of the experimental group and control group is calculated as follows: 4632 . 1 98.67 144.37 F = = Then, the result was consulted with the value of F table with dk numerator v 1 = 25 – 1 = 24, dk numerator v 2 = 25 ‐1 = 24, and α = 0.05, squared to v 1 = 25 and v 2 = 25, which is 2.27. It could be considered that the data were homogeny for the F value 1.4632 F table 2.27. The result of the post‐test of those two groups was also computed with the same formula in calculating the homogeneity as follows: 4103 . 1 52.00 73.33 F = = The result was also consulted with the value of F table with dk numerator v 1 = 25 – 1 = 24, dk numerator v 2 = 25 ‐1 = 24, and α = 0.05, squared to v 1 = 25 and v 2 = 25, which is 2.27. Since the F value 1.4103 F table 2.27, the post test of the experimental and control groups were also said to be homogeny. The computation of homogenity can be seen in Appendices 17 and 22.

4.3.3 Mean Difference Test

Dokumen yang terkait

“The Effectiveness of Contextual Teaching and Learning to Improve the Students’ Writing Skill in Descriptive Text in the Second Year of SMP 1 Muhammadiyah Malang in Academic Year 2015/2016”

1 24 16

An Analysis of the Seventh Year Students’ Morphological Errors in Descriptive Paragraph Writing at SMPN 1 Kalibaru in the 2010/2011 Academic Year;

0 4 15

A Descriptive Study of the Eight Grade Students’ Ability in Writing A Descriptive Paragraph by Using Individual Pictures at SMPN 3 Kencong, Jember in the 2010/2011 Academic Year

0 7 14

The effect of Role play in improving students' speaking Ability of tje elementary I level students of BBC English course Jember in the 2000/2001 Academic Year

0 4 63

The Effect of Using Free Writing Technique on the Tenth Year Students’ Writing Fluency at SMA Negeri 1 Pakusari Jember in the 2010 – 2011 Academic Year

0 16 14

Grammatical Error Analysis of the Eighth Grade Students in Writing Descriptive Text at SMP Negeri 1 Jember in the 2013/2014 Academic Year

1 7 3

Improving the Eleventh Grade Students' Writing Achievement by Using Controlled Writing Technique at SMAN 2 Lamongan in 2014/2015 Academic Year

0 4 4

The Effectiveness of Personal Vocabulary Notes (PVN) Technique on Students’ Vocabulary Understanding; An Experimental Research in the Seventh Grade Students in MTs. Salafiyah Bedahan in Academic Year 2013/2014

2 11 136

The Effectiveness of Numbered Heads Together Technique (NHT) Toward Students’ Reading Ability on Descriptive Text A Quasi Experimental Study at the Second Grade of SMPN 2 Tangerang Selatan in Academic Year 2013/2014

1 9 128

An Item Analysis of English Summative Test; An Analysis Study in the Second Grade of SMA Negeri 6 Depok in the 2013/2014 Academic Year

0 8 86