Result Analysis ARIMA Model Parameters by SPSS Result analysis Exponential Smoothing Model Parameters by EViews

24 As for who has the highest MAPE lowest in the population variable with a value of 0.071 MAE. Mean absolute error. Measures how much the series varies from its level prediction models. MAE is the highest on the production variable value and the lowest 6,021,407.853 population variable with a value of 4,272.438 MaxAPE. Maximum Absolute Percentage Error. The largest estimated error, expressed as a percentage. MaxAPE highest in the variable value consumption by 10.868 and the population with the lowest value of 0.125. MaxAE. Maximum Absolute Error. The largest estimated error. MaxAE highest in variable production abaout 19,004,280.541 and the lowest values occurring in the population variable with a value of 7,839,250. Normalized BIC. Normalized Bayesian Information Criterion. General measure overall model fit that tries to explain the complexity of the model. Normalized BIC variables that have high production is a variable with a value of 32,426 and the lowest values occur in the population variable with a value of 17. 273.

4.2.3 Result Analysis ARIMA Model Parameters by SPSS

Result analysis on the variable production cost, power generated, consumption, population, only four variables included in the ARIMA model type. The results of forecasting the variables that could use the model as follows ARIMA. commit to user 25 Table 4.8 Result analysis forecasting with ARIMA model parameters Years Production Cost Generated MWh Consumption MWh Population Real data 2011 405,504,753 26,348,587 12,993,675 6,103,221 2012 533,397,023 34,658,676 20,602,217 6,154,623 2013 543,774,561 35,332,980 6,237,393 Forecasting 2011 537,150,947 34,902,596 33,396,572 6,448,248.21 2012 571,653,578 37,144,482 35,112,440 6,542,064.89 2013 606,156,210 39,386,368 36,828,308 6,636,576.65 2014 640,658,842 41,628,255 38,544,176 6,731,790.58 2015 675,161,473 43,870,141 40,260,043 6,827,713.79 2016 709,664,105 46,112,028 41,975,911 6,924,353.35 2017 744,166,737 48,353,914 43,691,779 7,021,716.36 2018 778,669,368 50,595,800 45,407,647 7,119,809.92 2019 813,172,000 52,837,687 47,123,515 7,218,641.11 2020 847,674,632 55,079,573 48,839,383 7,318,217.03 2021 882,177,264 57,321,460 50,555,251 7,418,544.77 2022 916,679,895 59,563,346 52,271,119 7,519,631.42 There was gap on data 2011-2012 with the result forecasting on 2011-2012. That happened because of war tragedy in Libya. As long 7 month, in libya have internal conflict, so use electricity consumption can not be forecast as exactly.

4.2.4 Result analysis Exponential Smoothing Model Parameters by EViews

Exponential smoothing models are classified as either seasonal or non- seasonal. Seasonal models are only available if a periodicity has been defined for the active dataset see Current periodicity below. The results of the analysis of the description of the variables showed that the variables included in the Exponential Smoothing model electricity demand Parameters are variables, production cost, generated, consumption and population. The results of the forecasting models type included in the model of exponential smoothing parameters as follows. commit to user 26 Table 4.9. Result analysis forecasting with Exponential Smoothing Model parameters by EViews Years Production Cost Generated MWh Consumption MWh Population 2011 405,504,753 26,348,587 12,993,675 6,103,221 2012 533,397,023 34,658,676 20,602,217 6,154,623 2013 543,774,561 35,332,980 6,237,393 Forecasting 2011 537,336,336 34,914,642 34,728,817 6,447,557 2012 571,873,032 37,158,742 37,312,458 6,540,002 2013 606,409,729 39,402,841 39,896,099 6,632,447 2014 640,946,425 41,646,941 42,479,741 6,724,892 2015 675,483,121 43,891,041 45,063,382 6,817,337 2016 710,019,818 46,135,141 47,647,023 6,909,782 2017 744,556,514 48,379,241 50,230,665 7,002,227 2018 779,093,210 50,623,340 52,814,306 7,094,672 2019 813,629,907 52,867,440 55,397,948 7,187,117 2020 848,166,603 55,111,540 57,981,589 7,279,562 2021 882,703,299 57,355,640 60,565,230 7,372,007 2022 917,239,995 59,599,740 63,148,872 7,464,452 Source: Analysis data by EViews There was gap on empirical data and forecasting. That happened because of war tragedy in Libya. As long 7 month, at libya have internal conflict, so use electricity consumption can not be forecast as exactly.

4.3 Comparison of forecasting results